ci: update actions to current versions, golangci-lint v2, test against latest go versions

[thaJeztah]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.71%. Comparing base (343e590) to head (f0f7bf2).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #21 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.21% 83.71% -0.50% 
==========================================
Files 5 5 Lines 304 393 +89 ==========================================
+ Hits 256 329 +73 - Misses 38 54 +16 
Partials 10 10 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[thaJeztah]

Looks like CodeQL doesn't start because it's been a while since it ran;

We could probably add a scheduled job for it as well

[thaJeztah]

We could probably add a scheduled job for it as well

Interestingly, looks like we already have, so not sure why that didn't keep actions "alive"?;

reference/.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

Lines 7 to 10 in 8c942b0

	on:
	schedule:
	- cron: '0 12 * * 6'
	push:

[thaJeztah]

The CodeCov is probably missing data, or it's just a rounding error 😓

[thaJeztah]

Not sure how to handle those 2 actions; I don't have access to the repo config, but it's worth checking how they're defined and if the repo-settings / branch protection needs updating (they're a big pain to set up if names change etc).

[milosgajdos]

CodeQL Action major versions v1 and v2 have been deprecated. Please update all occurrences of the CodeQL Action in your workflow files to v3. For more information, see https://github.blog/changelog/2025-01-10-code-scanning-codeql-action-v2-is-now-deprecated/Show more

Need tot upgrade that workflow 😅

[thaJeztah]

LOL; that's what this PR does. Fun chicken-and-egg case then?

[milosgajdos]

I'm inclined to merge this. There is no way forward. Thoguhts?

[thaJeztah]

Yeah, easiest is to remove them from the "required" checks in branch protection, then after it's merged, we can probably add them back

[milosgajdos]

Done, let's merge

[thaJeztah]

SGTM; I don't have permissions though ☺️