Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works - #100626

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works#100626
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have warning suppressions in place assuming Array.CreateInstance will succeed if it's over reference types, same as MakeGeneric. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for __Canon[]. This adds the analysis.

The reflection\GenericAttribute test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.

We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for __Canon[] is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.

cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit beac274 into dotnet:mainApr 5, 2024
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the arraycreate branch April 5, 2024 05:19
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
MichalStrehovsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Follow up to #100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in #100331.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works - #100626

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works#100626
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have warning suppressions in place assuming Array.CreateInstance will succeed if it's over reference types, same as MakeGeneric. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for __Canon[]. This adds the analysis.

The reflection\GenericAttribute test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.

We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for __Canon[] is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.

cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit beac274 into dotnet:mainApr 5, 2024
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the arraycreate branch April 5, 2024 05:19
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
MichalStrehovsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Follow up to #100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in #100331.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works - #100626

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works#100626
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have warning suppressions in place assuming Array.CreateInstance will succeed if it's over reference types, same as MakeGeneric. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for __Canon[]. This adds the analysis.

The reflection\GenericAttribute test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.

We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for __Canon[] is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.

cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit beac274 into dotnet:mainApr 5, 2024
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the arraycreate branch April 5, 2024 05:19
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
MichalStrehovsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Follow up to #100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in #100331.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works - #100626

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works#100626
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have warning suppressions in place assuming Array.CreateInstance will succeed if it's over reference types, same as MakeGeneric. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for __Canon[]. This adds the analysis.

The reflection\GenericAttribute test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.

We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for __Canon[] is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.

cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit beac274 into dotnet:mainApr 5, 2024
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the arraycreate branch April 5, 2024 05:19
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
MichalStrehovsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Follow up to #100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in #100331.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works - #100626

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works#100626
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have warning suppressions in place assuming Array.CreateInstance will succeed if it's over reference types, same as MakeGeneric. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for __Canon[]. This adds the analysis.

The reflection\GenericAttribute test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.

We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for __Canon[] is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.

cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit beac274 into dotnet:mainApr 5, 2024
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the arraycreate branch April 5, 2024 05:19
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
MichalStrehovsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Follow up to #100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in #100331.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works - #100626

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works#100626
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have warning suppressions in place assuming Array.CreateInstance will succeed if it's over reference types, same as MakeGeneric. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for __Canon[]. This adds the analysis.

The reflection\GenericAttribute test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.

We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for __Canon[] is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.

cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit beac274 into dotnet:mainApr 5, 2024
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the arraycreate branch April 5, 2024 05:19
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
MichalStrehovsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Follow up to #100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in #100331.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works - #100626

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works#100626
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have warning suppressions in place assuming Array.CreateInstance will succeed if it's over reference types, same as MakeGeneric. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for __Canon[]. This adds the analysis.

The reflection\GenericAttribute test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.

We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for __Canon[] is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.

cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit beac274 into dotnet:mainApr 5, 2024
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the arraycreate branch April 5, 2024 05:19
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
MichalStrehovsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Follow up to #100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in #100331.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works - #100626

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Ensure Array.CreateInstance over reference types works#100626
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:arraycreate

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We have warning suppressions in place assuming Array.CreateInstance will succeed if it's over reference types, same as MakeGeneric. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for __Canon[]. This adds the analysis.

The reflection\GenericAttribute test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.

We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for __Canon[] is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.

cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit beac274 into dotnet:mainApr 5, 2024
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the arraycreate branch April 5, 2024 05:19
MichalStrehovsky added a commit to MichalStrehovsky/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
MichalStrehovsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Follow up to #100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in #100331.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
We have warning suppressions in place assuming `Array.CreateInstance` will succeed if it's over reference types, same as `MakeGeneric`. There's however no analysis to ensure we have the type loader template for `__Canon[]`. This adds the analysis.
The `reflection\GenericAttribute` test is currently failing because of this but we don't see it because it's marked RequiresProcessIsolation and we have a bug that we don't look at those tests at all.
We had this bug for a while, but the test regression is more recent because we're getting better at not generating useless stuff. Template for `__Canon[]` is probably part of any bigger test because it's common.
matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Follow up to dotnet#100626. The original fix only worked for unoptimized builds because the list of templates doesn't survive from scanning phase (when we do dataflow) to codegen phase (when we no longer do dataflow).
The test that this was supposed to fix is still failing in dotnet#100331.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas