Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release #96381

Closed
Closed
Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release#96381
Assignees
EgorBo
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Milestone
8.0.x

Description

@xoofx
xoofx
opened on Jan 1, 2024

Description

Hey, I discovered a bug with tiered compilation that is generating an invalid code when a Vector128<double> is embedded in a struct and we perform calculation with it.

Reproduction Steps

Create a program with the following code, dotnet run -c Release

usingSystem.Runtime.Intrinsics;usingSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices;varrect=newPseudoPointF64(1.0,2.0);varresult=rect*2.0;Console.WriteLine(result);publicreadonlystructPseudoPointF64{privatereadonlyVector128<double>_value;publicPseudoPointF64(Vector128<double>value){_value=value;}publicPseudoPointF64(doublex,doubley){_value=Vector128.Create(x,y);}[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]publicstaticPseudoPointF64operator*(PseudoPointF64left,doubleright)=>new(left._value*Vector128.Create(right));publicoverridestringToString(){return_value.ToString();}}

Expected behavior

It should print <2, 4>

Actual behavior

It prints <2, 0>

Regression?

No response

Known Workarounds

Add [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveOptimizations)] to the method is fixing the issue.

Configuration

  • dotnet --version 8.0.100
  • x64
  • Windows 11 Pro
  • Version 23H2
  • OS build 22631.2861

Other information

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

    Skip to content
    Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release #96381
    Closed
    Closed
    Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release#96381
    Assignees
    EgorBo
    Labels
    area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
    Milestone
    8.0.x
    Description
    @xoofx
    xoofx
    opened on Jan 1, 2024
    Description
    Hey, I discovered a bug with tiered compilation that is generating an invalid code when a Vector128<double> is embedded in a struct and we perform calculation with it.
    Reproduction Steps
    Create a program with the following code, dotnet run -c Release
    usingSystem.Runtime.Intrinsics;usingSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices;varrect=newPseudoPointF64(1.0,2.0);varresult=rect*2.0;Console.WriteLine(result);publicreadonlystructPseudoPointF64{privatereadonlyVector128<double>_value;publicPseudoPointF64(Vector128<double>value){_value=value;}publicPseudoPointF64(doublex,doubley){_value=Vector128.Create(x,y);}[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]publicstaticPseudoPointF64operator*(PseudoPointF64left,doubleright)=>new(left._value*Vector128.Create(right));publicoverridestringToString(){return_value.ToString();}}
    Expected behavior
    It should print <2, 4>
    Actual behavior
    It prints <2, 0>
    Regression?
    No response
    Known Workarounds
    Add [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveOptimizations)] to the method is fixing the issue.
    Configuration
    • dotnet --version 8.0.100
    • x64
    • Windows 11 Pro
    • Version	23H2
    • OS build	22631.2861
    Other information
    No response
    Metadata
    Metadata
    Assignees
    Labels
    area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
    Type
    No type
    Projects
    No projects
      Milestone
      Relationships
      None yet
      Development
      No branches or pull requests
      Issue actions
      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

      Skip to content
      Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release #96381
      Closed
      Closed
      Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release#96381
      Assignees
      EgorBo
      Labels
      area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
      Milestone
      8.0.x
      Description
      @xoofx
      xoofx
      opened on Jan 1, 2024
      Description
      Hey, I discovered a bug with tiered compilation that is generating an invalid code when a Vector128<double> is embedded in a struct and we perform calculation with it.
      Reproduction Steps
      Create a program with the following code, dotnet run -c Release
      usingSystem.Runtime.Intrinsics;usingSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices;varrect=newPseudoPointF64(1.0,2.0);varresult=rect*2.0;Console.WriteLine(result);publicreadonlystructPseudoPointF64{privatereadonlyVector128<double>_value;publicPseudoPointF64(Vector128<double>value){_value=value;}publicPseudoPointF64(doublex,doubley){_value=Vector128.Create(x,y);}[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]publicstaticPseudoPointF64operator*(PseudoPointF64left,doubleright)=>new(left._value*Vector128.Create(right));publicoverridestringToString(){return_value.ToString();}}
      Expected behavior
      It should print <2, 4>
      Actual behavior
      It prints <2, 0>
      Regression?
      No response
      Known Workarounds
      Add [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveOptimizations)] to the method is fixing the issue.
      Configuration
      • dotnet --version 8.0.100
      • x64
      • Windows 11 Pro
      • Version	23H2
      • OS build	22631.2861
      Other information
      No response
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      Labels
      area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
      Type
      No type
      Projects
      No projects
        Milestone
        Relationships
        None yet
        Development
        No branches or pull requests
        Issue actions
        
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

        Skip to content
        Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release #96381
        Closed
        Closed
        Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release#96381
        Assignees
        EgorBo
        Labels
        area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
        Milestone
        8.0.x
        Description
        @xoofx
        xoofx
        opened on Jan 1, 2024
        Description
        Hey, I discovered a bug with tiered compilation that is generating an invalid code when a Vector128<double> is embedded in a struct and we perform calculation with it.
        Reproduction Steps
        Create a program with the following code, dotnet run -c Release
        usingSystem.Runtime.Intrinsics;usingSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices;varrect=newPseudoPointF64(1.0,2.0);varresult=rect*2.0;Console.WriteLine(result);publicreadonlystructPseudoPointF64{privatereadonlyVector128<double>_value;publicPseudoPointF64(Vector128<double>value){_value=value;}publicPseudoPointF64(doublex,doubley){_value=Vector128.Create(x,y);}[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]publicstaticPseudoPointF64operator*(PseudoPointF64left,doubleright)=>new(left._value*Vector128.Create(right));publicoverridestringToString(){return_value.ToString();}}
        Expected behavior
        It should print <2, 4>
        Actual behavior
        It prints <2, 0>
        Regression?
        No response
        Known Workarounds
        Add [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveOptimizations)] to the method is fixing the issue.
        Configuration
        • dotnet --version 8.0.100
        • x64
        • Windows 11 Pro
        • Version	23H2
        • OS build	22631.2861
        Other information
        No response
        Metadata
        Metadata
        Assignees
        Labels
        area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

          Skip to content
          Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release #96381
          Closed
          Closed
          Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release#96381
          Assignees
          EgorBo
          Labels
          area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
          Milestone
          8.0.x
          Description
          @xoofx
          xoofx
          opened on Jan 1, 2024
          Description
          Hey, I discovered a bug with tiered compilation that is generating an invalid code when a Vector128<double> is embedded in a struct and we perform calculation with it.
          Reproduction Steps
          Create a program with the following code, dotnet run -c Release
          usingSystem.Runtime.Intrinsics;usingSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices;varrect=newPseudoPointF64(1.0,2.0);varresult=rect*2.0;Console.WriteLine(result);publicreadonlystructPseudoPointF64{privatereadonlyVector128<double>_value;publicPseudoPointF64(Vector128<double>value){_value=value;}publicPseudoPointF64(doublex,doubley){_value=Vector128.Create(x,y);}[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]publicstaticPseudoPointF64operator*(PseudoPointF64left,doubleright)=>new(left._value*Vector128.Create(right));publicoverridestringToString(){return_value.ToString();}}
          Expected behavior
          It should print <2, 4>
          Actual behavior
          It prints <2, 0>
          Regression?
          No response
          Known Workarounds
          Add [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveOptimizations)] to the method is fixing the issue.
          Configuration
          • dotnet --version 8.0.100
          • x64
          • Windows 11 Pro
          • Version	23H2
          • OS build	22631.2861
          Other information
          No response
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          Labels
          area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
          Type
          No type
          Projects
          No projects
            Milestone
            Relationships
            None yet
            Development
            No branches or pull requests
            Issue actions
            
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

            Skip to content
            Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release #96381
            Closed
            Closed
            Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release#96381
            Assignees
            EgorBo
            Labels
            area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
            Milestone
            8.0.x
            Description
            @xoofx
            xoofx
            opened on Jan 1, 2024
            Description
            Hey, I discovered a bug with tiered compilation that is generating an invalid code when a Vector128<double> is embedded in a struct and we perform calculation with it.
            Reproduction Steps
            Create a program with the following code, dotnet run -c Release
            usingSystem.Runtime.Intrinsics;usingSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices;varrect=newPseudoPointF64(1.0,2.0);varresult=rect*2.0;Console.WriteLine(result);publicreadonlystructPseudoPointF64{privatereadonlyVector128<double>_value;publicPseudoPointF64(Vector128<double>value){_value=value;}publicPseudoPointF64(doublex,doubley){_value=Vector128.Create(x,y);}[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]publicstaticPseudoPointF64operator*(PseudoPointF64left,doubleright)=>new(left._value*Vector128.Create(right));publicoverridestringToString(){return_value.ToString();}}
            Expected behavior
            It should print <2, 4>
            Actual behavior
            It prints <2, 0>
            Regression?
            No response
            Known Workarounds
            Add [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveOptimizations)] to the method is fixing the issue.
            Configuration
            • dotnet --version 8.0.100
            • x64
            • Windows 11 Pro
            • Version	23H2
            • OS build	22631.2861
            Other information
            No response
            Metadata
            Metadata
            Assignees
            Labels
            area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release #96381
              Closed
              Closed
              Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release#96381
              Assignees
              EgorBo
              Labels
              area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
              Milestone
              8.0.x
              Description
              @xoofx
              xoofx
              opened on Jan 1, 2024
              Description
              Hey, I discovered a bug with tiered compilation that is generating an invalid code when a Vector128<double> is embedded in a struct and we perform calculation with it.
              Reproduction Steps
              Create a program with the following code, dotnet run -c Release
              usingSystem.Runtime.Intrinsics;usingSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices;varrect=newPseudoPointF64(1.0,2.0);varresult=rect*2.0;Console.WriteLine(result);publicreadonlystructPseudoPointF64{privatereadonlyVector128<double>_value;publicPseudoPointF64(Vector128<double>value){_value=value;}publicPseudoPointF64(doublex,doubley){_value=Vector128.Create(x,y);}[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]publicstaticPseudoPointF64operator*(PseudoPointF64left,doubleright)=>new(left._value*Vector128.Create(right));publicoverridestringToString(){return_value.ToString();}}
              Expected behavior
              It should print <2, 4>
              Actual behavior
              It prints <2, 0>
              Regression?
              No response
              Known Workarounds
              Add [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveOptimizations)] to the method is fixing the issue.
              Configuration
              • dotnet --version 8.0.100
              • x64
              • Windows 11 Pro
              • Version	23H2
              • OS build	22631.2861
              Other information
              No response
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              Labels
              area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
              Type
              No type
              Projects
              No projects
                Milestone
                Relationships
                None yet
                Development
                No branches or pull requests
                Issue actions
                
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                Skip to content
                Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release #96381
                Closed
                Closed
                Vector128 invalid code generation with tiered compilation in Release#96381
                Assignees
                EgorBo
                Labels
                area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
                Milestone
                8.0.x
                Description
                @xoofx
                xoofx
                opened on Jan 1, 2024
                Description
                Hey, I discovered a bug with tiered compilation that is generating an invalid code when a Vector128<double> is embedded in a struct and we perform calculation with it.
                Reproduction Steps
                Create a program with the following code, dotnet run -c Release
                usingSystem.Runtime.Intrinsics;usingSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices;varrect=newPseudoPointF64(1.0,2.0);varresult=rect*2.0;Console.WriteLine(result);publicreadonlystructPseudoPointF64{privatereadonlyVector128<double>_value;publicPseudoPointF64(Vector128<double>value){_value=value;}publicPseudoPointF64(doublex,doubley){_value=Vector128.Create(x,y);}[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]publicstaticPseudoPointF64operator*(PseudoPointF64left,doubleright)=>new(left._value*Vector128.Create(right));publicoverridestringToString(){return_value.ToString();}}
                Expected behavior
                It should print <2, 4>
                Actual behavior
                It prints <2, 0>
                Regression?
                No response
                Known Workarounds
                Add [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveOptimizations)] to the method is fixing the issue.
                Configuration
                • dotnet --version 8.0.100
                • x64
                • Windows 11 Pro
                • Version	23H2
                • OS build	22631.2861
                Other information
                No response
                Metadata
                Metadata
                Assignees
                Labels
                area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions