Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment - #6338

Merged
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment#6338
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression

Conversation

@LittleLittleCloud

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

  • There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.

  • There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.

  • Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.

  • You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

  • AutoML.Net improvements tracking down list #6145

  • Update or deprecate AutoML 1.x APIs #6532

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud changed the title use AutoMLExperiment in RegressionExperimentImprove RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperimentSep 26, 2022
@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6338 (20fce65) into main (50e5068) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6338 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.64% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 1171 1171 Lines 247736 247964 +228 Branches 25733 25738 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 169858 170214 +356 + Misses 71115 71008 -107 + Partials 6763 6742 -21 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.64% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️
production63.04% <ø> (+0.06%)⬆️
test89.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
test/Microsoft.ML.AutoML.Tests/AutoFitTests.cs82.48% <100.00%> (+2.91%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Core/Data/ProgressReporter.cs70.95% <0.00%> (-6.99%)⬇️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs25.38% <0.00%> (-1.53%)⬇️
...soft.ML.Data/DataLoadSave/Text/TextLoaderCursor.cs89.61% <0.00%> (-0.16%)⬇️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs98.80% <0.00%> (+0.22%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Utils/LossFunctions.cs67.35% <0.00%> (+0.51%)⬆️
...oft.ML.StandardTrainers/Standard/SdcaMulticlass.cs92.49% <0.00%> (+1.02%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Sweeper/AsyncSweeper.cs72.78% <0.00%> (+1.36%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.IO.cs81.15% <0.00%> (+1.92%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/TrainCatalog.cs82.70% <0.00%> (+2.53%)⬆️
... and 5 more

[InlineData("en-US")]
[InlineData("ar-SA")]
[InlineData("pl-PL")]
public void AutoFitRegressionTest(string culture)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We no longer using SMac Sweeper in regression, so we can just remove this test.

if (rowCount < crossValRowCountThreshold)
{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
int numCrossValFolds = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have removed the const?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no specific reason of doing that. I just feel like there's no need to mark this numCrossValFolds as const.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have a variable in the first place then? I mean why you don't just call the method and passing 10?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that,, fixed and Resolved

// Else, run experiment using train-validate split.
const int crossValRowCountThreshold = 15000;
var rowCount = DatasetDimensionsUtil.CountRows(trainData, crossValRowCountThreshold);
// TODO

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO

this will be done in another PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@tarekghtarekgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

module my minor questions, LGTM.

{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, numCrossValFolds);
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, 10);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you may add the parameter name before 10 for code readability :-)

@LittleLittleCloud
LittleLittleCloud merged commit 3965078 into dotnet:mainSep 29, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@LittleLittleCloud@tarekgh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment - #6338

Merged
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment#6338
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression

Conversation

@LittleLittleCloud

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

  • There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.

  • There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.

  • Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.

  • You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

  • AutoML.Net improvements tracking down list #6145

  • Update or deprecate AutoML 1.x APIs #6532

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud changed the title use AutoMLExperiment in RegressionExperimentImprove RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperimentSep 26, 2022
@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6338 (20fce65) into main (50e5068) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6338 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.64% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 1171 1171 Lines 247736 247964 +228 Branches 25733 25738 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 169858 170214 +356 + Misses 71115 71008 -107 + Partials 6763 6742 -21 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.64% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️
production63.04% <ø> (+0.06%)⬆️
test89.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
test/Microsoft.ML.AutoML.Tests/AutoFitTests.cs82.48% <100.00%> (+2.91%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Core/Data/ProgressReporter.cs70.95% <0.00%> (-6.99%)⬇️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs25.38% <0.00%> (-1.53%)⬇️
...soft.ML.Data/DataLoadSave/Text/TextLoaderCursor.cs89.61% <0.00%> (-0.16%)⬇️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs98.80% <0.00%> (+0.22%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Utils/LossFunctions.cs67.35% <0.00%> (+0.51%)⬆️
...oft.ML.StandardTrainers/Standard/SdcaMulticlass.cs92.49% <0.00%> (+1.02%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Sweeper/AsyncSweeper.cs72.78% <0.00%> (+1.36%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.IO.cs81.15% <0.00%> (+1.92%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/TrainCatalog.cs82.70% <0.00%> (+2.53%)⬆️
... and 5 more

[InlineData("en-US")]
[InlineData("ar-SA")]
[InlineData("pl-PL")]
public void AutoFitRegressionTest(string culture)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We no longer using SMac Sweeper in regression, so we can just remove this test.

if (rowCount < crossValRowCountThreshold)
{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
int numCrossValFolds = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have removed the const?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no specific reason of doing that. I just feel like there's no need to mark this numCrossValFolds as const.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have a variable in the first place then? I mean why you don't just call the method and passing 10?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that,, fixed and Resolved

// Else, run experiment using train-validate split.
const int crossValRowCountThreshold = 15000;
var rowCount = DatasetDimensionsUtil.CountRows(trainData, crossValRowCountThreshold);
// TODO

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO

this will be done in another PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@tarekghtarekgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

module my minor questions, LGTM.

{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, numCrossValFolds);
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, 10);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you may add the parameter name before 10 for code readability :-)

@LittleLittleCloud
LittleLittleCloud merged commit 3965078 into dotnet:mainSep 29, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@LittleLittleCloud@tarekgh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment - #6338

Merged
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment#6338
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression

Conversation

@LittleLittleCloud

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

  • There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.

  • There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.

  • Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.

  • You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

  • AutoML.Net improvements tracking down list #6145

  • Update or deprecate AutoML 1.x APIs #6532

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud changed the title use AutoMLExperiment in RegressionExperimentImprove RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperimentSep 26, 2022
@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6338 (20fce65) into main (50e5068) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6338 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.64% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 1171 1171 Lines 247736 247964 +228 Branches 25733 25738 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 169858 170214 +356 + Misses 71115 71008 -107 + Partials 6763 6742 -21 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.64% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️
production63.04% <ø> (+0.06%)⬆️
test89.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
test/Microsoft.ML.AutoML.Tests/AutoFitTests.cs82.48% <100.00%> (+2.91%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Core/Data/ProgressReporter.cs70.95% <0.00%> (-6.99%)⬇️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs25.38% <0.00%> (-1.53%)⬇️
...soft.ML.Data/DataLoadSave/Text/TextLoaderCursor.cs89.61% <0.00%> (-0.16%)⬇️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs98.80% <0.00%> (+0.22%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Utils/LossFunctions.cs67.35% <0.00%> (+0.51%)⬆️
...oft.ML.StandardTrainers/Standard/SdcaMulticlass.cs92.49% <0.00%> (+1.02%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Sweeper/AsyncSweeper.cs72.78% <0.00%> (+1.36%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.IO.cs81.15% <0.00%> (+1.92%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/TrainCatalog.cs82.70% <0.00%> (+2.53%)⬆️
... and 5 more

[InlineData("en-US")]
[InlineData("ar-SA")]
[InlineData("pl-PL")]
public void AutoFitRegressionTest(string culture)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We no longer using SMac Sweeper in regression, so we can just remove this test.

if (rowCount < crossValRowCountThreshold)
{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
int numCrossValFolds = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have removed the const?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no specific reason of doing that. I just feel like there's no need to mark this numCrossValFolds as const.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have a variable in the first place then? I mean why you don't just call the method and passing 10?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that,, fixed and Resolved

// Else, run experiment using train-validate split.
const int crossValRowCountThreshold = 15000;
var rowCount = DatasetDimensionsUtil.CountRows(trainData, crossValRowCountThreshold);
// TODO

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO

this will be done in another PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@tarekghtarekgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

module my minor questions, LGTM.

{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, numCrossValFolds);
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, 10);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you may add the parameter name before 10 for code readability :-)

@LittleLittleCloud
LittleLittleCloud merged commit 3965078 into dotnet:mainSep 29, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@LittleLittleCloud@tarekgh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment - #6338

Merged
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment#6338
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression

Conversation

@LittleLittleCloud

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

  • There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.

  • There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.

  • Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.

  • You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

  • AutoML.Net improvements tracking down list #6145

  • Update or deprecate AutoML 1.x APIs #6532

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud changed the title use AutoMLExperiment in RegressionExperimentImprove RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperimentSep 26, 2022
@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6338 (20fce65) into main (50e5068) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6338 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.64% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 1171 1171 Lines 247736 247964 +228 Branches 25733 25738 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 169858 170214 +356 + Misses 71115 71008 -107 + Partials 6763 6742 -21 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.64% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️
production63.04% <ø> (+0.06%)⬆️
test89.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
test/Microsoft.ML.AutoML.Tests/AutoFitTests.cs82.48% <100.00%> (+2.91%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Core/Data/ProgressReporter.cs70.95% <0.00%> (-6.99%)⬇️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs25.38% <0.00%> (-1.53%)⬇️
...soft.ML.Data/DataLoadSave/Text/TextLoaderCursor.cs89.61% <0.00%> (-0.16%)⬇️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs98.80% <0.00%> (+0.22%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Utils/LossFunctions.cs67.35% <0.00%> (+0.51%)⬆️
...oft.ML.StandardTrainers/Standard/SdcaMulticlass.cs92.49% <0.00%> (+1.02%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Sweeper/AsyncSweeper.cs72.78% <0.00%> (+1.36%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.IO.cs81.15% <0.00%> (+1.92%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/TrainCatalog.cs82.70% <0.00%> (+2.53%)⬆️
... and 5 more

[InlineData("en-US")]
[InlineData("ar-SA")]
[InlineData("pl-PL")]
public void AutoFitRegressionTest(string culture)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We no longer using SMac Sweeper in regression, so we can just remove this test.

if (rowCount < crossValRowCountThreshold)
{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
int numCrossValFolds = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have removed the const?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no specific reason of doing that. I just feel like there's no need to mark this numCrossValFolds as const.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have a variable in the first place then? I mean why you don't just call the method and passing 10?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that,, fixed and Resolved

// Else, run experiment using train-validate split.
const int crossValRowCountThreshold = 15000;
var rowCount = DatasetDimensionsUtil.CountRows(trainData, crossValRowCountThreshold);
// TODO

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO

this will be done in another PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@tarekghtarekgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

module my minor questions, LGTM.

{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, numCrossValFolds);
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, 10);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you may add the parameter name before 10 for code readability :-)

@LittleLittleCloud
LittleLittleCloud merged commit 3965078 into dotnet:mainSep 29, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@LittleLittleCloud@tarekgh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment - #6338

Merged
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment#6338
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression

Conversation

@LittleLittleCloud

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

  • There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.

  • There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.

  • Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.

  • You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

  • AutoML.Net improvements tracking down list #6145

  • Update or deprecate AutoML 1.x APIs #6532

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud changed the title use AutoMLExperiment in RegressionExperimentImprove RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperimentSep 26, 2022
@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6338 (20fce65) into main (50e5068) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6338 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.64% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 1171 1171 Lines 247736 247964 +228 Branches 25733 25738 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 169858 170214 +356 + Misses 71115 71008 -107 + Partials 6763 6742 -21 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.64% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️
production63.04% <ø> (+0.06%)⬆️
test89.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
test/Microsoft.ML.AutoML.Tests/AutoFitTests.cs82.48% <100.00%> (+2.91%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Core/Data/ProgressReporter.cs70.95% <0.00%> (-6.99%)⬇️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs25.38% <0.00%> (-1.53%)⬇️
...soft.ML.Data/DataLoadSave/Text/TextLoaderCursor.cs89.61% <0.00%> (-0.16%)⬇️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs98.80% <0.00%> (+0.22%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Utils/LossFunctions.cs67.35% <0.00%> (+0.51%)⬆️
...oft.ML.StandardTrainers/Standard/SdcaMulticlass.cs92.49% <0.00%> (+1.02%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Sweeper/AsyncSweeper.cs72.78% <0.00%> (+1.36%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.IO.cs81.15% <0.00%> (+1.92%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/TrainCatalog.cs82.70% <0.00%> (+2.53%)⬆️
... and 5 more

[InlineData("en-US")]
[InlineData("ar-SA")]
[InlineData("pl-PL")]
public void AutoFitRegressionTest(string culture)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We no longer using SMac Sweeper in regression, so we can just remove this test.

if (rowCount < crossValRowCountThreshold)
{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
int numCrossValFolds = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have removed the const?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no specific reason of doing that. I just feel like there's no need to mark this numCrossValFolds as const.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have a variable in the first place then? I mean why you don't just call the method and passing 10?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that,, fixed and Resolved

// Else, run experiment using train-validate split.
const int crossValRowCountThreshold = 15000;
var rowCount = DatasetDimensionsUtil.CountRows(trainData, crossValRowCountThreshold);
// TODO

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO

this will be done in another PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@tarekghtarekgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

module my minor questions, LGTM.

{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, numCrossValFolds);
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, 10);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you may add the parameter name before 10 for code readability :-)

@LittleLittleCloud
LittleLittleCloud merged commit 3965078 into dotnet:mainSep 29, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@LittleLittleCloud@tarekgh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment - #6338

Merged
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment#6338
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression

Conversation

@LittleLittleCloud

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

  • There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.

  • There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.

  • Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.

  • You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

  • AutoML.Net improvements tracking down list #6145

  • Update or deprecate AutoML 1.x APIs #6532

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud changed the title use AutoMLExperiment in RegressionExperimentImprove RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperimentSep 26, 2022
@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6338 (20fce65) into main (50e5068) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6338 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.64% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 1171 1171 Lines 247736 247964 +228 Branches 25733 25738 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 169858 170214 +356 + Misses 71115 71008 -107 + Partials 6763 6742 -21 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.64% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️
production63.04% <ø> (+0.06%)⬆️
test89.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
test/Microsoft.ML.AutoML.Tests/AutoFitTests.cs82.48% <100.00%> (+2.91%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Core/Data/ProgressReporter.cs70.95% <0.00%> (-6.99%)⬇️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs25.38% <0.00%> (-1.53%)⬇️
...soft.ML.Data/DataLoadSave/Text/TextLoaderCursor.cs89.61% <0.00%> (-0.16%)⬇️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs98.80% <0.00%> (+0.22%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Utils/LossFunctions.cs67.35% <0.00%> (+0.51%)⬆️
...oft.ML.StandardTrainers/Standard/SdcaMulticlass.cs92.49% <0.00%> (+1.02%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Sweeper/AsyncSweeper.cs72.78% <0.00%> (+1.36%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.IO.cs81.15% <0.00%> (+1.92%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/TrainCatalog.cs82.70% <0.00%> (+2.53%)⬆️
... and 5 more

[InlineData("en-US")]
[InlineData("ar-SA")]
[InlineData("pl-PL")]
public void AutoFitRegressionTest(string culture)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We no longer using SMac Sweeper in regression, so we can just remove this test.

if (rowCount < crossValRowCountThreshold)
{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
int numCrossValFolds = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have removed the const?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no specific reason of doing that. I just feel like there's no need to mark this numCrossValFolds as const.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have a variable in the first place then? I mean why you don't just call the method and passing 10?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that,, fixed and Resolved

// Else, run experiment using train-validate split.
const int crossValRowCountThreshold = 15000;
var rowCount = DatasetDimensionsUtil.CountRows(trainData, crossValRowCountThreshold);
// TODO

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO

this will be done in another PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@tarekghtarekgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

module my minor questions, LGTM.

{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, numCrossValFolds);
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, 10);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you may add the parameter name before 10 for code readability :-)

@LittleLittleCloud
LittleLittleCloud merged commit 3965078 into dotnet:mainSep 29, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@LittleLittleCloud@tarekgh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment - #6338

Merged
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment#6338
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression

Conversation

@LittleLittleCloud

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

  • There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.

  • There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.

  • Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.

  • You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

  • AutoML.Net improvements tracking down list #6145

  • Update or deprecate AutoML 1.x APIs #6532

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud changed the title use AutoMLExperiment in RegressionExperimentImprove RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperimentSep 26, 2022
@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6338 (20fce65) into main (50e5068) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6338 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.64% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 1171 1171 Lines 247736 247964 +228 Branches 25733 25738 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 169858 170214 +356 + Misses 71115 71008 -107 + Partials 6763 6742 -21 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.64% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️
production63.04% <ø> (+0.06%)⬆️
test89.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
test/Microsoft.ML.AutoML.Tests/AutoFitTests.cs82.48% <100.00%> (+2.91%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Core/Data/ProgressReporter.cs70.95% <0.00%> (-6.99%)⬇️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs25.38% <0.00%> (-1.53%)⬇️
...soft.ML.Data/DataLoadSave/Text/TextLoaderCursor.cs89.61% <0.00%> (-0.16%)⬇️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs98.80% <0.00%> (+0.22%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Utils/LossFunctions.cs67.35% <0.00%> (+0.51%)⬆️
...oft.ML.StandardTrainers/Standard/SdcaMulticlass.cs92.49% <0.00%> (+1.02%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Sweeper/AsyncSweeper.cs72.78% <0.00%> (+1.36%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.IO.cs81.15% <0.00%> (+1.92%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/TrainCatalog.cs82.70% <0.00%> (+2.53%)⬆️
... and 5 more

[InlineData("en-US")]
[InlineData("ar-SA")]
[InlineData("pl-PL")]
public void AutoFitRegressionTest(string culture)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We no longer using SMac Sweeper in regression, so we can just remove this test.

if (rowCount < crossValRowCountThreshold)
{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
int numCrossValFolds = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have removed the const?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no specific reason of doing that. I just feel like there's no need to mark this numCrossValFolds as const.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have a variable in the first place then? I mean why you don't just call the method and passing 10?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that,, fixed and Resolved

// Else, run experiment using train-validate split.
const int crossValRowCountThreshold = 15000;
var rowCount = DatasetDimensionsUtil.CountRows(trainData, crossValRowCountThreshold);
// TODO

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO

this will be done in another PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@tarekghtarekgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

module my minor questions, LGTM.

{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, numCrossValFolds);
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, 10);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you may add the parameter name before 10 for code readability :-)

@LittleLittleCloud
LittleLittleCloud merged commit 3965078 into dotnet:mainSep 29, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@LittleLittleCloud@tarekgh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment - #6338

Merged
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Improve RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperiment#6338
LittleLittleCloud merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
LittleLittleCloud:u/xiaoyun/autoRegression

Conversation

@LittleLittleCloud

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

  • There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.

  • There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.

  • Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.

  • You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

  • AutoML.Net improvements tracking down list #6145

  • Update or deprecate AutoML 1.x APIs #6532

@LittleLittleCloudLittleLittleCloud changed the title use AutoMLExperiment in RegressionExperimentImprove RegressionExpeirment using AutoMLExperimentSep 26, 2022
@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6338 (20fce65) into main (50e5068) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6338 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.64% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 1171 1171 Lines 247736 247964 +228 Branches 25733 25738 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 169858 170214 +356 + Misses 71115 71008 -107 + Partials 6763 6742 -21 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.64% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️
production63.04% <ø> (+0.06%)⬆️
test89.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
test/Microsoft.ML.AutoML.Tests/AutoFitTests.cs82.48% <100.00%> (+2.91%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Core/Data/ProgressReporter.cs70.95% <0.00%> (-6.99%)⬇️
src/Microsoft.ML.Maml/MAML.cs25.38% <0.00%> (-1.53%)⬇️
...soft.ML.Data/DataLoadSave/Text/TextLoaderCursor.cs89.61% <0.00%> (-0.16%)⬇️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs98.80% <0.00%> (+0.22%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/Utils/LossFunctions.cs67.35% <0.00%> (+0.51%)⬆️
...oft.ML.StandardTrainers/Standard/SdcaMulticlass.cs92.49% <0.00%> (+1.02%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Sweeper/AsyncSweeper.cs72.78% <0.00%> (+1.36%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.IO.cs81.15% <0.00%> (+1.92%)⬆️
src/Microsoft.ML.Data/TrainCatalog.cs82.70% <0.00%> (+2.53%)⬆️
... and 5 more

[InlineData("en-US")]
[InlineData("ar-SA")]
[InlineData("pl-PL")]
public void AutoFitRegressionTest(string culture)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We no longer using SMac Sweeper in regression, so we can just remove this test.

if (rowCount < crossValRowCountThreshold)
{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
int numCrossValFolds = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have removed the const?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no specific reason of doing that. I just feel like there's no need to mark this numCrossValFolds as const.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have a variable in the first place then? I mean why you don't just call the method and passing 10?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that,, fixed and Resolved

// Else, run experiment using train-validate split.
const int crossValRowCountThreshold = 15000;
var rowCount = DatasetDimensionsUtil.CountRows(trainData, crossValRowCountThreshold);
// TODO

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO

this will be done in another PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@tarekghtarekgh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

module my minor questions, LGTM.

{
const int numCrossValFolds = 10;
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, numCrossValFolds);
_experiment.SetDataset(trainData, 10);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you may add the parameter name before 10 for code readability :-)

@LittleLittleCloud
LittleLittleCloud merged commit 3965078 into dotnet:mainSep 29, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@LittleLittleCloud@tarekgh