Merge changes from upstream - #186

Merged
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Merge changes from upstream#186
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This brings in the latest cecil changes from upstream. Importantly, includes:

Joshua Petersonand others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 09:53
…ion (jbevain#882)
When all other comparisons (return type, parameters, etc.) are the same,
treat instance and static methods with the same name as different
methods.
This corrects a problem we noticed in IL2CPP in Unity.
…vain#879)
During `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` there is a call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`
```
if (module.IsWindowsMetadata ())
foreach (var custom_attribute in custom_attributes)
WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project (owner, custom_attributes, custom_attribute);
```
`WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` would call `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute`, which would then call `type.CustomAttributes`, which would end up back in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`. This would lead to a StackOverflowException.
This wasn't an issue previously. My PR jbevain#843 caused this sequence of calls to start resulting in a StackOverflowException.
Prior to my PR, there was a call to `metadata.RemoveCustomAttributeRange (owner);` before the call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`. This meant that when `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute` would call `type.CustomAttributes`, we'd still end up in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`, however, no attributes would be found because the following if would be true and lead to returning an empty collection.
```
if (!metadata.TryGetCustomAttributeRanges (owner, out ranges))
return new Collection<CustomAttribute> ();
```
The old behavior was probably the wrong. Although I'm not certain what the tangible impact was.
The fix was pretty easy. `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` will now pass in the custom attributes to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` avoiding the need to call `type.CustomAttributes`
* Fix RVA field alignment
* Use non-latest images to run tests
* Revert windows-2019 change
* Don't align code segment
This wasn't aligned to begin with. Attempting to align it causes problems
due to the way CodeWriter gets the code RVA - it computes the RVA
from the CLI Header length, which doesn't take into account the code's
alignment requirements.
* Revert "Don't align code segment"
This reverts commit 9410f1e.
* Keep alignment values for code
With MSBuild 7.0.201 and later, building the Mono.Cecil projects used by
Unity's IL2CPP causes warning NU1605 to occur, indicating that there is
a package version mismatch between the .NET Framework reference
assemblies package used. To avoid this, bump the version used by
Mono.Cecil and similar project to be the latest, version 1.0.3.
Note that MSBuild version 7.0.100 and earlier did not cause this warning
to occur.
Co-authored-by: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
When resolving a `GenericInstanceMethod` for a `privatescope` method that has the same signature as other methods, `MetadataResolver.GetMethod` would incorrectly return the first method with the same name.
The fix for this seems to be an optimization opportunity as well. Although I have to admit it feels a little to easy. Please make sure I'm not overlooking some reason why this fix is not safe.
A added 2 variations of tests.
`PrivateScope` - These tests were fine and passed as is. This is because the instruction operands are MethodDefinitions and therefore didn't need to be resolved by `MetadataResolver`
`PrivateScopeGeneric` - This test triggered the bug.
* Add new flag for ByRefLike constraints
* Allow seems to be the prefered nomenclature
@sbomer
sbomer requested a review from jtschusterJune 5, 2024 22:59
@marek-safar
marek-safar merged commit 5c9255f into dotnet:mainJun 6, 2024
@sbomersbomer mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sbomer@marek-safar@mrvoorhe@nulldatamap@jbevain
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Merge changes from upstream - #186

Merged
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Merge changes from upstream#186
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This brings in the latest cecil changes from upstream. Importantly, includes:

Joshua Petersonand others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 09:53
…ion (jbevain#882)
When all other comparisons (return type, parameters, etc.) are the same,
treat instance and static methods with the same name as different
methods.
This corrects a problem we noticed in IL2CPP in Unity.
…vain#879)
During `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` there is a call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`
```
if (module.IsWindowsMetadata ())
foreach (var custom_attribute in custom_attributes)
WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project (owner, custom_attributes, custom_attribute);
```
`WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` would call `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute`, which would then call `type.CustomAttributes`, which would end up back in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`. This would lead to a StackOverflowException.
This wasn't an issue previously. My PR jbevain#843 caused this sequence of calls to start resulting in a StackOverflowException.
Prior to my PR, there was a call to `metadata.RemoveCustomAttributeRange (owner);` before the call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`. This meant that when `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute` would call `type.CustomAttributes`, we'd still end up in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`, however, no attributes would be found because the following if would be true and lead to returning an empty collection.
```
if (!metadata.TryGetCustomAttributeRanges (owner, out ranges))
return new Collection<CustomAttribute> ();
```
The old behavior was probably the wrong. Although I'm not certain what the tangible impact was.
The fix was pretty easy. `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` will now pass in the custom attributes to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` avoiding the need to call `type.CustomAttributes`
* Fix RVA field alignment
* Use non-latest images to run tests
* Revert windows-2019 change
* Don't align code segment
This wasn't aligned to begin with. Attempting to align it causes problems
due to the way CodeWriter gets the code RVA - it computes the RVA
from the CLI Header length, which doesn't take into account the code's
alignment requirements.
* Revert "Don't align code segment"
This reverts commit 9410f1e.
* Keep alignment values for code
With MSBuild 7.0.201 and later, building the Mono.Cecil projects used by
Unity's IL2CPP causes warning NU1605 to occur, indicating that there is
a package version mismatch between the .NET Framework reference
assemblies package used. To avoid this, bump the version used by
Mono.Cecil and similar project to be the latest, version 1.0.3.
Note that MSBuild version 7.0.100 and earlier did not cause this warning
to occur.
Co-authored-by: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
When resolving a `GenericInstanceMethod` for a `privatescope` method that has the same signature as other methods, `MetadataResolver.GetMethod` would incorrectly return the first method with the same name.
The fix for this seems to be an optimization opportunity as well. Although I have to admit it feels a little to easy. Please make sure I'm not overlooking some reason why this fix is not safe.
A added 2 variations of tests.
`PrivateScope` - These tests were fine and passed as is. This is because the instruction operands are MethodDefinitions and therefore didn't need to be resolved by `MetadataResolver`
`PrivateScopeGeneric` - This test triggered the bug.
* Add new flag for ByRefLike constraints
* Allow seems to be the prefered nomenclature
@sbomer
sbomer requested a review from jtschusterJune 5, 2024 22:59
@marek-safar
marek-safar merged commit 5c9255f into dotnet:mainJun 6, 2024
@sbomersbomer mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sbomer@marek-safar@mrvoorhe@nulldatamap@jbevain
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Merge changes from upstream - #186

Merged
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Merge changes from upstream#186
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This brings in the latest cecil changes from upstream. Importantly, includes:

Joshua Petersonand others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 09:53
…ion (jbevain#882)
When all other comparisons (return type, parameters, etc.) are the same,
treat instance and static methods with the same name as different
methods.
This corrects a problem we noticed in IL2CPP in Unity.
…vain#879)
During `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` there is a call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`
```
if (module.IsWindowsMetadata ())
foreach (var custom_attribute in custom_attributes)
WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project (owner, custom_attributes, custom_attribute);
```
`WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` would call `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute`, which would then call `type.CustomAttributes`, which would end up back in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`. This would lead to a StackOverflowException.
This wasn't an issue previously. My PR jbevain#843 caused this sequence of calls to start resulting in a StackOverflowException.
Prior to my PR, there was a call to `metadata.RemoveCustomAttributeRange (owner);` before the call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`. This meant that when `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute` would call `type.CustomAttributes`, we'd still end up in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`, however, no attributes would be found because the following if would be true and lead to returning an empty collection.
```
if (!metadata.TryGetCustomAttributeRanges (owner, out ranges))
return new Collection<CustomAttribute> ();
```
The old behavior was probably the wrong. Although I'm not certain what the tangible impact was.
The fix was pretty easy. `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` will now pass in the custom attributes to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` avoiding the need to call `type.CustomAttributes`
* Fix RVA field alignment
* Use non-latest images to run tests
* Revert windows-2019 change
* Don't align code segment
This wasn't aligned to begin with. Attempting to align it causes problems
due to the way CodeWriter gets the code RVA - it computes the RVA
from the CLI Header length, which doesn't take into account the code's
alignment requirements.
* Revert "Don't align code segment"
This reverts commit 9410f1e.
* Keep alignment values for code
With MSBuild 7.0.201 and later, building the Mono.Cecil projects used by
Unity's IL2CPP causes warning NU1605 to occur, indicating that there is
a package version mismatch between the .NET Framework reference
assemblies package used. To avoid this, bump the version used by
Mono.Cecil and similar project to be the latest, version 1.0.3.
Note that MSBuild version 7.0.100 and earlier did not cause this warning
to occur.
Co-authored-by: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
When resolving a `GenericInstanceMethod` for a `privatescope` method that has the same signature as other methods, `MetadataResolver.GetMethod` would incorrectly return the first method with the same name.
The fix for this seems to be an optimization opportunity as well. Although I have to admit it feels a little to easy. Please make sure I'm not overlooking some reason why this fix is not safe.
A added 2 variations of tests.
`PrivateScope` - These tests were fine and passed as is. This is because the instruction operands are MethodDefinitions and therefore didn't need to be resolved by `MetadataResolver`
`PrivateScopeGeneric` - This test triggered the bug.
* Add new flag for ByRefLike constraints
* Allow seems to be the prefered nomenclature
@sbomer
sbomer requested a review from jtschusterJune 5, 2024 22:59
@marek-safar
marek-safar merged commit 5c9255f into dotnet:mainJun 6, 2024
@sbomersbomer mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sbomer@marek-safar@mrvoorhe@nulldatamap@jbevain
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Merge changes from upstream - #186

Merged
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Merge changes from upstream#186
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This brings in the latest cecil changes from upstream. Importantly, includes:

Joshua Petersonand others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 09:53
…ion (jbevain#882)
When all other comparisons (return type, parameters, etc.) are the same,
treat instance and static methods with the same name as different
methods.
This corrects a problem we noticed in IL2CPP in Unity.
…vain#879)
During `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` there is a call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`
```
if (module.IsWindowsMetadata ())
foreach (var custom_attribute in custom_attributes)
WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project (owner, custom_attributes, custom_attribute);
```
`WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` would call `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute`, which would then call `type.CustomAttributes`, which would end up back in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`. This would lead to a StackOverflowException.
This wasn't an issue previously. My PR jbevain#843 caused this sequence of calls to start resulting in a StackOverflowException.
Prior to my PR, there was a call to `metadata.RemoveCustomAttributeRange (owner);` before the call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`. This meant that when `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute` would call `type.CustomAttributes`, we'd still end up in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`, however, no attributes would be found because the following if would be true and lead to returning an empty collection.
```
if (!metadata.TryGetCustomAttributeRanges (owner, out ranges))
return new Collection<CustomAttribute> ();
```
The old behavior was probably the wrong. Although I'm not certain what the tangible impact was.
The fix was pretty easy. `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` will now pass in the custom attributes to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` avoiding the need to call `type.CustomAttributes`
* Fix RVA field alignment
* Use non-latest images to run tests
* Revert windows-2019 change
* Don't align code segment
This wasn't aligned to begin with. Attempting to align it causes problems
due to the way CodeWriter gets the code RVA - it computes the RVA
from the CLI Header length, which doesn't take into account the code's
alignment requirements.
* Revert "Don't align code segment"
This reverts commit 9410f1e.
* Keep alignment values for code
With MSBuild 7.0.201 and later, building the Mono.Cecil projects used by
Unity's IL2CPP causes warning NU1605 to occur, indicating that there is
a package version mismatch between the .NET Framework reference
assemblies package used. To avoid this, bump the version used by
Mono.Cecil and similar project to be the latest, version 1.0.3.
Note that MSBuild version 7.0.100 and earlier did not cause this warning
to occur.
Co-authored-by: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
When resolving a `GenericInstanceMethod` for a `privatescope` method that has the same signature as other methods, `MetadataResolver.GetMethod` would incorrectly return the first method with the same name.
The fix for this seems to be an optimization opportunity as well. Although I have to admit it feels a little to easy. Please make sure I'm not overlooking some reason why this fix is not safe.
A added 2 variations of tests.
`PrivateScope` - These tests were fine and passed as is. This is because the instruction operands are MethodDefinitions and therefore didn't need to be resolved by `MetadataResolver`
`PrivateScopeGeneric` - This test triggered the bug.
* Add new flag for ByRefLike constraints
* Allow seems to be the prefered nomenclature
@sbomer
sbomer requested a review from jtschusterJune 5, 2024 22:59
@marek-safar
marek-safar merged commit 5c9255f into dotnet:mainJun 6, 2024
@sbomersbomer mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sbomer@marek-safar@mrvoorhe@nulldatamap@jbevain
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Merge changes from upstream - #186

Merged
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Merge changes from upstream#186
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This brings in the latest cecil changes from upstream. Importantly, includes:

Joshua Petersonand others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 09:53
…ion (jbevain#882)
When all other comparisons (return type, parameters, etc.) are the same,
treat instance and static methods with the same name as different
methods.
This corrects a problem we noticed in IL2CPP in Unity.
…vain#879)
During `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` there is a call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`
```
if (module.IsWindowsMetadata ())
foreach (var custom_attribute in custom_attributes)
WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project (owner, custom_attributes, custom_attribute);
```
`WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` would call `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute`, which would then call `type.CustomAttributes`, which would end up back in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`. This would lead to a StackOverflowException.
This wasn't an issue previously. My PR jbevain#843 caused this sequence of calls to start resulting in a StackOverflowException.
Prior to my PR, there was a call to `metadata.RemoveCustomAttributeRange (owner);` before the call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`. This meant that when `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute` would call `type.CustomAttributes`, we'd still end up in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`, however, no attributes would be found because the following if would be true and lead to returning an empty collection.
```
if (!metadata.TryGetCustomAttributeRanges (owner, out ranges))
return new Collection<CustomAttribute> ();
```
The old behavior was probably the wrong. Although I'm not certain what the tangible impact was.
The fix was pretty easy. `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` will now pass in the custom attributes to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` avoiding the need to call `type.CustomAttributes`
* Fix RVA field alignment
* Use non-latest images to run tests
* Revert windows-2019 change
* Don't align code segment
This wasn't aligned to begin with. Attempting to align it causes problems
due to the way CodeWriter gets the code RVA - it computes the RVA
from the CLI Header length, which doesn't take into account the code's
alignment requirements.
* Revert "Don't align code segment"
This reverts commit 9410f1e.
* Keep alignment values for code
With MSBuild 7.0.201 and later, building the Mono.Cecil projects used by
Unity's IL2CPP causes warning NU1605 to occur, indicating that there is
a package version mismatch between the .NET Framework reference
assemblies package used. To avoid this, bump the version used by
Mono.Cecil and similar project to be the latest, version 1.0.3.
Note that MSBuild version 7.0.100 and earlier did not cause this warning
to occur.
Co-authored-by: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
When resolving a `GenericInstanceMethod` for a `privatescope` method that has the same signature as other methods, `MetadataResolver.GetMethod` would incorrectly return the first method with the same name.
The fix for this seems to be an optimization opportunity as well. Although I have to admit it feels a little to easy. Please make sure I'm not overlooking some reason why this fix is not safe.
A added 2 variations of tests.
`PrivateScope` - These tests were fine and passed as is. This is because the instruction operands are MethodDefinitions and therefore didn't need to be resolved by `MetadataResolver`
`PrivateScopeGeneric` - This test triggered the bug.
* Add new flag for ByRefLike constraints
* Allow seems to be the prefered nomenclature
@sbomer
sbomer requested a review from jtschusterJune 5, 2024 22:59
@marek-safar
marek-safar merged commit 5c9255f into dotnet:mainJun 6, 2024
@sbomersbomer mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sbomer@marek-safar@mrvoorhe@nulldatamap@jbevain
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Merge changes from upstream - #186

Merged
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Merge changes from upstream#186
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This brings in the latest cecil changes from upstream. Importantly, includes:

Joshua Petersonand others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 09:53
…ion (jbevain#882)
When all other comparisons (return type, parameters, etc.) are the same,
treat instance and static methods with the same name as different
methods.
This corrects a problem we noticed in IL2CPP in Unity.
…vain#879)
During `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` there is a call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`
```
if (module.IsWindowsMetadata ())
foreach (var custom_attribute in custom_attributes)
WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project (owner, custom_attributes, custom_attribute);
```
`WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` would call `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute`, which would then call `type.CustomAttributes`, which would end up back in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`. This would lead to a StackOverflowException.
This wasn't an issue previously. My PR jbevain#843 caused this sequence of calls to start resulting in a StackOverflowException.
Prior to my PR, there was a call to `metadata.RemoveCustomAttributeRange (owner);` before the call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`. This meant that when `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute` would call `type.CustomAttributes`, we'd still end up in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`, however, no attributes would be found because the following if would be true and lead to returning an empty collection.
```
if (!metadata.TryGetCustomAttributeRanges (owner, out ranges))
return new Collection<CustomAttribute> ();
```
The old behavior was probably the wrong. Although I'm not certain what the tangible impact was.
The fix was pretty easy. `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` will now pass in the custom attributes to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` avoiding the need to call `type.CustomAttributes`
* Fix RVA field alignment
* Use non-latest images to run tests
* Revert windows-2019 change
* Don't align code segment
This wasn't aligned to begin with. Attempting to align it causes problems
due to the way CodeWriter gets the code RVA - it computes the RVA
from the CLI Header length, which doesn't take into account the code's
alignment requirements.
* Revert "Don't align code segment"
This reverts commit 9410f1e.
* Keep alignment values for code
With MSBuild 7.0.201 and later, building the Mono.Cecil projects used by
Unity's IL2CPP causes warning NU1605 to occur, indicating that there is
a package version mismatch between the .NET Framework reference
assemblies package used. To avoid this, bump the version used by
Mono.Cecil and similar project to be the latest, version 1.0.3.
Note that MSBuild version 7.0.100 and earlier did not cause this warning
to occur.
Co-authored-by: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
When resolving a `GenericInstanceMethod` for a `privatescope` method that has the same signature as other methods, `MetadataResolver.GetMethod` would incorrectly return the first method with the same name.
The fix for this seems to be an optimization opportunity as well. Although I have to admit it feels a little to easy. Please make sure I'm not overlooking some reason why this fix is not safe.
A added 2 variations of tests.
`PrivateScope` - These tests were fine and passed as is. This is because the instruction operands are MethodDefinitions and therefore didn't need to be resolved by `MetadataResolver`
`PrivateScopeGeneric` - This test triggered the bug.
* Add new flag for ByRefLike constraints
* Allow seems to be the prefered nomenclature
@sbomer
sbomer requested a review from jtschusterJune 5, 2024 22:59
@marek-safar
marek-safar merged commit 5c9255f into dotnet:mainJun 6, 2024
@sbomersbomer mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sbomer@marek-safar@mrvoorhe@nulldatamap@jbevain
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Merge changes from upstream - #186

Merged
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Merge changes from upstream#186
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This brings in the latest cecil changes from upstream. Importantly, includes:

Joshua Petersonand others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 09:53
…ion (jbevain#882)
When all other comparisons (return type, parameters, etc.) are the same,
treat instance and static methods with the same name as different
methods.
This corrects a problem we noticed in IL2CPP in Unity.
…vain#879)
During `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` there is a call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`
```
if (module.IsWindowsMetadata ())
foreach (var custom_attribute in custom_attributes)
WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project (owner, custom_attributes, custom_attribute);
```
`WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` would call `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute`, which would then call `type.CustomAttributes`, which would end up back in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`. This would lead to a StackOverflowException.
This wasn't an issue previously. My PR jbevain#843 caused this sequence of calls to start resulting in a StackOverflowException.
Prior to my PR, there was a call to `metadata.RemoveCustomAttributeRange (owner);` before the call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`. This meant that when `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute` would call `type.CustomAttributes`, we'd still end up in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`, however, no attributes would be found because the following if would be true and lead to returning an empty collection.
```
if (!metadata.TryGetCustomAttributeRanges (owner, out ranges))
return new Collection<CustomAttribute> ();
```
The old behavior was probably the wrong. Although I'm not certain what the tangible impact was.
The fix was pretty easy. `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` will now pass in the custom attributes to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` avoiding the need to call `type.CustomAttributes`
* Fix RVA field alignment
* Use non-latest images to run tests
* Revert windows-2019 change
* Don't align code segment
This wasn't aligned to begin with. Attempting to align it causes problems
due to the way CodeWriter gets the code RVA - it computes the RVA
from the CLI Header length, which doesn't take into account the code's
alignment requirements.
* Revert "Don't align code segment"
This reverts commit 9410f1e.
* Keep alignment values for code
With MSBuild 7.0.201 and later, building the Mono.Cecil projects used by
Unity's IL2CPP causes warning NU1605 to occur, indicating that there is
a package version mismatch between the .NET Framework reference
assemblies package used. To avoid this, bump the version used by
Mono.Cecil and similar project to be the latest, version 1.0.3.
Note that MSBuild version 7.0.100 and earlier did not cause this warning
to occur.
Co-authored-by: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
When resolving a `GenericInstanceMethod` for a `privatescope` method that has the same signature as other methods, `MetadataResolver.GetMethod` would incorrectly return the first method with the same name.
The fix for this seems to be an optimization opportunity as well. Although I have to admit it feels a little to easy. Please make sure I'm not overlooking some reason why this fix is not safe.
A added 2 variations of tests.
`PrivateScope` - These tests were fine and passed as is. This is because the instruction operands are MethodDefinitions and therefore didn't need to be resolved by `MetadataResolver`
`PrivateScopeGeneric` - This test triggered the bug.
* Add new flag for ByRefLike constraints
* Allow seems to be the prefered nomenclature
@sbomer
sbomer requested a review from jtschusterJune 5, 2024 22:59
@marek-safar
marek-safar merged commit 5c9255f into dotnet:mainJun 6, 2024
@sbomersbomer mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sbomer@marek-safar@mrvoorhe@nulldatamap@jbevain
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Merge changes from upstream - #186

Merged
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Merge changes from upstream#186
marek-safar merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:mergeUpstream

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This brings in the latest cecil changes from upstream. Importantly, includes:

Joshua Petersonand others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 09:53
…ion (jbevain#882)
When all other comparisons (return type, parameters, etc.) are the same,
treat instance and static methods with the same name as different
methods.
This corrects a problem we noticed in IL2CPP in Unity.
…vain#879)
During `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` there is a call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`
```
if (module.IsWindowsMetadata ())
foreach (var custom_attribute in custom_attributes)
WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project (owner, custom_attributes, custom_attribute);
```
`WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` would call `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute`, which would then call `type.CustomAttributes`, which would end up back in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`. This would lead to a StackOverflowException.
This wasn't an issue previously. My PR jbevain#843 caused this sequence of calls to start resulting in a StackOverflowException.
Prior to my PR, there was a call to `metadata.RemoveCustomAttributeRange (owner);` before the call to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project`. This meant that when `WindowsRuntimeProjections.HasAttribute` would call `type.CustomAttributes`, we'd still end up in `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes`, however, no attributes would be found because the following if would be true and lead to returning an empty collection.
```
if (!metadata.TryGetCustomAttributeRanges (owner, out ranges))
return new Collection<CustomAttribute> ();
```
The old behavior was probably the wrong. Although I'm not certain what the tangible impact was.
The fix was pretty easy. `AssemblyReader.ReadCustomAttributes` will now pass in the custom attributes to `WindowsRuntimeProjections.Project` avoiding the need to call `type.CustomAttributes`
* Fix RVA field alignment
* Use non-latest images to run tests
* Revert windows-2019 change
* Don't align code segment
This wasn't aligned to begin with. Attempting to align it causes problems
due to the way CodeWriter gets the code RVA - it computes the RVA
from the CLI Header length, which doesn't take into account the code's
alignment requirements.
* Revert "Don't align code segment"
This reverts commit 9410f1e.
* Keep alignment values for code
With MSBuild 7.0.201 and later, building the Mono.Cecil projects used by
Unity's IL2CPP causes warning NU1605 to occur, indicating that there is
a package version mismatch between the .NET Framework reference
assemblies package used. To avoid this, bump the version used by
Mono.Cecil and similar project to be the latest, version 1.0.3.
Note that MSBuild version 7.0.100 and earlier did not cause this warning
to occur.
Co-authored-by: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
When resolving a `GenericInstanceMethod` for a `privatescope` method that has the same signature as other methods, `MetadataResolver.GetMethod` would incorrectly return the first method with the same name.
The fix for this seems to be an optimization opportunity as well. Although I have to admit it feels a little to easy. Please make sure I'm not overlooking some reason why this fix is not safe.
A added 2 variations of tests.
`PrivateScope` - These tests were fine and passed as is. This is because the instruction operands are MethodDefinitions and therefore didn't need to be resolved by `MetadataResolver`
`PrivateScopeGeneric` - This test triggered the bug.
* Add new flag for ByRefLike constraints
* Allow seems to be the prefered nomenclature
@sbomer
sbomer requested a review from jtschusterJune 5, 2024 22:59
@marek-safar
marek-safar merged commit 5c9255f into dotnet:mainJun 6, 2024
@sbomersbomer mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sbomer@marek-safar@mrvoorhe@nulldatamap@jbevain