Current state of Blazor WebAssembly and the Firefox Debugger #52698

Description

@curtisy1

Transferring this question here based on my question in the mono project

To save you the long read, here's the gist of it:
As far as I can tell debugging Blazor Wasm is currently only possible in Chromium based browsers because it relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Having Firefox support as well would be great since there's many people using it as a daily development driver.

Taking that into consideration I have a few questions on the current state and future plans of the Wasm debugger and its support for different browsers:

  1. Is using the Firefox debugger currently supported and I'm just missing some configuration steps to make it work?
  2. Are there any future plans to add such support if it doesn't exist already?
  3. Firefox Nightly apparently supports a limited subset of CDP. If support is not planned, maybe the existing configuration could at least be tweaked to support one flavor of Firefox?
  4. If support is not planned because of the big workload another debugger implementation would cause, are community contributions still welcome to add support for it or can I and potentially others save myself the work on this? There used to be a PR about this topic already, for reference

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Current state of Blazor WebAssembly and the Firefox Debugger #52698

      Description

      @curtisy1

      Transferring this question here based on my question in the mono project

      To save you the long read, here's the gist of it:
      As far as I can tell debugging Blazor Wasm is currently only possible in Chromium based browsers because it relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Having Firefox support as well would be great since there's many people using it as a daily development driver.

      Taking that into consideration I have a few questions on the current state and future plans of the Wasm debugger and its support for different browsers:

      1. Is using the Firefox debugger currently supported and I'm just missing some configuration steps to make it work?
      2. Are there any future plans to add such support if it doesn't exist already?
      3. Firefox Nightly apparently supports a limited subset of CDP. If support is not planned, maybe the existing configuration could at least be tweaked to support one flavor of Firefox?
      4. If support is not planned because of the big workload another debugger implementation would cause, are community contributions still welcome to add support for it or can I and potentially others save myself the work on this? There used to be a PR about this topic already, for reference

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Current state of Blazor WebAssembly and the Firefox Debugger #52698

          Description

          @curtisy1

          Transferring this question here based on my question in the mono project

          To save you the long read, here's the gist of it:
          As far as I can tell debugging Blazor Wasm is currently only possible in Chromium based browsers because it relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Having Firefox support as well would be great since there's many people using it as a daily development driver.

          Taking that into consideration I have a few questions on the current state and future plans of the Wasm debugger and its support for different browsers:

          1. Is using the Firefox debugger currently supported and I'm just missing some configuration steps to make it work?
          2. Are there any future plans to add such support if it doesn't exist already?
          3. Firefox Nightly apparently supports a limited subset of CDP. If support is not planned, maybe the existing configuration could at least be tweaked to support one flavor of Firefox?
          4. If support is not planned because of the big workload another debugger implementation would cause, are community contributions still welcome to add support for it or can I and potentially others save myself the work on this? There used to be a PR about this topic already, for reference

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Current state of Blazor WebAssembly and the Firefox Debugger #52698

              Description

              @curtisy1

              Transferring this question here based on my question in the mono project

              To save you the long read, here's the gist of it:
              As far as I can tell debugging Blazor Wasm is currently only possible in Chromium based browsers because it relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Having Firefox support as well would be great since there's many people using it as a daily development driver.

              Taking that into consideration I have a few questions on the current state and future plans of the Wasm debugger and its support for different browsers:

              1. Is using the Firefox debugger currently supported and I'm just missing some configuration steps to make it work?
              2. Are there any future plans to add such support if it doesn't exist already?
              3. Firefox Nightly apparently supports a limited subset of CDP. If support is not planned, maybe the existing configuration could at least be tweaked to support one flavor of Firefox?
              4. If support is not planned because of the big workload another debugger implementation would cause, are community contributions still welcome to add support for it or can I and potentially others save myself the work on this? There used to be a PR about this topic already, for reference

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Current state of Blazor WebAssembly and the Firefox Debugger #52698

                  Description

                  @curtisy1

                  Transferring this question here based on my question in the mono project

                  To save you the long read, here's the gist of it:
                  As far as I can tell debugging Blazor Wasm is currently only possible in Chromium based browsers because it relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Having Firefox support as well would be great since there's many people using it as a daily development driver.

                  Taking that into consideration I have a few questions on the current state and future plans of the Wasm debugger and its support for different browsers:

                  1. Is using the Firefox debugger currently supported and I'm just missing some configuration steps to make it work?
                  2. Are there any future plans to add such support if it doesn't exist already?
                  3. Firefox Nightly apparently supports a limited subset of CDP. If support is not planned, maybe the existing configuration could at least be tweaked to support one flavor of Firefox?
                  4. If support is not planned because of the big workload another debugger implementation would cause, are community contributions still welcome to add support for it or can I and potentially others save myself the work on this? There used to be a PR about this topic already, for reference

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Current state of Blazor WebAssembly and the Firefox Debugger #52698

                      Description

                      @curtisy1

                      Transferring this question here based on my question in the mono project

                      To save you the long read, here's the gist of it:
                      As far as I can tell debugging Blazor Wasm is currently only possible in Chromium based browsers because it relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Having Firefox support as well would be great since there's many people using it as a daily development driver.

                      Taking that into consideration I have a few questions on the current state and future plans of the Wasm debugger and its support for different browsers:

                      1. Is using the Firefox debugger currently supported and I'm just missing some configuration steps to make it work?
                      2. Are there any future plans to add such support if it doesn't exist already?
                      3. Firefox Nightly apparently supports a limited subset of CDP. If support is not planned, maybe the existing configuration could at least be tweaked to support one flavor of Firefox?
                      4. If support is not planned because of the big workload another debugger implementation would cause, are community contributions still welcome to add support for it or can I and potentially others save myself the work on this? There used to be a PR about this topic already, for reference

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Current state of Blazor WebAssembly and the Firefox Debugger #52698

                          Description

                          @curtisy1

                          Transferring this question here based on my question in the mono project

                          To save you the long read, here's the gist of it:
                          As far as I can tell debugging Blazor Wasm is currently only possible in Chromium based browsers because it relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Having Firefox support as well would be great since there's many people using it as a daily development driver.

                          Taking that into consideration I have a few questions on the current state and future plans of the Wasm debugger and its support for different browsers:

                          1. Is using the Firefox debugger currently supported and I'm just missing some configuration steps to make it work?
                          2. Are there any future plans to add such support if it doesn't exist already?
                          3. Firefox Nightly apparently supports a limited subset of CDP. If support is not planned, maybe the existing configuration could at least be tweaked to support one flavor of Firefox?
                          4. If support is not planned because of the big workload another debugger implementation would cause, are community contributions still welcome to add support for it or can I and potentially others save myself the work on this? There used to be a PR about this topic already, for reference

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Current state of Blazor WebAssembly and the Firefox Debugger #52698

                              Description

                              @curtisy1

                              Transferring this question here based on my question in the mono project

                              To save you the long read, here's the gist of it:
                              As far as I can tell debugging Blazor Wasm is currently only possible in Chromium based browsers because it relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Having Firefox support as well would be great since there's many people using it as a daily development driver.

                              Taking that into consideration I have a few questions on the current state and future plans of the Wasm debugger and its support for different browsers:

                              1. Is using the Firefox debugger currently supported and I'm just missing some configuration steps to make it work?
                              2. Are there any future plans to add such support if it doesn't exist already?
                              3. Firefox Nightly apparently supports a limited subset of CDP. If support is not planned, maybe the existing configuration could at least be tweaked to support one flavor of Firefox?
                              4. If support is not planned because of the big workload another debugger implementation would cause, are community contributions still welcome to add support for it or can I and potentially others save myself the work on this? There used to be a PR about this topic already, for reference

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions