[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers - #100080

Merged
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers#100080
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo

Conversation

@tomeksowi

@tomeksowitomeksowi commented Mar 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussion in #99602 pointed out that MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags grew too complicated to properly compare against its crossgen2 version in RISCV64PassStructInRegister.cs (and understand in general). This PR simplifies it (LOC count reduced by ~70%) by following the wording of RISC-V ABI more closely, in particular by introducing an explicit step for struct field hierarchy flattening which the ABI enregistration rules are based on.

As a result of the re-write, MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags started returning correct flags (pass in float+integer registers) for the two cases:

  • struct { float; struct { string; }; } - the wrapper struct for string (one pointer) shouldn't matter
  • struct { float; struct {/*empty*/}; int; } - empty struct fields should be ignored

RISCV64PassStructInRegister.GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags was also re-written to match MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags.

This PR also fixes assertions in fgMorphMultiregStructArg when crossgen2 compiles in Debug build with --verify-type-and-field-layout option. Error messages:

/runtime/src/coreclr/jit/morph.cpp:3766
Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in ...
  • System.Private.CoreLib.dll: ValueType which contains two double fields
  • ./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp: ValueType which contains FieldOffset.

Part of #84834, cc @dotnet/samsung

clamp03and others added 4 commits March 20, 2024 11:02
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
@ghostghost added the area-ReadyToRun label Mar 21, 2024
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 21, 2024
@tomeksowi
tomeksowiforce-pushed the fixstructinfo branch 2 times, most recently from c5b27c4 to 1d6f53aCompareMarch 26, 2024 09:06
@tomeksowi

tomeksowi commented Mar 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Alright, I think the bulk of work is done. CLR tests are looking ok. I also ran some tests with RunCrossGen2=1, interop- and ABI-related tests are passing and a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way which will take some time.

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way

Too many crashes. The discrepancies in GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags I seen so far seem not to be the cause (new version returns better flags IMHO):

[S.P.CoreLib]System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair`2<System.__Canon,float64>: old(STRUCT_NO_FLOAT_FIELD), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_SECOND, STRUCT_HAS_8BYTES_FIELDS_MASK)
[S.P.CoreLib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.NFloat: old(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE, STRUCT_FIRST_FIELD_SIZE_IS8)

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

@tomeksowitomeksowi changed the title [RISC-V] WiP: Simplify flags for passing struct in registers[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registersApr 9, 2024
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

CLR tests with RunCrossGen2=1 look good now. PR ready for review.

@tomeksowi
tomeksowi marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 13:02
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I played around more with empty structs and they need some more work. Namely, we assume in quite a few places that only structs no bigger than 16 bytes can be passed in registers, which is not true for e.g. struct { double; struct {}; long; }. However, empty structs are rather niche so I'll go down that rabbit hole in another PR to make review of this one easier and sooner.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from a teamApril 10, 2024 09:52

@sirntarsirntar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas could you review please?

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice simplification!

}

if ((numIntroducedFields == 0) || (numIntroducedFields > 2) || (typeDesc.GetElementSize().AsInt > 16))
private static bool FlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesc td, StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[] types, ref int typeIndex)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[]types,refinttypeIndex)
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,Span<StructFloatFieldInfoFlags>types,refinttypeIndex)

Can this use span and stackallocated space in the caller to avoid GC allocations?

@tomeksowitomeksowiApr 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

There's still more opportunities, like use a single ref to struct { StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[2] types; int index; } (or even pass & return by value, it's so small). Since I'll be revisiting this in another PR to handle corner-cases with empty fields, I'll probably do sth like this in both C# and C++ while at it.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 691e31e into dotnet:mainApr 18, 2024
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* [RISC-V] Fix struct info value in crossgen2
* [RISC-V] Fix assertion in crossgen
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
* Check size in GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags early, use named constant
* Simplify managed branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Fix assert IsPrimitiveType for 2nd field
* Handle empty structs
* Apply FIELD_SIZE_IS8 flags only when there's at least one float
* Handle empty array struct elements
* Enregister any field type <= 8 bytes, not just primitives; i.e. pointers and refs are also OK
* Simplify native layout branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Rewrite native branch to look at only at native layout info
* Calculate flags already in GetFlattenedFieldTypes to avoid returning fake CorElementTypes from native branch
* Ignore empty structs during field flattenting because RISC-V calling convention tells us to
* Simplify crossgen2 GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags, make C++ and C# versions of this method look more alike
* Remove early exit if nFields == 0 because it wasn't doing much, the loop won't do any work if there's no fields
* Return early from HasImpliedRepeatedFields. GetApproxFieldDescListRaw() is null on empty structs, which crashes pFieldStart->GetFieldType()
* Cleanup GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags call sites
* Stackalloc field types to avoid GC allocations
---------
Co-authored-by: Dong-Heon Jung <clamp03@gmail.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 19, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-ReadyToRuncommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tomeksowi@jkotas@sirntar@am11@clamp03
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers - #100080

Merged
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers#100080
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo

Conversation

@tomeksowi

@tomeksowitomeksowi commented Mar 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussion in #99602 pointed out that MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags grew too complicated to properly compare against its crossgen2 version in RISCV64PassStructInRegister.cs (and understand in general). This PR simplifies it (LOC count reduced by ~70%) by following the wording of RISC-V ABI more closely, in particular by introducing an explicit step for struct field hierarchy flattening which the ABI enregistration rules are based on.

As a result of the re-write, MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags started returning correct flags (pass in float+integer registers) for the two cases:

  • struct { float; struct { string; }; } - the wrapper struct for string (one pointer) shouldn't matter
  • struct { float; struct {/*empty*/}; int; } - empty struct fields should be ignored

RISCV64PassStructInRegister.GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags was also re-written to match MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags.

This PR also fixes assertions in fgMorphMultiregStructArg when crossgen2 compiles in Debug build with --verify-type-and-field-layout option. Error messages:

/runtime/src/coreclr/jit/morph.cpp:3766
Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in ...
  • System.Private.CoreLib.dll: ValueType which contains two double fields
  • ./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp: ValueType which contains FieldOffset.

Part of #84834, cc @dotnet/samsung

clamp03and others added 4 commits March 20, 2024 11:02
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
@ghostghost added the area-ReadyToRun label Mar 21, 2024
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 21, 2024
@tomeksowi
tomeksowiforce-pushed the fixstructinfo branch 2 times, most recently from c5b27c4 to 1d6f53aCompareMarch 26, 2024 09:06
@tomeksowi

tomeksowi commented Mar 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Alright, I think the bulk of work is done. CLR tests are looking ok. I also ran some tests with RunCrossGen2=1, interop- and ABI-related tests are passing and a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way which will take some time.

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way

Too many crashes. The discrepancies in GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags I seen so far seem not to be the cause (new version returns better flags IMHO):

[S.P.CoreLib]System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair`2<System.__Canon,float64>: old(STRUCT_NO_FLOAT_FIELD), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_SECOND, STRUCT_HAS_8BYTES_FIELDS_MASK)
[S.P.CoreLib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.NFloat: old(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE, STRUCT_FIRST_FIELD_SIZE_IS8)

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

@tomeksowitomeksowi changed the title [RISC-V] WiP: Simplify flags for passing struct in registers[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registersApr 9, 2024
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

CLR tests with RunCrossGen2=1 look good now. PR ready for review.

@tomeksowi
tomeksowi marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 13:02
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I played around more with empty structs and they need some more work. Namely, we assume in quite a few places that only structs no bigger than 16 bytes can be passed in registers, which is not true for e.g. struct { double; struct {}; long; }. However, empty structs are rather niche so I'll go down that rabbit hole in another PR to make review of this one easier and sooner.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from a teamApril 10, 2024 09:52

@sirntarsirntar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas could you review please?

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice simplification!

}

if ((numIntroducedFields == 0) || (numIntroducedFields > 2) || (typeDesc.GetElementSize().AsInt > 16))
private static bool FlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesc td, StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[] types, ref int typeIndex)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[]types,refinttypeIndex)
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,Span<StructFloatFieldInfoFlags>types,refinttypeIndex)

Can this use span and stackallocated space in the caller to avoid GC allocations?

@tomeksowitomeksowiApr 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

There's still more opportunities, like use a single ref to struct { StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[2] types; int index; } (or even pass & return by value, it's so small). Since I'll be revisiting this in another PR to handle corner-cases with empty fields, I'll probably do sth like this in both C# and C++ while at it.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 691e31e into dotnet:mainApr 18, 2024
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* [RISC-V] Fix struct info value in crossgen2
* [RISC-V] Fix assertion in crossgen
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
* Check size in GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags early, use named constant
* Simplify managed branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Fix assert IsPrimitiveType for 2nd field
* Handle empty structs
* Apply FIELD_SIZE_IS8 flags only when there's at least one float
* Handle empty array struct elements
* Enregister any field type <= 8 bytes, not just primitives; i.e. pointers and refs are also OK
* Simplify native layout branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Rewrite native branch to look at only at native layout info
* Calculate flags already in GetFlattenedFieldTypes to avoid returning fake CorElementTypes from native branch
* Ignore empty structs during field flattenting because RISC-V calling convention tells us to
* Simplify crossgen2 GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags, make C++ and C# versions of this method look more alike
* Remove early exit if nFields == 0 because it wasn't doing much, the loop won't do any work if there's no fields
* Return early from HasImpliedRepeatedFields. GetApproxFieldDescListRaw() is null on empty structs, which crashes pFieldStart->GetFieldType()
* Cleanup GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags call sites
* Stackalloc field types to avoid GC allocations
---------
Co-authored-by: Dong-Heon Jung <clamp03@gmail.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 19, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-ReadyToRuncommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tomeksowi@jkotas@sirntar@am11@clamp03
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers - #100080

Merged
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers#100080
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo

Conversation

@tomeksowi

@tomeksowitomeksowi commented Mar 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussion in #99602 pointed out that MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags grew too complicated to properly compare against its crossgen2 version in RISCV64PassStructInRegister.cs (and understand in general). This PR simplifies it (LOC count reduced by ~70%) by following the wording of RISC-V ABI more closely, in particular by introducing an explicit step for struct field hierarchy flattening which the ABI enregistration rules are based on.

As a result of the re-write, MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags started returning correct flags (pass in float+integer registers) for the two cases:

  • struct { float; struct { string; }; } - the wrapper struct for string (one pointer) shouldn't matter
  • struct { float; struct {/*empty*/}; int; } - empty struct fields should be ignored

RISCV64PassStructInRegister.GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags was also re-written to match MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags.

This PR also fixes assertions in fgMorphMultiregStructArg when crossgen2 compiles in Debug build with --verify-type-and-field-layout option. Error messages:

/runtime/src/coreclr/jit/morph.cpp:3766
Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in ...
  • System.Private.CoreLib.dll: ValueType which contains two double fields
  • ./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp: ValueType which contains FieldOffset.

Part of #84834, cc @dotnet/samsung

clamp03and others added 4 commits March 20, 2024 11:02
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
@ghostghost added the area-ReadyToRun label Mar 21, 2024
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 21, 2024
@tomeksowi
tomeksowiforce-pushed the fixstructinfo branch 2 times, most recently from c5b27c4 to 1d6f53aCompareMarch 26, 2024 09:06
@tomeksowi

tomeksowi commented Mar 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Alright, I think the bulk of work is done. CLR tests are looking ok. I also ran some tests with RunCrossGen2=1, interop- and ABI-related tests are passing and a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way which will take some time.

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way

Too many crashes. The discrepancies in GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags I seen so far seem not to be the cause (new version returns better flags IMHO):

[S.P.CoreLib]System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair`2<System.__Canon,float64>: old(STRUCT_NO_FLOAT_FIELD), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_SECOND, STRUCT_HAS_8BYTES_FIELDS_MASK)
[S.P.CoreLib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.NFloat: old(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE, STRUCT_FIRST_FIELD_SIZE_IS8)

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

@tomeksowitomeksowi changed the title [RISC-V] WiP: Simplify flags for passing struct in registers[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registersApr 9, 2024
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

CLR tests with RunCrossGen2=1 look good now. PR ready for review.

@tomeksowi
tomeksowi marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 13:02
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I played around more with empty structs and they need some more work. Namely, we assume in quite a few places that only structs no bigger than 16 bytes can be passed in registers, which is not true for e.g. struct { double; struct {}; long; }. However, empty structs are rather niche so I'll go down that rabbit hole in another PR to make review of this one easier and sooner.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from a teamApril 10, 2024 09:52

@sirntarsirntar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas could you review please?

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice simplification!

}

if ((numIntroducedFields == 0) || (numIntroducedFields > 2) || (typeDesc.GetElementSize().AsInt > 16))
private static bool FlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesc td, StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[] types, ref int typeIndex)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[]types,refinttypeIndex)
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,Span<StructFloatFieldInfoFlags>types,refinttypeIndex)

Can this use span and stackallocated space in the caller to avoid GC allocations?

@tomeksowitomeksowiApr 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

There's still more opportunities, like use a single ref to struct { StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[2] types; int index; } (or even pass & return by value, it's so small). Since I'll be revisiting this in another PR to handle corner-cases with empty fields, I'll probably do sth like this in both C# and C++ while at it.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 691e31e into dotnet:mainApr 18, 2024
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* [RISC-V] Fix struct info value in crossgen2
* [RISC-V] Fix assertion in crossgen
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
* Check size in GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags early, use named constant
* Simplify managed branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Fix assert IsPrimitiveType for 2nd field
* Handle empty structs
* Apply FIELD_SIZE_IS8 flags only when there's at least one float
* Handle empty array struct elements
* Enregister any field type <= 8 bytes, not just primitives; i.e. pointers and refs are also OK
* Simplify native layout branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Rewrite native branch to look at only at native layout info
* Calculate flags already in GetFlattenedFieldTypes to avoid returning fake CorElementTypes from native branch
* Ignore empty structs during field flattenting because RISC-V calling convention tells us to
* Simplify crossgen2 GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags, make C++ and C# versions of this method look more alike
* Remove early exit if nFields == 0 because it wasn't doing much, the loop won't do any work if there's no fields
* Return early from HasImpliedRepeatedFields. GetApproxFieldDescListRaw() is null on empty structs, which crashes pFieldStart->GetFieldType()
* Cleanup GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags call sites
* Stackalloc field types to avoid GC allocations
---------
Co-authored-by: Dong-Heon Jung <clamp03@gmail.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 19, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-ReadyToRuncommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tomeksowi@jkotas@sirntar@am11@clamp03
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers - #100080

Merged
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers#100080
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo

Conversation

@tomeksowi

@tomeksowitomeksowi commented Mar 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussion in #99602 pointed out that MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags grew too complicated to properly compare against its crossgen2 version in RISCV64PassStructInRegister.cs (and understand in general). This PR simplifies it (LOC count reduced by ~70%) by following the wording of RISC-V ABI more closely, in particular by introducing an explicit step for struct field hierarchy flattening which the ABI enregistration rules are based on.

As a result of the re-write, MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags started returning correct flags (pass in float+integer registers) for the two cases:

  • struct { float; struct { string; }; } - the wrapper struct for string (one pointer) shouldn't matter
  • struct { float; struct {/*empty*/}; int; } - empty struct fields should be ignored

RISCV64PassStructInRegister.GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags was also re-written to match MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags.

This PR also fixes assertions in fgMorphMultiregStructArg when crossgen2 compiles in Debug build with --verify-type-and-field-layout option. Error messages:

/runtime/src/coreclr/jit/morph.cpp:3766
Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in ...
  • System.Private.CoreLib.dll: ValueType which contains two double fields
  • ./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp: ValueType which contains FieldOffset.

Part of #84834, cc @dotnet/samsung

clamp03and others added 4 commits March 20, 2024 11:02
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
@ghostghost added the area-ReadyToRun label Mar 21, 2024
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 21, 2024
@tomeksowi
tomeksowiforce-pushed the fixstructinfo branch 2 times, most recently from c5b27c4 to 1d6f53aCompareMarch 26, 2024 09:06
@tomeksowi

tomeksowi commented Mar 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Alright, I think the bulk of work is done. CLR tests are looking ok. I also ran some tests with RunCrossGen2=1, interop- and ABI-related tests are passing and a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way which will take some time.

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way

Too many crashes. The discrepancies in GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags I seen so far seem not to be the cause (new version returns better flags IMHO):

[S.P.CoreLib]System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair`2<System.__Canon,float64>: old(STRUCT_NO_FLOAT_FIELD), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_SECOND, STRUCT_HAS_8BYTES_FIELDS_MASK)
[S.P.CoreLib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.NFloat: old(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE, STRUCT_FIRST_FIELD_SIZE_IS8)

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

@tomeksowitomeksowi changed the title [RISC-V] WiP: Simplify flags for passing struct in registers[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registersApr 9, 2024
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

CLR tests with RunCrossGen2=1 look good now. PR ready for review.

@tomeksowi
tomeksowi marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 13:02
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I played around more with empty structs and they need some more work. Namely, we assume in quite a few places that only structs no bigger than 16 bytes can be passed in registers, which is not true for e.g. struct { double; struct {}; long; }. However, empty structs are rather niche so I'll go down that rabbit hole in another PR to make review of this one easier and sooner.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from a teamApril 10, 2024 09:52

@sirntarsirntar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas could you review please?

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice simplification!

}

if ((numIntroducedFields == 0) || (numIntroducedFields > 2) || (typeDesc.GetElementSize().AsInt > 16))
private static bool FlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesc td, StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[] types, ref int typeIndex)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[]types,refinttypeIndex)
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,Span<StructFloatFieldInfoFlags>types,refinttypeIndex)

Can this use span and stackallocated space in the caller to avoid GC allocations?

@tomeksowitomeksowiApr 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

There's still more opportunities, like use a single ref to struct { StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[2] types; int index; } (or even pass & return by value, it's so small). Since I'll be revisiting this in another PR to handle corner-cases with empty fields, I'll probably do sth like this in both C# and C++ while at it.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 691e31e into dotnet:mainApr 18, 2024
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* [RISC-V] Fix struct info value in crossgen2
* [RISC-V] Fix assertion in crossgen
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
* Check size in GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags early, use named constant
* Simplify managed branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Fix assert IsPrimitiveType for 2nd field
* Handle empty structs
* Apply FIELD_SIZE_IS8 flags only when there's at least one float
* Handle empty array struct elements
* Enregister any field type <= 8 bytes, not just primitives; i.e. pointers and refs are also OK
* Simplify native layout branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Rewrite native branch to look at only at native layout info
* Calculate flags already in GetFlattenedFieldTypes to avoid returning fake CorElementTypes from native branch
* Ignore empty structs during field flattenting because RISC-V calling convention tells us to
* Simplify crossgen2 GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags, make C++ and C# versions of this method look more alike
* Remove early exit if nFields == 0 because it wasn't doing much, the loop won't do any work if there's no fields
* Return early from HasImpliedRepeatedFields. GetApproxFieldDescListRaw() is null on empty structs, which crashes pFieldStart->GetFieldType()
* Cleanup GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags call sites
* Stackalloc field types to avoid GC allocations
---------
Co-authored-by: Dong-Heon Jung <clamp03@gmail.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 19, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-ReadyToRuncommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tomeksowi@jkotas@sirntar@am11@clamp03
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers - #100080

Merged
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers#100080
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo

Conversation

@tomeksowi

@tomeksowitomeksowi commented Mar 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussion in #99602 pointed out that MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags grew too complicated to properly compare against its crossgen2 version in RISCV64PassStructInRegister.cs (and understand in general). This PR simplifies it (LOC count reduced by ~70%) by following the wording of RISC-V ABI more closely, in particular by introducing an explicit step for struct field hierarchy flattening which the ABI enregistration rules are based on.

As a result of the re-write, MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags started returning correct flags (pass in float+integer registers) for the two cases:

  • struct { float; struct { string; }; } - the wrapper struct for string (one pointer) shouldn't matter
  • struct { float; struct {/*empty*/}; int; } - empty struct fields should be ignored

RISCV64PassStructInRegister.GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags was also re-written to match MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags.

This PR also fixes assertions in fgMorphMultiregStructArg when crossgen2 compiles in Debug build with --verify-type-and-field-layout option. Error messages:

/runtime/src/coreclr/jit/morph.cpp:3766
Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in ...
  • System.Private.CoreLib.dll: ValueType which contains two double fields
  • ./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp: ValueType which contains FieldOffset.

Part of #84834, cc @dotnet/samsung

clamp03and others added 4 commits March 20, 2024 11:02
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
@ghostghost added the area-ReadyToRun label Mar 21, 2024
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 21, 2024
@tomeksowi
tomeksowiforce-pushed the fixstructinfo branch 2 times, most recently from c5b27c4 to 1d6f53aCompareMarch 26, 2024 09:06
@tomeksowi

tomeksowi commented Mar 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Alright, I think the bulk of work is done. CLR tests are looking ok. I also ran some tests with RunCrossGen2=1, interop- and ABI-related tests are passing and a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way which will take some time.

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way

Too many crashes. The discrepancies in GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags I seen so far seem not to be the cause (new version returns better flags IMHO):

[S.P.CoreLib]System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair`2<System.__Canon,float64>: old(STRUCT_NO_FLOAT_FIELD), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_SECOND, STRUCT_HAS_8BYTES_FIELDS_MASK)
[S.P.CoreLib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.NFloat: old(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE, STRUCT_FIRST_FIELD_SIZE_IS8)

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

@tomeksowitomeksowi changed the title [RISC-V] WiP: Simplify flags for passing struct in registers[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registersApr 9, 2024
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

CLR tests with RunCrossGen2=1 look good now. PR ready for review.

@tomeksowi
tomeksowi marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 13:02
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I played around more with empty structs and they need some more work. Namely, we assume in quite a few places that only structs no bigger than 16 bytes can be passed in registers, which is not true for e.g. struct { double; struct {}; long; }. However, empty structs are rather niche so I'll go down that rabbit hole in another PR to make review of this one easier and sooner.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from a teamApril 10, 2024 09:52

@sirntarsirntar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas could you review please?

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice simplification!

}

if ((numIntroducedFields == 0) || (numIntroducedFields > 2) || (typeDesc.GetElementSize().AsInt > 16))
private static bool FlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesc td, StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[] types, ref int typeIndex)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[]types,refinttypeIndex)
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,Span<StructFloatFieldInfoFlags>types,refinttypeIndex)

Can this use span and stackallocated space in the caller to avoid GC allocations?

@tomeksowitomeksowiApr 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

There's still more opportunities, like use a single ref to struct { StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[2] types; int index; } (or even pass & return by value, it's so small). Since I'll be revisiting this in another PR to handle corner-cases with empty fields, I'll probably do sth like this in both C# and C++ while at it.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 691e31e into dotnet:mainApr 18, 2024
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* [RISC-V] Fix struct info value in crossgen2
* [RISC-V] Fix assertion in crossgen
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
* Check size in GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags early, use named constant
* Simplify managed branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Fix assert IsPrimitiveType for 2nd field
* Handle empty structs
* Apply FIELD_SIZE_IS8 flags only when there's at least one float
* Handle empty array struct elements
* Enregister any field type <= 8 bytes, not just primitives; i.e. pointers and refs are also OK
* Simplify native layout branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Rewrite native branch to look at only at native layout info
* Calculate flags already in GetFlattenedFieldTypes to avoid returning fake CorElementTypes from native branch
* Ignore empty structs during field flattenting because RISC-V calling convention tells us to
* Simplify crossgen2 GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags, make C++ and C# versions of this method look more alike
* Remove early exit if nFields == 0 because it wasn't doing much, the loop won't do any work if there's no fields
* Return early from HasImpliedRepeatedFields. GetApproxFieldDescListRaw() is null on empty structs, which crashes pFieldStart->GetFieldType()
* Cleanup GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags call sites
* Stackalloc field types to avoid GC allocations
---------
Co-authored-by: Dong-Heon Jung <clamp03@gmail.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 19, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-ReadyToRuncommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tomeksowi@jkotas@sirntar@am11@clamp03
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers - #100080

Merged
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers#100080
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo

Conversation

@tomeksowi

@tomeksowitomeksowi commented Mar 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussion in #99602 pointed out that MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags grew too complicated to properly compare against its crossgen2 version in RISCV64PassStructInRegister.cs (and understand in general). This PR simplifies it (LOC count reduced by ~70%) by following the wording of RISC-V ABI more closely, in particular by introducing an explicit step for struct field hierarchy flattening which the ABI enregistration rules are based on.

As a result of the re-write, MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags started returning correct flags (pass in float+integer registers) for the two cases:

  • struct { float; struct { string; }; } - the wrapper struct for string (one pointer) shouldn't matter
  • struct { float; struct {/*empty*/}; int; } - empty struct fields should be ignored

RISCV64PassStructInRegister.GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags was also re-written to match MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags.

This PR also fixes assertions in fgMorphMultiregStructArg when crossgen2 compiles in Debug build with --verify-type-and-field-layout option. Error messages:

/runtime/src/coreclr/jit/morph.cpp:3766
Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in ...
  • System.Private.CoreLib.dll: ValueType which contains two double fields
  • ./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp: ValueType which contains FieldOffset.

Part of #84834, cc @dotnet/samsung

clamp03and others added 4 commits March 20, 2024 11:02
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
@ghostghost added the area-ReadyToRun label Mar 21, 2024
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 21, 2024
@tomeksowi
tomeksowiforce-pushed the fixstructinfo branch 2 times, most recently from c5b27c4 to 1d6f53aCompareMarch 26, 2024 09:06
@tomeksowi

tomeksowi commented Mar 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Alright, I think the bulk of work is done. CLR tests are looking ok. I also ran some tests with RunCrossGen2=1, interop- and ABI-related tests are passing and a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way which will take some time.

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way

Too many crashes. The discrepancies in GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags I seen so far seem not to be the cause (new version returns better flags IMHO):

[S.P.CoreLib]System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair`2<System.__Canon,float64>: old(STRUCT_NO_FLOAT_FIELD), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_SECOND, STRUCT_HAS_8BYTES_FIELDS_MASK)
[S.P.CoreLib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.NFloat: old(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE, STRUCT_FIRST_FIELD_SIZE_IS8)

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

@tomeksowitomeksowi changed the title [RISC-V] WiP: Simplify flags for passing struct in registers[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registersApr 9, 2024
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

CLR tests with RunCrossGen2=1 look good now. PR ready for review.

@tomeksowi
tomeksowi marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 13:02
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I played around more with empty structs and they need some more work. Namely, we assume in quite a few places that only structs no bigger than 16 bytes can be passed in registers, which is not true for e.g. struct { double; struct {}; long; }. However, empty structs are rather niche so I'll go down that rabbit hole in another PR to make review of this one easier and sooner.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from a teamApril 10, 2024 09:52

@sirntarsirntar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas could you review please?

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice simplification!

}

if ((numIntroducedFields == 0) || (numIntroducedFields > 2) || (typeDesc.GetElementSize().AsInt > 16))
private static bool FlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesc td, StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[] types, ref int typeIndex)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[]types,refinttypeIndex)
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,Span<StructFloatFieldInfoFlags>types,refinttypeIndex)

Can this use span and stackallocated space in the caller to avoid GC allocations?

@tomeksowitomeksowiApr 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

There's still more opportunities, like use a single ref to struct { StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[2] types; int index; } (or even pass & return by value, it's so small). Since I'll be revisiting this in another PR to handle corner-cases with empty fields, I'll probably do sth like this in both C# and C++ while at it.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 691e31e into dotnet:mainApr 18, 2024
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* [RISC-V] Fix struct info value in crossgen2
* [RISC-V] Fix assertion in crossgen
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
* Check size in GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags early, use named constant
* Simplify managed branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Fix assert IsPrimitiveType for 2nd field
* Handle empty structs
* Apply FIELD_SIZE_IS8 flags only when there's at least one float
* Handle empty array struct elements
* Enregister any field type <= 8 bytes, not just primitives; i.e. pointers and refs are also OK
* Simplify native layout branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Rewrite native branch to look at only at native layout info
* Calculate flags already in GetFlattenedFieldTypes to avoid returning fake CorElementTypes from native branch
* Ignore empty structs during field flattenting because RISC-V calling convention tells us to
* Simplify crossgen2 GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags, make C++ and C# versions of this method look more alike
* Remove early exit if nFields == 0 because it wasn't doing much, the loop won't do any work if there's no fields
* Return early from HasImpliedRepeatedFields. GetApproxFieldDescListRaw() is null on empty structs, which crashes pFieldStart->GetFieldType()
* Cleanup GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags call sites
* Stackalloc field types to avoid GC allocations
---------
Co-authored-by: Dong-Heon Jung <clamp03@gmail.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 19, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-ReadyToRuncommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tomeksowi@jkotas@sirntar@am11@clamp03
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers - #100080

Merged
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers#100080
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo

Conversation

@tomeksowi

@tomeksowitomeksowi commented Mar 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussion in #99602 pointed out that MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags grew too complicated to properly compare against its crossgen2 version in RISCV64PassStructInRegister.cs (and understand in general). This PR simplifies it (LOC count reduced by ~70%) by following the wording of RISC-V ABI more closely, in particular by introducing an explicit step for struct field hierarchy flattening which the ABI enregistration rules are based on.

As a result of the re-write, MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags started returning correct flags (pass in float+integer registers) for the two cases:

  • struct { float; struct { string; }; } - the wrapper struct for string (one pointer) shouldn't matter
  • struct { float; struct {/*empty*/}; int; } - empty struct fields should be ignored

RISCV64PassStructInRegister.GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags was also re-written to match MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags.

This PR also fixes assertions in fgMorphMultiregStructArg when crossgen2 compiles in Debug build with --verify-type-and-field-layout option. Error messages:

/runtime/src/coreclr/jit/morph.cpp:3766
Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in ...
  • System.Private.CoreLib.dll: ValueType which contains two double fields
  • ./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp: ValueType which contains FieldOffset.

Part of #84834, cc @dotnet/samsung

clamp03and others added 4 commits March 20, 2024 11:02
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
@ghostghost added the area-ReadyToRun label Mar 21, 2024
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 21, 2024
@tomeksowi
tomeksowiforce-pushed the fixstructinfo branch 2 times, most recently from c5b27c4 to 1d6f53aCompareMarch 26, 2024 09:06
@tomeksowi

tomeksowi commented Mar 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Alright, I think the bulk of work is done. CLR tests are looking ok. I also ran some tests with RunCrossGen2=1, interop- and ABI-related tests are passing and a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way which will take some time.

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way

Too many crashes. The discrepancies in GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags I seen so far seem not to be the cause (new version returns better flags IMHO):

[S.P.CoreLib]System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair`2<System.__Canon,float64>: old(STRUCT_NO_FLOAT_FIELD), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_SECOND, STRUCT_HAS_8BYTES_FIELDS_MASK)
[S.P.CoreLib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.NFloat: old(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE, STRUCT_FIRST_FIELD_SIZE_IS8)

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

@tomeksowitomeksowi changed the title [RISC-V] WiP: Simplify flags for passing struct in registers[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registersApr 9, 2024
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

CLR tests with RunCrossGen2=1 look good now. PR ready for review.

@tomeksowi
tomeksowi marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 13:02
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I played around more with empty structs and they need some more work. Namely, we assume in quite a few places that only structs no bigger than 16 bytes can be passed in registers, which is not true for e.g. struct { double; struct {}; long; }. However, empty structs are rather niche so I'll go down that rabbit hole in another PR to make review of this one easier and sooner.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from a teamApril 10, 2024 09:52

@sirntarsirntar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas could you review please?

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice simplification!

}

if ((numIntroducedFields == 0) || (numIntroducedFields > 2) || (typeDesc.GetElementSize().AsInt > 16))
private static bool FlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesc td, StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[] types, ref int typeIndex)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[]types,refinttypeIndex)
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,Span<StructFloatFieldInfoFlags>types,refinttypeIndex)

Can this use span and stackallocated space in the caller to avoid GC allocations?

@tomeksowitomeksowiApr 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

There's still more opportunities, like use a single ref to struct { StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[2] types; int index; } (or even pass & return by value, it's so small). Since I'll be revisiting this in another PR to handle corner-cases with empty fields, I'll probably do sth like this in both C# and C++ while at it.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 691e31e into dotnet:mainApr 18, 2024
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* [RISC-V] Fix struct info value in crossgen2
* [RISC-V] Fix assertion in crossgen
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
* Check size in GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags early, use named constant
* Simplify managed branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Fix assert IsPrimitiveType for 2nd field
* Handle empty structs
* Apply FIELD_SIZE_IS8 flags only when there's at least one float
* Handle empty array struct elements
* Enregister any field type <= 8 bytes, not just primitives; i.e. pointers and refs are also OK
* Simplify native layout branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Rewrite native branch to look at only at native layout info
* Calculate flags already in GetFlattenedFieldTypes to avoid returning fake CorElementTypes from native branch
* Ignore empty structs during field flattenting because RISC-V calling convention tells us to
* Simplify crossgen2 GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags, make C++ and C# versions of this method look more alike
* Remove early exit if nFields == 0 because it wasn't doing much, the loop won't do any work if there's no fields
* Return early from HasImpliedRepeatedFields. GetApproxFieldDescListRaw() is null on empty structs, which crashes pFieldStart->GetFieldType()
* Cleanup GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags call sites
* Stackalloc field types to avoid GC allocations
---------
Co-authored-by: Dong-Heon Jung <clamp03@gmail.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 19, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-ReadyToRuncommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tomeksowi@jkotas@sirntar@am11@clamp03
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers - #100080

Merged
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registers#100080
jkotas merged 18 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tomeksowi:fixstructinfo

Conversation

@tomeksowi

@tomeksowitomeksowi commented Mar 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussion in #99602 pointed out that MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags grew too complicated to properly compare against its crossgen2 version in RISCV64PassStructInRegister.cs (and understand in general). This PR simplifies it (LOC count reduced by ~70%) by following the wording of RISC-V ABI more closely, in particular by introducing an explicit step for struct field hierarchy flattening which the ABI enregistration rules are based on.

As a result of the re-write, MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags started returning correct flags (pass in float+integer registers) for the two cases:

  • struct { float; struct { string; }; } - the wrapper struct for string (one pointer) shouldn't matter
  • struct { float; struct {/*empty*/}; int; } - empty struct fields should be ignored

RISCV64PassStructInRegister.GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags was also re-written to match MethodTable::GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags.

This PR also fixes assertions in fgMorphMultiregStructArg when crossgen2 compiles in Debug build with --verify-type-and-field-layout option. Error messages:

/runtime/src/coreclr/jit/morph.cpp:3766
Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in ...
  • System.Private.CoreLib.dll: ValueType which contains two double fields
  • ./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp: ValueType which contains FieldOffset.

Part of #84834, cc @dotnet/samsung

clamp03and others added 4 commits March 20, 2024 11:02
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
@ghostghost added the area-ReadyToRun label Mar 21, 2024
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 21, 2024
@tomeksowi
tomeksowiforce-pushed the fixstructinfo branch 2 times, most recently from c5b27c4 to 1d6f53aCompareMarch 26, 2024 09:06
@tomeksowi

tomeksowi commented Mar 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Alright, I think the bulk of work is done. CLR tests are looking ok. I also ran some tests with RunCrossGen2=1, interop- and ABI-related tests are passing and a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way which will take some time.

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

a full CLR test run with RunCrossGen2=1 is under way

Too many crashes. The discrepancies in GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags I seen so far seem not to be the cause (new version returns better flags IMHO):

[S.P.CoreLib]System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair`2<System.__Canon,float64>: old(STRUCT_NO_FLOAT_FIELD), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_SECOND, STRUCT_HAS_8BYTES_FIELDS_MASK)
[S.P.CoreLib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.NFloat: old(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE), new(STRUCT_FLOAT_FIELD_ONLY_ONE, STRUCT_FIRST_FIELD_SIZE_IS8)

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

@tomeksowitomeksowi changed the title [RISC-V] WiP: Simplify flags for passing struct in registers[RISC-V] Simplify flags for passing struct in registersApr 9, 2024
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll solve the crashes when I return from vacation.

CLR tests with RunCrossGen2=1 look good now. PR ready for review.

@tomeksowi
tomeksowi marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 13:02
@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I played around more with empty structs and they need some more work. Namely, we assume in quite a few places that only structs no bigger than 16 bytes can be passed in registers, which is not true for e.g. struct { double; struct {}; long; }. However, empty structs are rather niche so I'll go down that rabbit hole in another PR to make review of this one easier and sooner.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from a teamApril 10, 2024 09:52

@sirntarsirntar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomeksowi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas could you review please?

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Nice simplification!

}

if ((numIntroducedFields == 0) || (numIntroducedFields > 2) || (typeDesc.GetElementSize().AsInt > 16))
private static bool FlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesc td, StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[] types, ref int typeIndex)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[]types,refinttypeIndex)
privatestaticboolFlattenFieldTypes(TypeDesctd,Span<StructFloatFieldInfoFlags>types,refinttypeIndex)

Can this use span and stackallocated space in the caller to avoid GC allocations?

@tomeksowitomeksowiApr 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

There's still more opportunities, like use a single ref to struct { StructFloatFieldInfoFlags[2] types; int index; } (or even pass & return by value, it's so small). Since I'll be revisiting this in another PR to handle corner-cases with empty fields, I'll probably do sth like this in both C# and C++ while at it.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 691e31e into dotnet:mainApr 18, 2024
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* [RISC-V] Fix struct info value in crossgen2
* [RISC-V] Fix assertion in crossgen
Asserts in `./Interop/StructMarshalling/PInvoke/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp/MarshalStructAsLayoutExp.sh`
Error message is
`Assertion failed 'roundUp(structSize, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE) == roundUp(loadExtent, TARGET_POINTER_SIZE)' in 'Managed:MarshalStructAsParam_AsExpByVal(int)' during 'Morph - Global' (IL size 2208; hash 0x9fd9734a; MinOpts)`
Copied missed codes of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegiste in vm to crossgen2
* Check size in GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags early, use named constant
* Simplify managed branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Fix assert IsPrimitiveType for 2nd field
* Handle empty structs
* Apply FIELD_SIZE_IS8 flags only when there's at least one float
* Handle empty array struct elements
* Enregister any field type <= 8 bytes, not just primitives; i.e. pointers and refs are also OK
* Simplify native layout branch of GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags
* Rewrite native branch to look at only at native layout info
* Calculate flags already in GetFlattenedFieldTypes to avoid returning fake CorElementTypes from native branch
* Ignore empty structs during field flattenting because RISC-V calling convention tells us to
* Simplify crossgen2 GetRISCV64PassStructInRegisterFlags, make C++ and C# versions of this method look more alike
* Remove early exit if nFields == 0 because it wasn't doing much, the loop won't do any work if there's no fields
* Return early from HasImpliedRepeatedFields. GetApproxFieldDescListRaw() is null on empty structs, which crashes pFieldStart->GetFieldType()
* Cleanup GetRiscV64PassStructInRegisterFlags call sites
* Stackalloc field types to avoid GC allocations
---------
Co-authored-by: Dong-Heon Jung <clamp03@gmail.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 19, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-ReadyToRuncommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tomeksowi@jkotas@sirntar@am11@clamp03