Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now - #6658

Merged
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil
May 5, 2023
Merged

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now#6658
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil

Conversation

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently the TorchSharp nuget is targetting x64 only while we are targeting AnyCPU. TorchSharp is targetting x64 because right now they only package the x64 binaries. We are targeting AnyCPU because in theory if someone compiled their own native code for non x64 and dropped it in it should still work.

Disabling the check for MSB3270 for now to resolve the issue. Will need to address this again when TorchSharp changes.

@JakeRadMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It might be worth warning? I'm fine either way.

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JakeRadMSFT we treat warnings as errors, so making this warn will still throw an error for us. The real way to do it would be to add a targets file in the nuget that somehow checks for something like this. That can come in later though as this is blocking some builds now.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6658 (5d921dc) into main (ce9938d) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.57% 68.58% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 1200 1200 Lines 250309 250326 +17 Branches 26095 26096 +1 ==========================================
+ Hits 171647 171698 +51 + Misses 71843 71814 -29 + Partials 6819 6814 -5 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
production63.07% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
test88.84% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp merged commit 896d69a into dotnet:mainMay 5, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2023
@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp deleted the torchsharp-msil branch November 18, 2024 20:04
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@michaelgsharp@JakeRadMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now - #6658

Merged
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil
May 5, 2023
Merged

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now#6658
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil

Conversation

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently the TorchSharp nuget is targetting x64 only while we are targeting AnyCPU. TorchSharp is targetting x64 because right now they only package the x64 binaries. We are targeting AnyCPU because in theory if someone compiled their own native code for non x64 and dropped it in it should still work.

Disabling the check for MSB3270 for now to resolve the issue. Will need to address this again when TorchSharp changes.

@JakeRadMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It might be worth warning? I'm fine either way.

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JakeRadMSFT we treat warnings as errors, so making this warn will still throw an error for us. The real way to do it would be to add a targets file in the nuget that somehow checks for something like this. That can come in later though as this is blocking some builds now.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6658 (5d921dc) into main (ce9938d) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.57% 68.58% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 1200 1200 Lines 250309 250326 +17 Branches 26095 26096 +1 ==========================================
+ Hits 171647 171698 +51 + Misses 71843 71814 -29 + Partials 6819 6814 -5 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
production63.07% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
test88.84% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp merged commit 896d69a into dotnet:mainMay 5, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2023
@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp deleted the torchsharp-msil branch November 18, 2024 20:04
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@michaelgsharp@JakeRadMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now - #6658

Merged
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil
May 5, 2023
Merged

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now#6658
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil

Conversation

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently the TorchSharp nuget is targetting x64 only while we are targeting AnyCPU. TorchSharp is targetting x64 because right now they only package the x64 binaries. We are targeting AnyCPU because in theory if someone compiled their own native code for non x64 and dropped it in it should still work.

Disabling the check for MSB3270 for now to resolve the issue. Will need to address this again when TorchSharp changes.

@JakeRadMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It might be worth warning? I'm fine either way.

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JakeRadMSFT we treat warnings as errors, so making this warn will still throw an error for us. The real way to do it would be to add a targets file in the nuget that somehow checks for something like this. That can come in later though as this is blocking some builds now.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6658 (5d921dc) into main (ce9938d) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.57% 68.58% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 1200 1200 Lines 250309 250326 +17 Branches 26095 26096 +1 ==========================================
+ Hits 171647 171698 +51 + Misses 71843 71814 -29 + Partials 6819 6814 -5 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
production63.07% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
test88.84% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp merged commit 896d69a into dotnet:mainMay 5, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2023
@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp deleted the torchsharp-msil branch November 18, 2024 20:04
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@michaelgsharp@JakeRadMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now - #6658

Merged
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil
May 5, 2023
Merged

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now#6658
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil

Conversation

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently the TorchSharp nuget is targetting x64 only while we are targeting AnyCPU. TorchSharp is targetting x64 because right now they only package the x64 binaries. We are targeting AnyCPU because in theory if someone compiled their own native code for non x64 and dropped it in it should still work.

Disabling the check for MSB3270 for now to resolve the issue. Will need to address this again when TorchSharp changes.

@JakeRadMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It might be worth warning? I'm fine either way.

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JakeRadMSFT we treat warnings as errors, so making this warn will still throw an error for us. The real way to do it would be to add a targets file in the nuget that somehow checks for something like this. That can come in later though as this is blocking some builds now.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6658 (5d921dc) into main (ce9938d) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.57% 68.58% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 1200 1200 Lines 250309 250326 +17 Branches 26095 26096 +1 ==========================================
+ Hits 171647 171698 +51 + Misses 71843 71814 -29 + Partials 6819 6814 -5 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
production63.07% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
test88.84% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp merged commit 896d69a into dotnet:mainMay 5, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2023
@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp deleted the torchsharp-msil branch November 18, 2024 20:04
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@michaelgsharp@JakeRadMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now - #6658

Merged
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil
May 5, 2023
Merged

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now#6658
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil

Conversation

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently the TorchSharp nuget is targetting x64 only while we are targeting AnyCPU. TorchSharp is targetting x64 because right now they only package the x64 binaries. We are targeting AnyCPU because in theory if someone compiled their own native code for non x64 and dropped it in it should still work.

Disabling the check for MSB3270 for now to resolve the issue. Will need to address this again when TorchSharp changes.

@JakeRadMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It might be worth warning? I'm fine either way.

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JakeRadMSFT we treat warnings as errors, so making this warn will still throw an error for us. The real way to do it would be to add a targets file in the nuget that somehow checks for something like this. That can come in later though as this is blocking some builds now.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6658 (5d921dc) into main (ce9938d) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.57% 68.58% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 1200 1200 Lines 250309 250326 +17 Branches 26095 26096 +1 ==========================================
+ Hits 171647 171698 +51 + Misses 71843 71814 -29 + Partials 6819 6814 -5 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
production63.07% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
test88.84% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp merged commit 896d69a into dotnet:mainMay 5, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2023
@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp deleted the torchsharp-msil branch November 18, 2024 20:04
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@michaelgsharp@JakeRadMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now - #6658

Merged
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil
May 5, 2023
Merged

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now#6658
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil

Conversation

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently the TorchSharp nuget is targetting x64 only while we are targeting AnyCPU. TorchSharp is targetting x64 because right now they only package the x64 binaries. We are targeting AnyCPU because in theory if someone compiled their own native code for non x64 and dropped it in it should still work.

Disabling the check for MSB3270 for now to resolve the issue. Will need to address this again when TorchSharp changes.

@JakeRadMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It might be worth warning? I'm fine either way.

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JakeRadMSFT we treat warnings as errors, so making this warn will still throw an error for us. The real way to do it would be to add a targets file in the nuget that somehow checks for something like this. That can come in later though as this is blocking some builds now.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6658 (5d921dc) into main (ce9938d) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.57% 68.58% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 1200 1200 Lines 250309 250326 +17 Branches 26095 26096 +1 ==========================================
+ Hits 171647 171698 +51 + Misses 71843 71814 -29 + Partials 6819 6814 -5 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
production63.07% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
test88.84% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp merged commit 896d69a into dotnet:mainMay 5, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2023
@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp deleted the torchsharp-msil branch November 18, 2024 20:04
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@michaelgsharp@JakeRadMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now - #6658

Merged
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil
May 5, 2023
Merged

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now#6658
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil

Conversation

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently the TorchSharp nuget is targetting x64 only while we are targeting AnyCPU. TorchSharp is targetting x64 because right now they only package the x64 binaries. We are targeting AnyCPU because in theory if someone compiled their own native code for non x64 and dropped it in it should still work.

Disabling the check for MSB3270 for now to resolve the issue. Will need to address this again when TorchSharp changes.

@JakeRadMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It might be worth warning? I'm fine either way.

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JakeRadMSFT we treat warnings as errors, so making this warn will still throw an error for us. The real way to do it would be to add a targets file in the nuget that somehow checks for something like this. That can come in later though as this is blocking some builds now.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6658 (5d921dc) into main (ce9938d) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.57% 68.58% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 1200 1200 Lines 250309 250326 +17 Branches 26095 26096 +1 ==========================================
+ Hits 171647 171698 +51 + Misses 71843 71814 -29 + Partials 6819 6814 -5 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
production63.07% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
test88.84% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp merged commit 896d69a into dotnet:mainMay 5, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2023
@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp deleted the torchsharp-msil branch November 18, 2024 20:04
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@michaelgsharp@JakeRadMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now - #6658

Merged
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil
May 5, 2023
Merged

Removing MSIL check for TorchSharp for now#6658
michaelgsharp merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
michaelgsharp:torchsharp-msil

Conversation

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently the TorchSharp nuget is targetting x64 only while we are targeting AnyCPU. TorchSharp is targetting x64 because right now they only package the x64 binaries. We are targeting AnyCPU because in theory if someone compiled their own native code for non x64 and dropped it in it should still work.

Disabling the check for MSB3270 for now to resolve the issue. Will need to address this again when TorchSharp changes.

@JakeRadMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It might be worth warning? I'm fine either way.

@michaelgsharp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JakeRadMSFT we treat warnings as errors, so making this warn will still throw an error for us. The real way to do it would be to add a targets file in the nuget that somehow checks for something like this. That can come in later though as this is blocking some builds now.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6658 (5d921dc) into main (ce9938d) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.57% 68.58% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 1200 1200 Lines 250309 250326 +17 Branches 26095 26096 +1 ==========================================
+ Hits 171647 171698 +51 + Misses 71843 71814 -29 + Partials 6819 6814 -5 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
production63.07% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
test88.84% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp merged commit 896d69a into dotnet:mainMay 5, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2023
@michaelgsharp
michaelgsharp deleted the torchsharp-msil branch November 18, 2024 20:04
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@michaelgsharp@JakeRadMSFT