Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove redundant column names collection from DataFrameColumnCollection - #6701
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6701 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 68.77% =======================================
Files ? 1215 Lines ? 251723 Branches ? 26256 =======================================
Hits ? 173132 Misses ? 71773 Partials ? 6818
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
@asmirnov82 thanks so much for all your contributions to DataFrame. I’m on vacation but I can review in about a week and I’m the resident expert at the moment. Would you be open to porting them to another branch? I have a fairly big PR to modernize DataFrame to .NET 6 and Generic Math. If you could open a PR into that branch also… it would help a bunch. |
asmirnov82
commented
May 21, 2023
Hi, @JakeRadMSFT. Many thanks for you quick response. I hope you're having a great time enjoying your vacation! I created PR with porting all my changes to a new logic with general math. I also had to merge the latest main branch from the original machinelearning repo to avoid merging conflicts. You may check, when you have time: https://github.com/JakeRadMSFT/machinelearning/pull/2/commits |
JakeRadMSFT
commented
May 21, 2023
Thanks so much! |
michaelgsharp
commented
Jun 1, 2023
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
JakeRadMSFT
commented
Jun 23, 2023
Merged into Generic Math branch. (This is just a note for myself) |
column names collection was used to get column name by column index. As DataFrameColumnCollection is already collection of columns that can be accessed by index - this[i].Name can be used instead to get name. Storing dedicated collection of names is excessive,