Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778

Merged
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search#103778
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup

Conversation

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
tannergoodingforce-pushed the hwintrin-binarylookup branch 2 times, most recently from 154a553 to 9319a0eCompareJune 20, 2024 21:05
@tannergooding
tannergooding marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 21:32
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved.

More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@tannergooding
tannergooding merged commit 7df87e8 into dotnet:mainJun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
tannergooding deleted the hwintrin-binarylookup branch June 24, 2024 17:33
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tannergooding@jkotas@jakobbotsch
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778

Merged
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search#103778
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup

Conversation

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
tannergoodingforce-pushed the hwintrin-binarylookup branch 2 times, most recently from 154a553 to 9319a0eCompareJune 20, 2024 21:05
@tannergooding
tannergooding marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 21:32
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved.

More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@tannergooding
tannergooding merged commit 7df87e8 into dotnet:mainJun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
tannergooding deleted the hwintrin-binarylookup branch June 24, 2024 17:33
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tannergooding@jkotas@jakobbotsch
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778

Merged
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search#103778
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup

Conversation

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
tannergoodingforce-pushed the hwintrin-binarylookup branch 2 times, most recently from 154a553 to 9319a0eCompareJune 20, 2024 21:05
@tannergooding
tannergooding marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 21:32
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved.

More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@tannergooding
tannergooding merged commit 7df87e8 into dotnet:mainJun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
tannergooding deleted the hwintrin-binarylookup branch June 24, 2024 17:33
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tannergooding@jkotas@jakobbotsch
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778

Merged
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search#103778
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup

Conversation

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
tannergoodingforce-pushed the hwintrin-binarylookup branch 2 times, most recently from 154a553 to 9319a0eCompareJune 20, 2024 21:05
@tannergooding
tannergooding marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 21:32
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved.

More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@tannergooding
tannergooding merged commit 7df87e8 into dotnet:mainJun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
tannergooding deleted the hwintrin-binarylookup branch June 24, 2024 17:33
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tannergooding@jkotas@jakobbotsch
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778

Merged
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search#103778
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup

Conversation

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
tannergoodingforce-pushed the hwintrin-binarylookup branch 2 times, most recently from 154a553 to 9319a0eCompareJune 20, 2024 21:05
@tannergooding
tannergooding marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 21:32
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved.

More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@tannergooding
tannergooding merged commit 7df87e8 into dotnet:mainJun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
tannergooding deleted the hwintrin-binarylookup branch June 24, 2024 17:33
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tannergooding@jkotas@jakobbotsch
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778

Merged
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search#103778
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup

Conversation

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
tannergoodingforce-pushed the hwintrin-binarylookup branch 2 times, most recently from 154a553 to 9319a0eCompareJune 20, 2024 21:05
@tannergooding
tannergooding marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 21:32
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved.

More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@tannergooding
tannergooding merged commit 7df87e8 into dotnet:mainJun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
tannergooding deleted the hwintrin-binarylookup branch June 24, 2024 17:33
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tannergooding@jkotas@jakobbotsch
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778

Merged
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search#103778
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup

Conversation

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
tannergoodingforce-pushed the hwintrin-binarylookup branch 2 times, most recently from 154a553 to 9319a0eCompareJune 20, 2024 21:05
@tannergooding
tannergooding marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 21:32
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved.

More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@tannergooding
tannergooding merged commit 7df87e8 into dotnet:mainJun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
tannergooding deleted the hwintrin-binarylookup branch June 24, 2024 17:33
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tannergooding@jkotas@jakobbotsch
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search - #103778

Merged
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Update HWIntrinsicInfo::lookupId to use a binary search#103778
tannergooding merged 9 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
tannergooding:hwintrin-binarylookup

Conversation

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
tannergoodingforce-pushed the hwintrin-binarylookup branch 2 times, most recently from 154a553 to 9319a0eCompareJune 20, 2024 21:05
@tannergooding
tannergooding marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 21:32
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What is the experience if somebody adds a new intrinsic and gets the order wrong?

It depends on how they get it wrong. Assertions exist for some, but not all scenarios at the moment. In the worst case they'll only see SPMI regressions and test failures stemming from intrinsics no longer being resolved.

More ideally we'd have a simple one time validation path. I don't think we have an existing spot to easily do such validation today, so I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I can probably just have do it in lookupId, tracking if its already been done or not (debug only, of course).

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

@tannergooding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, this should be ready for review.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/hwintrinsic.cpp Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
@tannergooding
tannergooding merged commit 7df87e8 into dotnet:mainJun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
tannergooding deleted the hwintrin-binarylookup branch June 24, 2024 17:33
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tannergooding@jkotas@jakobbotsch