[Breaking change]: C# overload resolution prefers span overloads which might not work in Expression lambdas #43952

Description

@jjonescz

Description

C# 14 introduces new built-in span conversions and type inference rules making overloads with span parameters applicable in more scenarios.

However, Expression lambdas cannot be interpreted when they involve ref structs like Span and ReadOnlySpan. For example:

usingSystem;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>exp=(array,num)=>array.Contains(num);exp.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);// fails at runtime in C# 14

The array.Contains binds to Enumerable.Contains in C# 13 but binds to MemoryExtensions.Contains in C# 14. The latter involves ReadOnlySpan and hence crashes when Expression.Compile(preferInterpretation: true) is called.

Version

.NET 10 Preview 1

Previous behavior

In C# 13 and earlier, an extension method taking a ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> receiver is not applicable to a value of type T[]. Therefore, only non-span extension methods like the ones from the System.Linq.Enumerable class are usually bound inside Expression lambdas.

New behavior

In C# 14 and later, methods with ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> parameters can participate in type inference or be used as extension methods in more scenarios. This makes span-based methods like the ones from the System.MemoryExtensions class bind in more scenarios, including inside Expression lambdas where they will cause runtime exceptions when compiled with interpretation.

Type of breaking change

  • Binary incompatible: Existing binaries might encounter a breaking change in behavior, such as failure to load or execute, and if so, require recompilation.
  • Source incompatible: When recompiled using the new SDK or component or to target the new runtime, existing source code might require source changes to compile successfully.
  • Behavioral change: Existing binaries might behave differently at run time.

Reason for change

The C# language feature allows simplified API design and usage (e.g., one ReadOnlySpan extension method can apply to both spans and arrays).

Recommended action

If you need to continue using Expression interpretation, you should make sure the non-span overloads are bound, e.g., by casting arguments to the exact types the method signature takes or calling the extension methods as explicit static invocations:

usingSystem;usingSystem.Collections.Generic;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;M((array,num)=>array.Contains(num));// fails, binds to MemoryExtensions.ContainsM((array,num)=>((IEnumerable<int>)array).Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>array.AsEnumerable().Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>Enumerable.Contains(array,num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsvoidM(Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>e)=>e.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);

Feature area

Other (please put exact area in description textbox)

Affected APIs

System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Compile

Associated WorkItem - 360646

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

🏁 Release: .NET 10Work items for the .NET 10 release📌 seQUESTeredIdentifies that an issue has been imported into Quest.breaking-changeIndicates a .NET Core breaking changein-prThis issue will be closed (fixed) by an active pull request.

Type

No type

Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    [Breaking change]: C# overload resolution prefers span overloads which might not work in Expression lambdas #43952

    Description

    @jjonescz

    Description

    C# 14 introduces new built-in span conversions and type inference rules making overloads with span parameters applicable in more scenarios.

    However, Expression lambdas cannot be interpreted when they involve ref structs like Span and ReadOnlySpan. For example:

    usingSystem;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>exp=(array,num)=>array.Contains(num);exp.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);// fails at runtime in C# 14

    The array.Contains binds to Enumerable.Contains in C# 13 but binds to MemoryExtensions.Contains in C# 14. The latter involves ReadOnlySpan and hence crashes when Expression.Compile(preferInterpretation: true) is called.

    Version

    .NET 10 Preview 1

    Previous behavior

    In C# 13 and earlier, an extension method taking a ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> receiver is not applicable to a value of type T[]. Therefore, only non-span extension methods like the ones from the System.Linq.Enumerable class are usually bound inside Expression lambdas.

    New behavior

    In C# 14 and later, methods with ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> parameters can participate in type inference or be used as extension methods in more scenarios. This makes span-based methods like the ones from the System.MemoryExtensions class bind in more scenarios, including inside Expression lambdas where they will cause runtime exceptions when compiled with interpretation.

    Type of breaking change

    • Binary incompatible: Existing binaries might encounter a breaking change in behavior, such as failure to load or execute, and if so, require recompilation.
    • Source incompatible: When recompiled using the new SDK or component or to target the new runtime, existing source code might require source changes to compile successfully.
    • Behavioral change: Existing binaries might behave differently at run time.

    Reason for change

    The C# language feature allows simplified API design and usage (e.g., one ReadOnlySpan extension method can apply to both spans and arrays).

    Recommended action

    If you need to continue using Expression interpretation, you should make sure the non-span overloads are bound, e.g., by casting arguments to the exact types the method signature takes or calling the extension methods as explicit static invocations:

    usingSystem;usingSystem.Collections.Generic;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;M((array,num)=>array.Contains(num));// fails, binds to MemoryExtensions.ContainsM((array,num)=>((IEnumerable<int>)array).Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>array.AsEnumerable().Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>Enumerable.Contains(array,num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsvoidM(Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>e)=>e.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);

    Feature area

    Other (please put exact area in description textbox)

    Affected APIs

    System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Compile

    Associated WorkItem - 360646

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Labels

    🏁 Release: .NET 10Work items for the .NET 10 release📌 seQUESTeredIdentifies that an issue has been imported into Quest.breaking-changeIndicates a .NET Core breaking changein-prThis issue will be closed (fixed) by an active pull request.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      [Breaking change]: C# overload resolution prefers span overloads which might not work in Expression lambdas #43952

      Description

      @jjonescz

      Description

      C# 14 introduces new built-in span conversions and type inference rules making overloads with span parameters applicable in more scenarios.

      However, Expression lambdas cannot be interpreted when they involve ref structs like Span and ReadOnlySpan. For example:

      usingSystem;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>exp=(array,num)=>array.Contains(num);exp.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);// fails at runtime in C# 14

      The array.Contains binds to Enumerable.Contains in C# 13 but binds to MemoryExtensions.Contains in C# 14. The latter involves ReadOnlySpan and hence crashes when Expression.Compile(preferInterpretation: true) is called.

      Version

      .NET 10 Preview 1

      Previous behavior

      In C# 13 and earlier, an extension method taking a ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> receiver is not applicable to a value of type T[]. Therefore, only non-span extension methods like the ones from the System.Linq.Enumerable class are usually bound inside Expression lambdas.

      New behavior

      In C# 14 and later, methods with ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> parameters can participate in type inference or be used as extension methods in more scenarios. This makes span-based methods like the ones from the System.MemoryExtensions class bind in more scenarios, including inside Expression lambdas where they will cause runtime exceptions when compiled with interpretation.

      Type of breaking change

      • Binary incompatible: Existing binaries might encounter a breaking change in behavior, such as failure to load or execute, and if so, require recompilation.
      • Source incompatible: When recompiled using the new SDK or component or to target the new runtime, existing source code might require source changes to compile successfully.
      • Behavioral change: Existing binaries might behave differently at run time.

      Reason for change

      The C# language feature allows simplified API design and usage (e.g., one ReadOnlySpan extension method can apply to both spans and arrays).

      Recommended action

      If you need to continue using Expression interpretation, you should make sure the non-span overloads are bound, e.g., by casting arguments to the exact types the method signature takes or calling the extension methods as explicit static invocations:

      usingSystem;usingSystem.Collections.Generic;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;M((array,num)=>array.Contains(num));// fails, binds to MemoryExtensions.ContainsM((array,num)=>((IEnumerable<int>)array).Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>array.AsEnumerable().Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>Enumerable.Contains(array,num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsvoidM(Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>e)=>e.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);

      Feature area

      Other (please put exact area in description textbox)

      Affected APIs

      System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Compile

      Associated WorkItem - 360646

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Labels

      🏁 Release: .NET 10Work items for the .NET 10 release📌 seQUESTeredIdentifies that an issue has been imported into Quest.breaking-changeIndicates a .NET Core breaking changein-prThis issue will be closed (fixed) by an active pull request.

      Type

      No type

      Projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        [Breaking change]: C# overload resolution prefers span overloads which might not work in Expression lambdas #43952

        Description

        @jjonescz

        Description

        C# 14 introduces new built-in span conversions and type inference rules making overloads with span parameters applicable in more scenarios.

        However, Expression lambdas cannot be interpreted when they involve ref structs like Span and ReadOnlySpan. For example:

        usingSystem;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>exp=(array,num)=>array.Contains(num);exp.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);// fails at runtime in C# 14

        The array.Contains binds to Enumerable.Contains in C# 13 but binds to MemoryExtensions.Contains in C# 14. The latter involves ReadOnlySpan and hence crashes when Expression.Compile(preferInterpretation: true) is called.

        Version

        .NET 10 Preview 1

        Previous behavior

        In C# 13 and earlier, an extension method taking a ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> receiver is not applicable to a value of type T[]. Therefore, only non-span extension methods like the ones from the System.Linq.Enumerable class are usually bound inside Expression lambdas.

        New behavior

        In C# 14 and later, methods with ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> parameters can participate in type inference or be used as extension methods in more scenarios. This makes span-based methods like the ones from the System.MemoryExtensions class bind in more scenarios, including inside Expression lambdas where they will cause runtime exceptions when compiled with interpretation.

        Type of breaking change

        • Binary incompatible: Existing binaries might encounter a breaking change in behavior, such as failure to load or execute, and if so, require recompilation.
        • Source incompatible: When recompiled using the new SDK or component or to target the new runtime, existing source code might require source changes to compile successfully.
        • Behavioral change: Existing binaries might behave differently at run time.

        Reason for change

        The C# language feature allows simplified API design and usage (e.g., one ReadOnlySpan extension method can apply to both spans and arrays).

        Recommended action

        If you need to continue using Expression interpretation, you should make sure the non-span overloads are bound, e.g., by casting arguments to the exact types the method signature takes or calling the extension methods as explicit static invocations:

        usingSystem;usingSystem.Collections.Generic;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;M((array,num)=>array.Contains(num));// fails, binds to MemoryExtensions.ContainsM((array,num)=>((IEnumerable<int>)array).Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>array.AsEnumerable().Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>Enumerable.Contains(array,num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsvoidM(Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>e)=>e.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);

        Feature area

        Other (please put exact area in description textbox)

        Affected APIs

        System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Compile

        Associated WorkItem - 360646

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Labels

        🏁 Release: .NET 10Work items for the .NET 10 release📌 seQUESTeredIdentifies that an issue has been imported into Quest.breaking-changeIndicates a .NET Core breaking changein-prThis issue will be closed (fixed) by an active pull request.

        Type

        No type

        Projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          [Breaking change]: C# overload resolution prefers span overloads which might not work in Expression lambdas #43952

          Description

          @jjonescz

          Description

          C# 14 introduces new built-in span conversions and type inference rules making overloads with span parameters applicable in more scenarios.

          However, Expression lambdas cannot be interpreted when they involve ref structs like Span and ReadOnlySpan. For example:

          usingSystem;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>exp=(array,num)=>array.Contains(num);exp.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);// fails at runtime in C# 14

          The array.Contains binds to Enumerable.Contains in C# 13 but binds to MemoryExtensions.Contains in C# 14. The latter involves ReadOnlySpan and hence crashes when Expression.Compile(preferInterpretation: true) is called.

          Version

          .NET 10 Preview 1

          Previous behavior

          In C# 13 and earlier, an extension method taking a ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> receiver is not applicable to a value of type T[]. Therefore, only non-span extension methods like the ones from the System.Linq.Enumerable class are usually bound inside Expression lambdas.

          New behavior

          In C# 14 and later, methods with ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> parameters can participate in type inference or be used as extension methods in more scenarios. This makes span-based methods like the ones from the System.MemoryExtensions class bind in more scenarios, including inside Expression lambdas where they will cause runtime exceptions when compiled with interpretation.

          Type of breaking change

          • Binary incompatible: Existing binaries might encounter a breaking change in behavior, such as failure to load or execute, and if so, require recompilation.
          • Source incompatible: When recompiled using the new SDK or component or to target the new runtime, existing source code might require source changes to compile successfully.
          • Behavioral change: Existing binaries might behave differently at run time.

          Reason for change

          The C# language feature allows simplified API design and usage (e.g., one ReadOnlySpan extension method can apply to both spans and arrays).

          Recommended action

          If you need to continue using Expression interpretation, you should make sure the non-span overloads are bound, e.g., by casting arguments to the exact types the method signature takes or calling the extension methods as explicit static invocations:

          usingSystem;usingSystem.Collections.Generic;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;M((array,num)=>array.Contains(num));// fails, binds to MemoryExtensions.ContainsM((array,num)=>((IEnumerable<int>)array).Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>array.AsEnumerable().Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>Enumerable.Contains(array,num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsvoidM(Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>e)=>e.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);

          Feature area

          Other (please put exact area in description textbox)

          Affected APIs

          System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Compile

          Associated WorkItem - 360646

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Labels

          🏁 Release: .NET 10Work items for the .NET 10 release📌 seQUESTeredIdentifies that an issue has been imported into Quest.breaking-changeIndicates a .NET Core breaking changein-prThis issue will be closed (fixed) by an active pull request.

          Type

          No type

          Projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            [Breaking change]: C# overload resolution prefers span overloads which might not work in Expression lambdas #43952

            Description

            @jjonescz

            Description

            C# 14 introduces new built-in span conversions and type inference rules making overloads with span parameters applicable in more scenarios.

            However, Expression lambdas cannot be interpreted when they involve ref structs like Span and ReadOnlySpan. For example:

            usingSystem;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>exp=(array,num)=>array.Contains(num);exp.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);// fails at runtime in C# 14

            The array.Contains binds to Enumerable.Contains in C# 13 but binds to MemoryExtensions.Contains in C# 14. The latter involves ReadOnlySpan and hence crashes when Expression.Compile(preferInterpretation: true) is called.

            Version

            .NET 10 Preview 1

            Previous behavior

            In C# 13 and earlier, an extension method taking a ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> receiver is not applicable to a value of type T[]. Therefore, only non-span extension methods like the ones from the System.Linq.Enumerable class are usually bound inside Expression lambdas.

            New behavior

            In C# 14 and later, methods with ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> parameters can participate in type inference or be used as extension methods in more scenarios. This makes span-based methods like the ones from the System.MemoryExtensions class bind in more scenarios, including inside Expression lambdas where they will cause runtime exceptions when compiled with interpretation.

            Type of breaking change

            • Binary incompatible: Existing binaries might encounter a breaking change in behavior, such as failure to load or execute, and if so, require recompilation.
            • Source incompatible: When recompiled using the new SDK or component or to target the new runtime, existing source code might require source changes to compile successfully.
            • Behavioral change: Existing binaries might behave differently at run time.

            Reason for change

            The C# language feature allows simplified API design and usage (e.g., one ReadOnlySpan extension method can apply to both spans and arrays).

            Recommended action

            If you need to continue using Expression interpretation, you should make sure the non-span overloads are bound, e.g., by casting arguments to the exact types the method signature takes or calling the extension methods as explicit static invocations:

            usingSystem;usingSystem.Collections.Generic;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;M((array,num)=>array.Contains(num));// fails, binds to MemoryExtensions.ContainsM((array,num)=>((IEnumerable<int>)array).Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>array.AsEnumerable().Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>Enumerable.Contains(array,num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsvoidM(Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>e)=>e.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);

            Feature area

            Other (please put exact area in description textbox)

            Affected APIs

            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Compile

            Associated WorkItem - 360646

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Labels

            🏁 Release: .NET 10Work items for the .NET 10 release📌 seQUESTeredIdentifies that an issue has been imported into Quest.breaking-changeIndicates a .NET Core breaking changein-prThis issue will be closed (fixed) by an active pull request.

            Type

            No type

            Projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [Breaking change]: C# overload resolution prefers span overloads which might not work in Expression lambdas #43952

              Description

              @jjonescz

              Description

              C# 14 introduces new built-in span conversions and type inference rules making overloads with span parameters applicable in more scenarios.

              However, Expression lambdas cannot be interpreted when they involve ref structs like Span and ReadOnlySpan. For example:

              usingSystem;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>exp=(array,num)=>array.Contains(num);exp.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);// fails at runtime in C# 14

              The array.Contains binds to Enumerable.Contains in C# 13 but binds to MemoryExtensions.Contains in C# 14. The latter involves ReadOnlySpan and hence crashes when Expression.Compile(preferInterpretation: true) is called.

              Version

              .NET 10 Preview 1

              Previous behavior

              In C# 13 and earlier, an extension method taking a ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> receiver is not applicable to a value of type T[]. Therefore, only non-span extension methods like the ones from the System.Linq.Enumerable class are usually bound inside Expression lambdas.

              New behavior

              In C# 14 and later, methods with ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> parameters can participate in type inference or be used as extension methods in more scenarios. This makes span-based methods like the ones from the System.MemoryExtensions class bind in more scenarios, including inside Expression lambdas where they will cause runtime exceptions when compiled with interpretation.

              Type of breaking change

              • Binary incompatible: Existing binaries might encounter a breaking change in behavior, such as failure to load or execute, and if so, require recompilation.
              • Source incompatible: When recompiled using the new SDK or component or to target the new runtime, existing source code might require source changes to compile successfully.
              • Behavioral change: Existing binaries might behave differently at run time.

              Reason for change

              The C# language feature allows simplified API design and usage (e.g., one ReadOnlySpan extension method can apply to both spans and arrays).

              Recommended action

              If you need to continue using Expression interpretation, you should make sure the non-span overloads are bound, e.g., by casting arguments to the exact types the method signature takes or calling the extension methods as explicit static invocations:

              usingSystem;usingSystem.Collections.Generic;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;M((array,num)=>array.Contains(num));// fails, binds to MemoryExtensions.ContainsM((array,num)=>((IEnumerable<int>)array).Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>array.AsEnumerable().Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>Enumerable.Contains(array,num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsvoidM(Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>e)=>e.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);

              Feature area

              Other (please put exact area in description textbox)

              Affected APIs

              System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Compile

              Associated WorkItem - 360646

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Labels

              🏁 Release: .NET 10Work items for the .NET 10 release📌 seQUESTeredIdentifies that an issue has been imported into Quest.breaking-changeIndicates a .NET Core breaking changein-prThis issue will be closed (fixed) by an active pull request.

              Type

              No type

              Projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                [Breaking change]: C# overload resolution prefers span overloads which might not work in Expression lambdas #43952

                Description

                @jjonescz

                Description

                C# 14 introduces new built-in span conversions and type inference rules making overloads with span parameters applicable in more scenarios.

                However, Expression lambdas cannot be interpreted when they involve ref structs like Span and ReadOnlySpan. For example:

                usingSystem;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>exp=(array,num)=>array.Contains(num);exp.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);// fails at runtime in C# 14

                The array.Contains binds to Enumerable.Contains in C# 13 but binds to MemoryExtensions.Contains in C# 14. The latter involves ReadOnlySpan and hence crashes when Expression.Compile(preferInterpretation: true) is called.

                Version

                .NET 10 Preview 1

                Previous behavior

                In C# 13 and earlier, an extension method taking a ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> receiver is not applicable to a value of type T[]. Therefore, only non-span extension methods like the ones from the System.Linq.Enumerable class are usually bound inside Expression lambdas.

                New behavior

                In C# 14 and later, methods with ReadOnlySpan<T> or Span<T> parameters can participate in type inference or be used as extension methods in more scenarios. This makes span-based methods like the ones from the System.MemoryExtensions class bind in more scenarios, including inside Expression lambdas where they will cause runtime exceptions when compiled with interpretation.

                Type of breaking change

                • Binary incompatible: Existing binaries might encounter a breaking change in behavior, such as failure to load or execute, and if so, require recompilation.
                • Source incompatible: When recompiled using the new SDK or component or to target the new runtime, existing source code might require source changes to compile successfully.
                • Behavioral change: Existing binaries might behave differently at run time.

                Reason for change

                The C# language feature allows simplified API design and usage (e.g., one ReadOnlySpan extension method can apply to both spans and arrays).

                Recommended action

                If you need to continue using Expression interpretation, you should make sure the non-span overloads are bound, e.g., by casting arguments to the exact types the method signature takes or calling the extension methods as explicit static invocations:

                usingSystem;usingSystem.Collections.Generic;usingSystem.Linq;usingSystem.Linq.Expressions;M((array,num)=>array.Contains(num));// fails, binds to MemoryExtensions.ContainsM((array,num)=>((IEnumerable<int>)array).Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>array.AsEnumerable().Contains(num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsM((array,num)=>Enumerable.Contains(array,num));// ok, binds to Enumerable.ContainsvoidM(Expression<Func<int[],int,bool>>e)=>e.Compile(preferInterpretation:true);

                Feature area

                Other (please put exact area in description textbox)

                Affected APIs

                System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Compile

                Associated WorkItem - 360646

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Labels

                🏁 Release: .NET 10Work items for the .NET 10 release📌 seQUESTeredIdentifies that an issue has been imported into Quest.breaking-changeIndicates a .NET Core breaking changein-prThis issue will be closed (fixed) by an active pull request.

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions