[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml - #305

Merged
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests
Nov 21, 2016
Merged

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml#305
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests

Conversation

@jonpryor

@jonpryorjonpryor commented Nov 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!

When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?

The Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the Mono.Android-Tests.csproj
project contains a number of such unit tests.

The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.

In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.

The task, then, is to fix the make run-all-tests target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.

Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)

For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).

:-)

Add a new build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets file, which will
process an @(UnitTestApk) Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.

Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support @(UnitTestApk).

Update the default $(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis) value to be
armeabi-v7a:x86. The created Android emulator is x86.

: new [] { ToolPath };
string filename;
var path = Which.GetProgramLocation (ToolBaseName, out filename, dirs);
Log.LogMessage ($"# jonp: PathToolTask.GenerateFullPathToTool: path={path}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to have "# jonp:" :P

}
}

public static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, out string filename, string[] directories = null)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird spacing here

return null;
}

static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, string directory, out string filename)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, more weird spacing


Targets = targets?.ToArray ();
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (AdbTarget)}: {AdbTarget}");
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (IsValidTarget)}: {IsValidTarget}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be outputting "TargetId" and "Targets"?


string line;
while ((line = p.StandardOutput.ReadLine ()) != null) {
yield return line;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting use of yield here... I like it :)

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!
When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?
The `Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite` assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the `Mono.Android-Tests.csproj`
project contains a number of such unit tests.
The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.
In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.
The task, then, is to fix the `make run-all-tests` target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.
Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)
For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).
:-)
Add a new `build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets` file, which will
process an `@(UnitTestApk)` Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.
Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support `@(UnitTestApk)`.
Update the default `$(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis)` value to be
`armeabi-v7a:x86`. The created Android emulator is x86.
@jonpryorjonpryor removed the do-not-merge PR should not be merged. label Nov 21, 2016
@dellis1972
dellis1972 merged commit 48e3fc2 into dotnet:masterNov 21, 2016
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jonpryor@dellis1972@dnfclas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml - #305

Merged
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests
Nov 21, 2016
Merged

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml#305
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests

Conversation

@jonpryor

@jonpryorjonpryor commented Nov 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!

When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?

The Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the Mono.Android-Tests.csproj
project contains a number of such unit tests.

The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.

In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.

The task, then, is to fix the make run-all-tests target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.

Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)

For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).

:-)

Add a new build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets file, which will
process an @(UnitTestApk) Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.

Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support @(UnitTestApk).

Update the default $(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis) value to be
armeabi-v7a:x86. The created Android emulator is x86.

: new [] { ToolPath };
string filename;
var path = Which.GetProgramLocation (ToolBaseName, out filename, dirs);
Log.LogMessage ($"# jonp: PathToolTask.GenerateFullPathToTool: path={path}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to have "# jonp:" :P

}
}

public static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, out string filename, string[] directories = null)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird spacing here

return null;
}

static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, string directory, out string filename)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, more weird spacing


Targets = targets?.ToArray ();
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (AdbTarget)}: {AdbTarget}");
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (IsValidTarget)}: {IsValidTarget}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be outputting "TargetId" and "Targets"?


string line;
while ((line = p.StandardOutput.ReadLine ()) != null) {
yield return line;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting use of yield here... I like it :)

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!
When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?
The `Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite` assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the `Mono.Android-Tests.csproj`
project contains a number of such unit tests.
The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.
In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.
The task, then, is to fix the `make run-all-tests` target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.
Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)
For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).
:-)
Add a new `build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets` file, which will
process an `@(UnitTestApk)` Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.
Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support `@(UnitTestApk)`.
Update the default `$(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis)` value to be
`armeabi-v7a:x86`. The created Android emulator is x86.
@jonpryorjonpryor removed the do-not-merge PR should not be merged. label Nov 21, 2016
@dellis1972
dellis1972 merged commit 48e3fc2 into dotnet:masterNov 21, 2016
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jonpryor@dellis1972@dnfclas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml - #305

Merged
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests
Nov 21, 2016
Merged

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml#305
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests

Conversation

@jonpryor

@jonpryorjonpryor commented Nov 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!

When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?

The Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the Mono.Android-Tests.csproj
project contains a number of such unit tests.

The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.

In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.

The task, then, is to fix the make run-all-tests target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.

Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)

For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).

:-)

Add a new build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets file, which will
process an @(UnitTestApk) Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.

Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support @(UnitTestApk).

Update the default $(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis) value to be
armeabi-v7a:x86. The created Android emulator is x86.

: new [] { ToolPath };
string filename;
var path = Which.GetProgramLocation (ToolBaseName, out filename, dirs);
Log.LogMessage ($"# jonp: PathToolTask.GenerateFullPathToTool: path={path}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to have "# jonp:" :P

}
}

public static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, out string filename, string[] directories = null)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird spacing here

return null;
}

static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, string directory, out string filename)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, more weird spacing


Targets = targets?.ToArray ();
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (AdbTarget)}: {AdbTarget}");
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (IsValidTarget)}: {IsValidTarget}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be outputting "TargetId" and "Targets"?


string line;
while ((line = p.StandardOutput.ReadLine ()) != null) {
yield return line;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting use of yield here... I like it :)

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!
When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?
The `Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite` assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the `Mono.Android-Tests.csproj`
project contains a number of such unit tests.
The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.
In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.
The task, then, is to fix the `make run-all-tests` target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.
Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)
For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).
:-)
Add a new `build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets` file, which will
process an `@(UnitTestApk)` Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.
Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support `@(UnitTestApk)`.
Update the default `$(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis)` value to be
`armeabi-v7a:x86`. The created Android emulator is x86.
@jonpryorjonpryor removed the do-not-merge PR should not be merged. label Nov 21, 2016
@dellis1972
dellis1972 merged commit 48e3fc2 into dotnet:masterNov 21, 2016
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jonpryor@dellis1972@dnfclas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml - #305

Merged
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests
Nov 21, 2016
Merged

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml#305
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests

Conversation

@jonpryor

@jonpryorjonpryor commented Nov 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!

When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?

The Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the Mono.Android-Tests.csproj
project contains a number of such unit tests.

The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.

In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.

The task, then, is to fix the make run-all-tests target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.

Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)

For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).

:-)

Add a new build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets file, which will
process an @(UnitTestApk) Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.

Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support @(UnitTestApk).

Update the default $(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis) value to be
armeabi-v7a:x86. The created Android emulator is x86.

: new [] { ToolPath };
string filename;
var path = Which.GetProgramLocation (ToolBaseName, out filename, dirs);
Log.LogMessage ($"# jonp: PathToolTask.GenerateFullPathToTool: path={path}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to have "# jonp:" :P

}
}

public static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, out string filename, string[] directories = null)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird spacing here

return null;
}

static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, string directory, out string filename)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, more weird spacing


Targets = targets?.ToArray ();
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (AdbTarget)}: {AdbTarget}");
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (IsValidTarget)}: {IsValidTarget}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be outputting "TargetId" and "Targets"?


string line;
while ((line = p.StandardOutput.ReadLine ()) != null) {
yield return line;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting use of yield here... I like it :)

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!
When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?
The `Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite` assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the `Mono.Android-Tests.csproj`
project contains a number of such unit tests.
The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.
In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.
The task, then, is to fix the `make run-all-tests` target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.
Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)
For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).
:-)
Add a new `build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets` file, which will
process an `@(UnitTestApk)` Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.
Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support `@(UnitTestApk)`.
Update the default `$(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis)` value to be
`armeabi-v7a:x86`. The created Android emulator is x86.
@jonpryorjonpryor removed the do-not-merge PR should not be merged. label Nov 21, 2016
@dellis1972
dellis1972 merged commit 48e3fc2 into dotnet:masterNov 21, 2016
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jonpryor@dellis1972@dnfclas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml - #305

Merged
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests
Nov 21, 2016
Merged

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml#305
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests

Conversation

@jonpryor

@jonpryorjonpryor commented Nov 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!

When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?

The Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the Mono.Android-Tests.csproj
project contains a number of such unit tests.

The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.

In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.

The task, then, is to fix the make run-all-tests target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.

Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)

For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).

:-)

Add a new build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets file, which will
process an @(UnitTestApk) Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.

Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support @(UnitTestApk).

Update the default $(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis) value to be
armeabi-v7a:x86. The created Android emulator is x86.

: new [] { ToolPath };
string filename;
var path = Which.GetProgramLocation (ToolBaseName, out filename, dirs);
Log.LogMessage ($"# jonp: PathToolTask.GenerateFullPathToTool: path={path}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to have "# jonp:" :P

}
}

public static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, out string filename, string[] directories = null)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird spacing here

return null;
}

static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, string directory, out string filename)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, more weird spacing


Targets = targets?.ToArray ();
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (AdbTarget)}: {AdbTarget}");
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (IsValidTarget)}: {IsValidTarget}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be outputting "TargetId" and "Targets"?


string line;
while ((line = p.StandardOutput.ReadLine ()) != null) {
yield return line;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting use of yield here... I like it :)

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!
When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?
The `Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite` assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the `Mono.Android-Tests.csproj`
project contains a number of such unit tests.
The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.
In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.
The task, then, is to fix the `make run-all-tests` target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.
Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)
For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).
:-)
Add a new `build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets` file, which will
process an `@(UnitTestApk)` Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.
Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support `@(UnitTestApk)`.
Update the default `$(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis)` value to be
`armeabi-v7a:x86`. The created Android emulator is x86.
@jonpryorjonpryor removed the do-not-merge PR should not be merged. label Nov 21, 2016
@dellis1972
dellis1972 merged commit 48e3fc2 into dotnet:masterNov 21, 2016
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jonpryor@dellis1972@dnfclas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml - #305

Merged
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests
Nov 21, 2016
Merged

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml#305
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests

Conversation

@jonpryor

@jonpryorjonpryor commented Nov 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!

When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?

The Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the Mono.Android-Tests.csproj
project contains a number of such unit tests.

The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.

In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.

The task, then, is to fix the make run-all-tests target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.

Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)

For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).

:-)

Add a new build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets file, which will
process an @(UnitTestApk) Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.

Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support @(UnitTestApk).

Update the default $(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis) value to be
armeabi-v7a:x86. The created Android emulator is x86.

: new [] { ToolPath };
string filename;
var path = Which.GetProgramLocation (ToolBaseName, out filename, dirs);
Log.LogMessage ($"# jonp: PathToolTask.GenerateFullPathToTool: path={path}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to have "# jonp:" :P

}
}

public static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, out string filename, string[] directories = null)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird spacing here

return null;
}

static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, string directory, out string filename)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, more weird spacing


Targets = targets?.ToArray ();
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (AdbTarget)}: {AdbTarget}");
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (IsValidTarget)}: {IsValidTarget}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be outputting "TargetId" and "Targets"?


string line;
while ((line = p.StandardOutput.ReadLine ()) != null) {
yield return line;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting use of yield here... I like it :)

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!
When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?
The `Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite` assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the `Mono.Android-Tests.csproj`
project contains a number of such unit tests.
The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.
In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.
The task, then, is to fix the `make run-all-tests` target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.
Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)
For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).
:-)
Add a new `build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets` file, which will
process an `@(UnitTestApk)` Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.
Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support `@(UnitTestApk)`.
Update the default `$(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis)` value to be
`armeabi-v7a:x86`. The created Android emulator is x86.
@jonpryorjonpryor removed the do-not-merge PR should not be merged. label Nov 21, 2016
@dellis1972
dellis1972 merged commit 48e3fc2 into dotnet:masterNov 21, 2016
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jonpryor@dellis1972@dnfclas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml - #305

Merged
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests
Nov 21, 2016
Merged

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml#305
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests

Conversation

@jonpryor

@jonpryorjonpryor commented Nov 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!

When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?

The Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the Mono.Android-Tests.csproj
project contains a number of such unit tests.

The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.

In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.

The task, then, is to fix the make run-all-tests target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.

Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)

For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).

:-)

Add a new build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets file, which will
process an @(UnitTestApk) Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.

Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support @(UnitTestApk).

Update the default $(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis) value to be
armeabi-v7a:x86. The created Android emulator is x86.

: new [] { ToolPath };
string filename;
var path = Which.GetProgramLocation (ToolBaseName, out filename, dirs);
Log.LogMessage ($"# jonp: PathToolTask.GenerateFullPathToTool: path={path}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to have "# jonp:" :P

}
}

public static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, out string filename, string[] directories = null)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird spacing here

return null;
}

static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, string directory, out string filename)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, more weird spacing


Targets = targets?.ToArray ();
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (AdbTarget)}: {AdbTarget}");
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (IsValidTarget)}: {IsValidTarget}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be outputting "TargetId" and "Targets"?


string line;
while ((line = p.StandardOutput.ReadLine ()) != null) {
yield return line;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting use of yield here... I like it :)

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!
When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?
The `Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite` assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the `Mono.Android-Tests.csproj`
project contains a number of such unit tests.
The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.
In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.
The task, then, is to fix the `make run-all-tests` target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.
Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)
For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).
:-)
Add a new `build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets` file, which will
process an `@(UnitTestApk)` Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.
Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support `@(UnitTestApk)`.
Update the default `$(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis)` value to be
`armeabi-v7a:x86`. The created Android emulator is x86.
@jonpryorjonpryor removed the do-not-merge PR should not be merged. label Nov 21, 2016
@dellis1972
dellis1972 merged commit 48e3fc2 into dotnet:masterNov 21, 2016
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jonpryor@dellis1972@dnfclas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml - #305

Merged
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests
Nov 21, 2016
Merged

[tests] Run .apk unit tests and collect TestResults.xml#305
dellis1972 merged 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
jonpryor:jonp-run-tests

Conversation

@jonpryor

@jonpryorjonpryor commented Nov 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!

When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?

The Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the Mono.Android-Tests.csproj
project contains a number of such unit tests.

The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.

In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.

The task, then, is to fix the make run-all-tests target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.

Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)

For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).

:-)

Add a new build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets file, which will
process an @(UnitTestApk) Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.

Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support @(UnitTestApk).

Update the default $(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis) value to be
armeabi-v7a:x86. The created Android emulator is x86.

: new [] { ToolPath };
string filename;
var path = Which.GetProgramLocation (ToolBaseName, out filename, dirs);
Log.LogMessage ($"# jonp: PathToolTask.GenerateFullPathToTool: path={path}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to have "# jonp:" :P

}
}

public static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, out string filename, string[] directories = null)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird spacing here

return null;
}

static string GetProgramLocation (string programBasename, string directory, out string filename)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, more weird spacing


Targets = targets?.ToArray ();
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (AdbTarget)}: {AdbTarget}");
// Log.LogMessage (MessageImportance.Low, $" [Output] {nameof (IsValidTarget)}: {IsValidTarget}");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should these be outputting "TargetId" and "Targets"?


string line;
while ((line = p.StandardOutput.ReadLine ()) != null) {
yield return line;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting use of yield here... I like it :)

What do we want? Execution of unit tests!
When do we want it? Uh...4 months ago?
The `Xamarin.Android.NUnitLite` assembly allows writing NUnit-based
unit tests that execute on-device, and the `Mono.Android-Tests.csproj`
project contains a number of such unit tests.
The problem is that these unit tests aren't executed as part of the
Jenkins build process, so there's no way to know if a given commit
actually breaks anything.
In short, the existence of those unit tests is meaningless.
The task, then, is to fix the `make run-all-tests` target so that it
runs on-device unit tests...on an Android device.
Which raises all manner of problems. :-) (Hence 4+ months!)
For starters, our internal tooling is a horrible mish-mash of make(1),
ruby(1), bash(1), which creates an emulator, launches it, installs the
test .apk onto the emulator, and runs the tests. I don't want all of
that "cruft" in this repo, which means it needs to be rewritten in a
form more amenable to this repo: MSBuild tasks....and some make(1).
:-)
Add a new `build-tools/scripts/UnitTestApks.targets` file, which will
process an `@(UnitTestApk)` Item Group to permit deploying, running,
and undeploying test .apks from an attached Android device.
Add a slew of MSBuild tasks to support `@(UnitTestApk)`.
Update the default `$(AndroidSupportedTargetJitAbis)` value to be
`armeabi-v7a:x86`. The created Android emulator is x86.
@jonpryorjonpryor removed the do-not-merge PR should not be merged. label Nov 21, 2016
@dellis1972
dellis1972 merged commit 48e3fc2 into dotnet:masterNov 21, 2016
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jonpryor@dellis1972@dnfclas