Skip to content

Fix markdown errors - #36

Closed
seesharprun wants to merge 2 commits into
documentdb:mainfrom
seesharprun:fix-markdown-errors
Closed

Fix markdown errors#36
seesharprun wants to merge 2 commits into
documentdb:mainfrom
seesharprun:fix-markdown-errors

Conversation

@seesharprun

@seesharprunseesharprun commented Jan 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request makes a series of documentation improvements to the API reference, focusing on correcting internal links and clarifying the $[identifier] array update operator. The main changes are grouped into two themes: link corrections for consistency and accuracy, and operator documentation clarification.

Documentation link corrections:

  • Updated internal documentation links throughout the query-and-write command reference files to use the .md file extension for consistency and to ensure proper navigation. This affects references to insert, update, find, and delete command documentation. [1][2][3][4][5]

Operator documentation clarification:

  • Clarified the documentation for the $[identifier] array update operator by updating the title and description to accurately reflect its usage, replacing the generic $[] with the more precise $[identifier].
image

@seesharprun
seesharprun deleted the fix-markdown-errors branch January 9, 2026 19:10
GuanzhouSong added a commit to GuanzhouSong/docs that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
The Index Management row was wrong in three ways. It took the function
name from the filename rather than the definition: create_index_
background--*.sql (singular) defines create_indexes_background (plural).
It also had the wrong schema. The definition uses __API_SCHEMA_V2__,
which pg_documentdb/Makefile:28 resolves to documentdb_api, not
documentdb_api_internal - and documentdb_api_internal.create_index_
background does not exist in any schema in any version file.
And the description belonged to a different function. "Schedules
background index builds via the index queue" is the COMMENT ON for
create_indexes_background_internal ("Queues the Index creation
request(s) on a collection"). The public function is synchronous; its
own comment reads "Submits the build index(es) requests on a collection
and waits for them to finish."
Dropped "(the default since v0.104-0)" as unsupported: the v0.104-0
CHANGELOG entry says only "Support background index builds [Bugfix]
(documentdb#36)", nothing about it becoming the default.
Parameter naming is left as-is to match the neighbouring
create_indexes_non_concurrently row, which maps p_arg to spec the same
way.
Fixesdocumentdb/documentdb.github.io#128
Signed-off-by: Guanzhou Song <guanzhousong@microsoft.com>
guanzhousongmicrosoft added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
…ge against v0.114-0 (#58)
* Correct the create_indexes_background row
The Index Management row was wrong in three ways. It took the function
name from the filename rather than the definition: create_index_
background--*.sql (singular) defines create_indexes_background (plural).
It also had the wrong schema. The definition uses __API_SCHEMA_V2__,
which pg_documentdb/Makefile:28 resolves to documentdb_api, not
documentdb_api_internal - and documentdb_api_internal.create_index_
background does not exist in any schema in any version file.
And the description belonged to a different function. "Schedules
background index builds via the index queue" is the COMMENT ON for
create_indexes_background_internal ("Queues the Index creation
request(s) on a collection"). The public function is synchronous; its
own comment reads "Submits the build index(es) requests on a collection
and waits for them to finish."
Dropped "(the default since v0.104-0)" as unsupported: the v0.104-0
CHANGELOG entry says only "Support background index builds [Bugfix]
(#36)", nothing about it becoming the default.
Parameter naming is left as-is to match the neighbouring
create_indexes_non_concurrently row, which maps p_arg to spec the same
way.
Fixesdocumentdb/documentdb.github.io#128
Signed-off-by: Guanzhou Song <guanzhousong@microsoft.com>
* Audit the functions page against v0.114-0
Follow-up to the create_indexes_background row. Transcribing that one row
correctly turned up the same class of error across the rest of the page,
so this checks every row against the installed catalog (\df
documentdb_api.*) at the v0.114-0 tag - the release
getting-started/prebuilt-packages.md names as current. All 50 public
documentdb_api entries are now documented and every signature matches
name-for-name, including OUT/INOUT parameters and DEFAULTs that the page
had been dropping.
Validating against the tag rather than upstream main matters, and compact
is why. On main, compact takes a `mode` field and defaults to a
non-blocking standard VACUUM. That field does not exist in v0.114-0: the
gate there is a bare `if (!EnableCompactVacuumFull)`, and that GUC
defaults off, so on the shipped release compact returns
{ "ok": 1, "bytesFreed": 0 } and reclaims nothing by default. The page
now documents the shipped behavior.
create_indexes_background does not wait. The previous commit took "and
waits for them to finish" from the SQL COMMENT ON, but the C
implementation contradicts it: command_create_indexes_background only
builds a SELECT of create_indexes_background_internal and hands it to
ReindexOrCreateCommandCore, which runs one SPI query and returns. The
waiting lives in the gateway and in upstream's own test helper. The page
now documents the two-call protocol, adds check_build_index_status (the
other half, previously absent from the whole docs repo), and covers the
three ways a naive caller gets it wrong: no COMMIT after queueing leaves
the request invisible to the drain worker; exiting the poll loop on
`complete` alone reports success for a build that failed or that merely
left the queue; and nothing drains the queue at all unless pg_cron or
documentdb.indexBuildsScheduledOnBgWorker is running.
Several rows described functions that cannot do what they claim:
- documentdb_api_internal.insert_one is a stub that always raises
"insert_one is deprecated and should not be called"
- bulkWrite raises "bulkWrite is not yet implemented"; only its command
surface shipped
- the *_txn_proc and *_bulk procedures raise inside an explicit
transaction rather than requiring one, and both variants sit behind
gateway flags that default off
- create_indexes_non_concurrently raises on an existing collection unless
p_skip_check_collection_create is true
- shard keys must be "hashed"; the remedial example used '{ "a": 1 }',
which raises "only shard keys that use hashed are supported"
- documentdb_api.collection requires constant name arguments and a FROM
clause, or it raises
Version corrections: current_op_command is v0.102-0, not v0.101-0;
rolesInfo is v0.108-0, not v0.106-0; and create_indexes_background is not
"added in v0.104-0" - it is declared as far back as
create_index_background--0.23-0.sql. What v0.104-0 added was automatic
scheduling of the drain job, which is what made background builds the
working default, so the phrasing dropped by the previous commit was
closer to right than its replacement.
Also: delete has no procedure form in v0.114-0 (delete_txn_proc is
post-release); the preamble's claim that OUT parameters imply a record
return is true only for multi-OUT functions; the two list_* cursor
functions ignore cursorId and can never be resumed; all four cursor
functions are STRICT, so binding NULL silently yields an empty row; and
create_collection_view is not the "only" entry point for collection
options, since coll_mod takes the same set.
configuration.md gains the three off-by-default flags this page now
refers to - enableCompactVacuumFull, enablePreImages, and
indexBuildsScheduledOnBgWorker - each of which fails by doing nothing
rather than by raising.
Signed-off-by: Guanzhou Song <guanzhousong@microsoft.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Guanzhou Song <guanzhousong@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Guanzhou Song <guanzhousong@microsoft.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@seesharprun