Fixes #591: typos, adding the type attribute to lists, and moving the name attribute for some examples by sfilipi · Pull Request #592 · dotnet/machinelearning

sfilipi · 2018-07-27T16:30:39Z

Testing the documentation in the doc.microsoft.com staging environment, i noticed a few typos, unescaped apostrophes, and missing xml tag attributes.

Fixes#591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson

… attribute in OGD and Poisson

TomFinley

Thank you @sfilipi !

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:32:28Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example [](start = 5, length = 7)
is this not an error to have nested examples? #Pending

Yea I see it's used everywhere. I wonder why though?
In reply to: 205926076 [](ancestors = 205926076)

it is legal in xml.
The internal example node is needed by the documentation to display the snippet as an example.
I needed a named wrapper to get the node, and ...just called it example.
this is how they are being included:
I don't need to include them with the /* notation, i can just include the named node itself, but i wasn't sure if the docs tools would tolerate the name attribute on it.
But with both you and Ivan commenting on it, though, might be worth to try it, and if they are robust to it, clean this two level example.
In my TODO list.
In reply to: 205926101 [](ancestors = 205926101,205926076)

Ivanidzo4ka · 2018-07-28T00:33:43Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example name="OGD" [](start = 5, length = 18)
out of curiosity, is order of having name / not having name matter? In AP example you have and here you have #Pending

it depends how you include the node in the code.
see the long answer to Pete's comment. Should clarify it.
Note the * notation:
In reply to: 205926135 [](ancestors = 205926135)

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:33:51Z

 <remarks>
- CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the
- value and using the hash as an index in the bag.
+ CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the value and using the hash as an index in the bag.


the value [](start = 104, length = 9)
why removing the newline here, but not, say, in line 33? #Pending

I am not sure why the text is broken in newlines identically how my text is structured for the page corresponding to the CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer, and it is flowing differently for the CategoricalOneHotVectorizer, disregarding line indentations in the XML.
Could be because the text in the other one is inside the tags; and we should always use the para tags to keep the convenience formatting in the xml.
links if curious:
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalhashonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
In reply to: 205926140 [](ancestors = 205926140)

Zruty0

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:27:53Z

 For each row, the entire text string appearing in the input column is defined as a category.
- The output of this transform is an indicator vector.
+ The output of this transform is an indicator vector.</para>
 Each slot in this vector corresponds to a category in the dictionary, so its length is the size of the built dictionary.


📝 This line should be in a paragraph element.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:29:25Z

 <remarks>
 In machine learning it is a pretty common and powerful approach to utilize the already trained model in the process of defining features.
- <para>One such example would be the use of model's scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 
+ <para>One such example would be the use of model&apos;s scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 


❔ Why is this required? It's awkward to read and seems like it would be easy to regress.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:30:36Z

+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)
+ {
+ ReplaceWith = NAHandleTransformReplacementKind.Mean


💡 Should likely be indented

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:15Z

+ <example name="NAHandle">
+ <example>
+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)


❔ Why is the " escape needed? I would only expect this if it appeared as the value of an XML attribute.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:38Z

+ It can be changed to true for known length vectors, but it results in an error if changed to false for variable length vectors.
+ </para>
+ </remarks>
+ <seealso cref=" Microsoft.ML.Runtime.Data.MetadataUtils.Kinds.HasMissingValues"/>


❔ Is this missing a T: prefix? It's unclear why the others are given in full form but I noticed this one is different.

…ng the name attribute for some examples (dotnet#592) * Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson * getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself. * merging from master

sfilipi · 2018-07-27T16:30:39Z

Testing the documentation in the doc.microsoft.com staging environment, i noticed a few typos, unescaped apostrophes, and missing xml tag attributes.

Fixes#591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson

… attribute in OGD and Poisson

TomFinley

Thank you @sfilipi !

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:32:28Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example [](start = 5, length = 7)
is this not an error to have nested examples? #Pending

Yea I see it's used everywhere. I wonder why though?
In reply to: 205926076 [](ancestors = 205926076)

it is legal in xml.
The internal example node is needed by the documentation to display the snippet as an example.
I needed a named wrapper to get the node, and ...just called it example.
this is how they are being included:
I don't need to include them with the /* notation, i can just include the named node itself, but i wasn't sure if the docs tools would tolerate the name attribute on it.
But with both you and Ivan commenting on it, though, might be worth to try it, and if they are robust to it, clean this two level example.
In my TODO list.
In reply to: 205926101 [](ancestors = 205926101,205926076)

Ivanidzo4ka · 2018-07-28T00:33:43Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example name="OGD" [](start = 5, length = 18)
out of curiosity, is order of having name / not having name matter? In AP example you have and here you have #Pending

it depends how you include the node in the code.
see the long answer to Pete's comment. Should clarify it.
Note the * notation:
In reply to: 205926135 [](ancestors = 205926135)

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:33:51Z

 <remarks>
- CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the
- value and using the hash as an index in the bag.
+ CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the value and using the hash as an index in the bag.


the value [](start = 104, length = 9)
why removing the newline here, but not, say, in line 33? #Pending

I am not sure why the text is broken in newlines identically how my text is structured for the page corresponding to the CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer, and it is flowing differently for the CategoricalOneHotVectorizer, disregarding line indentations in the XML.
Could be because the text in the other one is inside the tags; and we should always use the para tags to keep the convenience formatting in the xml.
links if curious:
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalhashonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
In reply to: 205926140 [](ancestors = 205926140)

Zruty0

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:27:53Z

 For each row, the entire text string appearing in the input column is defined as a category.
- The output of this transform is an indicator vector.
+ The output of this transform is an indicator vector.</para>
 Each slot in this vector corresponds to a category in the dictionary, so its length is the size of the built dictionary.


📝 This line should be in a paragraph element.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:29:25Z

 <remarks>
 In machine learning it is a pretty common and powerful approach to utilize the already trained model in the process of defining features.
- <para>One such example would be the use of model's scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 
+ <para>One such example would be the use of model&apos;s scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 


❔ Why is this required? It's awkward to read and seems like it would be easy to regress.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:30:36Z

+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)
+ {
+ ReplaceWith = NAHandleTransformReplacementKind.Mean


💡 Should likely be indented

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:15Z

+ <example name="NAHandle">
+ <example>
+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)


❔ Why is the " escape needed? I would only expect this if it appeared as the value of an XML attribute.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:38Z

+ It can be changed to true for known length vectors, but it results in an error if changed to false for variable length vectors.
+ </para>
+ </remarks>
+ <seealso cref=" Microsoft.ML.Runtime.Data.MetadataUtils.Kinds.HasMissingValues"/>


❔ Is this missing a T: prefix? It's unclear why the others are given in full form but I noticed this one is different.

…ng the name attribute for some examples (dotnet#592) * Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson * getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself. * merging from master

sfilipi · 2018-07-27T16:30:39Z

Testing the documentation in the doc.microsoft.com staging environment, i noticed a few typos, unescaped apostrophes, and missing xml tag attributes.

Fixes#591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson

… attribute in OGD and Poisson

TomFinley

Thank you @sfilipi !

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:32:28Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example [](start = 5, length = 7)
is this not an error to have nested examples? #Pending

Yea I see it's used everywhere. I wonder why though?
In reply to: 205926076 [](ancestors = 205926076)

it is legal in xml.
The internal example node is needed by the documentation to display the snippet as an example.
I needed a named wrapper to get the node, and ...just called it example.
this is how they are being included:
I don't need to include them with the /* notation, i can just include the named node itself, but i wasn't sure if the docs tools would tolerate the name attribute on it.
But with both you and Ivan commenting on it, though, might be worth to try it, and if they are robust to it, clean this two level example.
In my TODO list.
In reply to: 205926101 [](ancestors = 205926101,205926076)

Ivanidzo4ka · 2018-07-28T00:33:43Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example name="OGD" [](start = 5, length = 18)
out of curiosity, is order of having name / not having name matter? In AP example you have and here you have #Pending

it depends how you include the node in the code.
see the long answer to Pete's comment. Should clarify it.
Note the * notation:
In reply to: 205926135 [](ancestors = 205926135)

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:33:51Z

 <remarks>
- CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the
- value and using the hash as an index in the bag.
+ CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the value and using the hash as an index in the bag.


the value [](start = 104, length = 9)
why removing the newline here, but not, say, in line 33? #Pending

I am not sure why the text is broken in newlines identically how my text is structured for the page corresponding to the CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer, and it is flowing differently for the CategoricalOneHotVectorizer, disregarding line indentations in the XML.
Could be because the text in the other one is inside the tags; and we should always use the para tags to keep the convenience formatting in the xml.
links if curious:
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalhashonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
In reply to: 205926140 [](ancestors = 205926140)

Zruty0

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:27:53Z

 For each row, the entire text string appearing in the input column is defined as a category.
- The output of this transform is an indicator vector.
+ The output of this transform is an indicator vector.</para>
 Each slot in this vector corresponds to a category in the dictionary, so its length is the size of the built dictionary.


📝 This line should be in a paragraph element.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:29:25Z

 <remarks>
 In machine learning it is a pretty common and powerful approach to utilize the already trained model in the process of defining features.
- <para>One such example would be the use of model's scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 
+ <para>One such example would be the use of model&apos;s scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 


❔ Why is this required? It's awkward to read and seems like it would be easy to regress.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:30:36Z

+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)
+ {
+ ReplaceWith = NAHandleTransformReplacementKind.Mean


💡 Should likely be indented

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:15Z

+ <example name="NAHandle">
+ <example>
+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)


❔ Why is the " escape needed? I would only expect this if it appeared as the value of an XML attribute.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:38Z

+ It can be changed to true for known length vectors, but it results in an error if changed to false for variable length vectors.
+ </para>
+ </remarks>
+ <seealso cref=" Microsoft.ML.Runtime.Data.MetadataUtils.Kinds.HasMissingValues"/>


❔ Is this missing a T: prefix? It's unclear why the others are given in full form but I noticed this one is different.

…ng the name attribute for some examples (dotnet#592) * Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson * getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself. * merging from master

sfilipi · 2018-07-27T16:30:39Z

Testing the documentation in the doc.microsoft.com staging environment, i noticed a few typos, unescaped apostrophes, and missing xml tag attributes.

Fixes#591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson

… attribute in OGD and Poisson

TomFinley

Thank you @sfilipi !

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:32:28Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example [](start = 5, length = 7)
is this not an error to have nested examples? #Pending

Yea I see it's used everywhere. I wonder why though?
In reply to: 205926076 [](ancestors = 205926076)

it is legal in xml.
The internal example node is needed by the documentation to display the snippet as an example.
I needed a named wrapper to get the node, and ...just called it example.
this is how they are being included:
I don't need to include them with the /* notation, i can just include the named node itself, but i wasn't sure if the docs tools would tolerate the name attribute on it.
But with both you and Ivan commenting on it, though, might be worth to try it, and if they are robust to it, clean this two level example.
In my TODO list.
In reply to: 205926101 [](ancestors = 205926101,205926076)

Ivanidzo4ka · 2018-07-28T00:33:43Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example name="OGD" [](start = 5, length = 18)
out of curiosity, is order of having name / not having name matter? In AP example you have and here you have #Pending

it depends how you include the node in the code.
see the long answer to Pete's comment. Should clarify it.
Note the * notation:
In reply to: 205926135 [](ancestors = 205926135)

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:33:51Z

 <remarks>
- CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the
- value and using the hash as an index in the bag.
+ CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the value and using the hash as an index in the bag.


the value [](start = 104, length = 9)
why removing the newline here, but not, say, in line 33? #Pending

I am not sure why the text is broken in newlines identically how my text is structured for the page corresponding to the CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer, and it is flowing differently for the CategoricalOneHotVectorizer, disregarding line indentations in the XML.
Could be because the text in the other one is inside the tags; and we should always use the para tags to keep the convenience formatting in the xml.
links if curious:
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalhashonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
In reply to: 205926140 [](ancestors = 205926140)

Zruty0

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:27:53Z

 For each row, the entire text string appearing in the input column is defined as a category.
- The output of this transform is an indicator vector.
+ The output of this transform is an indicator vector.</para>
 Each slot in this vector corresponds to a category in the dictionary, so its length is the size of the built dictionary.


📝 This line should be in a paragraph element.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:29:25Z

 <remarks>
 In machine learning it is a pretty common and powerful approach to utilize the already trained model in the process of defining features.
- <para>One such example would be the use of model's scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 
+ <para>One such example would be the use of model&apos;s scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 


❔ Why is this required? It's awkward to read and seems like it would be easy to regress.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:30:36Z

+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)
+ {
+ ReplaceWith = NAHandleTransformReplacementKind.Mean


💡 Should likely be indented

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:15Z

+ <example name="NAHandle">
+ <example>
+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)


❔ Why is the " escape needed? I would only expect this if it appeared as the value of an XML attribute.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:38Z

+ It can be changed to true for known length vectors, but it results in an error if changed to false for variable length vectors.
+ </para>
+ </remarks>
+ <seealso cref=" Microsoft.ML.Runtime.Data.MetadataUtils.Kinds.HasMissingValues"/>


❔ Is this missing a T: prefix? It's unclear why the others are given in full form but I noticed this one is different.

…ng the name attribute for some examples (dotnet#592) * Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson * getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself. * merging from master

sfilipi · 2018-07-27T16:30:39Z

Testing the documentation in the doc.microsoft.com staging environment, i noticed a few typos, unescaped apostrophes, and missing xml tag attributes.

Fixes#591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson

… attribute in OGD and Poisson

TomFinley

Thank you @sfilipi !

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:32:28Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example [](start = 5, length = 7)
is this not an error to have nested examples? #Pending

Yea I see it's used everywhere. I wonder why though?
In reply to: 205926076 [](ancestors = 205926076)

it is legal in xml.
The internal example node is needed by the documentation to display the snippet as an example.
I needed a named wrapper to get the node, and ...just called it example.
this is how they are being included:
I don't need to include them with the /* notation, i can just include the named node itself, but i wasn't sure if the docs tools would tolerate the name attribute on it.
But with both you and Ivan commenting on it, though, might be worth to try it, and if they are robust to it, clean this two level example.
In my TODO list.
In reply to: 205926101 [](ancestors = 205926101,205926076)

Ivanidzo4ka · 2018-07-28T00:33:43Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example name="OGD" [](start = 5, length = 18)
out of curiosity, is order of having name / not having name matter? In AP example you have and here you have #Pending

it depends how you include the node in the code.
see the long answer to Pete's comment. Should clarify it.
Note the * notation:
In reply to: 205926135 [](ancestors = 205926135)

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:33:51Z

 <remarks>
- CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the
- value and using the hash as an index in the bag.
+ CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the value and using the hash as an index in the bag.


the value [](start = 104, length = 9)
why removing the newline here, but not, say, in line 33? #Pending

I am not sure why the text is broken in newlines identically how my text is structured for the page corresponding to the CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer, and it is flowing differently for the CategoricalOneHotVectorizer, disregarding line indentations in the XML.
Could be because the text in the other one is inside the tags; and we should always use the para tags to keep the convenience formatting in the xml.
links if curious:
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalhashonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
In reply to: 205926140 [](ancestors = 205926140)

Zruty0

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:27:53Z

 For each row, the entire text string appearing in the input column is defined as a category.
- The output of this transform is an indicator vector.
+ The output of this transform is an indicator vector.</para>
 Each slot in this vector corresponds to a category in the dictionary, so its length is the size of the built dictionary.


📝 This line should be in a paragraph element.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:29:25Z

 <remarks>
 In machine learning it is a pretty common and powerful approach to utilize the already trained model in the process of defining features.
- <para>One such example would be the use of model's scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 
+ <para>One such example would be the use of model&apos;s scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 


❔ Why is this required? It's awkward to read and seems like it would be easy to regress.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:30:36Z

+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)
+ {
+ ReplaceWith = NAHandleTransformReplacementKind.Mean


💡 Should likely be indented

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:15Z

+ <example name="NAHandle">
+ <example>
+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)


❔ Why is the " escape needed? I would only expect this if it appeared as the value of an XML attribute.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:38Z

+ It can be changed to true for known length vectors, but it results in an error if changed to false for variable length vectors.
+ </para>
+ </remarks>
+ <seealso cref=" Microsoft.ML.Runtime.Data.MetadataUtils.Kinds.HasMissingValues"/>


❔ Is this missing a T: prefix? It's unclear why the others are given in full form but I noticed this one is different.

…ng the name attribute for some examples (dotnet#592) * Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson * getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself. * merging from master

sfilipi · 2018-07-27T16:30:39Z

Testing the documentation in the doc.microsoft.com staging environment, i noticed a few typos, unescaped apostrophes, and missing xml tag attributes.

Fixes#591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson

… attribute in OGD and Poisson

TomFinley

Thank you @sfilipi !

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:32:28Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example [](start = 5, length = 7)
is this not an error to have nested examples? #Pending

Yea I see it's used everywhere. I wonder why though?
In reply to: 205926076 [](ancestors = 205926076)

it is legal in xml.
The internal example node is needed by the documentation to display the snippet as an example.
I needed a named wrapper to get the node, and ...just called it example.
this is how they are being included:
I don't need to include them with the /* notation, i can just include the named node itself, but i wasn't sure if the docs tools would tolerate the name attribute on it.
But with both you and Ivan commenting on it, though, might be worth to try it, and if they are robust to it, clean this two level example.
In my TODO list.
In reply to: 205926101 [](ancestors = 205926101,205926076)

Ivanidzo4ka · 2018-07-28T00:33:43Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example name="OGD" [](start = 5, length = 18)
out of curiosity, is order of having name / not having name matter? In AP example you have and here you have #Pending

it depends how you include the node in the code.
see the long answer to Pete's comment. Should clarify it.
Note the * notation:
In reply to: 205926135 [](ancestors = 205926135)

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:33:51Z

 <remarks>
- CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the
- value and using the hash as an index in the bag.
+ CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the value and using the hash as an index in the bag.


the value [](start = 104, length = 9)
why removing the newline here, but not, say, in line 33? #Pending

I am not sure why the text is broken in newlines identically how my text is structured for the page corresponding to the CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer, and it is flowing differently for the CategoricalOneHotVectorizer, disregarding line indentations in the XML.
Could be because the text in the other one is inside the tags; and we should always use the para tags to keep the convenience formatting in the xml.
links if curious:
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalhashonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
In reply to: 205926140 [](ancestors = 205926140)

Zruty0

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:27:53Z

 For each row, the entire text string appearing in the input column is defined as a category.
- The output of this transform is an indicator vector.
+ The output of this transform is an indicator vector.</para>
 Each slot in this vector corresponds to a category in the dictionary, so its length is the size of the built dictionary.


📝 This line should be in a paragraph element.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:29:25Z

 <remarks>
 In machine learning it is a pretty common and powerful approach to utilize the already trained model in the process of defining features.
- <para>One such example would be the use of model's scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 
+ <para>One such example would be the use of model&apos;s scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 


❔ Why is this required? It's awkward to read and seems like it would be easy to regress.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:30:36Z

+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)
+ {
+ ReplaceWith = NAHandleTransformReplacementKind.Mean


💡 Should likely be indented

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:15Z

+ <example name="NAHandle">
+ <example>
+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)


❔ Why is the " escape needed? I would only expect this if it appeared as the value of an XML attribute.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:38Z

+ It can be changed to true for known length vectors, but it results in an error if changed to false for variable length vectors.
+ </para>
+ </remarks>
+ <seealso cref=" Microsoft.ML.Runtime.Data.MetadataUtils.Kinds.HasMissingValues"/>


❔ Is this missing a T: prefix? It's unclear why the others are given in full form but I noticed this one is different.

…ng the name attribute for some examples (dotnet#592) * Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson * getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself. * merging from master

sfilipi · 2018-07-27T16:30:39Z

Testing the documentation in the doc.microsoft.com staging environment, i noticed a few typos, unescaped apostrophes, and missing xml tag attributes.

Fixes#591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson

… attribute in OGD and Poisson

TomFinley

Thank you @sfilipi !

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:32:28Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example [](start = 5, length = 7)
is this not an error to have nested examples? #Pending

Yea I see it's used everywhere. I wonder why though?
In reply to: 205926076 [](ancestors = 205926076)

it is legal in xml.
The internal example node is needed by the documentation to display the snippet as an example.
I needed a named wrapper to get the node, and ...just called it example.
this is how they are being included:
I don't need to include them with the /* notation, i can just include the named node itself, but i wasn't sure if the docs tools would tolerate the name attribute on it.
But with both you and Ivan commenting on it, though, might be worth to try it, and if they are robust to it, clean this two level example.
In my TODO list.
In reply to: 205926101 [](ancestors = 205926101,205926076)

Ivanidzo4ka · 2018-07-28T00:33:43Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example name="OGD" [](start = 5, length = 18)
out of curiosity, is order of having name / not having name matter? In AP example you have and here you have #Pending

it depends how you include the node in the code.
see the long answer to Pete's comment. Should clarify it.
Note the * notation:
In reply to: 205926135 [](ancestors = 205926135)

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:33:51Z

 <remarks>
- CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the
- value and using the hash as an index in the bag.
+ CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the value and using the hash as an index in the bag.


the value [](start = 104, length = 9)
why removing the newline here, but not, say, in line 33? #Pending

I am not sure why the text is broken in newlines identically how my text is structured for the page corresponding to the CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer, and it is flowing differently for the CategoricalOneHotVectorizer, disregarding line indentations in the XML.
Could be because the text in the other one is inside the tags; and we should always use the para tags to keep the convenience formatting in the xml.
links if curious:
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalhashonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
In reply to: 205926140 [](ancestors = 205926140)

Zruty0

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:27:53Z

 For each row, the entire text string appearing in the input column is defined as a category.
- The output of this transform is an indicator vector.
+ The output of this transform is an indicator vector.</para>
 Each slot in this vector corresponds to a category in the dictionary, so its length is the size of the built dictionary.


📝 This line should be in a paragraph element.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:29:25Z

 <remarks>
 In machine learning it is a pretty common and powerful approach to utilize the already trained model in the process of defining features.
- <para>One such example would be the use of model's scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 
+ <para>One such example would be the use of model&apos;s scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 


❔ Why is this required? It's awkward to read and seems like it would be easy to regress.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:30:36Z

+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)
+ {
+ ReplaceWith = NAHandleTransformReplacementKind.Mean


💡 Should likely be indented

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:15Z

+ <example name="NAHandle">
+ <example>
+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)


❔ Why is the " escape needed? I would only expect this if it appeared as the value of an XML attribute.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:38Z

+ It can be changed to true for known length vectors, but it results in an error if changed to false for variable length vectors.
+ </para>
+ </remarks>
+ <seealso cref=" Microsoft.ML.Runtime.Data.MetadataUtils.Kinds.HasMissingValues"/>


❔ Is this missing a T: prefix? It's unclear why the others are given in full form but I noticed this one is different.

…ng the name attribute for some examples (dotnet#592) * Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson * getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself. * merging from master

sfilipi · 2018-07-27T16:30:39Z

Testing the documentation in the doc.microsoft.com staging environment, i noticed a few typos, unescaped apostrophes, and missing xml tag attributes.

Fixes#591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson

… attribute in OGD and Poisson

TomFinley

Thank you @sfilipi !

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:32:28Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example [](start = 5, length = 7)
is this not an error to have nested examples? #Pending

Yea I see it's used everywhere. I wonder why though?
In reply to: 205926076 [](ancestors = 205926076)

it is legal in xml.
The internal example node is needed by the documentation to display the snippet as an example.
I needed a named wrapper to get the node, and ...just called it example.
this is how they are being included:
I don't need to include them with the /* notation, i can just include the named node itself, but i wasn't sure if the docs tools would tolerate the name attribute on it.
But with both you and Ivan commenting on it, though, might be worth to try it, and if they are robust to it, clean this two level example.
In my TODO list.
In reply to: 205926101 [](ancestors = 205926101,205926076)

Ivanidzo4ka · 2018-07-28T00:33:43Z

 </member>
- <example>
- <example name="OGD">
+ <example name="OGD">


example name="OGD" [](start = 5, length = 18)
out of curiosity, is order of having name / not having name matter? In AP example you have and here you have #Pending

it depends how you include the node in the code.
see the long answer to Pete's comment. Should clarify it.
Note the * notation:
In reply to: 205926135 [](ancestors = 205926135)

Zruty0 · 2018-07-28T00:33:51Z

 <remarks>
- CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the
- value and using the hash as an index in the bag.
+ CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer converts a categorical value into an indicator array by hashing the value and using the hash as an index in the bag.


the value [](start = 104, length = 9)
why removing the newline here, but not, say, in line 33? #Pending

I am not sure why the text is broken in newlines identically how my text is structured for the page corresponding to the CategoricalHashOneHotVectorizer, and it is flowing differently for the CategoricalOneHotVectorizer, disregarding line indentations in the XML.
Could be because the text in the other one is inside the tags; and we should always use the para tags to keep the convenience formatting in the xml.
links if curious:
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.ml.transforms.categoricalhashonehotvectorizer?view=ml-dotnet&branch=smoke-test-preview
In reply to: 205926140 [](ancestors = 205926140)

Zruty0

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:27:53Z

 For each row, the entire text string appearing in the input column is defined as a category.
- The output of this transform is an indicator vector.
+ The output of this transform is an indicator vector.</para>
 Each slot in this vector corresponds to a category in the dictionary, so its length is the size of the built dictionary.


📝 This line should be in a paragraph element.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:29:25Z

 <remarks>
 In machine learning it is a pretty common and powerful approach to utilize the already trained model in the process of defining features.
- <para>One such example would be the use of model's scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 
+ <para>One such example would be the use of model&apos;s scores as features to downstream models. For example, we might run clustering on the original features, 


❔ Why is this required? It's awkward to read and seems like it would be easy to regress.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:30:36Z

+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)
+ {
+ ReplaceWith = NAHandleTransformReplacementKind.Mean


💡 Should likely be indented

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:15Z

+ <example name="NAHandle">
+ <example>
+ <code language="csharp">
+ pipeline.Add(new MissingValueHandler(&quot;FeatureCol&quot;, &quot;CleanFeatureCol&quot;)


❔ Why is the " escape needed? I would only expect this if it appeared as the value of an XML attribute.

sharwell · 2018-07-28T02:31:38Z

+ It can be changed to true for known length vectors, but it results in an error if changed to false for variable length vectors.
+ </para>
+ </remarks>
+ <seealso cref=" Microsoft.ML.Runtime.Data.MetadataUtils.Kinds.HasMissingValues"/>


❔ Is this missing a T: prefix? It's unclear why the others are given in full form but I noticed this one is different.

…ng the name attribute for some examples (dotnet#592) * Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name attribute in OGD and Poisson * getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself. * merging from master

Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name…
3767713
… attribute in OGD and Poisson

sfilipi requested review from TomFinley, Zruty0 and shauheen July 27, 2018 16:30

TomFinley approved these changes Jul 27, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi added 3 commits July 27, 2018 10:27

getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself.
59c4f65

merging from master
c7217f4

merging from master
2b0e075

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Ivanidzo4ka reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 approved these changes Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi merged commit 502e422 into dotnet:masterJul 28, 2018

sfilipi deleted the docFormattingFixes branch July 28, 2018 00:58

sharwell reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2022

Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name…
3767713
… attribute in OGD and Poisson

sfilipi requested review from TomFinley, Zruty0 and shauheen July 27, 2018 16:30

TomFinley approved these changes Jul 27, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi added 3 commits July 27, 2018 10:27

getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself.
59c4f65

merging from master
c7217f4

merging from master
2b0e075

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Ivanidzo4ka reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 approved these changes Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi merged commit 502e422 into dotnet:masterJul 28, 2018

sfilipi deleted the docFormattingFixes branch July 28, 2018 00:58

sharwell reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2022

Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name…
3767713
… attribute in OGD and Poisson

sfilipi requested review from TomFinley, Zruty0 and shauheen July 27, 2018 16:30

TomFinley approved these changes Jul 27, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi added 3 commits July 27, 2018 10:27

getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself.
59c4f65

merging from master
c7217f4

merging from master
2b0e075

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Ivanidzo4ka reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 approved these changes Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi merged commit 502e422 into dotnet:masterJul 28, 2018

sfilipi deleted the docFormattingFixes branch July 28, 2018 00:58

sharwell reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2022

Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name…
3767713
… attribute in OGD and Poisson

sfilipi requested review from TomFinley, Zruty0 and shauheen July 27, 2018 16:30

TomFinley approved these changes Jul 27, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi added 3 commits July 27, 2018 10:27

getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself.
59c4f65

merging from master
c7217f4

merging from master
2b0e075

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Ivanidzo4ka reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 approved these changes Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi merged commit 502e422 into dotnet:masterJul 28, 2018

sfilipi deleted the docFormattingFixes branch July 28, 2018 00:58

sharwell reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2022

Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name…
3767713
… attribute in OGD and Poisson

sfilipi requested review from TomFinley, Zruty0 and shauheen July 27, 2018 16:30

TomFinley approved these changes Jul 27, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi added 3 commits July 27, 2018 10:27

getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself.
59c4f65

merging from master
c7217f4

merging from master
2b0e075

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Ivanidzo4ka reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 approved these changes Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi merged commit 502e422 into dotnet:masterJul 28, 2018

sfilipi deleted the docFormattingFixes branch July 28, 2018 00:58

sharwell reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2022

Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name…
3767713
… attribute in OGD and Poisson

sfilipi requested review from TomFinley, Zruty0 and shauheen July 27, 2018 16:30

TomFinley approved these changes Jul 27, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi added 3 commits July 27, 2018 10:27

getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself.
59c4f65

merging from master
c7217f4

merging from master
2b0e075

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Ivanidzo4ka reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 approved these changes Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi merged commit 502e422 into dotnet:masterJul 28, 2018

sfilipi deleted the docFormattingFixes branch July 28, 2018 00:58

sharwell reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2022

Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name…
3767713
… attribute in OGD and Poisson

sfilipi requested review from TomFinley, Zruty0 and shauheen July 27, 2018 16:30

TomFinley approved these changes Jul 27, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi added 3 commits July 27, 2018 10:27

getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself.
59c4f65

merging from master
c7217f4

merging from master
2b0e075

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Ivanidzo4ka reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 approved these changes Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi merged commit 502e422 into dotnet:masterJul 28, 2018

sfilipi deleted the docFormattingFixes branch July 28, 2018 00:58

sharwell reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2022

Fixes issue 591: typos, adding the type to lists, and fixing the name…
3767713
… attribute in OGD and Poisson

sfilipi requested review from TomFinley, Zruty0 and shauheen July 27, 2018 16:30

TomFinley approved these changes Jul 27, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi added 3 commits July 27, 2018 10:27

getting just the content under the memeber node, not the member itself.
59c4f65

merging from master
c7217f4

merging from master
2b0e075

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Ivanidzo4ka reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

Zruty0 approved these changes Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

sfilipi merged commit 502e422 into dotnet:masterJul 28, 2018

sfilipi deleted the docFormattingFixes branch July 28, 2018 00:58

sharwell reviewed Jul 28, 2018
View reviewed changes

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2022

Uh oh!

Conversation

sfilipi commented Jul 27, 2018

Uh oh!

TomFinley left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018• edited by sfilipi Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

sfilipiJul 28, 2018• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Ivanidzo4kaJul 28, 2018• edited by sfilipi Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018• edited by sfilipi Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Zruty0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

sfilipi commented Jul 27, 2018

Uh oh!

TomFinley left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018• edited by sfilipi Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

sfilipiJul 28, 2018• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Ivanidzo4kaJul 28, 2018• edited by sfilipi Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018• edited by sfilipi Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

TomFinley left a comment •
edited
Loading

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018•
edited by sfilipi
Loading

sfilipiJul 28, 2018•
edited
Loading

Ivanidzo4kaJul 28, 2018•
edited by sfilipi
Loading

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018•
edited by sfilipi
Loading

TomFinley left a comment •
edited
Loading

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018•
edited by sfilipi
Loading

sfilipiJul 28, 2018•
edited
Loading

Ivanidzo4kaJul 28, 2018•
edited by sfilipi
Loading

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018•
edited by sfilipi
Loading

TomFinley left a comment •
edited
Loading

Zruty0Jul 28, 2018•
edited by sfilipi
Loading

sfilipiJul 28, 2018•
edited
Loading