Opt out of metadata trimming - #2020

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Opt out of metadata trimming#2020
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.

I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.

It's reflecting on a field that is not used in any other way than by unanalyzable reflection. We would previously keep all fields, irrespective of whether they're used on reflected on dotnet/runtime#70546.

Benchmark.NET should ideally <EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer> in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.
I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.
Benchmark.NET should ideally `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.
@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The failure looks like this. Normally this would be some silent weird behavior (because the field just be missing), but BenchmarkDotNet is opting into IlcGenerateCompleteTypeMetadata that creates the fields that were trimmed for reflection purposes, but makes them unusable.

2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] ---> EETypeRva:0x00AAFC80(System.Reflection.MissingRuntimeArtifactException): This object cannot be invoked because no code was generated for it: 'BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.MetaMode.BaselineCharacteristic'.
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.get_FieldAccessor() + 0x113
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.GetValue(Object) + 0xd
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.<>c.<GetThisTypeCharacteristicsCore>b__8_1(FieldInfo) + 0x16
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectArrayIterator`2.MoveNext() + 0x6d
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.ConcatIterator`1.MoveNext() + 0x5b
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1.UnionWith(IEnumerable`1) + 0x3e
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1, IEqualityComparer`1) + 0xe8
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.DistinctIterator`1.ToArray() + 0x32
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1) + 0x30
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.OrderedEnumerable`1.ToArray() + 0x34
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x26
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x1d0
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.GetAllCharacteristicsCore(Type) + 0x44
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicObject.GetCharacteristicsToApply(CharacteristicObject) + 0x3c
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.Job..cctor() + 0x218

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @MichalStrehovsky !

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit b09431c into dotnet:masterJun 22, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2022 20:34
@AndreyAkinshinAndreyAkinshin added this to the v0.13.2 milestone Jun 23, 2022
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/BenchmarkDotNet that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in dotnet#2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
adamsitnik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
* Make a bit of BenchmarkDotNet trimmable
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in #2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@adamsitnik@AndreyAkinshin
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Opt out of metadata trimming - #2020

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Opt out of metadata trimming#2020
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.

I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.

It's reflecting on a field that is not used in any other way than by unanalyzable reflection. We would previously keep all fields, irrespective of whether they're used on reflected on dotnet/runtime#70546.

Benchmark.NET should ideally <EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer> in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.
I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.
Benchmark.NET should ideally `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.
@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The failure looks like this. Normally this would be some silent weird behavior (because the field just be missing), but BenchmarkDotNet is opting into IlcGenerateCompleteTypeMetadata that creates the fields that were trimmed for reflection purposes, but makes them unusable.

2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] ---> EETypeRva:0x00AAFC80(System.Reflection.MissingRuntimeArtifactException): This object cannot be invoked because no code was generated for it: 'BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.MetaMode.BaselineCharacteristic'.
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.get_FieldAccessor() + 0x113
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.GetValue(Object) + 0xd
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.<>c.<GetThisTypeCharacteristicsCore>b__8_1(FieldInfo) + 0x16
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectArrayIterator`2.MoveNext() + 0x6d
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.ConcatIterator`1.MoveNext() + 0x5b
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1.UnionWith(IEnumerable`1) + 0x3e
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1, IEqualityComparer`1) + 0xe8
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.DistinctIterator`1.ToArray() + 0x32
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1) + 0x30
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.OrderedEnumerable`1.ToArray() + 0x34
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x26
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x1d0
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.GetAllCharacteristicsCore(Type) + 0x44
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicObject.GetCharacteristicsToApply(CharacteristicObject) + 0x3c
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.Job..cctor() + 0x218

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @MichalStrehovsky !

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit b09431c into dotnet:masterJun 22, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2022 20:34
@AndreyAkinshinAndreyAkinshin added this to the v0.13.2 milestone Jun 23, 2022
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/BenchmarkDotNet that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in dotnet#2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
adamsitnik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
* Make a bit of BenchmarkDotNet trimmable
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in #2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@adamsitnik@AndreyAkinshin
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Opt out of metadata trimming - #2020

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Opt out of metadata trimming#2020
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.

I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.

It's reflecting on a field that is not used in any other way than by unanalyzable reflection. We would previously keep all fields, irrespective of whether they're used on reflected on dotnet/runtime#70546.

Benchmark.NET should ideally <EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer> in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.
I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.
Benchmark.NET should ideally `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.
@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The failure looks like this. Normally this would be some silent weird behavior (because the field just be missing), but BenchmarkDotNet is opting into IlcGenerateCompleteTypeMetadata that creates the fields that were trimmed for reflection purposes, but makes them unusable.

2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] ---> EETypeRva:0x00AAFC80(System.Reflection.MissingRuntimeArtifactException): This object cannot be invoked because no code was generated for it: 'BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.MetaMode.BaselineCharacteristic'.
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.get_FieldAccessor() + 0x113
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.GetValue(Object) + 0xd
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.<>c.<GetThisTypeCharacteristicsCore>b__8_1(FieldInfo) + 0x16
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectArrayIterator`2.MoveNext() + 0x6d
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.ConcatIterator`1.MoveNext() + 0x5b
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1.UnionWith(IEnumerable`1) + 0x3e
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1, IEqualityComparer`1) + 0xe8
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.DistinctIterator`1.ToArray() + 0x32
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1) + 0x30
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.OrderedEnumerable`1.ToArray() + 0x34
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x26
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x1d0
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.GetAllCharacteristicsCore(Type) + 0x44
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicObject.GetCharacteristicsToApply(CharacteristicObject) + 0x3c
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.Job..cctor() + 0x218

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @MichalStrehovsky !

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit b09431c into dotnet:masterJun 22, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2022 20:34
@AndreyAkinshinAndreyAkinshin added this to the v0.13.2 milestone Jun 23, 2022
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/BenchmarkDotNet that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in dotnet#2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
adamsitnik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
* Make a bit of BenchmarkDotNet trimmable
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in #2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@adamsitnik@AndreyAkinshin
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Opt out of metadata trimming - #2020

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Opt out of metadata trimming#2020
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.

I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.

It's reflecting on a field that is not used in any other way than by unanalyzable reflection. We would previously keep all fields, irrespective of whether they're used on reflected on dotnet/runtime#70546.

Benchmark.NET should ideally <EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer> in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.
I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.
Benchmark.NET should ideally `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.
@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The failure looks like this. Normally this would be some silent weird behavior (because the field just be missing), but BenchmarkDotNet is opting into IlcGenerateCompleteTypeMetadata that creates the fields that were trimmed for reflection purposes, but makes them unusable.

2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] ---> EETypeRva:0x00AAFC80(System.Reflection.MissingRuntimeArtifactException): This object cannot be invoked because no code was generated for it: 'BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.MetaMode.BaselineCharacteristic'.
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.get_FieldAccessor() + 0x113
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.GetValue(Object) + 0xd
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.<>c.<GetThisTypeCharacteristicsCore>b__8_1(FieldInfo) + 0x16
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectArrayIterator`2.MoveNext() + 0x6d
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.ConcatIterator`1.MoveNext() + 0x5b
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1.UnionWith(IEnumerable`1) + 0x3e
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1, IEqualityComparer`1) + 0xe8
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.DistinctIterator`1.ToArray() + 0x32
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1) + 0x30
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.OrderedEnumerable`1.ToArray() + 0x34
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x26
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x1d0
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.GetAllCharacteristicsCore(Type) + 0x44
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicObject.GetCharacteristicsToApply(CharacteristicObject) + 0x3c
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.Job..cctor() + 0x218

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @MichalStrehovsky !

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit b09431c into dotnet:masterJun 22, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2022 20:34
@AndreyAkinshinAndreyAkinshin added this to the v0.13.2 milestone Jun 23, 2022
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/BenchmarkDotNet that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in dotnet#2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
adamsitnik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
* Make a bit of BenchmarkDotNet trimmable
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in #2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@adamsitnik@AndreyAkinshin
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Opt out of metadata trimming - #2020

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Opt out of metadata trimming#2020
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.

I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.

It's reflecting on a field that is not used in any other way than by unanalyzable reflection. We would previously keep all fields, irrespective of whether they're used on reflected on dotnet/runtime#70546.

Benchmark.NET should ideally <EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer> in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.
I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.
Benchmark.NET should ideally `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.
@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The failure looks like this. Normally this would be some silent weird behavior (because the field just be missing), but BenchmarkDotNet is opting into IlcGenerateCompleteTypeMetadata that creates the fields that were trimmed for reflection purposes, but makes them unusable.

2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] ---> EETypeRva:0x00AAFC80(System.Reflection.MissingRuntimeArtifactException): This object cannot be invoked because no code was generated for it: 'BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.MetaMode.BaselineCharacteristic'.
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.get_FieldAccessor() + 0x113
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.GetValue(Object) + 0xd
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.<>c.<GetThisTypeCharacteristicsCore>b__8_1(FieldInfo) + 0x16
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectArrayIterator`2.MoveNext() + 0x6d
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.ConcatIterator`1.MoveNext() + 0x5b
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1.UnionWith(IEnumerable`1) + 0x3e
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1, IEqualityComparer`1) + 0xe8
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.DistinctIterator`1.ToArray() + 0x32
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1) + 0x30
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.OrderedEnumerable`1.ToArray() + 0x34
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x26
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x1d0
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.GetAllCharacteristicsCore(Type) + 0x44
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicObject.GetCharacteristicsToApply(CharacteristicObject) + 0x3c
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.Job..cctor() + 0x218

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @MichalStrehovsky !

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit b09431c into dotnet:masterJun 22, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2022 20:34
@AndreyAkinshinAndreyAkinshin added this to the v0.13.2 milestone Jun 23, 2022
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/BenchmarkDotNet that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in dotnet#2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
adamsitnik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
* Make a bit of BenchmarkDotNet trimmable
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in #2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@adamsitnik@AndreyAkinshin
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Opt out of metadata trimming - #2020

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Opt out of metadata trimming#2020
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.

I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.

It's reflecting on a field that is not used in any other way than by unanalyzable reflection. We would previously keep all fields, irrespective of whether they're used on reflected on dotnet/runtime#70546.

Benchmark.NET should ideally <EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer> in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.
I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.
Benchmark.NET should ideally `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.
@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The failure looks like this. Normally this would be some silent weird behavior (because the field just be missing), but BenchmarkDotNet is opting into IlcGenerateCompleteTypeMetadata that creates the fields that were trimmed for reflection purposes, but makes them unusable.

2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] ---> EETypeRva:0x00AAFC80(System.Reflection.MissingRuntimeArtifactException): This object cannot be invoked because no code was generated for it: 'BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.MetaMode.BaselineCharacteristic'.
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.get_FieldAccessor() + 0x113
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.GetValue(Object) + 0xd
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.<>c.<GetThisTypeCharacteristicsCore>b__8_1(FieldInfo) + 0x16
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectArrayIterator`2.MoveNext() + 0x6d
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.ConcatIterator`1.MoveNext() + 0x5b
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1.UnionWith(IEnumerable`1) + 0x3e
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1, IEqualityComparer`1) + 0xe8
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.DistinctIterator`1.ToArray() + 0x32
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1) + 0x30
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.OrderedEnumerable`1.ToArray() + 0x34
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x26
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x1d0
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.GetAllCharacteristicsCore(Type) + 0x44
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicObject.GetCharacteristicsToApply(CharacteristicObject) + 0x3c
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.Job..cctor() + 0x218

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @MichalStrehovsky !

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit b09431c into dotnet:masterJun 22, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2022 20:34
@AndreyAkinshinAndreyAkinshin added this to the v0.13.2 milestone Jun 23, 2022
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/BenchmarkDotNet that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in dotnet#2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
adamsitnik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
* Make a bit of BenchmarkDotNet trimmable
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in #2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@adamsitnik@AndreyAkinshin
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Opt out of metadata trimming - #2020

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Opt out of metadata trimming#2020
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.

I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.

It's reflecting on a field that is not used in any other way than by unanalyzable reflection. We would previously keep all fields, irrespective of whether they're used on reflected on dotnet/runtime#70546.

Benchmark.NET should ideally <EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer> in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.
I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.
Benchmark.NET should ideally `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.
@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The failure looks like this. Normally this would be some silent weird behavior (because the field just be missing), but BenchmarkDotNet is opting into IlcGenerateCompleteTypeMetadata that creates the fields that were trimmed for reflection purposes, but makes them unusable.

2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] ---> EETypeRva:0x00AAFC80(System.Reflection.MissingRuntimeArtifactException): This object cannot be invoked because no code was generated for it: 'BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.MetaMode.BaselineCharacteristic'.
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.get_FieldAccessor() + 0x113
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.GetValue(Object) + 0xd
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.<>c.<GetThisTypeCharacteristicsCore>b__8_1(FieldInfo) + 0x16
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectArrayIterator`2.MoveNext() + 0x6d
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.ConcatIterator`1.MoveNext() + 0x5b
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1.UnionWith(IEnumerable`1) + 0x3e
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1, IEqualityComparer`1) + 0xe8
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.DistinctIterator`1.ToArray() + 0x32
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1) + 0x30
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.OrderedEnumerable`1.ToArray() + 0x34
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x26
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x1d0
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.GetAllCharacteristicsCore(Type) + 0x44
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicObject.GetCharacteristicsToApply(CharacteristicObject) + 0x3c
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.Job..cctor() + 0x218

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @MichalStrehovsky !

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit b09431c into dotnet:masterJun 22, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2022 20:34
@AndreyAkinshinAndreyAkinshin added this to the v0.13.2 milestone Jun 23, 2022
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/BenchmarkDotNet that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in dotnet#2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
adamsitnik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
* Make a bit of BenchmarkDotNet trimmable
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in #2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@adamsitnik@AndreyAkinshin
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Opt out of metadata trimming - #2020

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Opt out of metadata trimming#2020
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
MichalStrehovsky:patch-1

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.

I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.

It's reflecting on a field that is not used in any other way than by unanalyzable reflection. We would previously keep all fields, irrespective of whether they're used on reflected on dotnet/runtime#70546.

Benchmark.NET should ideally <EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer> in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.

Benchmark.NET opts itself into trimming, but it's trim compatible only by accident (it's reflecting on things that are statically referenced and therefore would be kept by IL-based trimming solutions). NativeAOT is able to trim metadata more aggressively - e.g. an accessed field might still have its name and metadata removed and the only thing that is kept is a location in memory that can be read and written.
I'm now seeing Benchmark.NET failing with latest ILCompiler packages after dotnet/runtime#70201 that enabled more aggressive trimming.
Benchmark.NET should ideally `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` in the BenchmarkDotNet.csproj project and fix all the warnings and the problem will go away. But enabling compat mode should help too.
@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Jun 16, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The failure looks like this. Normally this would be some silent weird behavior (because the field just be missing), but BenchmarkDotNet is opting into IlcGenerateCompleteTypeMetadata that creates the fields that were trimmed for reflection purposes, but makes them unusable.

2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] ---> EETypeRva:0x00AAFC80(System.Reflection.MissingRuntimeArtifactException): This object cannot be invoked because no code was generated for it: 'BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.MetaMode.BaselineCharacteristic'.
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.get_FieldAccessor() + 0x113
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Reflection.Runtime.FieldInfos.RuntimeFieldInfo.GetValue(Object) + 0xd
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.<>c.<GetThisTypeCharacteristicsCore>b__8_1(FieldInfo) + 0x16
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereSelectArrayIterator`2.MoveNext() + 0x6d
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.ConcatIterator`1.MoveNext() + 0x5b
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1.UnionWith(IEnumerable`1) + 0x3e
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Generic.HashSet`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1, IEqualityComparer`1) + 0xe8
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Enumerable.DistinctIterator`1.ToArray() + 0x32
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1) + 0x30
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Linq.OrderedEnumerable`1.ToArray() + 0x34
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x26
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.FillAllCharacteristicsCore(Type, List`1, HashSet`1) + 0x1d0
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicHelper.GetAllCharacteristicsCore(Type) + 0x44
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey, Func`2) + 0x82
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Characteristics.CharacteristicObject.GetCharacteristicsToApply(CharacteristicObject) + 0x3c
[2022/06/16 16:40:32][INFO] at BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.Job..cctor() + 0x218

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @MichalStrehovsky !

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit b09431c into dotnet:masterJun 22, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2022 20:34
@AndreyAkinshinAndreyAkinshin added this to the v0.13.2 milestone Jun 23, 2022
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/BenchmarkDotNet that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in dotnet#2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
adamsitnik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
* Make a bit of BenchmarkDotNet trimmable
Another attempt at fixing the problem I tried to fix in #2020.
In that pull request, I reflection-rooted all of BenchmarkDotNet, but that looks like it increases the size of the closure too much (dotnet/performance#2532). So here I'm rolling that part back and annotating enough of the `Characteristic` APIs to make it so that we shouldn't run into the original problem.
I basically added `<EnableTrimAnalyzer>true</EnableTrimAnalyzer>` to the BechmarkDotNet project, looked at the trimming warning in https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/blob/63e28c100a42a6492d09a0b93a8a4c141061bb0d/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Characteristics/CharacteristicHelper.cs#L49-L68 where we were getting the crash and kept getting annotations until it stopped generating new warnings.
We now have an annotation in a spot that should make sure the `Job` class has all fields and properties kept (it's used with one of the annotated `Create` methods).
There are more trimming warnings that I didn't try to solve because they're unrelated to the problem at hand.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@adamsitnik@AndreyAkinshin