[mono][interp] Remove short branches - #105386

Merged
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

[mono][interp] Remove short branches#105386
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They don't really seem to have perf benefits, at the expense of quite a bit of implementation cost with existing issues that are awkward to fix.

…sets
Previously they were all short branches without long counterparts. This was buggy and awkward because we tried to compute early conservatively whether a branch is short or long, at superins generation time. The conditions would always hold and we had no fallback if the branch didn't turn out to actually be short. Having a long offset for these branches should have negligible perf impact.
…pass
We generate superins without caring if the branch is long or short since the superinstructions use a long offset now.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch from 057e2bd to 6a54c14CompareJuly 24, 2024 13:42
@lewing
lewing requested a review from kgJuly 24, 2024 14:56
kg
kg approved these changes Jul 24, 2024
@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch 4 times, most recently from a519562 to ea69694CompareJuly 30, 2024 13:37
They don't seem to have any benefit at the expense of a lot of code and added complexity.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@kg It wouldn't hurt to take another look at this, just in case by deleting some of the long short opcodes I'm accidentally breaking generation of some traces. The microbenchmarks should show something anyway if that is the case though.

@kg

kg commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll take a look at the stats on browser-bench, and it should show up in microbenchmarks for sure. Thanks for pushing this across the finish line :)

BrzVlad added a commit to BrzVlad/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
BrzVlad added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
* Revert "[wasm] Fix long branches in jiterpreter (#106030)"
This reverts commit 9fa8fd5.
* Revert "[mono][interp] Remove short branches (#105386)"
This reverts commit ac89819.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BrzVlad@kg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[mono][interp] Remove short branches - #105386

Merged
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

[mono][interp] Remove short branches#105386
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They don't really seem to have perf benefits, at the expense of quite a bit of implementation cost with existing issues that are awkward to fix.

…sets
Previously they were all short branches without long counterparts. This was buggy and awkward because we tried to compute early conservatively whether a branch is short or long, at superins generation time. The conditions would always hold and we had no fallback if the branch didn't turn out to actually be short. Having a long offset for these branches should have negligible perf impact.
…pass
We generate superins without caring if the branch is long or short since the superinstructions use a long offset now.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch from 057e2bd to 6a54c14CompareJuly 24, 2024 13:42
@lewing
lewing requested a review from kgJuly 24, 2024 14:56
kg
kg approved these changes Jul 24, 2024
@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch 4 times, most recently from a519562 to ea69694CompareJuly 30, 2024 13:37
They don't seem to have any benefit at the expense of a lot of code and added complexity.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@kg It wouldn't hurt to take another look at this, just in case by deleting some of the long short opcodes I'm accidentally breaking generation of some traces. The microbenchmarks should show something anyway if that is the case though.

@kg

kg commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll take a look at the stats on browser-bench, and it should show up in microbenchmarks for sure. Thanks for pushing this across the finish line :)

BrzVlad added a commit to BrzVlad/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
BrzVlad added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
* Revert "[wasm] Fix long branches in jiterpreter (#106030)"
This reverts commit 9fa8fd5.
* Revert "[mono][interp] Remove short branches (#105386)"
This reverts commit ac89819.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BrzVlad@kg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[mono][interp] Remove short branches - #105386

Merged
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

[mono][interp] Remove short branches#105386
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They don't really seem to have perf benefits, at the expense of quite a bit of implementation cost with existing issues that are awkward to fix.

…sets
Previously they were all short branches without long counterparts. This was buggy and awkward because we tried to compute early conservatively whether a branch is short or long, at superins generation time. The conditions would always hold and we had no fallback if the branch didn't turn out to actually be short. Having a long offset for these branches should have negligible perf impact.
…pass
We generate superins without caring if the branch is long or short since the superinstructions use a long offset now.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch from 057e2bd to 6a54c14CompareJuly 24, 2024 13:42
@lewing
lewing requested a review from kgJuly 24, 2024 14:56
kg
kg approved these changes Jul 24, 2024
@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch 4 times, most recently from a519562 to ea69694CompareJuly 30, 2024 13:37
They don't seem to have any benefit at the expense of a lot of code and added complexity.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@kg It wouldn't hurt to take another look at this, just in case by deleting some of the long short opcodes I'm accidentally breaking generation of some traces. The microbenchmarks should show something anyway if that is the case though.

@kg

kg commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll take a look at the stats on browser-bench, and it should show up in microbenchmarks for sure. Thanks for pushing this across the finish line :)

BrzVlad added a commit to BrzVlad/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
BrzVlad added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
* Revert "[wasm] Fix long branches in jiterpreter (#106030)"
This reverts commit 9fa8fd5.
* Revert "[mono][interp] Remove short branches (#105386)"
This reverts commit ac89819.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BrzVlad@kg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[mono][interp] Remove short branches - #105386

Merged
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

[mono][interp] Remove short branches#105386
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They don't really seem to have perf benefits, at the expense of quite a bit of implementation cost with existing issues that are awkward to fix.

…sets
Previously they were all short branches without long counterparts. This was buggy and awkward because we tried to compute early conservatively whether a branch is short or long, at superins generation time. The conditions would always hold and we had no fallback if the branch didn't turn out to actually be short. Having a long offset for these branches should have negligible perf impact.
…pass
We generate superins without caring if the branch is long or short since the superinstructions use a long offset now.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch from 057e2bd to 6a54c14CompareJuly 24, 2024 13:42
@lewing
lewing requested a review from kgJuly 24, 2024 14:56
kg
kg approved these changes Jul 24, 2024
@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch 4 times, most recently from a519562 to ea69694CompareJuly 30, 2024 13:37
They don't seem to have any benefit at the expense of a lot of code and added complexity.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@kg It wouldn't hurt to take another look at this, just in case by deleting some of the long short opcodes I'm accidentally breaking generation of some traces. The microbenchmarks should show something anyway if that is the case though.

@kg

kg commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll take a look at the stats on browser-bench, and it should show up in microbenchmarks for sure. Thanks for pushing this across the finish line :)

BrzVlad added a commit to BrzVlad/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
BrzVlad added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
* Revert "[wasm] Fix long branches in jiterpreter (#106030)"
This reverts commit 9fa8fd5.
* Revert "[mono][interp] Remove short branches (#105386)"
This reverts commit ac89819.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BrzVlad@kg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[mono][interp] Remove short branches - #105386

Merged
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

[mono][interp] Remove short branches#105386
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They don't really seem to have perf benefits, at the expense of quite a bit of implementation cost with existing issues that are awkward to fix.

…sets
Previously they were all short branches without long counterparts. This was buggy and awkward because we tried to compute early conservatively whether a branch is short or long, at superins generation time. The conditions would always hold and we had no fallback if the branch didn't turn out to actually be short. Having a long offset for these branches should have negligible perf impact.
…pass
We generate superins without caring if the branch is long or short since the superinstructions use a long offset now.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch from 057e2bd to 6a54c14CompareJuly 24, 2024 13:42
@lewing
lewing requested a review from kgJuly 24, 2024 14:56
kg
kg approved these changes Jul 24, 2024
@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch 4 times, most recently from a519562 to ea69694CompareJuly 30, 2024 13:37
They don't seem to have any benefit at the expense of a lot of code and added complexity.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@kg It wouldn't hurt to take another look at this, just in case by deleting some of the long short opcodes I'm accidentally breaking generation of some traces. The microbenchmarks should show something anyway if that is the case though.

@kg

kg commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll take a look at the stats on browser-bench, and it should show up in microbenchmarks for sure. Thanks for pushing this across the finish line :)

BrzVlad added a commit to BrzVlad/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
BrzVlad added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
* Revert "[wasm] Fix long branches in jiterpreter (#106030)"
This reverts commit 9fa8fd5.
* Revert "[mono][interp] Remove short branches (#105386)"
This reverts commit ac89819.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BrzVlad@kg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[mono][interp] Remove short branches - #105386

Merged
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

[mono][interp] Remove short branches#105386
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They don't really seem to have perf benefits, at the expense of quite a bit of implementation cost with existing issues that are awkward to fix.

…sets
Previously they were all short branches without long counterparts. This was buggy and awkward because we tried to compute early conservatively whether a branch is short or long, at superins generation time. The conditions would always hold and we had no fallback if the branch didn't turn out to actually be short. Having a long offset for these branches should have negligible perf impact.
…pass
We generate superins without caring if the branch is long or short since the superinstructions use a long offset now.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch from 057e2bd to 6a54c14CompareJuly 24, 2024 13:42
@lewing
lewing requested a review from kgJuly 24, 2024 14:56
kg
kg approved these changes Jul 24, 2024
@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch 4 times, most recently from a519562 to ea69694CompareJuly 30, 2024 13:37
They don't seem to have any benefit at the expense of a lot of code and added complexity.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@kg It wouldn't hurt to take another look at this, just in case by deleting some of the long short opcodes I'm accidentally breaking generation of some traces. The microbenchmarks should show something anyway if that is the case though.

@kg

kg commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll take a look at the stats on browser-bench, and it should show up in microbenchmarks for sure. Thanks for pushing this across the finish line :)

BrzVlad added a commit to BrzVlad/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
BrzVlad added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
* Revert "[wasm] Fix long branches in jiterpreter (#106030)"
This reverts commit 9fa8fd5.
* Revert "[mono][interp] Remove short branches (#105386)"
This reverts commit ac89819.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BrzVlad@kg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[mono][interp] Remove short branches - #105386

Merged
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

[mono][interp] Remove short branches#105386
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They don't really seem to have perf benefits, at the expense of quite a bit of implementation cost with existing issues that are awkward to fix.

…sets
Previously they were all short branches without long counterparts. This was buggy and awkward because we tried to compute early conservatively whether a branch is short or long, at superins generation time. The conditions would always hold and we had no fallback if the branch didn't turn out to actually be short. Having a long offset for these branches should have negligible perf impact.
…pass
We generate superins without caring if the branch is long or short since the superinstructions use a long offset now.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch from 057e2bd to 6a54c14CompareJuly 24, 2024 13:42
@lewing
lewing requested a review from kgJuly 24, 2024 14:56
kg
kg approved these changes Jul 24, 2024
@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch 4 times, most recently from a519562 to ea69694CompareJuly 30, 2024 13:37
They don't seem to have any benefit at the expense of a lot of code and added complexity.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@kg It wouldn't hurt to take another look at this, just in case by deleting some of the long short opcodes I'm accidentally breaking generation of some traces. The microbenchmarks should show something anyway if that is the case though.

@kg

kg commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll take a look at the stats on browser-bench, and it should show up in microbenchmarks for sure. Thanks for pushing this across the finish line :)

BrzVlad added a commit to BrzVlad/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
BrzVlad added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
* Revert "[wasm] Fix long branches in jiterpreter (#106030)"
This reverts commit 9fa8fd5.
* Revert "[mono][interp] Remove short branches (#105386)"
This reverts commit ac89819.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BrzVlad@kg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[mono][interp] Remove short branches - #105386

Merged
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

[mono][interp] Remove short branches#105386
BrzVlad merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-interp-short-branches

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

They don't really seem to have perf benefits, at the expense of quite a bit of implementation cost with existing issues that are awkward to fix.

…sets
Previously they were all short branches without long counterparts. This was buggy and awkward because we tried to compute early conservatively whether a branch is short or long, at superins generation time. The conditions would always hold and we had no fallback if the branch didn't turn out to actually be short. Having a long offset for these branches should have negligible perf impact.
…pass
We generate superins without caring if the branch is long or short since the superinstructions use a long offset now.
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch from 057e2bd to 6a54c14CompareJuly 24, 2024 13:42
@lewing
lewing requested a review from kgJuly 24, 2024 14:56
kg
kg approved these changes Jul 24, 2024
@BrzVlad
BrzVladforce-pushed the fix-interp-short-branches branch 4 times, most recently from a519562 to ea69694CompareJuly 30, 2024 13:37
They don't seem to have any benefit at the expense of a lot of code and added complexity.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@kg It wouldn't hurt to take another look at this, just in case by deleting some of the long short opcodes I'm accidentally breaking generation of some traces. The microbenchmarks should show something anyway if that is the case though.

@kg

kg commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll take a look at the stats on browser-bench, and it should show up in microbenchmarks for sure. Thanks for pushing this across the finish line :)

BrzVlad added a commit to BrzVlad/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
BrzVlad added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
* Revert "[wasm] Fix long branches in jiterpreter (#106030)"
This reverts commit 9fa8fd5.
* Revert "[mono][interp] Remove short branches (#105386)"
This reverts commit ac89819.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BrzVlad@kg