Repeated commits for mark array #75207

Description

@cshung

Suppose we have a region that has the associated mark array committed. It is returned to the free region list through return_free_region and then got back to the heap through get_free_region. The code in init_heap_segment called by get_free_region will reset the heap_segment_flags_ma_committed flag and we will commit the mark array again when we need it.

In case we are running on a supported platform where duplicated virtual_commit to the same address range is non-fatal, it is fine.

On certain platforms, repeated virtual_commit to the same address range is fatal. Even in the case that it isn't fatal, in the presence of a hard limit, this will repeatedly consume the hard limit, so we will eventually "run out of memory" just because the number is leaked and we think the system is running out of committed bytes when it actually isn't.

To reproduce the issue, check out my private branch here.

Note: This branch requires the use of heap_hard_limit, it will assert and crash otherwise.

The branch features a heap segment analyzer that can be used to detect the case when we have overlapped virtual commits, which can be used to detect the bug as follow:

We can run GCPerfSim with these parameters (with a release build of the Core_Root built on the branch):

GCPerfSim.dll -tc 6 -tagb 100.0 -tlgb 0.01 -lohar 0 -pohar 0 -sohsi 10 -lohsi 0 -pohsi 0 -sohsr 100-4000 -lohsr 102400-204800 -pohsr 100-4000 -sohpi 10 -lohpi 0 -sohfi 0 -lohfi 0 -pohfi 0 -allocType reference -testKind time

and these environment variables:

COMPlus_GCHeapCount=6
COMPlus_GCHeapHardLimit=1C200000
COMPlus_GCServer=1

This will generate a file named andrew.txt, running analyze.py with that file will lead to the tool detecting the overlap.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Repeated commits for mark array #75207

      Description

      @cshung

      Suppose we have a region that has the associated mark array committed. It is returned to the free region list through return_free_region and then got back to the heap through get_free_region. The code in init_heap_segment called by get_free_region will reset the heap_segment_flags_ma_committed flag and we will commit the mark array again when we need it.

      In case we are running on a supported platform where duplicated virtual_commit to the same address range is non-fatal, it is fine.

      On certain platforms, repeated virtual_commit to the same address range is fatal. Even in the case that it isn't fatal, in the presence of a hard limit, this will repeatedly consume the hard limit, so we will eventually "run out of memory" just because the number is leaked and we think the system is running out of committed bytes when it actually isn't.

      To reproduce the issue, check out my private branch here.

      Note: This branch requires the use of heap_hard_limit, it will assert and crash otherwise.

      The branch features a heap segment analyzer that can be used to detect the case when we have overlapped virtual commits, which can be used to detect the bug as follow:

      We can run GCPerfSim with these parameters (with a release build of the Core_Root built on the branch):

      GCPerfSim.dll -tc 6 -tagb 100.0 -tlgb 0.01 -lohar 0 -pohar 0 -sohsi 10 -lohsi 0 -pohsi 0 -sohsr 100-4000 -lohsr 102400-204800 -pohsr 100-4000 -sohpi 10 -lohpi 0 -sohfi 0 -lohfi 0 -pohfi 0 -allocType reference -testKind time
      

      and these environment variables:

      COMPlus_GCHeapCount=6
      COMPlus_GCHeapHardLimit=1C200000
      COMPlus_GCServer=1
      

      This will generate a file named andrew.txt, running analyze.py with that file will lead to the tool detecting the overlap.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Repeated commits for mark array #75207

          Description

          @cshung

          Suppose we have a region that has the associated mark array committed. It is returned to the free region list through return_free_region and then got back to the heap through get_free_region. The code in init_heap_segment called by get_free_region will reset the heap_segment_flags_ma_committed flag and we will commit the mark array again when we need it.

          In case we are running on a supported platform where duplicated virtual_commit to the same address range is non-fatal, it is fine.

          On certain platforms, repeated virtual_commit to the same address range is fatal. Even in the case that it isn't fatal, in the presence of a hard limit, this will repeatedly consume the hard limit, so we will eventually "run out of memory" just because the number is leaked and we think the system is running out of committed bytes when it actually isn't.

          To reproduce the issue, check out my private branch here.

          Note: This branch requires the use of heap_hard_limit, it will assert and crash otherwise.

          The branch features a heap segment analyzer that can be used to detect the case when we have overlapped virtual commits, which can be used to detect the bug as follow:

          We can run GCPerfSim with these parameters (with a release build of the Core_Root built on the branch):

          GCPerfSim.dll -tc 6 -tagb 100.0 -tlgb 0.01 -lohar 0 -pohar 0 -sohsi 10 -lohsi 0 -pohsi 0 -sohsr 100-4000 -lohsr 102400-204800 -pohsr 100-4000 -sohpi 10 -lohpi 0 -sohfi 0 -lohfi 0 -pohfi 0 -allocType reference -testKind time
          

          and these environment variables:

          COMPlus_GCHeapCount=6
          COMPlus_GCHeapHardLimit=1C200000
          COMPlus_GCServer=1
          

          This will generate a file named andrew.txt, running analyze.py with that file will lead to the tool detecting the overlap.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Repeated commits for mark array #75207

              Description

              @cshung

              Suppose we have a region that has the associated mark array committed. It is returned to the free region list through return_free_region and then got back to the heap through get_free_region. The code in init_heap_segment called by get_free_region will reset the heap_segment_flags_ma_committed flag and we will commit the mark array again when we need it.

              In case we are running on a supported platform where duplicated virtual_commit to the same address range is non-fatal, it is fine.

              On certain platforms, repeated virtual_commit to the same address range is fatal. Even in the case that it isn't fatal, in the presence of a hard limit, this will repeatedly consume the hard limit, so we will eventually "run out of memory" just because the number is leaked and we think the system is running out of committed bytes when it actually isn't.

              To reproduce the issue, check out my private branch here.

              Note: This branch requires the use of heap_hard_limit, it will assert and crash otherwise.

              The branch features a heap segment analyzer that can be used to detect the case when we have overlapped virtual commits, which can be used to detect the bug as follow:

              We can run GCPerfSim with these parameters (with a release build of the Core_Root built on the branch):

              GCPerfSim.dll -tc 6 -tagb 100.0 -tlgb 0.01 -lohar 0 -pohar 0 -sohsi 10 -lohsi 0 -pohsi 0 -sohsr 100-4000 -lohsr 102400-204800 -pohsr 100-4000 -sohpi 10 -lohpi 0 -sohfi 0 -lohfi 0 -pohfi 0 -allocType reference -testKind time
              

              and these environment variables:

              COMPlus_GCHeapCount=6
              COMPlus_GCHeapHardLimit=1C200000
              COMPlus_GCServer=1
              

              This will generate a file named andrew.txt, running analyze.py with that file will lead to the tool detecting the overlap.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Repeated commits for mark array #75207

                  Description

                  @cshung

                  Suppose we have a region that has the associated mark array committed. It is returned to the free region list through return_free_region and then got back to the heap through get_free_region. The code in init_heap_segment called by get_free_region will reset the heap_segment_flags_ma_committed flag and we will commit the mark array again when we need it.

                  In case we are running on a supported platform where duplicated virtual_commit to the same address range is non-fatal, it is fine.

                  On certain platforms, repeated virtual_commit to the same address range is fatal. Even in the case that it isn't fatal, in the presence of a hard limit, this will repeatedly consume the hard limit, so we will eventually "run out of memory" just because the number is leaked and we think the system is running out of committed bytes when it actually isn't.

                  To reproduce the issue, check out my private branch here.

                  Note: This branch requires the use of heap_hard_limit, it will assert and crash otherwise.

                  The branch features a heap segment analyzer that can be used to detect the case when we have overlapped virtual commits, which can be used to detect the bug as follow:

                  We can run GCPerfSim with these parameters (with a release build of the Core_Root built on the branch):

                  GCPerfSim.dll -tc 6 -tagb 100.0 -tlgb 0.01 -lohar 0 -pohar 0 -sohsi 10 -lohsi 0 -pohsi 0 -sohsr 100-4000 -lohsr 102400-204800 -pohsr 100-4000 -sohpi 10 -lohpi 0 -sohfi 0 -lohfi 0 -pohfi 0 -allocType reference -testKind time
                  

                  and these environment variables:

                  COMPlus_GCHeapCount=6
                  COMPlus_GCHeapHardLimit=1C200000
                  COMPlus_GCServer=1
                  

                  This will generate a file named andrew.txt, running analyze.py with that file will lead to the tool detecting the overlap.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Repeated commits for mark array #75207

                      Description

                      @cshung

                      Suppose we have a region that has the associated mark array committed. It is returned to the free region list through return_free_region and then got back to the heap through get_free_region. The code in init_heap_segment called by get_free_region will reset the heap_segment_flags_ma_committed flag and we will commit the mark array again when we need it.

                      In case we are running on a supported platform where duplicated virtual_commit to the same address range is non-fatal, it is fine.

                      On certain platforms, repeated virtual_commit to the same address range is fatal. Even in the case that it isn't fatal, in the presence of a hard limit, this will repeatedly consume the hard limit, so we will eventually "run out of memory" just because the number is leaked and we think the system is running out of committed bytes when it actually isn't.

                      To reproduce the issue, check out my private branch here.

                      Note: This branch requires the use of heap_hard_limit, it will assert and crash otherwise.

                      The branch features a heap segment analyzer that can be used to detect the case when we have overlapped virtual commits, which can be used to detect the bug as follow:

                      We can run GCPerfSim with these parameters (with a release build of the Core_Root built on the branch):

                      GCPerfSim.dll -tc 6 -tagb 100.0 -tlgb 0.01 -lohar 0 -pohar 0 -sohsi 10 -lohsi 0 -pohsi 0 -sohsr 100-4000 -lohsr 102400-204800 -pohsr 100-4000 -sohpi 10 -lohpi 0 -sohfi 0 -lohfi 0 -pohfi 0 -allocType reference -testKind time
                      

                      and these environment variables:

                      COMPlus_GCHeapCount=6
                      COMPlus_GCHeapHardLimit=1C200000
                      COMPlus_GCServer=1
                      

                      This will generate a file named andrew.txt, running analyze.py with that file will lead to the tool detecting the overlap.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Repeated commits for mark array #75207

                          Description

                          @cshung

                          Suppose we have a region that has the associated mark array committed. It is returned to the free region list through return_free_region and then got back to the heap through get_free_region. The code in init_heap_segment called by get_free_region will reset the heap_segment_flags_ma_committed flag and we will commit the mark array again when we need it.

                          In case we are running on a supported platform where duplicated virtual_commit to the same address range is non-fatal, it is fine.

                          On certain platforms, repeated virtual_commit to the same address range is fatal. Even in the case that it isn't fatal, in the presence of a hard limit, this will repeatedly consume the hard limit, so we will eventually "run out of memory" just because the number is leaked and we think the system is running out of committed bytes when it actually isn't.

                          To reproduce the issue, check out my private branch here.

                          Note: This branch requires the use of heap_hard_limit, it will assert and crash otherwise.

                          The branch features a heap segment analyzer that can be used to detect the case when we have overlapped virtual commits, which can be used to detect the bug as follow:

                          We can run GCPerfSim with these parameters (with a release build of the Core_Root built on the branch):

                          GCPerfSim.dll -tc 6 -tagb 100.0 -tlgb 0.01 -lohar 0 -pohar 0 -sohsi 10 -lohsi 0 -pohsi 0 -sohsr 100-4000 -lohsr 102400-204800 -pohsr 100-4000 -sohpi 10 -lohpi 0 -sohfi 0 -lohfi 0 -pohfi 0 -allocType reference -testKind time
                          

                          and these environment variables:

                          COMPlus_GCHeapCount=6
                          COMPlus_GCHeapHardLimit=1C200000
                          COMPlus_GCServer=1
                          

                          This will generate a file named andrew.txt, running analyze.py with that file will lead to the tool detecting the overlap.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Repeated commits for mark array #75207

                              Description

                              @cshung

                              Suppose we have a region that has the associated mark array committed. It is returned to the free region list through return_free_region and then got back to the heap through get_free_region. The code in init_heap_segment called by get_free_region will reset the heap_segment_flags_ma_committed flag and we will commit the mark array again when we need it.

                              In case we are running on a supported platform where duplicated virtual_commit to the same address range is non-fatal, it is fine.

                              On certain platforms, repeated virtual_commit to the same address range is fatal. Even in the case that it isn't fatal, in the presence of a hard limit, this will repeatedly consume the hard limit, so we will eventually "run out of memory" just because the number is leaked and we think the system is running out of committed bytes when it actually isn't.

                              To reproduce the issue, check out my private branch here.

                              Note: This branch requires the use of heap_hard_limit, it will assert and crash otherwise.

                              The branch features a heap segment analyzer that can be used to detect the case when we have overlapped virtual commits, which can be used to detect the bug as follow:

                              We can run GCPerfSim with these parameters (with a release build of the Core_Root built on the branch):

                              GCPerfSim.dll -tc 6 -tagb 100.0 -tlgb 0.01 -lohar 0 -pohar 0 -sohsi 10 -lohsi 0 -pohsi 0 -sohsr 100-4000 -lohsr 102400-204800 -pohsr 100-4000 -sohpi 10 -lohpi 0 -sohfi 0 -lohfi 0 -pohfi 0 -allocType reference -testKind time
                              

                              and these environment variables:

                              COMPlus_GCHeapCount=6
                              COMPlus_GCHeapHardLimit=1C200000
                              COMPlus_GCServer=1
                              

                              This will generate a file named andrew.txt, running analyze.py with that file will lead to the tool detecting the overlap.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions