Condicio Schema

Open standard for contract intelligence data — parties, clauses, obligations, risks, dates, and financial terms.

---

What is Condicio?

Condicio (Latin: agreement, condition, stipulation) defines a universal schema for representing structured contract intelligence data. Every contract extraction tool — CLM platforms, AI engines, obligation trackers — invents its own output format. Condicio is the missing standard.

{
"condicio": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/docfide/condicio/main/schema/condicio.schema.json",
"contract": {
"title": "Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement",
"type": "NDA",
"status": "executed",
"jurisdiction": "Delaware"
},
"parties": [
{ "name": "Acme Corporation", "role": "disclosing party" },
{ "name": "Beta Inc", "role": "receiving party" }
],
"obligations": [
{
"description": "Maintain Confidential Information in strict confidence.",
"obligor": "Beta Inc",
"deadlineType": "ongoing"
}
]
}

A common schema means interoperability, portability, and an ecosystem of tools that work together out of the box.

---

Table of Contents

• Why Condicio
• Schema Overview
• Quick Start
• Examples
• Use Cases
• Comparison with Related Work
• Roadmap
• Contributing
• License

---

Why Condicio

Every contract intelligence tool produces structured data — but they all use different schemas.

Problem	Consequence
Proprietary output formats	Vendor lock-in, costly migrations
No standard for obligations	Each tool tracks them differently
Inconsistent date representations	Parsing errors, missed deadlines
Non-portable risk flags	Risk intelligence trapped in one platform

Condicio solves this by providing a vendor-neutral, open schema that any tool can produce and consume.

Principles

• Open by default — Apache 2.0 license, community-governed
• Extraction-first — designed for what contract intelligence tools produce, not for drafting
• Composable — use only the sections you need (just parties? just obligations?)
• Language-agnostic — JSON Schema core with first-class YAML support
• Confidence-aware — every extracted field can carry a confidence score from the extraction engine

---

Schema Overview

The schema is defined in schema/condicio.schema.json using JSON Schema 2020-12.

Section	Type	Description
contract	object	Document-level metadata — title, type, jurisdiction, governing law, status, IDs
parties	[party]	Named parties with roles, identifiers, type (corporation, individual, llc), contact info
dates	[date]	Key dates — execution, effective, expiry, renewal windows, notice periods
clauses	[clause]	Extracted clauses with classification, full text, and confidence
obligations	[obligation]	Actionable items — deadlines (fixed, recurring, conditional, ongoing), responsible parties, clause references
financials	object	Monetary terms — total contract value, currency, payment schedule, line items, late payment penalties
risks	[risk]	Risk flags — severity (low/medium/high/critical), category, impact, affected party
definitions	[definition]	Defined terms and their definitions as they appear in the contract
metadata	object	Extraction provenance — engine name/version, confidence score, source document info, timestamps

Design approach

• Uses $defs for composable reusable types (party, clause, obligation, financialTerm, payment, risk, date, contactInfo, address)
• additionalProperties: false at root enforces strict compliance
• A top-level condicio const URI identifies the schema version
• Every extraction field includes optional confidence (0.0–1.0) for AI-engine uncertainty

---

Quick Start

Try it now:Live Validator — paste a Condicio document and validate in your browser.

npm

npm install condicio-schema
# Validate your contract data
npx ajv validate -s node_modules/condicio-schema/schema/condicio.schema.json -d your-contract.json

Or validate programmatically:

importAjvfrom'ajv/dist/2020.js'importaddFormatsfrom'ajv-formats'importcondiciofrom'condicio-schema'constajv=newAjv()addFormats(ajv)constvalidate=ajv.compile(condicio)if(validate(myContractData)){console.log('Valid Condicio document')}else{console.error(validate.errors)}

Python

pip install condicio
# Validate a document
condicio validate your-contract.json
# Inspect a document
condicio inspect your-contract.json

fromcondicio.validatorimportvalidate_documentimportjsonwithopen('your-contract.json') asf:
data=json.load(f)
errors=validate_document(data)
ifnoterrors:
print('Valid Condicio document')

Local development

git clone https://github.com/docfide/condicio
cd condicio
npm install
npm test# Validates all examples against the schema

---

Examples

Ready-to-use examples in both JSON and YAML format:

Example	Highlights
NDA	Mutual confidentiality, exclusions, survival period, auto-renewal
Service Agreement	Milestone-based payments ($150K), IP assignment, liability cap
Employment	Salary + bonus + equity, non-compete, severance, at-will
License Agreement	Perpetual license, maintenance SLA, audit rights, usage restrictions

YAML equivalents are available alongside each JSON example.

---

Use Cases

Use Case	How Condicio Helps
AI contract extraction	Standard output format for any extraction engine
CLM data portability	Export contracts from one CLM, import into another
Obligation tracking	Structured obligations with deadlines, owners, status
Risk assessment	Portable risk flags with severity, category, impact
Contract analytics	Aggregate across portfolios with consistent field definitions
Regulatory reporting	Standard date, party, and clause representations
M&A due diligence	Uniform contract data from disparate sources
ISDA/derivatives processing	Extensible for financial contract specifics

---

Comparison with Related Work

Standard	Focus	Status	Relationship to Condicio
Accord Project	Smart legal contracts (Cicero, Ergo)	Active	Complementary — Condicio covers extraction output, Accord covers executable contracts
SALI	Contract standards alliance (tags, classifications)	Active	Compatible — Condicio can reference SALI classification IDs
LEDES	Legal billing/invoicing	Active	Different domain — billing data, not contract intelligence
LegalXML	Court filings, legislative documents	Maintained	Different domain — e-filing, not commercial contracts
OCDS (Open Contracting)	Public procurement	Active	Different domain — government procurement transparency
ODCS (Open Data Charter)	Contract publication	Active	Different domain — contract publication, not extraction

No existing standard addresses the output of contract intelligence extraction — that is the gap Condicio fills.

---

Contributing

Contributions are welcome and encouraged.

How to contribute

1. Review existing examples — understand the patterns before proposing changes
2. Open an issue — discuss your use case or proposed extension
3. Submit a PR — with schema changes, examples, and validation passing (npm test)
4. Add examples — new contract types in both JSON and YAML formats

Guidelines

• Preserve backward compatibility where possible
• Add new optional fields before changing required fields
• Every field should include a description
• New $defs should follow the existing composable pattern
• Every schema change should include updated examples

---

License

Apache 2.0. See LICENSE.

---

Built by Docfide.
Website · Schema Browser · Live Validator