Add support for docker's client's --add-host command

[sampwing]

Updated docker-py to the most recent version ( 0.7.1), which allows assigning values to extra_hosts (similar to ---add-host.) Updated fig to allow passing in these parameters and added tests.

Implementation requested in the following issues:
#597
#754

[sampwing]

Kinda stumped on this I test locally (script/test) and I don't get the two failures wercker ran into. Currently running:
Docker version 1.4.1, build 5bc2ff8

[dnephin]

@sampwing wercker runs Docker 1.2.1 I believe https://github.com/wercker/wercker-labs-docker

I'm not sure if we can convince them to upgrade to latest, or if we'd have to create a custom box to run the tests.

[sampwing]

@dnephin I could look into creating a box if that could push this along - 1.2 is a bit out of date, fig seems to be recommending 1.4 on irc

[aanand]

I had a quick go yesterday at creating a custom Wercker box with Docker installed, but it failed with an error:

Docker found, this is not supported in the default wercker environment. See for more information: http://devcenter.wercker.com/articles/docker/

This suggests that you're not allowed to build a custom box with Docker in it. I've asked them about it on Twitter - we'll see.

[thaJeztah]

@aanand given that fig/compose is part of docker, don't you have access to the build servers a Docker itself is using?

[tdesvenain]

Hi, what is the review status of this pull request ? What is the next step ? I can help.
Thanks

[dnephin]

It needs a rebase and squash, but it's also blocked on #886

[ch3lo]

+1

[ddunwoody]

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

[tdesvenain]

Actually this introduces a bug

I just commited a fix + some unit tests, could you review them please ?
https://github.com/tdesvenain/fig/commit/3e6c7cd5a49a52f68184a3d784066d00ab377c1d

2015-02-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 ddunwoody notifications@github.com:

In fig/service.py
#848 (comment):

@@ -629,6 +634,25 @@ def split_port(port):
return internal_port, (external_ip, external_port or None)

+def build_extra_hosts(extra_hosts_config):

• if extra_hosts_config is None:

•  return None
  
• if isinstance(extra_hosts_config, basestring):

•  extra_hosts_config = [extra_hosts_config]
  
• extra_hosts_dict = {}
• for extra_hosts_line in extra_hosts_config:

•  if isinstance(extra_hosts_line, dict):
  

•  # already interpreted as a dict (depends on pyyaml version)
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line)
  

•  else:
  

•  # not already interpreted as a dict
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line.split(':'))
  

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/docker/fig/pull/848/files#r25335828.

Thomas Desvenain

Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18

[skrassiev]

hope this is the right way for +1

[albers]

+1

[phylake]

+1

[c0deaddict]

+1

[bmilesp]

+1

[aanand]

Needs a rebase. docker-py changes can probably go.

[slashmili]

+1

[jelmstrom]

+1

[tristan0x]

+1

[aanand]

Superseded by #1158

[sampwing]

Updated docker-py to the most recent version ( 0.7.1), which allows assigning values to extra_hosts (similar to ---add-host.) Updated fig to allow passing in these parameters and added tests.

Implementation requested in the following issues:
#597
#754

[sampwing]

Kinda stumped on this I test locally (script/test) and I don't get the two failures wercker ran into. Currently running:
Docker version 1.4.1, build 5bc2ff8

[dnephin]

@sampwing wercker runs Docker 1.2.1 I believe https://github.com/wercker/wercker-labs-docker

I'm not sure if we can convince them to upgrade to latest, or if we'd have to create a custom box to run the tests.

[sampwing]

@dnephin I could look into creating a box if that could push this along - 1.2 is a bit out of date, fig seems to be recommending 1.4 on irc

[aanand]

I had a quick go yesterday at creating a custom Wercker box with Docker installed, but it failed with an error:

Docker found, this is not supported in the default wercker environment. See for more information: http://devcenter.wercker.com/articles/docker/

This suggests that you're not allowed to build a custom box with Docker in it. I've asked them about it on Twitter - we'll see.

[thaJeztah]

@aanand given that fig/compose is part of docker, don't you have access to the build servers a Docker itself is using?

[tdesvenain]

Hi, what is the review status of this pull request ? What is the next step ? I can help.
Thanks

[dnephin]

It needs a rebase and squash, but it's also blocked on #886

[ch3lo]

+1

[ddunwoody]

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

[tdesvenain]

Actually this introduces a bug

I just commited a fix + some unit tests, could you review them please ?
https://github.com/tdesvenain/fig/commit/3e6c7cd5a49a52f68184a3d784066d00ab377c1d

2015-02-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 ddunwoody notifications@github.com:

In fig/service.py
#848 (comment):

@@ -629,6 +634,25 @@ def split_port(port):
return internal_port, (external_ip, external_port or None)

+def build_extra_hosts(extra_hosts_config):

• if extra_hosts_config is None:

•  return None
  
• if isinstance(extra_hosts_config, basestring):

•  extra_hosts_config = [extra_hosts_config]
  
• extra_hosts_dict = {}
• for extra_hosts_line in extra_hosts_config:

•  if isinstance(extra_hosts_line, dict):
  

•  # already interpreted as a dict (depends on pyyaml version)
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line)
  

•  else:
  

•  # not already interpreted as a dict
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line.split(':'))
  

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/docker/fig/pull/848/files#r25335828.

Thomas Desvenain

Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18

[skrassiev]

hope this is the right way for +1

[albers]

+1

[phylake]

+1

[c0deaddict]

+1

[bmilesp]

+1

[aanand]

Needs a rebase. docker-py changes can probably go.

[slashmili]

+1

[jelmstrom]

+1

[tristan0x]

+1

[aanand]

Superseded by #1158

[sampwing]

Updated docker-py to the most recent version ( 0.7.1), which allows assigning values to extra_hosts (similar to ---add-host.) Updated fig to allow passing in these parameters and added tests.

Implementation requested in the following issues:
#597
#754

[sampwing]

Kinda stumped on this I test locally (script/test) and I don't get the two failures wercker ran into. Currently running:
Docker version 1.4.1, build 5bc2ff8

[dnephin]

@sampwing wercker runs Docker 1.2.1 I believe https://github.com/wercker/wercker-labs-docker

I'm not sure if we can convince them to upgrade to latest, or if we'd have to create a custom box to run the tests.

[sampwing]

@dnephin I could look into creating a box if that could push this along - 1.2 is a bit out of date, fig seems to be recommending 1.4 on irc

[aanand]

I had a quick go yesterday at creating a custom Wercker box with Docker installed, but it failed with an error:

Docker found, this is not supported in the default wercker environment. See for more information: http://devcenter.wercker.com/articles/docker/

This suggests that you're not allowed to build a custom box with Docker in it. I've asked them about it on Twitter - we'll see.

[thaJeztah]

@aanand given that fig/compose is part of docker, don't you have access to the build servers a Docker itself is using?

[tdesvenain]

Hi, what is the review status of this pull request ? What is the next step ? I can help.
Thanks

[dnephin]

It needs a rebase and squash, but it's also blocked on #886

[ch3lo]

+1

[ddunwoody]

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

[tdesvenain]

Actually this introduces a bug

I just commited a fix + some unit tests, could you review them please ?
https://github.com/tdesvenain/fig/commit/3e6c7cd5a49a52f68184a3d784066d00ab377c1d

2015-02-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 ddunwoody notifications@github.com:

In fig/service.py
#848 (comment):

@@ -629,6 +634,25 @@ def split_port(port):
return internal_port, (external_ip, external_port or None)

+def build_extra_hosts(extra_hosts_config):

• if extra_hosts_config is None:

•  return None
  
• if isinstance(extra_hosts_config, basestring):

•  extra_hosts_config = [extra_hosts_config]
  
• extra_hosts_dict = {}
• for extra_hosts_line in extra_hosts_config:

•  if isinstance(extra_hosts_line, dict):
  

•  # already interpreted as a dict (depends on pyyaml version)
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line)
  

•  else:
  

•  # not already interpreted as a dict
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line.split(':'))
  

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/docker/fig/pull/848/files#r25335828.

Thomas Desvenain

Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18

[skrassiev]

hope this is the right way for +1

[albers]

+1

[phylake]

+1

[c0deaddict]

+1

[bmilesp]

+1

[aanand]

Needs a rebase. docker-py changes can probably go.

[slashmili]

+1

[jelmstrom]

+1

[tristan0x]

+1

[aanand]

Superseded by #1158

[sampwing]

Updated docker-py to the most recent version ( 0.7.1), which allows assigning values to extra_hosts (similar to ---add-host.) Updated fig to allow passing in these parameters and added tests.

Implementation requested in the following issues:
#597
#754

[sampwing]

Kinda stumped on this I test locally (script/test) and I don't get the two failures wercker ran into. Currently running:
Docker version 1.4.1, build 5bc2ff8

[dnephin]

@sampwing wercker runs Docker 1.2.1 I believe https://github.com/wercker/wercker-labs-docker

I'm not sure if we can convince them to upgrade to latest, or if we'd have to create a custom box to run the tests.

[sampwing]

@dnephin I could look into creating a box if that could push this along - 1.2 is a bit out of date, fig seems to be recommending 1.4 on irc

[aanand]

I had a quick go yesterday at creating a custom Wercker box with Docker installed, but it failed with an error:

Docker found, this is not supported in the default wercker environment. See for more information: http://devcenter.wercker.com/articles/docker/

This suggests that you're not allowed to build a custom box with Docker in it. I've asked them about it on Twitter - we'll see.

[thaJeztah]

@aanand given that fig/compose is part of docker, don't you have access to the build servers a Docker itself is using?

[tdesvenain]

Hi, what is the review status of this pull request ? What is the next step ? I can help.
Thanks

[dnephin]

It needs a rebase and squash, but it's also blocked on #886

[ch3lo]

+1

[ddunwoody]

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

[tdesvenain]

Actually this introduces a bug

I just commited a fix + some unit tests, could you review them please ?
https://github.com/tdesvenain/fig/commit/3e6c7cd5a49a52f68184a3d784066d00ab377c1d

2015-02-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 ddunwoody notifications@github.com:

In fig/service.py
#848 (comment):

@@ -629,6 +634,25 @@ def split_port(port):
return internal_port, (external_ip, external_port or None)

+def build_extra_hosts(extra_hosts_config):

• if extra_hosts_config is None:

•  return None
  
• if isinstance(extra_hosts_config, basestring):

•  extra_hosts_config = [extra_hosts_config]
  
• extra_hosts_dict = {}
• for extra_hosts_line in extra_hosts_config:

•  if isinstance(extra_hosts_line, dict):
  

•  # already interpreted as a dict (depends on pyyaml version)
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line)
  

•  else:
  

•  # not already interpreted as a dict
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line.split(':'))
  

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/docker/fig/pull/848/files#r25335828.

Thomas Desvenain

Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18

[skrassiev]

hope this is the right way for +1

[albers]

+1

[phylake]

+1

[c0deaddict]

+1

[bmilesp]

+1

[aanand]

Needs a rebase. docker-py changes can probably go.

[slashmili]

+1

[jelmstrom]

+1

[tristan0x]

+1

[aanand]

Superseded by #1158

[sampwing]

Updated docker-py to the most recent version ( 0.7.1), which allows assigning values to extra_hosts (similar to ---add-host.) Updated fig to allow passing in these parameters and added tests.

Implementation requested in the following issues:
#597
#754

[sampwing]

Kinda stumped on this I test locally (script/test) and I don't get the two failures wercker ran into. Currently running:
Docker version 1.4.1, build 5bc2ff8

[dnephin]

@sampwing wercker runs Docker 1.2.1 I believe https://github.com/wercker/wercker-labs-docker

I'm not sure if we can convince them to upgrade to latest, or if we'd have to create a custom box to run the tests.

[sampwing]

@dnephin I could look into creating a box if that could push this along - 1.2 is a bit out of date, fig seems to be recommending 1.4 on irc

[aanand]

I had a quick go yesterday at creating a custom Wercker box with Docker installed, but it failed with an error:

Docker found, this is not supported in the default wercker environment. See for more information: http://devcenter.wercker.com/articles/docker/

This suggests that you're not allowed to build a custom box with Docker in it. I've asked them about it on Twitter - we'll see.

[thaJeztah]

@aanand given that fig/compose is part of docker, don't you have access to the build servers a Docker itself is using?

[tdesvenain]

Hi, what is the review status of this pull request ? What is the next step ? I can help.
Thanks

[dnephin]

It needs a rebase and squash, but it's also blocked on #886

[ch3lo]

+1

[ddunwoody]

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

[tdesvenain]

Actually this introduces a bug

I just commited a fix + some unit tests, could you review them please ?
https://github.com/tdesvenain/fig/commit/3e6c7cd5a49a52f68184a3d784066d00ab377c1d

2015-02-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 ddunwoody notifications@github.com:

In fig/service.py
#848 (comment):

@@ -629,6 +634,25 @@ def split_port(port):
return internal_port, (external_ip, external_port or None)

+def build_extra_hosts(extra_hosts_config):

• if extra_hosts_config is None:

•  return None
  
• if isinstance(extra_hosts_config, basestring):

•  extra_hosts_config = [extra_hosts_config]
  
• extra_hosts_dict = {}
• for extra_hosts_line in extra_hosts_config:

•  if isinstance(extra_hosts_line, dict):
  

•  # already interpreted as a dict (depends on pyyaml version)
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line)
  

•  else:
  

•  # not already interpreted as a dict
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line.split(':'))
  

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/docker/fig/pull/848/files#r25335828.

Thomas Desvenain

Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18

[skrassiev]

hope this is the right way for +1

[albers]

+1

[phylake]

+1

[c0deaddict]

+1

[bmilesp]

+1

[aanand]

Needs a rebase. docker-py changes can probably go.

[slashmili]

+1

[jelmstrom]

+1

[tristan0x]

+1

[aanand]

Superseded by #1158

[sampwing]

Updated docker-py to the most recent version ( 0.7.1), which allows assigning values to extra_hosts (similar to ---add-host.) Updated fig to allow passing in these parameters and added tests.

Implementation requested in the following issues:
#597
#754

[sampwing]

Kinda stumped on this I test locally (script/test) and I don't get the two failures wercker ran into. Currently running:
Docker version 1.4.1, build 5bc2ff8

[dnephin]

@sampwing wercker runs Docker 1.2.1 I believe https://github.com/wercker/wercker-labs-docker

I'm not sure if we can convince them to upgrade to latest, or if we'd have to create a custom box to run the tests.

[sampwing]

@dnephin I could look into creating a box if that could push this along - 1.2 is a bit out of date, fig seems to be recommending 1.4 on irc

[aanand]

I had a quick go yesterday at creating a custom Wercker box with Docker installed, but it failed with an error:

Docker found, this is not supported in the default wercker environment. See for more information: http://devcenter.wercker.com/articles/docker/

This suggests that you're not allowed to build a custom box with Docker in it. I've asked them about it on Twitter - we'll see.

[thaJeztah]

@aanand given that fig/compose is part of docker, don't you have access to the build servers a Docker itself is using?

[tdesvenain]

Hi, what is the review status of this pull request ? What is the next step ? I can help.
Thanks

[dnephin]

It needs a rebase and squash, but it's also blocked on #886

[ch3lo]

+1

[ddunwoody]

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

[tdesvenain]

Actually this introduces a bug

I just commited a fix + some unit tests, could you review them please ?
https://github.com/tdesvenain/fig/commit/3e6c7cd5a49a52f68184a3d784066d00ab377c1d

2015-02-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 ddunwoody notifications@github.com:

In fig/service.py
#848 (comment):

@@ -629,6 +634,25 @@ def split_port(port):
return internal_port, (external_ip, external_port or None)

+def build_extra_hosts(extra_hosts_config):

• if extra_hosts_config is None:

•  return None
  
• if isinstance(extra_hosts_config, basestring):

•  extra_hosts_config = [extra_hosts_config]
  
• extra_hosts_dict = {}
• for extra_hosts_line in extra_hosts_config:

•  if isinstance(extra_hosts_line, dict):
  

•  # already interpreted as a dict (depends on pyyaml version)
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line)
  

•  else:
  

•  # not already interpreted as a dict
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line.split(':'))
  

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/docker/fig/pull/848/files#r25335828.

Thomas Desvenain

Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18

[skrassiev]

hope this is the right way for +1

[albers]

+1

[phylake]

+1

[c0deaddict]

+1

[bmilesp]

+1

[aanand]

Needs a rebase. docker-py changes can probably go.

[slashmili]

+1

[jelmstrom]

+1

[tristan0x]

+1

[aanand]

Superseded by #1158

[sampwing]

Updated docker-py to the most recent version ( 0.7.1), which allows assigning values to extra_hosts (similar to ---add-host.) Updated fig to allow passing in these parameters and added tests.

Implementation requested in the following issues:
#597
#754

[sampwing]

Kinda stumped on this I test locally (script/test) and I don't get the two failures wercker ran into. Currently running:
Docker version 1.4.1, build 5bc2ff8

[dnephin]

@sampwing wercker runs Docker 1.2.1 I believe https://github.com/wercker/wercker-labs-docker

I'm not sure if we can convince them to upgrade to latest, or if we'd have to create a custom box to run the tests.

[sampwing]

@dnephin I could look into creating a box if that could push this along - 1.2 is a bit out of date, fig seems to be recommending 1.4 on irc

[aanand]

I had a quick go yesterday at creating a custom Wercker box with Docker installed, but it failed with an error:

Docker found, this is not supported in the default wercker environment. See for more information: http://devcenter.wercker.com/articles/docker/

This suggests that you're not allowed to build a custom box with Docker in it. I've asked them about it on Twitter - we'll see.

[thaJeztah]

@aanand given that fig/compose is part of docker, don't you have access to the build servers a Docker itself is using?

[tdesvenain]

Hi, what is the review status of this pull request ? What is the next step ? I can help.
Thanks

[dnephin]

It needs a rebase and squash, but it's also blocked on #886

[ch3lo]

+1

[ddunwoody]

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

[tdesvenain]

Actually this introduces a bug

I just commited a fix + some unit tests, could you review them please ?
https://github.com/tdesvenain/fig/commit/3e6c7cd5a49a52f68184a3d784066d00ab377c1d

2015-02-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 ddunwoody notifications@github.com:

In fig/service.py
#848 (comment):

@@ -629,6 +634,25 @@ def split_port(port):
return internal_port, (external_ip, external_port or None)

+def build_extra_hosts(extra_hosts_config):

• if extra_hosts_config is None:

•  return None
  
• if isinstance(extra_hosts_config, basestring):

•  extra_hosts_config = [extra_hosts_config]
  
• extra_hosts_dict = {}
• for extra_hosts_line in extra_hosts_config:

•  if isinstance(extra_hosts_line, dict):
  

•  # already interpreted as a dict (depends on pyyaml version)
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line)
  

•  else:
  

•  # not already interpreted as a dict
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line.split(':'))
  

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/docker/fig/pull/848/files#r25335828.

Thomas Desvenain

Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18

[skrassiev]

hope this is the right way for +1

[albers]

+1

[phylake]

+1

[c0deaddict]

+1

[bmilesp]

+1

[aanand]

Needs a rebase. docker-py changes can probably go.

[slashmili]

+1

[jelmstrom]

+1

[tristan0x]

+1

[aanand]

Superseded by #1158

[sampwing]

Updated docker-py to the most recent version ( 0.7.1), which allows assigning values to extra_hosts (similar to ---add-host.) Updated fig to allow passing in these parameters and added tests.

Implementation requested in the following issues:
#597
#754

[sampwing]

Kinda stumped on this I test locally (script/test) and I don't get the two failures wercker ran into. Currently running:
Docker version 1.4.1, build 5bc2ff8

[dnephin]

@sampwing wercker runs Docker 1.2.1 I believe https://github.com/wercker/wercker-labs-docker

I'm not sure if we can convince them to upgrade to latest, or if we'd have to create a custom box to run the tests.

[sampwing]

@dnephin I could look into creating a box if that could push this along - 1.2 is a bit out of date, fig seems to be recommending 1.4 on irc

[aanand]

I had a quick go yesterday at creating a custom Wercker box with Docker installed, but it failed with an error:

Docker found, this is not supported in the default wercker environment. See for more information: http://devcenter.wercker.com/articles/docker/

This suggests that you're not allowed to build a custom box with Docker in it. I've asked them about it on Twitter - we'll see.

[thaJeztah]

@aanand given that fig/compose is part of docker, don't you have access to the build servers a Docker itself is using?

[tdesvenain]

Hi, what is the review status of this pull request ? What is the next step ? I can help.
Thanks

[dnephin]

It needs a rebase and squash, but it's also blocked on #886

[ch3lo]

+1

[ddunwoody]

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

[tdesvenain]

Actually this introduces a bug

I just commited a fix + some unit tests, could you review them please ?
https://github.com/tdesvenain/fig/commit/3e6c7cd5a49a52f68184a3d784066d00ab377c1d

2015-02-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 ddunwoody notifications@github.com:

In fig/service.py
#848 (comment):

@@ -629,6 +634,25 @@ def split_port(port):
return internal_port, (external_ip, external_port or None)

+def build_extra_hosts(extra_hosts_config):

• if extra_hosts_config is None:

•  return None
  
• if isinstance(extra_hosts_config, basestring):

•  extra_hosts_config = [extra_hosts_config]
  
• extra_hosts_dict = {}
• for extra_hosts_line in extra_hosts_config:

•  if isinstance(extra_hosts_line, dict):
  

•  # already interpreted as a dict (depends on pyyaml version)
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line)
  

•  else:
  

•  # not already interpreted as a dict
  

•  extra_hosts_dict.update(extra_hosts_line.split(':'))
  

I believe line 651 should read:

extra_hosts_dict.update([extra_hosts_line.split(':')])

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/docker/fig/pull/848/files#r25335828.

Thomas Desvenain

Téléphone : 09 51 37 35 18

[skrassiev]

hope this is the right way for +1

[albers]

+1

[phylake]

+1

[c0deaddict]

+1

[bmilesp]

+1

[aanand]

Needs a rebase. docker-py changes can probably go.

[slashmili]

+1

[jelmstrom]

+1

[tristan0x]

+1

[aanand]

Superseded by #1158