Skip to content

[v22.0.x] backport: v22.0.0 rc.3 - #6447

Merged
PastaPastaPasta merged 4 commits into
dashpay:v22.0.xfrom
PastaPastaPasta:v22.0.0-rc.3-backports
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

[v22.0.x] backport: v22.0.0 rc.3#6447
PastaPastaPasta merged 4 commits into
dashpay:v22.0.xfrom
PastaPastaPasta:v22.0.0-rc.3-backports

Conversation

@PastaPastaPasta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

See commits; backports for rc.3

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

built locally

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

4629bb9 fix: add missing cs_main annotation for ForceSignalDBUpdate (Konstantin Akimov)
05041a4 fix: force ehf signal db update (UdjinM6)
94d8032 fix: typo name of key (Konstantin Akimov)
9ceba88 style: clang suggestion (Konstantin Akimov)
c6bb9a5 perf: re-use evo data about signals between v20 and mn_rr as non-corrupted (Konstantin Akimov)
7a7c9f1 fix: early EHF and buried EHF are indistinguish (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
It seems as EHF signal will be mined before node is updated, this signal is lost and node can't activate hard-fork anymore.
## What was done?
EHF signals doesn't expire anymore.
To avoid full re-index key in database is changed.
Client with enabled "pruned mode" will be required to do re-index.
Alternate solution - revert this commit 4b046bb and introduce time-out for expiring EHF signals.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Test on my local instance with testnet and mainnet.
Testing on miner-1 on testnet is done.
First start of miner took 50 seconds, 29 of them the node was re-scanning blockchain and looking for EHF transaction
## Breaking Changes
It requires re-index for nodes with enabled pruning of blocks.
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK [4629bb9](dashpay@4629bb9)
UdjinM6:
utACK 4629bb9
Tree-SHA512: 189533da5726edbcf2d9cf0e9a3957a10ebc223c25fd88aec3aa9095ae2e7d955ea1f7a1384bc2c97a0cc06110c9e38845a8cafdbd56ff9637bb907ddc639850
…should respect `nCoinType`
e5114da fix: coin selection with `include_unsafe` option should respect `nCoinType` (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
The issue was introduced in dashpay#6074 via dashpay@69c5aa8
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK e5114da
kwvg:
utACK e5114da
Tree-SHA512: 5d4e22f9d2cecf2239185e0f4c9d8b29b995b25b4f53a74d6c9b7929aac6ec918ebfb4029a83b72a003fe42fe82619f7ab4892d620bf5846cadf99f1f0cb0969
36893e4 fix: add platform transfer to "most common" filter on transactions tab (Konstantin Akimov)
d033a3a refactor: change mask from Dec presentation to Hex for transaction filter (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Follow-up dashpay#6131 - missing 'Platform Transfer' in the list of most common. Reported by splawik.
## What was done?
Updated filter, added comment to prevent similar mistakes in future, present filter in hex for better readability.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Transaction with platform transfer appeared in filter "Most Common"
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ccc17553-d71a-45f8-be2f-8ce5fb699c1a)
Also they are added to Overview page (compare screenshots by 'address' field)
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea657672-46c8-4a66-a972-15768feb4d57)
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 36893e4
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 36893e4
Tree-SHA512: e072b78e257b2c262a912a3cc0daebde93aca655edfee9bbf4869f2528f10377d7d234c73c4fd7ab6006e87607d5a7c4eddd7634d55b16d1b3885d0bc48f225a
…sions to prevent concurrent unload
2d7c7f8 fix: do not transfer wallet ownership to CTransactionBuilder{Output} (UdjinM6)
0aeeb85 fix: add missing `AddWallet` call in `TestLoadWallet` (UdjinM6)
e800d9d fix: hold wallet shared pointer in CJ Manager/Sessions to prevent concurrent unload (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
dashpay#6440 (comment)
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 2d7c7f8
Tree-SHA512: 308e3bed077baa2167b7f9d81b87e5a61a113e4d465706548f303dfc499bc072d4e823e85772e591a879986b0fb0413d5afe0e3995e1f939fa772b29adc0300d
kwvg
kwvg approved these changes Dec 3, 2024

@kwvgkwvg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@UdjinM6UdjinM6 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK c7b0d80

@PastaPastaPasta
PastaPastaPasta merged commit e0151e3 into dashpay:v22.0.xDec 3, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
PastaPastaPasta deleted the v22.0.0-rc.3-backports branch December 3, 2024 18:57
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@PastaPastaPasta@UdjinM6@kwvg