[android][infra] Validate .NET 9 Android functionality across different API versions #106717

Description

@matouskozak

Why

Android versions come with broad range of different API versions. Currently, most of our testing uses only API 29 (e.g. Android emulators Ubuntu.2204.Amd64.Android.29.Open). However, in .NET 9, we support API levels 21 and higher. We should periodically test functionality on different API versions.

How

There is a prepared set of emulator queues with different API versions with naming: ubuntu.2204.amd64.android.<API> (where <API> goes from 21 to 32, if needed ask dnceng to include other API levels). To validate the functionality, we can open a PR which sends Android emulator jobs to all these different queues. An example of past PR used to validate different API versions #64341. Finally, we must verify the results from all queues to make sure the functionality is correct across supported API levels.

What

This verification makes the most sense to be done on the pre-release branch of dotnet/runtime. Optionally, we can also verify servicing branches if we await any issues. Throughout the release cycle, this validation should be performed periodically to prevent unexpected issues caused by un-tested API levels.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
     blocks
    (function() {
    function addCopyButtons() {
    document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
    if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
    codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
    var btn = document.createElement('button');
    btn.textContent = 'Copy';
    btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
    btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
    btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
    btn.onclick = function() {
    navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
    btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
    setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
    });
    };
    codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
    codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
    });
    }
    addCopyButtons();
    // Re-run on dynamic content
    var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
    observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
    })();
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    [android][infra] Validate .NET 9 Android functionality across different API versions #106717

    Description

    @matouskozak

    Why

    Android versions come with broad range of different API versions. Currently, most of our testing uses only API 29 (e.g. Android emulators Ubuntu.2204.Amd64.Android.29.Open). However, in .NET 9, we support API levels 21 and higher. We should periodically test functionality on different API versions.

    How

    There is a prepared set of emulator queues with different API versions with naming: ubuntu.2204.amd64.android.<API> (where <API> goes from 21 to 32, if needed ask dnceng to include other API levels). To validate the functionality, we can open a PR which sends Android emulator jobs to all these different queues. An example of past PR used to validate different API versions #64341. Finally, we must verify the results from all queues to make sure the functionality is correct across supported API levels.

    What

    This verification makes the most sense to be done on the pre-release branch of dotnet/runtime. Optionally, we can also verify servicing branches if we await any issues. Throughout the release cycle, this validation should be performed periodically to prevent unexpected issues caused by un-tested API levels.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      [android][infra] Validate .NET 9 Android functionality across different API versions #106717

      Description

      @matouskozak

      Why

      Android versions come with broad range of different API versions. Currently, most of our testing uses only API 29 (e.g. Android emulators Ubuntu.2204.Amd64.Android.29.Open). However, in .NET 9, we support API levels 21 and higher. We should periodically test functionality on different API versions.

      How

      There is a prepared set of emulator queues with different API versions with naming: ubuntu.2204.amd64.android.<API> (where <API> goes from 21 to 32, if needed ask dnceng to include other API levels). To validate the functionality, we can open a PR which sends Android emulator jobs to all these different queues. An example of past PR used to validate different API versions #64341. Finally, we must verify the results from all queues to make sure the functionality is correct across supported API levels.

      What

      This verification makes the most sense to be done on the pre-release branch of dotnet/runtime. Optionally, we can also verify servicing branches if we await any issues. Throughout the release cycle, this validation should be performed periodically to prevent unexpected issues caused by un-tested API levels.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        [android][infra] Validate .NET 9 Android functionality across different API versions #106717

        Description

        @matouskozak

        Why

        Android versions come with broad range of different API versions. Currently, most of our testing uses only API 29 (e.g. Android emulators Ubuntu.2204.Amd64.Android.29.Open). However, in .NET 9, we support API levels 21 and higher. We should periodically test functionality on different API versions.

        How

        There is a prepared set of emulator queues with different API versions with naming: ubuntu.2204.amd64.android.<API> (where <API> goes from 21 to 32, if needed ask dnceng to include other API levels). To validate the functionality, we can open a PR which sends Android emulator jobs to all these different queues. An example of past PR used to validate different API versions #64341. Finally, we must verify the results from all queues to make sure the functionality is correct across supported API levels.

        What

        This verification makes the most sense to be done on the pre-release branch of dotnet/runtime. Optionally, we can also verify servicing branches if we await any issues. Throughout the release cycle, this validation should be performed periodically to prevent unexpected issues caused by un-tested API levels.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          [android][infra] Validate .NET 9 Android functionality across different API versions #106717

          Description

          @matouskozak

          Why

          Android versions come with broad range of different API versions. Currently, most of our testing uses only API 29 (e.g. Android emulators Ubuntu.2204.Amd64.Android.29.Open). However, in .NET 9, we support API levels 21 and higher. We should periodically test functionality on different API versions.

          How

          There is a prepared set of emulator queues with different API versions with naming: ubuntu.2204.amd64.android.<API> (where <API> goes from 21 to 32, if needed ask dnceng to include other API levels). To validate the functionality, we can open a PR which sends Android emulator jobs to all these different queues. An example of past PR used to validate different API versions #64341. Finally, we must verify the results from all queues to make sure the functionality is correct across supported API levels.

          What

          This verification makes the most sense to be done on the pre-release branch of dotnet/runtime. Optionally, we can also verify servicing branches if we await any issues. Throughout the release cycle, this validation should be performed periodically to prevent unexpected issues caused by un-tested API levels.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            [android][infra] Validate .NET 9 Android functionality across different API versions #106717

            Description

            @matouskozak

            Why

            Android versions come with broad range of different API versions. Currently, most of our testing uses only API 29 (e.g. Android emulators Ubuntu.2204.Amd64.Android.29.Open). However, in .NET 9, we support API levels 21 and higher. We should periodically test functionality on different API versions.

            How

            There is a prepared set of emulator queues with different API versions with naming: ubuntu.2204.amd64.android.<API> (where <API> goes from 21 to 32, if needed ask dnceng to include other API levels). To validate the functionality, we can open a PR which sends Android emulator jobs to all these different queues. An example of past PR used to validate different API versions #64341. Finally, we must verify the results from all queues to make sure the functionality is correct across supported API levels.

            What

            This verification makes the most sense to be done on the pre-release branch of dotnet/runtime. Optionally, we can also verify servicing branches if we await any issues. Throughout the release cycle, this validation should be performed periodically to prevent unexpected issues caused by un-tested API levels.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [android][infra] Validate .NET 9 Android functionality across different API versions #106717

              Description

              @matouskozak

              Why

              Android versions come with broad range of different API versions. Currently, most of our testing uses only API 29 (e.g. Android emulators Ubuntu.2204.Amd64.Android.29.Open). However, in .NET 9, we support API levels 21 and higher. We should periodically test functionality on different API versions.

              How

              There is a prepared set of emulator queues with different API versions with naming: ubuntu.2204.amd64.android.<API> (where <API> goes from 21 to 32, if needed ask dnceng to include other API levels). To validate the functionality, we can open a PR which sends Android emulator jobs to all these different queues. An example of past PR used to validate different API versions #64341. Finally, we must verify the results from all queues to make sure the functionality is correct across supported API levels.

              What

              This verification makes the most sense to be done on the pre-release branch of dotnet/runtime. Optionally, we can also verify servicing branches if we await any issues. Throughout the release cycle, this validation should be performed periodically to prevent unexpected issues caused by un-tested API levels.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                [android][infra] Validate .NET 9 Android functionality across different API versions #106717

                Description

                @matouskozak

                Why

                Android versions come with broad range of different API versions. Currently, most of our testing uses only API 29 (e.g. Android emulators Ubuntu.2204.Amd64.Android.29.Open). However, in .NET 9, we support API levels 21 and higher. We should periodically test functionality on different API versions.

                How

                There is a prepared set of emulator queues with different API versions with naming: ubuntu.2204.amd64.android.<API> (where <API> goes from 21 to 32, if needed ask dnceng to include other API levels). To validate the functionality, we can open a PR which sends Android emulator jobs to all these different queues. An example of past PR used to validate different API versions #64341. Finally, we must verify the results from all queues to make sure the functionality is correct across supported API levels.

                What

                This verification makes the most sense to be done on the pre-release branch of dotnet/runtime. Optionally, we can also verify servicing branches if we await any issues. Throughout the release cycle, this validation should be performed periodically to prevent unexpected issues caused by un-tested API levels.

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions