Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Run tests under CoreCLR - #9863
Conversation
grendello
commented
Feb 28, 2025
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines failed to run 1 pipeline(s). |
a29ba59 to
a9f513fComparegrendello
commented
Mar 6, 2025
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
b90d3d1 to
aea3b79Comparegrendello
commented
Mar 11, 2025
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
15d87f9 to
d3e28deComparegrendello
commented
Mar 12, 2025
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
026cd0f to
f99ba5aComparegrendello
commented
Mar 13, 2025
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
d6e6d70 to
e5d04efComparegrendello
commented
Mar 17, 2025
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
grendello
commented
Mar 17, 2025
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
9e821b5 to
b47f929Compare
pjcollins
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given the timeframe for 'official' support I think we may be better served by incrementally adding tests for additional runtime configurations? For instance, Peppers has a WIP Mono.Android tests flavor addition here #9916 which will bring in some CoreCLR coverage.
In addition to that, perhaps we could just parameterize one or more of the Build/Packaging and Deploy/Debug tests to run against CoreCLR for now, rather than duplicating all of our test stages?
As we get closer to 'official' support we'll need to reevaluate and determine whether we want all PR builds to run all tests against all runtime flavors (similar to the current approach in this PR). Some alternatives to this approach that may be worth considering would be:
- Adding duplicate test stages for new runtime flavors to the nightly build
- Creating additional separate pipeline(s) that can be triggered automatically or manually based on certain code path changes or when we otherwise determine we want additioinal runtime flavor coverage
acbc518 to
a952745Compare1bd4f5f to
88cecfaComparegrendello
commented
May 29, 2025
This PR has already served its purpose, no longer needed. |
This PR actually enables building of the CoreCLR host added to
mainin #9572The goal is to fix all the failing tests, possibly add new ones.