Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Update to use "/etc/apt/keyrings" per APT maintainers recommendations - #14813
Merged
Conversation
See https://tracker.debian.org/news/1305679/accepted-apt-240-source-into-unstable/: * Install an empty /etc/apt/keyrings directory. This directory is intended to provide an alternative to /usr/share/keyrings for placing keys used with signed-by. See also https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/UseThirdParty?action=diff&rev2=47&rev1=46 (which was edited following a discussion with the APT maintainers about the expected usage): > If future updates to the key will be managed by an apt/dpkg package as recommended below, then it SHOULD be downloaded into `/usr/share/keyrings` using the same filename that will be provided by the package. If it will be managed locally , it SHOULD be downloaded into `/etc/apt/keyrings` instead. Signed-off-by: Tianon Gravi <admwiggin@gmail.com>
✅ Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
thaJeztah
commented
May 23, 2022
Member
Does that mean that potentially we can expect reports similar to docker/for-linux#1349 ? |
tianon
commented
May 23, 2022
ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I don't think so -- that one looks like it's because we had both |
thaJeztah
commented
May 23, 2022
Member
Ah, right makes sense; I thought it would cache the previous value somewhere 👍 |
thaJeztah
commented
May 24, 2022
Member
Opened docker/docker-install#294 to update the install script at get.docker.com to do the same |
3 tasks
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See https://tracker.debian.org/news/1305679/accepted-apt-240-source-into-unstable/:
See also https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/UseThirdParty?action=diff&rev2=47&rev1=46 (which was edited following a discussion with the APT maintainers about the expected usage):