feat: global signal handling to cancel ctx for graceful exits

[Benehiko]

Since other repositories import from the CLI, the signal termination handling done inside the PromptForConfirmation could cause problems for the third party repositories. Thus this PR hoists the signal termination out of the PromptForConfirmation function.

- What I did
Hoist the signal handling from the PromptForConfirmation function to the more appropriate top-level function runDocker.

- How I did it
Using the signal package I catch context cancellations as well as termination signals then pass the returned context to cobra's Execute method.

- How to verify it
Tests

- Description for the changelog

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 7.69231% with 36 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.83%. Comparing base (8b924a5) to head (3f0d90a).
Report is 23 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #4993 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 61.37% 61.83% +0.46% 
==========================================
Files 298 298 Lines 20717 20736 +19 ==========================================
+ Hits 12715 12823 +108 + Misses 7102 7000 -102 - Partials 900 913 +13 

[Benehiko]

Thinking about this now, maybe I should just do this top-level inside the main function and then rework the plugin signal handling as well to accept a context.Done() instead.

[Benehiko]

This PR is blocked by moby/moby#47536. The cobra context isn't given to the prompt function when plugin install is called due to acceptPrivileges not accepting a context https://github.com/docker/cli/blob/master/cli/command/plugin/install.go#L145

Also need to update and merge #4774

[laurazard]

Looks like the linter's complaining, and some tests are broken because now the output from the graceful termination logic is different:

=== FAIL: e2e/cli-plugins TestPluginSocketCommunication/detached/the_main_CLI_exits_after_3_signals (1.10s)
socket_test.go:232: assertion failed: --- ←
+++ →
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-got 2 SIGTERM/SIGINTs, forcefully exiting
+got 3 SIGTERM/SIGINTs, forcefully exiting

I think it should be fine to hardcode the 3 in that print, since that's the total number of signals we've received (counting the one that cancelled the context. It might also be possible to reword it some other way 😅

---

I guess we'll hold off on merging this one since it needs changes to moby that we want to get in after 26.1, so we can get it in after we cut a release.

[Benehiko]

Looks like the linter's complaining, and some tests are broken because now the output from the graceful termination logic is different:

=== FAIL: e2e/cli-plugins TestPluginSocketCommunication/detached/the_main_CLI_exits_after_3_signals (1.10s)
socket_test.go:232: assertion failed: --- ←
+++ →
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-got 2 SIGTERM/SIGINTs, forcefully exiting
+got 3 SIGTERM/SIGINTs, forcefully exiting

I think it should be fine to hardcode the 3 in that print, since that's the total number of signals we've received (counting the one that cancelled the context. It might also be possible to reword it some other way 😅

I guess we'll hold off on merging this one since it needs changes to moby that we want to get in after 26.1, so we can get it in after we cut a release.

Ah yeah, the tests won't pass right now. Not without the changes to moby and context passing in CLI.

I'll hardcode the 3 :)

[laurazard]

LGTM overall, but looks like there's some tests failing/linters complaining. I wonder if were doing things correctly with those deferred cancel()s in main.

[Benehiko]

LGTM overall, but looks like there's some tests failing/linters complaining. I wonder if were doing things correctly with those deferred cancel()s in main.

I have been looking into it. I've fixed one of the tests, specifically the plugins e2e signal handling and still busy on the containers e2e

[Benehiko]

Wondering why this test is failing on the connhelper-ssh tests only. I haven't been able to reproduce it locally. Might be a race condition of sorts...
https://github.com/docker/cli/actions/runs/9398990847/job/25885517677?pr=4993#step:5:731

[krissetto]

overall LGTM, just a couple minor comments

[laurazard]

re-LGTM

[laurazard]

@vvoland can you take another look and then I'll merge?

re-reviewing

[vvoland]

LGTM