Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references - #116416

Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references#116416
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358

Conversation

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the intermittent failure of the Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test that was causing assertion failures in methodtable.cpp with the error:

ASSERT FAILED
Expression: (GetComponentSize() <= 2) || IsArray()
Location: line 6277 in /__w/1/s/src/coreclr/vm/methodtable.cpp
Function: SanityCheck

Root Cause

The issue was in the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method in InvalidCSharp.il, which contained invalid IL:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type referenceldarg.1ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type reference ceqret
}

The problem was using ldind.ref to dereference WithRefField& (reference to a value type). ldind.ref is only valid for dereferencing object references, not value type references. This caused the JIT to generate incorrect GC information, leading to the assertion failure.

Fix

The fix removes the invalid ldind.ref instructions and directly compares the two WithRefField& references:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldarg.1ceqret
}

This correctly compares whether the stored reference in the field points to the same location as the parameter reference, which is the intended behavior of the test.

Verification

  • Verified the IL assembles correctly using ilasm
  • Confirmed the syntax follows proper IL patterns for reference comparison
  • The fix addresses the root cause of the intermittent GC-related crashes

Fixes#116358.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • k0ivsblobprodcus356.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)
  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref are identical. However, the approach I took was incorrect for value types. Instead, the solution should be to simply compare the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them in IL. The easiest way to address this would be to remove both ldind.ref instructions in the method mentioned in the referenced comment above.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework labels Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added area-System.Runtime.CompilerServices and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
…erences
Co-authored-by: AaronRobinsonMSFT <30635565+AaronRobinsonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI changed the title [WIP] Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittentlyFix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type referencesJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotas
jkotas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref ...

Done. Both ldind.ref instructions have been removed from the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method. The method now directly compares the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them, which is the correct approach for value type references. The IL assembles successfully without errors. (bb97cb7)

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/InvalidCSharp.ilproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=4becf198-a8ff-4047-b763-206cb6de1a72;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit af399c4 into mainJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the copilot/fix-116358 branch June 8, 2025 22:43
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Runtime.CompilerServicestest-bugProblem in test source code (most likely)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittently

3 participants

@AaronRobinsonMSFT@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references - #116416

Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references#116416
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358

Conversation

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the intermittent failure of the Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test that was causing assertion failures in methodtable.cpp with the error:

ASSERT FAILED
Expression: (GetComponentSize() <= 2) || IsArray()
Location: line 6277 in /__w/1/s/src/coreclr/vm/methodtable.cpp
Function: SanityCheck

Root Cause

The issue was in the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method in InvalidCSharp.il, which contained invalid IL:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type referenceldarg.1ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type reference ceqret
}

The problem was using ldind.ref to dereference WithRefField& (reference to a value type). ldind.ref is only valid for dereferencing object references, not value type references. This caused the JIT to generate incorrect GC information, leading to the assertion failure.

Fix

The fix removes the invalid ldind.ref instructions and directly compares the two WithRefField& references:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldarg.1ceqret
}

This correctly compares whether the stored reference in the field points to the same location as the parameter reference, which is the intended behavior of the test.

Verification

  • Verified the IL assembles correctly using ilasm
  • Confirmed the syntax follows proper IL patterns for reference comparison
  • The fix addresses the root cause of the intermittent GC-related crashes

Fixes#116358.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • k0ivsblobprodcus356.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)
  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref are identical. However, the approach I took was incorrect for value types. Instead, the solution should be to simply compare the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them in IL. The easiest way to address this would be to remove both ldind.ref instructions in the method mentioned in the referenced comment above.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework labels Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added area-System.Runtime.CompilerServices and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
…erences
Co-authored-by: AaronRobinsonMSFT <30635565+AaronRobinsonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI changed the title [WIP] Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittentlyFix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type referencesJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotas
jkotas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref ...

Done. Both ldind.ref instructions have been removed from the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method. The method now directly compares the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them, which is the correct approach for value type references. The IL assembles successfully without errors. (bb97cb7)

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/InvalidCSharp.ilproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=4becf198-a8ff-4047-b763-206cb6de1a72;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit af399c4 into mainJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the copilot/fix-116358 branch June 8, 2025 22:43
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Runtime.CompilerServicestest-bugProblem in test source code (most likely)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittently

3 participants

@AaronRobinsonMSFT@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references - #116416

Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references#116416
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358

Conversation

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the intermittent failure of the Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test that was causing assertion failures in methodtable.cpp with the error:

ASSERT FAILED
Expression: (GetComponentSize() <= 2) || IsArray()
Location: line 6277 in /__w/1/s/src/coreclr/vm/methodtable.cpp
Function: SanityCheck

Root Cause

The issue was in the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method in InvalidCSharp.il, which contained invalid IL:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type referenceldarg.1ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type reference ceqret
}

The problem was using ldind.ref to dereference WithRefField& (reference to a value type). ldind.ref is only valid for dereferencing object references, not value type references. This caused the JIT to generate incorrect GC information, leading to the assertion failure.

Fix

The fix removes the invalid ldind.ref instructions and directly compares the two WithRefField& references:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldarg.1ceqret
}

This correctly compares whether the stored reference in the field points to the same location as the parameter reference, which is the intended behavior of the test.

Verification

  • Verified the IL assembles correctly using ilasm
  • Confirmed the syntax follows proper IL patterns for reference comparison
  • The fix addresses the root cause of the intermittent GC-related crashes

Fixes#116358.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • k0ivsblobprodcus356.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)
  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref are identical. However, the approach I took was incorrect for value types. Instead, the solution should be to simply compare the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them in IL. The easiest way to address this would be to remove both ldind.ref instructions in the method mentioned in the referenced comment above.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework labels Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added area-System.Runtime.CompilerServices and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
…erences
Co-authored-by: AaronRobinsonMSFT <30635565+AaronRobinsonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI changed the title [WIP] Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittentlyFix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type referencesJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotas
jkotas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref ...

Done. Both ldind.ref instructions have been removed from the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method. The method now directly compares the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them, which is the correct approach for value type references. The IL assembles successfully without errors. (bb97cb7)

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/InvalidCSharp.ilproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=4becf198-a8ff-4047-b763-206cb6de1a72;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit af399c4 into mainJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the copilot/fix-116358 branch June 8, 2025 22:43
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Runtime.CompilerServicestest-bugProblem in test source code (most likely)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittently

3 participants

@AaronRobinsonMSFT@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references - #116416

Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references#116416
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358

Conversation

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the intermittent failure of the Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test that was causing assertion failures in methodtable.cpp with the error:

ASSERT FAILED
Expression: (GetComponentSize() <= 2) || IsArray()
Location: line 6277 in /__w/1/s/src/coreclr/vm/methodtable.cpp
Function: SanityCheck

Root Cause

The issue was in the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method in InvalidCSharp.il, which contained invalid IL:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type referenceldarg.1ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type reference ceqret
}

The problem was using ldind.ref to dereference WithRefField& (reference to a value type). ldind.ref is only valid for dereferencing object references, not value type references. This caused the JIT to generate incorrect GC information, leading to the assertion failure.

Fix

The fix removes the invalid ldind.ref instructions and directly compares the two WithRefField& references:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldarg.1ceqret
}

This correctly compares whether the stored reference in the field points to the same location as the parameter reference, which is the intended behavior of the test.

Verification

  • Verified the IL assembles correctly using ilasm
  • Confirmed the syntax follows proper IL patterns for reference comparison
  • The fix addresses the root cause of the intermittent GC-related crashes

Fixes#116358.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • k0ivsblobprodcus356.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)
  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref are identical. However, the approach I took was incorrect for value types. Instead, the solution should be to simply compare the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them in IL. The easiest way to address this would be to remove both ldind.ref instructions in the method mentioned in the referenced comment above.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework labels Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added area-System.Runtime.CompilerServices and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
…erences
Co-authored-by: AaronRobinsonMSFT <30635565+AaronRobinsonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI changed the title [WIP] Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittentlyFix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type referencesJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotas
jkotas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref ...

Done. Both ldind.ref instructions have been removed from the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method. The method now directly compares the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them, which is the correct approach for value type references. The IL assembles successfully without errors. (bb97cb7)

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/InvalidCSharp.ilproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=4becf198-a8ff-4047-b763-206cb6de1a72;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit af399c4 into mainJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the copilot/fix-116358 branch June 8, 2025 22:43
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Runtime.CompilerServicestest-bugProblem in test source code (most likely)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittently

3 participants

@AaronRobinsonMSFT@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references - #116416

Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references#116416
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358

Conversation

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the intermittent failure of the Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test that was causing assertion failures in methodtable.cpp with the error:

ASSERT FAILED
Expression: (GetComponentSize() <= 2) || IsArray()
Location: line 6277 in /__w/1/s/src/coreclr/vm/methodtable.cpp
Function: SanityCheck

Root Cause

The issue was in the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method in InvalidCSharp.il, which contained invalid IL:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type referenceldarg.1ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type reference ceqret
}

The problem was using ldind.ref to dereference WithRefField& (reference to a value type). ldind.ref is only valid for dereferencing object references, not value type references. This caused the JIT to generate incorrect GC information, leading to the assertion failure.

Fix

The fix removes the invalid ldind.ref instructions and directly compares the two WithRefField& references:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldarg.1ceqret
}

This correctly compares whether the stored reference in the field points to the same location as the parameter reference, which is the intended behavior of the test.

Verification

  • Verified the IL assembles correctly using ilasm
  • Confirmed the syntax follows proper IL patterns for reference comparison
  • The fix addresses the root cause of the intermittent GC-related crashes

Fixes#116358.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • k0ivsblobprodcus356.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)
  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref are identical. However, the approach I took was incorrect for value types. Instead, the solution should be to simply compare the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them in IL. The easiest way to address this would be to remove both ldind.ref instructions in the method mentioned in the referenced comment above.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework labels Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added area-System.Runtime.CompilerServices and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
…erences
Co-authored-by: AaronRobinsonMSFT <30635565+AaronRobinsonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI changed the title [WIP] Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittentlyFix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type referencesJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotas
jkotas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref ...

Done. Both ldind.ref instructions have been removed from the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method. The method now directly compares the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them, which is the correct approach for value type references. The IL assembles successfully without errors. (bb97cb7)

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/InvalidCSharp.ilproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=4becf198-a8ff-4047-b763-206cb6de1a72;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit af399c4 into mainJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the copilot/fix-116358 branch June 8, 2025 22:43
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Runtime.CompilerServicestest-bugProblem in test source code (most likely)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittently

3 participants

@AaronRobinsonMSFT@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references - #116416

Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references#116416
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358

Conversation

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the intermittent failure of the Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test that was causing assertion failures in methodtable.cpp with the error:

ASSERT FAILED
Expression: (GetComponentSize() <= 2) || IsArray()
Location: line 6277 in /__w/1/s/src/coreclr/vm/methodtable.cpp
Function: SanityCheck

Root Cause

The issue was in the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method in InvalidCSharp.il, which contained invalid IL:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type referenceldarg.1ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type reference ceqret
}

The problem was using ldind.ref to dereference WithRefField& (reference to a value type). ldind.ref is only valid for dereferencing object references, not value type references. This caused the JIT to generate incorrect GC information, leading to the assertion failure.

Fix

The fix removes the invalid ldind.ref instructions and directly compares the two WithRefField& references:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldarg.1ceqret
}

This correctly compares whether the stored reference in the field points to the same location as the parameter reference, which is the intended behavior of the test.

Verification

  • Verified the IL assembles correctly using ilasm
  • Confirmed the syntax follows proper IL patterns for reference comparison
  • The fix addresses the root cause of the intermittent GC-related crashes

Fixes#116358.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • k0ivsblobprodcus356.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)
  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref are identical. However, the approach I took was incorrect for value types. Instead, the solution should be to simply compare the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them in IL. The easiest way to address this would be to remove both ldind.ref instructions in the method mentioned in the referenced comment above.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework labels Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added area-System.Runtime.CompilerServices and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
…erences
Co-authored-by: AaronRobinsonMSFT <30635565+AaronRobinsonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI changed the title [WIP] Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittentlyFix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type referencesJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotas
jkotas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref ...

Done. Both ldind.ref instructions have been removed from the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method. The method now directly compares the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them, which is the correct approach for value type references. The IL assembles successfully without errors. (bb97cb7)

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/InvalidCSharp.ilproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=4becf198-a8ff-4047-b763-206cb6de1a72;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit af399c4 into mainJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the copilot/fix-116358 branch June 8, 2025 22:43
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Runtime.CompilerServicestest-bugProblem in test source code (most likely)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittently

3 participants

@AaronRobinsonMSFT@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references - #116416

Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references#116416
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358

Conversation

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the intermittent failure of the Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test that was causing assertion failures in methodtable.cpp with the error:

ASSERT FAILED
Expression: (GetComponentSize() <= 2) || IsArray()
Location: line 6277 in /__w/1/s/src/coreclr/vm/methodtable.cpp
Function: SanityCheck

Root Cause

The issue was in the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method in InvalidCSharp.il, which contained invalid IL:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type referenceldarg.1ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type reference ceqret
}

The problem was using ldind.ref to dereference WithRefField& (reference to a value type). ldind.ref is only valid for dereferencing object references, not value type references. This caused the JIT to generate incorrect GC information, leading to the assertion failure.

Fix

The fix removes the invalid ldind.ref instructions and directly compares the two WithRefField& references:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldarg.1ceqret
}

This correctly compares whether the stored reference in the field points to the same location as the parameter reference, which is the intended behavior of the test.

Verification

  • Verified the IL assembles correctly using ilasm
  • Confirmed the syntax follows proper IL patterns for reference comparison
  • The fix addresses the root cause of the intermittent GC-related crashes

Fixes#116358.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • k0ivsblobprodcus356.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)
  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref are identical. However, the approach I took was incorrect for value types. Instead, the solution should be to simply compare the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them in IL. The easiest way to address this would be to remove both ldind.ref instructions in the method mentioned in the referenced comment above.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework labels Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added area-System.Runtime.CompilerServices and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
…erences
Co-authored-by: AaronRobinsonMSFT <30635565+AaronRobinsonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI changed the title [WIP] Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittentlyFix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type referencesJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotas
jkotas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref ...

Done. Both ldind.ref instructions have been removed from the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method. The method now directly compares the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them, which is the correct approach for value type references. The IL assembles successfully without errors. (bb97cb7)

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/InvalidCSharp.ilproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=4becf198-a8ff-4047-b763-206cb6de1a72;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit af399c4 into mainJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the copilot/fix-116358 branch June 8, 2025 22:43
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Runtime.CompilerServicestest-bugProblem in test source code (most likely)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittently

3 participants

@AaronRobinsonMSFT@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references - #116416

Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

Fix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type references#116416
jkotas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-116358

Conversation

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes the intermittent failure of the Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test that was causing assertion failures in methodtable.cpp with the error:

ASSERT FAILED
Expression: (GetComponentSize() <= 2) || IsArray()
Location: line 6277 in /__w/1/s/src/coreclr/vm/methodtable.cpp
Function: SanityCheck

Root Cause

The issue was in the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method in InvalidCSharp.il, which contained invalid IL:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type referenceldarg.1ldind.ref// ❌ INVALID: ldind.ref on value type reference ceqret
}

The problem was using ldind.ref to dereference WithRefField& (reference to a value type). ldind.ref is only valid for dereferencing object references, not value type references. This caused the JIT to generate incorrect GC information, leading to the assertion failure.

Fix

The fix removes the invalid ldind.ref instructions and directly compares the two WithRefField& references:

.methodpublichidebysiginstancebool ConfirmFieldInstance (
valuetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField&
) cilmanaged
{
ldarg.0ldfldvaluetype InvalidCSharp.WithRefField& InvalidCSharp.WithRefStructField::Field
ldarg.1ceqret
}

This correctly compares whether the stored reference in the field points to the same location as the parameter reference, which is the intended behavior of the test.

Verification

  • Verified the IL assembles correctly using ilasm
  • Confirmed the syntax follows proper IL patterns for reference comparison
  • The fix addresses the root cause of the intermittent GC-related crashes

Fixes#116358.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • k0ivsblobprodcus356.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)
  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate.csproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=21e5ac85-7729-4227-9df0-d7f3c485866d;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref are identical. However, the approach I took was incorrect for value types. Instead, the solution should be to simply compare the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them in IL. The easiest way to address this would be to remove both ldind.ref instructions in the method mentioned in the referenced comment above.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework labels Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added area-System.Runtime.CompilerServices and removed linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025
…erences
Co-authored-by: AaronRobinsonMSFT <30635565+AaronRobinsonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI changed the title [WIP] Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittentlyFix invalid IL in RefFields test - remove ldind.ref on value type referencesJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotas
jkotas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 8, 2025 19:27
@jkotasjkotas removed the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label Jun 8, 2025

CopilotAI commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@copilot The issue here is captured in the comment by @jkotas, #116358 (comment). The point of this test was to validate the targets of the byref ...

Done. Both ldind.ref instructions have been removed from the WithRefStructField.ConfirmFieldInstance method. The method now directly compares the managed pointers instead of dereferencing them, which is the correct approach for value type references. The IL assembles successfully without errors. (bb97cb7)

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • mfjvsblobprodcus373.vsblob.vsassets.io
    • Triggering command: /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/dotnet /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/NuGet.Build.Tasks.Console.dll Recursive=True;CleanupAssetsForUnsupportedProjects=True;DisableParallel=False;Force=False;ForceEvaluate=False;HideWarningsAndErrors=False;IgnoreFailedSources=False;Interactive=False;NoCache=False;NoHttpCache=False;RestorePackagesConfig=False /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/.dotnet/sdk/10.0.100-preview.6.25272.112/MSBuild.dll /home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields/InvalidCSharp.ilproj NuGetInteractive=false;MSBuildRestoreSessionId=4becf198-a8ff-4047-b763-206cb6de1a72;MSBuildIsRestoring=True;ExcludeRestorePackageImports=True;OriginalMSBuildStartupDirectory=/home/REDACTED/work/runtime/runtime/src/tests/Loader/classloader/RefFields (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit af399c4 into mainJun 8, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the copilot/fix-116358 branch June 8, 2025 22:43
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Runtime.CompilerServicestest-bugProblem in test source code (most likely)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loader/classloader/RefFields/Validate test failing intermittently

3 participants

@AaronRobinsonMSFT@jkotas