Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer - #7427

Merged
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer#7427
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removing creating sentence piece tokenizer creation with options as it is not needed at least from now. Also, address some older comment #7409 (review) for checking the special tokens before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2025 22:25
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the ML.NET 5.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the SentencePiece tokenizer implementation by removing the JSON‐based tokenizer creation and its associated tests, and by adding a validation check to ensure that the special tokens exist in the vocabulary. Key changes include:

  • Removal of the CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson method and corresponding tests.
  • Addition of a validation check in the SentencePieceUnigramModel to ensure the BOS, EOS, and UNK token IDs are within bounds.
  • Removal of the constructors that take SentencePieceOptions and the related SentencePieceOptions file.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.csRemoved creation and tests for the outdated JSON tokenizer variant.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.csAdded bounds-check for special token indexes before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.csRemoved the constructor overload that created the tokenizer from options.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.csRemoved the constructor that used SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.csRemoved the constructor accepting SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.csRemoved the unused SentencePieceOptions file.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs:21

  • [nitpick] Removal of the JSON tokenizer tests is intentional; please ensure that the remaining tests fully cover the expected behavior of the tokenizer with special tokens.
private static SentencePieceTokenizer _unigramTokenizerFromJson = CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson();

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs:31

  • The added check for BOS, EOS, and UNK tokens is critical; ensure that the condition correctly reflects the expected bounds for modelProto.Pieces to prevent runtime errors.
if (modelProto.TrainerSpec.BosId >= modelProto.Pieces.Count ||

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.cs:1

  • Since the SentencePieceOptions file has been removed, verify that all documentation and external references have been updated accordingly to prevent integration issues.
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @ericstj

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.96%. Comparing base (d4f690c) to head (66f201e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs40.00%2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #7427 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.96% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 1483 1482 -1 Lines 274563 274198 -365 Branches 28395 28347 -48 ==========================================
- Hits 189455 189103 -352 - Misses 77672 77681 +9 + Partials 7436 7414 -22 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.96% <40.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
production63.25% <40.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
test89.46% <ø> (-0.03%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.cs79.64% <ø> (+1.25%)⬆️
...osoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.cs77.43% <ø> (+2.92%)⬆️
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.cs90.00% <ø> (+4.73%)⬆️
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs92.96% <ø> (-1.14%)⬇️
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs60.04% <40.00%> (-5.85%)⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@michaelgsharp
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer - #7427

Merged
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer#7427
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removing creating sentence piece tokenizer creation with options as it is not needed at least from now. Also, address some older comment #7409 (review) for checking the special tokens before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2025 22:25
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the ML.NET 5.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the SentencePiece tokenizer implementation by removing the JSON‐based tokenizer creation and its associated tests, and by adding a validation check to ensure that the special tokens exist in the vocabulary. Key changes include:

  • Removal of the CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson method and corresponding tests.
  • Addition of a validation check in the SentencePieceUnigramModel to ensure the BOS, EOS, and UNK token IDs are within bounds.
  • Removal of the constructors that take SentencePieceOptions and the related SentencePieceOptions file.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.csRemoved creation and tests for the outdated JSON tokenizer variant.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.csAdded bounds-check for special token indexes before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.csRemoved the constructor overload that created the tokenizer from options.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.csRemoved the constructor that used SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.csRemoved the constructor accepting SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.csRemoved the unused SentencePieceOptions file.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs:21

  • [nitpick] Removal of the JSON tokenizer tests is intentional; please ensure that the remaining tests fully cover the expected behavior of the tokenizer with special tokens.
private static SentencePieceTokenizer _unigramTokenizerFromJson = CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson();

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs:31

  • The added check for BOS, EOS, and UNK tokens is critical; ensure that the condition correctly reflects the expected bounds for modelProto.Pieces to prevent runtime errors.
if (modelProto.TrainerSpec.BosId >= modelProto.Pieces.Count ||

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.cs:1

  • Since the SentencePieceOptions file has been removed, verify that all documentation and external references have been updated accordingly to prevent integration issues.
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @ericstj

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.96%. Comparing base (d4f690c) to head (66f201e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs40.00%2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #7427 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.96% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 1483 1482 -1 Lines 274563 274198 -365 Branches 28395 28347 -48 ==========================================
- Hits 189455 189103 -352 - Misses 77672 77681 +9 + Partials 7436 7414 -22 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.96% <40.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
production63.25% <40.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
test89.46% <ø> (-0.03%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.cs79.64% <ø> (+1.25%)⬆️
...osoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.cs77.43% <ø> (+2.92%)⬆️
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.cs90.00% <ø> (+4.73%)⬆️
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs92.96% <ø> (-1.14%)⬇️
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs60.04% <40.00%> (-5.85%)⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@michaelgsharp
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer - #7427

Merged
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer#7427
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removing creating sentence piece tokenizer creation with options as it is not needed at least from now. Also, address some older comment #7409 (review) for checking the special tokens before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2025 22:25
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the ML.NET 5.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the SentencePiece tokenizer implementation by removing the JSON‐based tokenizer creation and its associated tests, and by adding a validation check to ensure that the special tokens exist in the vocabulary. Key changes include:

  • Removal of the CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson method and corresponding tests.
  • Addition of a validation check in the SentencePieceUnigramModel to ensure the BOS, EOS, and UNK token IDs are within bounds.
  • Removal of the constructors that take SentencePieceOptions and the related SentencePieceOptions file.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.csRemoved creation and tests for the outdated JSON tokenizer variant.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.csAdded bounds-check for special token indexes before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.csRemoved the constructor overload that created the tokenizer from options.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.csRemoved the constructor that used SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.csRemoved the constructor accepting SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.csRemoved the unused SentencePieceOptions file.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs:21

  • [nitpick] Removal of the JSON tokenizer tests is intentional; please ensure that the remaining tests fully cover the expected behavior of the tokenizer with special tokens.
private static SentencePieceTokenizer _unigramTokenizerFromJson = CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson();

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs:31

  • The added check for BOS, EOS, and UNK tokens is critical; ensure that the condition correctly reflects the expected bounds for modelProto.Pieces to prevent runtime errors.
if (modelProto.TrainerSpec.BosId >= modelProto.Pieces.Count ||

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.cs:1

  • Since the SentencePieceOptions file has been removed, verify that all documentation and external references have been updated accordingly to prevent integration issues.
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @ericstj

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.96%. Comparing base (d4f690c) to head (66f201e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs40.00%2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #7427 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.96% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 1483 1482 -1 Lines 274563 274198 -365 Branches 28395 28347 -48 ==========================================
- Hits 189455 189103 -352 - Misses 77672 77681 +9 + Partials 7436 7414 -22 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.96% <40.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
production63.25% <40.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
test89.46% <ø> (-0.03%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.cs79.64% <ø> (+1.25%)⬆️
...osoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.cs77.43% <ø> (+2.92%)⬆️
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.cs90.00% <ø> (+4.73%)⬆️
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs92.96% <ø> (-1.14%)⬇️
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs60.04% <40.00%> (-5.85%)⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@michaelgsharp
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer - #7427

Merged
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer#7427
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removing creating sentence piece tokenizer creation with options as it is not needed at least from now. Also, address some older comment #7409 (review) for checking the special tokens before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2025 22:25
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the ML.NET 5.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the SentencePiece tokenizer implementation by removing the JSON‐based tokenizer creation and its associated tests, and by adding a validation check to ensure that the special tokens exist in the vocabulary. Key changes include:

  • Removal of the CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson method and corresponding tests.
  • Addition of a validation check in the SentencePieceUnigramModel to ensure the BOS, EOS, and UNK token IDs are within bounds.
  • Removal of the constructors that take SentencePieceOptions and the related SentencePieceOptions file.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.csRemoved creation and tests for the outdated JSON tokenizer variant.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.csAdded bounds-check for special token indexes before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.csRemoved the constructor overload that created the tokenizer from options.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.csRemoved the constructor that used SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.csRemoved the constructor accepting SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.csRemoved the unused SentencePieceOptions file.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs:21

  • [nitpick] Removal of the JSON tokenizer tests is intentional; please ensure that the remaining tests fully cover the expected behavior of the tokenizer with special tokens.
private static SentencePieceTokenizer _unigramTokenizerFromJson = CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson();

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs:31

  • The added check for BOS, EOS, and UNK tokens is critical; ensure that the condition correctly reflects the expected bounds for modelProto.Pieces to prevent runtime errors.
if (modelProto.TrainerSpec.BosId >= modelProto.Pieces.Count ||

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.cs:1

  • Since the SentencePieceOptions file has been removed, verify that all documentation and external references have been updated accordingly to prevent integration issues.
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @ericstj

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.96%. Comparing base (d4f690c) to head (66f201e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs40.00%2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #7427 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.96% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 1483 1482 -1 Lines 274563 274198 -365 Branches 28395 28347 -48 ==========================================
- Hits 189455 189103 -352 - Misses 77672 77681 +9 + Partials 7436 7414 -22 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.96% <40.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
production63.25% <40.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
test89.46% <ø> (-0.03%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.cs79.64% <ø> (+1.25%)⬆️
...osoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.cs77.43% <ø> (+2.92%)⬆️
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.cs90.00% <ø> (+4.73%)⬆️
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs92.96% <ø> (-1.14%)⬇️
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs60.04% <40.00%> (-5.85%)⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@michaelgsharp
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer - #7427

Merged
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer#7427
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removing creating sentence piece tokenizer creation with options as it is not needed at least from now. Also, address some older comment #7409 (review) for checking the special tokens before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2025 22:25
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the ML.NET 5.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the SentencePiece tokenizer implementation by removing the JSON‐based tokenizer creation and its associated tests, and by adding a validation check to ensure that the special tokens exist in the vocabulary. Key changes include:

  • Removal of the CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson method and corresponding tests.
  • Addition of a validation check in the SentencePieceUnigramModel to ensure the BOS, EOS, and UNK token IDs are within bounds.
  • Removal of the constructors that take SentencePieceOptions and the related SentencePieceOptions file.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.csRemoved creation and tests for the outdated JSON tokenizer variant.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.csAdded bounds-check for special token indexes before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.csRemoved the constructor overload that created the tokenizer from options.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.csRemoved the constructor that used SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.csRemoved the constructor accepting SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.csRemoved the unused SentencePieceOptions file.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs:21

  • [nitpick] Removal of the JSON tokenizer tests is intentional; please ensure that the remaining tests fully cover the expected behavior of the tokenizer with special tokens.
private static SentencePieceTokenizer _unigramTokenizerFromJson = CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson();

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs:31

  • The added check for BOS, EOS, and UNK tokens is critical; ensure that the condition correctly reflects the expected bounds for modelProto.Pieces to prevent runtime errors.
if (modelProto.TrainerSpec.BosId >= modelProto.Pieces.Count ||

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.cs:1

  • Since the SentencePieceOptions file has been removed, verify that all documentation and external references have been updated accordingly to prevent integration issues.
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @ericstj

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.96%. Comparing base (d4f690c) to head (66f201e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs40.00%2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #7427 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.96% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 1483 1482 -1 Lines 274563 274198 -365 Branches 28395 28347 -48 ==========================================
- Hits 189455 189103 -352 - Misses 77672 77681 +9 + Partials 7436 7414 -22 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.96% <40.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
production63.25% <40.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
test89.46% <ø> (-0.03%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.cs79.64% <ø> (+1.25%)⬆️
...osoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.cs77.43% <ø> (+2.92%)⬆️
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.cs90.00% <ø> (+4.73%)⬆️
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs92.96% <ø> (-1.14%)⬇️
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs60.04% <40.00%> (-5.85%)⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@michaelgsharp
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer - #7427

Merged
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer#7427
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removing creating sentence piece tokenizer creation with options as it is not needed at least from now. Also, address some older comment #7409 (review) for checking the special tokens before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2025 22:25
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the ML.NET 5.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the SentencePiece tokenizer implementation by removing the JSON‐based tokenizer creation and its associated tests, and by adding a validation check to ensure that the special tokens exist in the vocabulary. Key changes include:

  • Removal of the CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson method and corresponding tests.
  • Addition of a validation check in the SentencePieceUnigramModel to ensure the BOS, EOS, and UNK token IDs are within bounds.
  • Removal of the constructors that take SentencePieceOptions and the related SentencePieceOptions file.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.csRemoved creation and tests for the outdated JSON tokenizer variant.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.csAdded bounds-check for special token indexes before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.csRemoved the constructor overload that created the tokenizer from options.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.csRemoved the constructor that used SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.csRemoved the constructor accepting SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.csRemoved the unused SentencePieceOptions file.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs:21

  • [nitpick] Removal of the JSON tokenizer tests is intentional; please ensure that the remaining tests fully cover the expected behavior of the tokenizer with special tokens.
private static SentencePieceTokenizer _unigramTokenizerFromJson = CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson();

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs:31

  • The added check for BOS, EOS, and UNK tokens is critical; ensure that the condition correctly reflects the expected bounds for modelProto.Pieces to prevent runtime errors.
if (modelProto.TrainerSpec.BosId >= modelProto.Pieces.Count ||

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.cs:1

  • Since the SentencePieceOptions file has been removed, verify that all documentation and external references have been updated accordingly to prevent integration issues.
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @ericstj

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.96%. Comparing base (d4f690c) to head (66f201e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs40.00%2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #7427 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.96% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 1483 1482 -1 Lines 274563 274198 -365 Branches 28395 28347 -48 ==========================================
- Hits 189455 189103 -352 - Misses 77672 77681 +9 + Partials 7436 7414 -22 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.96% <40.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
production63.25% <40.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
test89.46% <ø> (-0.03%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.cs79.64% <ø> (+1.25%)⬆️
...osoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.cs77.43% <ø> (+2.92%)⬆️
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.cs90.00% <ø> (+4.73%)⬆️
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs92.96% <ø> (-1.14%)⬇️
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs60.04% <40.00%> (-5.85%)⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@michaelgsharp
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer - #7427

Merged
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer#7427
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removing creating sentence piece tokenizer creation with options as it is not needed at least from now. Also, address some older comment #7409 (review) for checking the special tokens before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2025 22:25
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the ML.NET 5.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the SentencePiece tokenizer implementation by removing the JSON‐based tokenizer creation and its associated tests, and by adding a validation check to ensure that the special tokens exist in the vocabulary. Key changes include:

  • Removal of the CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson method and corresponding tests.
  • Addition of a validation check in the SentencePieceUnigramModel to ensure the BOS, EOS, and UNK token IDs are within bounds.
  • Removal of the constructors that take SentencePieceOptions and the related SentencePieceOptions file.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.csRemoved creation and tests for the outdated JSON tokenizer variant.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.csAdded bounds-check for special token indexes before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.csRemoved the constructor overload that created the tokenizer from options.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.csRemoved the constructor that used SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.csRemoved the constructor accepting SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.csRemoved the unused SentencePieceOptions file.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs:21

  • [nitpick] Removal of the JSON tokenizer tests is intentional; please ensure that the remaining tests fully cover the expected behavior of the tokenizer with special tokens.
private static SentencePieceTokenizer _unigramTokenizerFromJson = CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson();

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs:31

  • The added check for BOS, EOS, and UNK tokens is critical; ensure that the condition correctly reflects the expected bounds for modelProto.Pieces to prevent runtime errors.
if (modelProto.TrainerSpec.BosId >= modelProto.Pieces.Count ||

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.cs:1

  • Since the SentencePieceOptions file has been removed, verify that all documentation and external references have been updated accordingly to prevent integration issues.
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @ericstj

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.96%. Comparing base (d4f690c) to head (66f201e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs40.00%2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #7427 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.96% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 1483 1482 -1 Lines 274563 274198 -365 Branches 28395 28347 -48 ==========================================
- Hits 189455 189103 -352 - Misses 77672 77681 +9 + Partials 7436 7414 -22 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.96% <40.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
production63.25% <40.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
test89.46% <ø> (-0.03%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.cs79.64% <ø> (+1.25%)⬆️
...osoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.cs77.43% <ø> (+2.92%)⬆️
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.cs90.00% <ø> (+4.73%)⬆️
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs92.96% <ø> (-1.14%)⬇️
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs60.04% <40.00%> (-5.85%)⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@michaelgsharp
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer - #7427

Merged
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

Cleanup SentencePiece tokenizer#7427
tarekgh merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
tarekgh:CleanUpSentencePieceTokenizer

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removing creating sentence piece tokenizer creation with options as it is not needed at least from now. Also, address some older comment #7409 (review) for checking the special tokens before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2025 22:25
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the ML.NET 5.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up the SentencePiece tokenizer implementation by removing the JSON‐based tokenizer creation and its associated tests, and by adding a validation check to ensure that the special tokens exist in the vocabulary. Key changes include:

  • Removal of the CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson method and corresponding tests.
  • Addition of a validation check in the SentencePieceUnigramModel to ensure the BOS, EOS, and UNK token IDs are within bounds.
  • Removal of the constructors that take SentencePieceOptions and the related SentencePieceOptions file.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.csRemoved creation and tests for the outdated JSON tokenizer variant.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.csAdded bounds-check for special token indexes before storing them in the vocabulary reverse array.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.csRemoved the constructor overload that created the tokenizer from options.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.csRemoved the constructor that used SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.csRemoved the constructor accepting SentencePieceOptions.
src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.csRemoved the unused SentencePieceOptions file.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs:21

  • [nitpick] Removal of the JSON tokenizer tests is intentional; please ensure that the remaining tests fully cover the expected behavior of the tokenizer with special tokens.
private static SentencePieceTokenizer _unigramTokenizerFromJson = CreateUnigramTokenizerFromJson();

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs:31

  • The added check for BOS, EOS, and UNK tokens is critical; ensure that the condition correctly reflects the expected bounds for modelProto.Pieces to prevent runtime errors.
if (modelProto.TrainerSpec.BosId >= modelProto.Pieces.Count ||

src/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceOptions.cs:1

  • Since the SentencePieceOptions file has been removed, verify that all documentation and external references have been updated accordingly to prevent integration issues.
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @ericstj

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.96%. Comparing base (d4f690c) to head (66f201e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs40.00%2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #7427 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.96% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 1483 1482 -1 Lines 274563 274198 -365 Branches 28395 28347 -48 ==========================================
- Hits 189455 189103 -352 - Misses 77672 77681 +9 + Partials 7436 7414 -22 
FlagCoverage Δ
Debug68.96% <40.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
production63.25% <40.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
test89.46% <ø> (-0.03%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBaseModel.cs79.64% <ø> (+1.25%)⬆️
...osoft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceBpeModel.cs77.43% <ø> (+2.92%)⬆️
...soft.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceTokenizer.cs90.00% <ø> (+4.73%)⬆️
test/Microsoft.ML.Tokenizers.Tests/UnigramTests.cs92.96% <ø> (-1.14%)⬇️
...t.ML.Tokenizers/Model/SentencePieceUnigramModel.cs60.04% <40.00%> (-5.85%)⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@michaelgsharp