Skip to content

Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments - #25

Open
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom
vstefanoxx:master
Open

Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments#25
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom
vstefanoxx:master

Conversation

@vstefanoxx

@vstefanoxxvstefanoxx commented Mar 30, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit

@vstefanoxx
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments
fb2ece1
- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem

dooblem commented Jun 14, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hello Stefano,

Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.

Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.

Whatever you prefer.

Thanks in advance,
Marc

@vstefanoxx

vstefanoxx commented Jun 20, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Hello Marc,

I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you
add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at
least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in
the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time

Thank you,
Stefano

2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE notifications@github.com:

Hello Stefano,

Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain
and review issues/pull requests.

Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to
my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork
instead.

Whatever you prefer.

Thanks in advance,
Marc

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu
.

@mikebentley15mikebentley15 mentioned this pull request Apr 12, 2022
Open
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstefanoxx@dooblem
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments by vstefanoxx · Pull Request #25 · dooblem/bsync · GitHub
Skip to content
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments - #25
Open
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Open
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments#25
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Conversation
@vstefanoxx
@vstefanoxxvstefanoxx
commented
Mar 30, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@vstefanoxx
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments
fb2ece1
- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem
dooblem
commented
Jun 14, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
@vstefanoxx
vstefanoxx
commented
Jun 20, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hello Marc,
I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you

add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at

least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in

the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time
Thank you,

Stefano
2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE notifications@github.com:
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain

and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to

my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork

instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute

the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu

.
@mikebentley15mikebentley15
mentioned this pull request
Apr 12, 2022
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstefanoxx@dooblem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments by vstefanoxx · Pull Request #25 · dooblem/bsync · GitHub
Skip to content
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments - #25
Open
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Open
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments#25
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Conversation
@vstefanoxx
@vstefanoxxvstefanoxx
commented
Mar 30, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@vstefanoxx
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments
fb2ece1
- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem
dooblem
commented
Jun 14, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
@vstefanoxx
vstefanoxx
commented
Jun 20, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hello Marc,
I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you

add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at

least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in

the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time
Thank you,

Stefano
2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE notifications@github.com:
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain

and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to

my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork

instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute

the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu

.
@mikebentley15mikebentley15
mentioned this pull request
Apr 12, 2022
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstefanoxx@dooblem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments by vstefanoxx · Pull Request #25 · dooblem/bsync · GitHub
Skip to content
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments - #25
Open
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Open
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments#25
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Conversation
@vstefanoxx
@vstefanoxxvstefanoxx
commented
Mar 30, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@vstefanoxx
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments
fb2ece1
- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem
dooblem
commented
Jun 14, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
@vstefanoxx
vstefanoxx
commented
Jun 20, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hello Marc,
I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you

add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at

least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in

the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time
Thank you,

Stefano
2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE notifications@github.com:
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain

and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to

my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork

instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute

the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu

.
@mikebentley15mikebentley15
mentioned this pull request
Apr 12, 2022
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstefanoxx@dooblem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments by vstefanoxx · Pull Request #25 · dooblem/bsync · GitHub
Skip to content
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments - #25
Open
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Open
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments#25
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Conversation
@vstefanoxx
@vstefanoxxvstefanoxx
commented
Mar 30, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@vstefanoxx
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments
fb2ece1
- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem
dooblem
commented
Jun 14, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
@vstefanoxx
vstefanoxx
commented
Jun 20, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hello Marc,
I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you

add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at

least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in

the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time
Thank you,

Stefano
2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE notifications@github.com:
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain

and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to

my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork

instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute

the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu

.
@mikebentley15mikebentley15
mentioned this pull request
Apr 12, 2022
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstefanoxx@dooblem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments by vstefanoxx · Pull Request #25 · dooblem/bsync · GitHub
Skip to content
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments - #25
Open
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Open
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments#25
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Conversation
@vstefanoxx
@vstefanoxxvstefanoxx
commented
Mar 30, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@vstefanoxx
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments
fb2ece1
- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem
dooblem
commented
Jun 14, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
@vstefanoxx
vstefanoxx
commented
Jun 20, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hello Marc,
I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you

add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at

least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in

the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time
Thank you,

Stefano
2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE notifications@github.com:
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain

and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to

my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork

instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute

the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu

.
@mikebentley15mikebentley15
mentioned this pull request
Apr 12, 2022
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstefanoxx@dooblem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments by vstefanoxx · Pull Request #25 · dooblem/bsync · GitHub
Skip to content
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments - #25
Open
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Open
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments#25
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Conversation
@vstefanoxx
@vstefanoxxvstefanoxx
commented
Mar 30, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@vstefanoxx
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments
fb2ece1
- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem
dooblem
commented
Jun 14, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
@vstefanoxx
vstefanoxx
commented
Jun 20, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hello Marc,
I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you

add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at

least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in

the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time
Thank you,

Stefano
2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE notifications@github.com:
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain

and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to

my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork

instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute

the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu

.
@mikebentley15mikebentley15
mentioned this pull request
Apr 12, 2022
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstefanoxx@dooblem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments by vstefanoxx · Pull Request #25 · dooblem/bsync · GitHub
Skip to content
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments - #25
Open
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Open
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments#25
vstefanoxx wants to merge 1 commit into
dooblem:masterfrom 
vstefanoxx:master
Conversation
@vstefanoxx
@vstefanoxxvstefanoxx
commented
Mar 30, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@vstefanoxx
Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments
fb2ece1
- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem
dooblem
commented
Jun 14, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
@vstefanoxx
vstefanoxx
commented
Jun 20, 2016

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hello Marc,
I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you

add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at

least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in

the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time
Thank you,

Stefano
2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE notifications@github.com:
Hello Stefano,
Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain

and review issues/pull requests.
Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to

my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork

instead.
Whatever you prefer.
Thanks in advance,

Marc
—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute

the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu

.
@mikebentley15mikebentley15
mentioned this pull request
Apr 12, 2022
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstefanoxx@dooblem