Remove audit sources from NuGet.config - #120696

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config#120696
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2

Conversation

@akoeplinger

@akoeplingerakoeplinger commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy and the same data is provided by AzDO now.

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the audit sources configuration from NuGet.config to resolve network isolation policy conflicts. The api.nuget.org source in the audit configuration was clashing with the CFSClean network isolation policy.

Key Changes

  • Removed the entire <auditSources> section from NuGet.config
  • Eliminated the reference to api.nuget.org that was causing network policy conflicts

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2025
@akoeplingerakoeplinger added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 14, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@agocke
agocke merged commit f9fce60 into mainOct 15, 2025
151 of 153 checks passed
@agocke
agocke deleted the akoeplinger-patch-2 branch October 15, 2025 01:10
@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/10.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/10.0 (link to workflow run)

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/9.0-staging

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging (link to workflow run)

akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [X] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
hoyosjs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/10.0
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [x] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2025
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I heard from NuGet team that this is fixed, we can use https://data.nuget.org/v3/index.json

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@akoeplinger@ericstj@jkoritzinsky@ViktorHofer@agocke
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config - #120696

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config#120696
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2

Conversation

@akoeplinger

@akoeplingerakoeplinger commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy and the same data is provided by AzDO now.

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the audit sources configuration from NuGet.config to resolve network isolation policy conflicts. The api.nuget.org source in the audit configuration was clashing with the CFSClean network isolation policy.

Key Changes

  • Removed the entire <auditSources> section from NuGet.config
  • Eliminated the reference to api.nuget.org that was causing network policy conflicts

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2025
@akoeplingerakoeplinger added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 14, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@agocke
agocke merged commit f9fce60 into mainOct 15, 2025
151 of 153 checks passed
@agocke
agocke deleted the akoeplinger-patch-2 branch October 15, 2025 01:10
@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/10.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/10.0 (link to workflow run)

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/9.0-staging

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging (link to workflow run)

akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [X] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
hoyosjs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/10.0
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [x] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2025
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I heard from NuGet team that this is fixed, we can use https://data.nuget.org/v3/index.json

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@akoeplinger@ericstj@jkoritzinsky@ViktorHofer@agocke
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config - #120696

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config#120696
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2

Conversation

@akoeplinger

@akoeplingerakoeplinger commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy and the same data is provided by AzDO now.

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the audit sources configuration from NuGet.config to resolve network isolation policy conflicts. The api.nuget.org source in the audit configuration was clashing with the CFSClean network isolation policy.

Key Changes

  • Removed the entire <auditSources> section from NuGet.config
  • Eliminated the reference to api.nuget.org that was causing network policy conflicts

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2025
@akoeplingerakoeplinger added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 14, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@agocke
agocke merged commit f9fce60 into mainOct 15, 2025
151 of 153 checks passed
@agocke
agocke deleted the akoeplinger-patch-2 branch October 15, 2025 01:10
@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/10.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/10.0 (link to workflow run)

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/9.0-staging

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging (link to workflow run)

akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [X] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
hoyosjs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/10.0
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [x] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2025
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I heard from NuGet team that this is fixed, we can use https://data.nuget.org/v3/index.json

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@akoeplinger@ericstj@jkoritzinsky@ViktorHofer@agocke
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config - #120696

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config#120696
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2

Conversation

@akoeplinger

@akoeplingerakoeplinger commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy and the same data is provided by AzDO now.

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the audit sources configuration from NuGet.config to resolve network isolation policy conflicts. The api.nuget.org source in the audit configuration was clashing with the CFSClean network isolation policy.

Key Changes

  • Removed the entire <auditSources> section from NuGet.config
  • Eliminated the reference to api.nuget.org that was causing network policy conflicts

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2025
@akoeplingerakoeplinger added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 14, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@agocke
agocke merged commit f9fce60 into mainOct 15, 2025
151 of 153 checks passed
@agocke
agocke deleted the akoeplinger-patch-2 branch October 15, 2025 01:10
@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/10.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/10.0 (link to workflow run)

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/9.0-staging

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging (link to workflow run)

akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [X] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
hoyosjs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/10.0
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [x] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2025
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I heard from NuGet team that this is fixed, we can use https://data.nuget.org/v3/index.json

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@akoeplinger@ericstj@jkoritzinsky@ViktorHofer@agocke
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config - #120696

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config#120696
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2

Conversation

@akoeplinger

@akoeplingerakoeplinger commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy and the same data is provided by AzDO now.

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the audit sources configuration from NuGet.config to resolve network isolation policy conflicts. The api.nuget.org source in the audit configuration was clashing with the CFSClean network isolation policy.

Key Changes

  • Removed the entire <auditSources> section from NuGet.config
  • Eliminated the reference to api.nuget.org that was causing network policy conflicts

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2025
@akoeplingerakoeplinger added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 14, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@agocke
agocke merged commit f9fce60 into mainOct 15, 2025
151 of 153 checks passed
@agocke
agocke deleted the akoeplinger-patch-2 branch October 15, 2025 01:10
@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/10.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/10.0 (link to workflow run)

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/9.0-staging

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging (link to workflow run)

akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [X] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
hoyosjs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/10.0
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [x] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2025
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I heard from NuGet team that this is fixed, we can use https://data.nuget.org/v3/index.json

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@akoeplinger@ericstj@jkoritzinsky@ViktorHofer@agocke
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config - #120696

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config#120696
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2

Conversation

@akoeplinger

@akoeplingerakoeplinger commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy and the same data is provided by AzDO now.

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the audit sources configuration from NuGet.config to resolve network isolation policy conflicts. The api.nuget.org source in the audit configuration was clashing with the CFSClean network isolation policy.

Key Changes

  • Removed the entire <auditSources> section from NuGet.config
  • Eliminated the reference to api.nuget.org that was causing network policy conflicts

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2025
@akoeplingerakoeplinger added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 14, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@agocke
agocke merged commit f9fce60 into mainOct 15, 2025
151 of 153 checks passed
@agocke
agocke deleted the akoeplinger-patch-2 branch October 15, 2025 01:10
@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/10.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/10.0 (link to workflow run)

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/9.0-staging

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging (link to workflow run)

akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [X] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
hoyosjs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/10.0
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [x] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2025
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I heard from NuGet team that this is fixed, we can use https://data.nuget.org/v3/index.json

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@akoeplinger@ericstj@jkoritzinsky@ViktorHofer@agocke
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config - #120696

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config#120696
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2

Conversation

@akoeplinger

@akoeplingerakoeplinger commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy and the same data is provided by AzDO now.

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the audit sources configuration from NuGet.config to resolve network isolation policy conflicts. The api.nuget.org source in the audit configuration was clashing with the CFSClean network isolation policy.

Key Changes

  • Removed the entire <auditSources> section from NuGet.config
  • Eliminated the reference to api.nuget.org that was causing network policy conflicts

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2025
@akoeplingerakoeplinger added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 14, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@agocke
agocke merged commit f9fce60 into mainOct 15, 2025
151 of 153 checks passed
@agocke
agocke deleted the akoeplinger-patch-2 branch October 15, 2025 01:10
@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/10.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/10.0 (link to workflow run)

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/9.0-staging

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging (link to workflow run)

akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [X] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
hoyosjs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/10.0
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [x] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2025
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I heard from NuGet team that this is fixed, we can use https://data.nuget.org/v3/index.json

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@akoeplinger@ericstj@jkoritzinsky@ViktorHofer@agocke
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config - #120696

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

Remove audit sources from NuGet.config#120696
agocke merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
akoeplinger-patch-2

Conversation

@akoeplinger

@akoeplingerakoeplinger commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy and the same data is provided by AzDO now.

The api.nuget.org source will clash with the CFSClean network isolation policy

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the audit sources configuration from NuGet.config to resolve network isolation policy conflicts. The api.nuget.org source in the audit configuration was clashing with the CFSClean network isolation policy.

Key Changes

  • Removed the entire <auditSources> section from NuGet.config
  • Eliminated the reference to api.nuget.org that was causing network policy conflicts

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2025
@akoeplingerakoeplinger added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Oct 14, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@agocke
agocke merged commit f9fce60 into mainOct 15, 2025
151 of 153 checks passed
@agocke
agocke deleted the akoeplinger-patch-2 branch October 15, 2025 01:10
@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/10.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/10.0 (link to workflow run)

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/9.0-staging

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging (link to workflow run)

akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [X] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
hoyosjs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Backport of #120696 to release/10.0
/cc @akoeplinger
## Customer Impact
- [ ] Customer reported
- [x] Found internally
no customer impact, this affects our internal builds due to CFS
restrictions.
## Regression
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Testing
Tested in CI.
## Risk
None. This just changes a setting for nuget package restore.
**IMPORTANT**: If this backport is for a servicing release, please
verify that:
- For .NET 8 and .NET 9: The PR target branch is `release/X.0-staging`,
not `release/X.0`.
- For .NET 10+: The PR target branch is `release/X.0` (no `-staging`
suffix).
## Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
**IMPORTANT**: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet
package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older
versions.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2025
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I heard from NuGet team that this is fixed, we can use https://data.nuget.org/v3/index.json

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@akoeplinger@ericstj@jkoritzinsky@ViktorHofer@agocke