Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Graphviz - #644
Conversation
TODO:
|
b35efd9 to
d4b6e10Compare19fe156 to
5416f88Comparejames-d-mitchell
commented
May 15, 2024
The CI will likely fail here until: is merged. |
james-d-mitchell
commented
Apr 7, 2025
This might be a bit much for this week, but maybe not. |
5416f88 to
a236436CompareUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| <#GAPDoc Label="GraphvizVertexLabelledDigraph"> | ||
| <ManSection> | ||
| <Attr Name="GraphvizVertexLabelledDigraph" Arg="D"/> | ||
| <Attr Name="GraphvizVertexLabelledGraph" Arg="D"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sweet, I was wishing we had such a function already yesterday.
| <Description> | ||
| These functions produce &graphviz; objects representing the digraph | ||
| <A>D</A>, where the vertices in the list <A>verts</A>, and edges | ||
| between them, are drawn with color <A>color1</A> and all other vertices |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the text of the Digraphs manual, we sometimes use the US spelling color and sometimes we use the British spelling colour. I suggest we standardise at some point.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is this file part of this PR? Should it be a separate one?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
4aee2cd to
e5a6048Comparewilfwilson
commented
Oct 3, 2025
I've rebased this on |
james-d-mitchell
commented
Oct 7, 2025
Thanks @wilfwilson don't mind even a little bit |
This is a reworking of #639, which goes a bit further than #639 in removing the old stuff for displays. This PR doesn't introduce any breaking changes except that we now require the
graphvizpackage. So this PR shouldn't be merged until there is a release of `graphviz'.