Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778
Conversation
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch |
154a553 to
9319a0eCompare9319a0e to
08d03efComparejkotas
commented
Jun 22, 2024
What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong? |
tannergooding
commented
Jun 22, 2024
It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved. More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in |
jkotas
commented
Jun 22, 2024
Yes, I think it would be a good idea. |
tannergooding
commented
Jun 22, 2024
CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
No description provided.