[API Proposal]: Assembly.SetEntryAssembly() #101616

Description

@ivdiazsa

Background and motivation

There exist certain specialty applications that act as a launcher for other applications within the same process. These applications typically wait for some event to occur (file system change, database change, time elapsed, etc), load a target application, and then execute it.

This works almost perfectly within .NET where the launcher can do something like spawn a thread and quickly get out of the way. However, this remains a tad complicated in the initial bookkeeping of the BCL / runtime that applications rely on. If, as applications sometimes do, they want to invoke Assembly.GetEntryAssembly, the result they get would obviously be wrong, as it would point to the launcher instead of the application itself. So, this requires changes in order to operate correctly within a launcher.

In order for customers to have that bookkeeping consistency and be able to change the assembly that actually will be run in these scenarios, we would like to propose allowing them to update what the runtime views as the entry assembly, and acts accordingly to that.

API Proposal

namespace System.Reflection;
public class Assembly
{
public static Assembly? GetEntryAssembly(); // Existing API
+ public static void SetEntryAssembly(Assembly assembly);
}

API Usage

publicclassProgram{staticvoidMain(){varwatcher=newFileSystemWatcher{Path="path_to_directory",Filter="*.*",NotifyFilter=NotifyFilters.LastWrite};watcher.Changed+=OnChanged;watcher.EnableRaisingEvents=true;Console.WriteLine("Press 'q' to quit the sample.");while(Console.Read()!='q');}privatestaticvoidOnChanged(objectsource,FileSystemEventArgse){newThread(()=>{AssemblyappToRun=Assembly.LoadFrom("path_to_other_assembly.dll");MethodInfoentryPoint=appToRun.EntryPoint;if(entryPoint!=null){Assembly.SetEntryAssembly(appToRun);entryPoint.Invoke(null,newobject[]{newstring[]{}});}}).Start();}}

Alternative Designs

One alternative may be to provide an API like the dotnet/arcade RemoteExecutor that makes it easier to launch a new process with copy of the existing runtime but running a different entry method (potentially from another assembly). That is insufficient for some use cases: some platforms (for example WebAssembly or mobile) do not support launching a new process; in other use cases it may be important to preserve part of the runtime state rather than starting from a brand new process.

Risks

The risk of this new API depends on the depth of the implementation. For diagnostics purposes, there are places in the runtime that cache the string path to the initial entry assembly. We would need to update and potentially change how that information is stored. Additionally, we may want to consider tricks that benefit startup should the entry assembly change early enough (within a startup hook, for example).

Other Notes to Consider

Questions:

  • Should this be unsupported on NativeAOT? Trimming?
  • Should we allow this to be called multiple times?
  • What is the impact on collectable assemblies? For example, if you call SetEntryAssembly with an assembly from a collectable ALC and then later set it to something else, should the collectable ALC be able to be collected?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
       blocks
      (function() {
      function addCopyButtons() {
      document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
      if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
      codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
      var btn = document.createElement('button');
      btn.textContent = 'Copy';
      btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
      btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
      btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
      btn.onclick = function() {
      navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
      btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
      setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
      });
      };
      codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
      codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
      });
      }
      addCopyButtons();
      // Re-run on dynamic content
      var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
      observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
      })();
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      [API Proposal]: Assembly.SetEntryAssembly() #101616

      Description

      @ivdiazsa

      Background and motivation

      There exist certain specialty applications that act as a launcher for other applications within the same process. These applications typically wait for some event to occur (file system change, database change, time elapsed, etc), load a target application, and then execute it.

      This works almost perfectly within .NET where the launcher can do something like spawn a thread and quickly get out of the way. However, this remains a tad complicated in the initial bookkeeping of the BCL / runtime that applications rely on. If, as applications sometimes do, they want to invoke Assembly.GetEntryAssembly, the result they get would obviously be wrong, as it would point to the launcher instead of the application itself. So, this requires changes in order to operate correctly within a launcher.

      In order for customers to have that bookkeeping consistency and be able to change the assembly that actually will be run in these scenarios, we would like to propose allowing them to update what the runtime views as the entry assembly, and acts accordingly to that.

      API Proposal

      namespace System.Reflection;
      public class Assembly
      {
      public static Assembly? GetEntryAssembly(); // Existing API
      + public static void SetEntryAssembly(Assembly assembly);
      }

      API Usage

      publicclassProgram{staticvoidMain(){varwatcher=newFileSystemWatcher{Path="path_to_directory",Filter="*.*",NotifyFilter=NotifyFilters.LastWrite};watcher.Changed+=OnChanged;watcher.EnableRaisingEvents=true;Console.WriteLine("Press 'q' to quit the sample.");while(Console.Read()!='q');}privatestaticvoidOnChanged(objectsource,FileSystemEventArgse){newThread(()=>{AssemblyappToRun=Assembly.LoadFrom("path_to_other_assembly.dll");MethodInfoentryPoint=appToRun.EntryPoint;if(entryPoint!=null){Assembly.SetEntryAssembly(appToRun);entryPoint.Invoke(null,newobject[]{newstring[]{}});}}).Start();}}

      Alternative Designs

      One alternative may be to provide an API like the dotnet/arcade RemoteExecutor that makes it easier to launch a new process with copy of the existing runtime but running a different entry method (potentially from another assembly). That is insufficient for some use cases: some platforms (for example WebAssembly or mobile) do not support launching a new process; in other use cases it may be important to preserve part of the runtime state rather than starting from a brand new process.

      Risks

      The risk of this new API depends on the depth of the implementation. For diagnostics purposes, there are places in the runtime that cache the string path to the initial entry assembly. We would need to update and potentially change how that information is stored. Additionally, we may want to consider tricks that benefit startup should the entry assembly change early enough (within a startup hook, for example).

      Other Notes to Consider

      Questions:

      • Should this be unsupported on NativeAOT? Trimming?
      • Should we allow this to be called multiple times?
      • What is the impact on collectable assemblies? For example, if you call SetEntryAssembly with an assembly from a collectable ALC and then later set it to something else, should the collectable ALC be able to be collected?

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          [API Proposal]: Assembly.SetEntryAssembly() #101616

          Description

          @ivdiazsa

          Background and motivation

          There exist certain specialty applications that act as a launcher for other applications within the same process. These applications typically wait for some event to occur (file system change, database change, time elapsed, etc), load a target application, and then execute it.

          This works almost perfectly within .NET where the launcher can do something like spawn a thread and quickly get out of the way. However, this remains a tad complicated in the initial bookkeeping of the BCL / runtime that applications rely on. If, as applications sometimes do, they want to invoke Assembly.GetEntryAssembly, the result they get would obviously be wrong, as it would point to the launcher instead of the application itself. So, this requires changes in order to operate correctly within a launcher.

          In order for customers to have that bookkeeping consistency and be able to change the assembly that actually will be run in these scenarios, we would like to propose allowing them to update what the runtime views as the entry assembly, and acts accordingly to that.

          API Proposal

          namespace System.Reflection;
          public class Assembly
          {
          public static Assembly? GetEntryAssembly(); // Existing API
          + public static void SetEntryAssembly(Assembly assembly);
          }

          API Usage

          publicclassProgram{staticvoidMain(){varwatcher=newFileSystemWatcher{Path="path_to_directory",Filter="*.*",NotifyFilter=NotifyFilters.LastWrite};watcher.Changed+=OnChanged;watcher.EnableRaisingEvents=true;Console.WriteLine("Press 'q' to quit the sample.");while(Console.Read()!='q');}privatestaticvoidOnChanged(objectsource,FileSystemEventArgse){newThread(()=>{AssemblyappToRun=Assembly.LoadFrom("path_to_other_assembly.dll");MethodInfoentryPoint=appToRun.EntryPoint;if(entryPoint!=null){Assembly.SetEntryAssembly(appToRun);entryPoint.Invoke(null,newobject[]{newstring[]{}});}}).Start();}}

          Alternative Designs

          One alternative may be to provide an API like the dotnet/arcade RemoteExecutor that makes it easier to launch a new process with copy of the existing runtime but running a different entry method (potentially from another assembly). That is insufficient for some use cases: some platforms (for example WebAssembly or mobile) do not support launching a new process; in other use cases it may be important to preserve part of the runtime state rather than starting from a brand new process.

          Risks

          The risk of this new API depends on the depth of the implementation. For diagnostics purposes, there are places in the runtime that cache the string path to the initial entry assembly. We would need to update and potentially change how that information is stored. Additionally, we may want to consider tricks that benefit startup should the entry assembly change early enough (within a startup hook, for example).

          Other Notes to Consider

          Questions:

          • Should this be unsupported on NativeAOT? Trimming?
          • Should we allow this to be called multiple times?
          • What is the impact on collectable assemblies? For example, if you call SetEntryAssembly with an assembly from a collectable ALC and then later set it to something else, should the collectable ALC be able to be collected?

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [API Proposal]: Assembly.SetEntryAssembly() #101616

              Description

              @ivdiazsa

              Background and motivation

              There exist certain specialty applications that act as a launcher for other applications within the same process. These applications typically wait for some event to occur (file system change, database change, time elapsed, etc), load a target application, and then execute it.

              This works almost perfectly within .NET where the launcher can do something like spawn a thread and quickly get out of the way. However, this remains a tad complicated in the initial bookkeeping of the BCL / runtime that applications rely on. If, as applications sometimes do, they want to invoke Assembly.GetEntryAssembly, the result they get would obviously be wrong, as it would point to the launcher instead of the application itself. So, this requires changes in order to operate correctly within a launcher.

              In order for customers to have that bookkeeping consistency and be able to change the assembly that actually will be run in these scenarios, we would like to propose allowing them to update what the runtime views as the entry assembly, and acts accordingly to that.

              API Proposal

              namespace System.Reflection;
              public class Assembly
              {
              public static Assembly? GetEntryAssembly(); // Existing API
              + public static void SetEntryAssembly(Assembly assembly);
              }

              API Usage

              publicclassProgram{staticvoidMain(){varwatcher=newFileSystemWatcher{Path="path_to_directory",Filter="*.*",NotifyFilter=NotifyFilters.LastWrite};watcher.Changed+=OnChanged;watcher.EnableRaisingEvents=true;Console.WriteLine("Press 'q' to quit the sample.");while(Console.Read()!='q');}privatestaticvoidOnChanged(objectsource,FileSystemEventArgse){newThread(()=>{AssemblyappToRun=Assembly.LoadFrom("path_to_other_assembly.dll");MethodInfoentryPoint=appToRun.EntryPoint;if(entryPoint!=null){Assembly.SetEntryAssembly(appToRun);entryPoint.Invoke(null,newobject[]{newstring[]{}});}}).Start();}}

              Alternative Designs

              One alternative may be to provide an API like the dotnet/arcade RemoteExecutor that makes it easier to launch a new process with copy of the existing runtime but running a different entry method (potentially from another assembly). That is insufficient for some use cases: some platforms (for example WebAssembly or mobile) do not support launching a new process; in other use cases it may be important to preserve part of the runtime state rather than starting from a brand new process.

              Risks

              The risk of this new API depends on the depth of the implementation. For diagnostics purposes, there are places in the runtime that cache the string path to the initial entry assembly. We would need to update and potentially change how that information is stored. Additionally, we may want to consider tricks that benefit startup should the entry assembly change early enough (within a startup hook, for example).

              Other Notes to Consider

              Questions:

              • Should this be unsupported on NativeAOT? Trimming?
              • Should we allow this to be called multiple times?
              • What is the impact on collectable assemblies? For example, if you call SetEntryAssembly with an assembly from a collectable ALC and then later set it to something else, should the collectable ALC be able to be collected?

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  [API Proposal]: Assembly.SetEntryAssembly() #101616

                  Description

                  @ivdiazsa

                  Background and motivation

                  There exist certain specialty applications that act as a launcher for other applications within the same process. These applications typically wait for some event to occur (file system change, database change, time elapsed, etc), load a target application, and then execute it.

                  This works almost perfectly within .NET where the launcher can do something like spawn a thread and quickly get out of the way. However, this remains a tad complicated in the initial bookkeeping of the BCL / runtime that applications rely on. If, as applications sometimes do, they want to invoke Assembly.GetEntryAssembly, the result they get would obviously be wrong, as it would point to the launcher instead of the application itself. So, this requires changes in order to operate correctly within a launcher.

                  In order for customers to have that bookkeeping consistency and be able to change the assembly that actually will be run in these scenarios, we would like to propose allowing them to update what the runtime views as the entry assembly, and acts accordingly to that.

                  API Proposal

                  namespace System.Reflection;
                  public class Assembly
                  {
                  public static Assembly? GetEntryAssembly(); // Existing API
                  + public static void SetEntryAssembly(Assembly assembly);
                  }

                  API Usage

                  publicclassProgram{staticvoidMain(){varwatcher=newFileSystemWatcher{Path="path_to_directory",Filter="*.*",NotifyFilter=NotifyFilters.LastWrite};watcher.Changed+=OnChanged;watcher.EnableRaisingEvents=true;Console.WriteLine("Press 'q' to quit the sample.");while(Console.Read()!='q');}privatestaticvoidOnChanged(objectsource,FileSystemEventArgse){newThread(()=>{AssemblyappToRun=Assembly.LoadFrom("path_to_other_assembly.dll");MethodInfoentryPoint=appToRun.EntryPoint;if(entryPoint!=null){Assembly.SetEntryAssembly(appToRun);entryPoint.Invoke(null,newobject[]{newstring[]{}});}}).Start();}}

                  Alternative Designs

                  One alternative may be to provide an API like the dotnet/arcade RemoteExecutor that makes it easier to launch a new process with copy of the existing runtime but running a different entry method (potentially from another assembly). That is insufficient for some use cases: some platforms (for example WebAssembly or mobile) do not support launching a new process; in other use cases it may be important to preserve part of the runtime state rather than starting from a brand new process.

                  Risks

                  The risk of this new API depends on the depth of the implementation. For diagnostics purposes, there are places in the runtime that cache the string path to the initial entry assembly. We would need to update and potentially change how that information is stored. Additionally, we may want to consider tricks that benefit startup should the entry assembly change early enough (within a startup hook, for example).

                  Other Notes to Consider

                  Questions:

                  • Should this be unsupported on NativeAOT? Trimming?
                  • Should we allow this to be called multiple times?
                  • What is the impact on collectable assemblies? For example, if you call SetEntryAssembly with an assembly from a collectable ALC and then later set it to something else, should the collectable ALC be able to be collected?

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      [API Proposal]: Assembly.SetEntryAssembly() #101616

                      Description

                      @ivdiazsa

                      Background and motivation

                      There exist certain specialty applications that act as a launcher for other applications within the same process. These applications typically wait for some event to occur (file system change, database change, time elapsed, etc), load a target application, and then execute it.

                      This works almost perfectly within .NET where the launcher can do something like spawn a thread and quickly get out of the way. However, this remains a tad complicated in the initial bookkeeping of the BCL / runtime that applications rely on. If, as applications sometimes do, they want to invoke Assembly.GetEntryAssembly, the result they get would obviously be wrong, as it would point to the launcher instead of the application itself. So, this requires changes in order to operate correctly within a launcher.

                      In order for customers to have that bookkeeping consistency and be able to change the assembly that actually will be run in these scenarios, we would like to propose allowing them to update what the runtime views as the entry assembly, and acts accordingly to that.

                      API Proposal

                      namespace System.Reflection;
                      public class Assembly
                      {
                      public static Assembly? GetEntryAssembly(); // Existing API
                      + public static void SetEntryAssembly(Assembly assembly);
                      }

                      API Usage

                      publicclassProgram{staticvoidMain(){varwatcher=newFileSystemWatcher{Path="path_to_directory",Filter="*.*",NotifyFilter=NotifyFilters.LastWrite};watcher.Changed+=OnChanged;watcher.EnableRaisingEvents=true;Console.WriteLine("Press 'q' to quit the sample.");while(Console.Read()!='q');}privatestaticvoidOnChanged(objectsource,FileSystemEventArgse){newThread(()=>{AssemblyappToRun=Assembly.LoadFrom("path_to_other_assembly.dll");MethodInfoentryPoint=appToRun.EntryPoint;if(entryPoint!=null){Assembly.SetEntryAssembly(appToRun);entryPoint.Invoke(null,newobject[]{newstring[]{}});}}).Start();}}

                      Alternative Designs

                      One alternative may be to provide an API like the dotnet/arcade RemoteExecutor that makes it easier to launch a new process with copy of the existing runtime but running a different entry method (potentially from another assembly). That is insufficient for some use cases: some platforms (for example WebAssembly or mobile) do not support launching a new process; in other use cases it may be important to preserve part of the runtime state rather than starting from a brand new process.

                      Risks

                      The risk of this new API depends on the depth of the implementation. For diagnostics purposes, there are places in the runtime that cache the string path to the initial entry assembly. We would need to update and potentially change how that information is stored. Additionally, we may want to consider tricks that benefit startup should the entry assembly change early enough (within a startup hook, for example).

                      Other Notes to Consider

                      Questions:

                      • Should this be unsupported on NativeAOT? Trimming?
                      • Should we allow this to be called multiple times?
                      • What is the impact on collectable assemblies? For example, if you call SetEntryAssembly with an assembly from a collectable ALC and then later set it to something else, should the collectable ALC be able to be collected?

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          [API Proposal]: Assembly.SetEntryAssembly() #101616

                          Description

                          @ivdiazsa

                          Background and motivation

                          There exist certain specialty applications that act as a launcher for other applications within the same process. These applications typically wait for some event to occur (file system change, database change, time elapsed, etc), load a target application, and then execute it.

                          This works almost perfectly within .NET where the launcher can do something like spawn a thread and quickly get out of the way. However, this remains a tad complicated in the initial bookkeeping of the BCL / runtime that applications rely on. If, as applications sometimes do, they want to invoke Assembly.GetEntryAssembly, the result they get would obviously be wrong, as it would point to the launcher instead of the application itself. So, this requires changes in order to operate correctly within a launcher.

                          In order for customers to have that bookkeeping consistency and be able to change the assembly that actually will be run in these scenarios, we would like to propose allowing them to update what the runtime views as the entry assembly, and acts accordingly to that.

                          API Proposal

                          namespace System.Reflection;
                          public class Assembly
                          {
                          public static Assembly? GetEntryAssembly(); // Existing API
                          + public static void SetEntryAssembly(Assembly assembly);
                          }

                          API Usage

                          publicclassProgram{staticvoidMain(){varwatcher=newFileSystemWatcher{Path="path_to_directory",Filter="*.*",NotifyFilter=NotifyFilters.LastWrite};watcher.Changed+=OnChanged;watcher.EnableRaisingEvents=true;Console.WriteLine("Press 'q' to quit the sample.");while(Console.Read()!='q');}privatestaticvoidOnChanged(objectsource,FileSystemEventArgse){newThread(()=>{AssemblyappToRun=Assembly.LoadFrom("path_to_other_assembly.dll");MethodInfoentryPoint=appToRun.EntryPoint;if(entryPoint!=null){Assembly.SetEntryAssembly(appToRun);entryPoint.Invoke(null,newobject[]{newstring[]{}});}}).Start();}}

                          Alternative Designs

                          One alternative may be to provide an API like the dotnet/arcade RemoteExecutor that makes it easier to launch a new process with copy of the existing runtime but running a different entry method (potentially from another assembly). That is insufficient for some use cases: some platforms (for example WebAssembly or mobile) do not support launching a new process; in other use cases it may be important to preserve part of the runtime state rather than starting from a brand new process.

                          Risks

                          The risk of this new API depends on the depth of the implementation. For diagnostics purposes, there are places in the runtime that cache the string path to the initial entry assembly. We would need to update and potentially change how that information is stored. Additionally, we may want to consider tricks that benefit startup should the entry assembly change early enough (within a startup hook, for example).

                          Other Notes to Consider

                          Questions:

                          • Should this be unsupported on NativeAOT? Trimming?
                          • Should we allow this to be called multiple times?
                          • What is the impact on collectable assemblies? For example, if you call SetEntryAssembly with an assembly from a collectable ALC and then later set it to something else, should the collectable ALC be able to be collected?

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              [API Proposal]: Assembly.SetEntryAssembly() #101616

                              Description

                              @ivdiazsa

                              Background and motivation

                              There exist certain specialty applications that act as a launcher for other applications within the same process. These applications typically wait for some event to occur (file system change, database change, time elapsed, etc), load a target application, and then execute it.

                              This works almost perfectly within .NET where the launcher can do something like spawn a thread and quickly get out of the way. However, this remains a tad complicated in the initial bookkeeping of the BCL / runtime that applications rely on. If, as applications sometimes do, they want to invoke Assembly.GetEntryAssembly, the result they get would obviously be wrong, as it would point to the launcher instead of the application itself. So, this requires changes in order to operate correctly within a launcher.

                              In order for customers to have that bookkeeping consistency and be able to change the assembly that actually will be run in these scenarios, we would like to propose allowing them to update what the runtime views as the entry assembly, and acts accordingly to that.

                              API Proposal

                              namespace System.Reflection;
                              public class Assembly
                              {
                              public static Assembly? GetEntryAssembly(); // Existing API
                              + public static void SetEntryAssembly(Assembly assembly);
                              }

                              API Usage

                              publicclassProgram{staticvoidMain(){varwatcher=newFileSystemWatcher{Path="path_to_directory",Filter="*.*",NotifyFilter=NotifyFilters.LastWrite};watcher.Changed+=OnChanged;watcher.EnableRaisingEvents=true;Console.WriteLine("Press 'q' to quit the sample.");while(Console.Read()!='q');}privatestaticvoidOnChanged(objectsource,FileSystemEventArgse){newThread(()=>{AssemblyappToRun=Assembly.LoadFrom("path_to_other_assembly.dll");MethodInfoentryPoint=appToRun.EntryPoint;if(entryPoint!=null){Assembly.SetEntryAssembly(appToRun);entryPoint.Invoke(null,newobject[]{newstring[]{}});}}).Start();}}

                              Alternative Designs

                              One alternative may be to provide an API like the dotnet/arcade RemoteExecutor that makes it easier to launch a new process with copy of the existing runtime but running a different entry method (potentially from another assembly). That is insufficient for some use cases: some platforms (for example WebAssembly or mobile) do not support launching a new process; in other use cases it may be important to preserve part of the runtime state rather than starting from a brand new process.

                              Risks

                              The risk of this new API depends on the depth of the implementation. For diagnostics purposes, there are places in the runtime that cache the string path to the initial entry assembly. We would need to update and potentially change how that information is stored. Additionally, we may want to consider tricks that benefit startup should the entry assembly change early enough (within a startup hook, for example).

                              Other Notes to Consider

                              Questions:

                              • Should this be unsupported on NativeAOT? Trimming?
                              • Should we allow this to be called multiple times?
                              • What is the impact on collectable assemblies? For example, if you call SetEntryAssembly with an assembly from a collectable ALC and then later set it to something else, should the collectable ALC be able to be collected?

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions