Unsafe.OffsetOf to get field offsets in types

[PJB3005]

Background and Motivation

We wanted to quickly set attribute-tagged fields in user defined types at runtime. The fastest and most flexible way to do this would be various Unsafe APIs like AddByteOffset and As to get refs to the field and to then set them (obviously caching the field offsets ahead of time). The problem is that it's kind of extremely annoying to get the actual offset of individual fields: the best way I could figure out is using DynamicMethod to generate a tiny method that returns a ref to the field or the offset directly (because there is no FieldInfo.GetValueRef or something), then to Unsafe.ByteOffset<T> it.

So I simply propose an API that gets the in-memory offset of a field from the object's memory layout.

Proposed API

namespace System.Runtime.CompilerServices
{
 public class Unsafe
 {
 public int OffsetOf<T>(string fieldName);
 public int OffsetOf(Type t, string fieldName);
 public int OffsetOf(FieldInfo field);
 }
}

Usage Example

private static void SetField<T>(object o, int offset, T value)
{
	// or some better way to get a base ref to the class, see below in "nuisances".
 var asDummy = Unsafe.As<FieldOffsetDummy>(o);
 ref var @ref = ref Unsafe.Add(ref asDummy.A, offset);
 ref var oRef = ref Unsafe.As<byte, T>(ref @ref);
 oRef = value;
}

private sealed class FieldOffsetDummy
{
 public byte A;
}

var offset = Unsafe.OffsetOf(typeof(Foo), "Bar");
var foo = new Foo();

SetField(foo, offset, "hello");

Some nuisances

There isn't really a "clean" way to get a base reference this field offset can be used with. You can define a new class with a single byte field and then get a ref to that (after Unsafe.As) but that's far from clear or obvious.

So maybe an API to actually fetch the base reference for an object would go along with this aswell.

[BreyerW]

Basically dupe of #28001.

Btw while we are on this topic i would also like overload based on RuntimeFieldHandle. This is already possible but requires dependency on internal implementation details. Useful when u have FieldInfo but not object itself

Edit:

This is what im talking about: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30817924/obtain-non-explicit-field-offset

Interestingly enough it still works on net 5

Edit:

You already included such overload but i think my link is still useful for those who cant wait or as reference for possible impl

Just a trivia this method work for private fields too which is useful for source generators

[obiwanjacobi]

Or int FieldInfo.ByteOffset {get;}?

[PJB3005]

Other methods like e.g. Unsafe.SizeOf<T> could "also" be Type.Size or something but aren't. That's the logic for this one being on Unsafe aswell.

[obiwanjacobi]

Unsafe is all about unsafe pointer manipulation (by looks of it). SizeOf<T>() was there to provide a similar function as Marshal.SizeOf does: report the true size in bytes of a type, which the normal (C#) sizeof() does not do in all circumstances correctly (AFAIK).
I feel adding these proposed methods would bring Unsafe out of focus, dilute it.
There is nothing inherently unsafe about querying for a byte-offset, is there?

[PJB3005]

Yes but these byte offsets are only ever useful when used with unsafe operations like the example provided in the issue.

[GrabYourPitchforks]

IMO #23716 is a better way to handle this. We really shouldn't be encouraging devs to perform arbitrary interior pointer manipulation on CLR objects which have been unsafe cast to an invalid / dummy type. There's no stated guarantee that the CLR supports such manipulation.

[obiwanjacobi]

Would the new Roslyn code generator extensions not cover much of these requirements?
More you can do at compile time the better, right?

[BreyerW]

@obiwanjacobi as far as i know you cant access private data with source generators currently unless u can link IL code somehow with source generator (important for databinding+serializers) since we dont have blessed reflection-free way to do it (offsetof on FieldInfo or similar alternative allows this scenario but theres no blessed\existing api for that) and source generators dont allow rewrites so its not like roslyn generator is panacea for all related problems

[Joe4evr]

@BreyerW Source generators generate a partial for the class it triggers on, so it can access all the private data you want.