[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly - #120712

Merged
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly#120712
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #120459 to release/10.0

/cc @davidwrighton

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

There is a regression between .NET 9 and .NET 10 where the number of types loaded on startup has increased significantly due to greater use of static virtual methods and generics. This PR addresses the issue by changing the behavior of the type loader to not require as many instantiations of interface types to be loaded by using a variety of optimization techniques. This is not a regression in the correctness of the type loader, or in its behavior, but the overall issue being addressed is a regression.

Notably

  1. Using a technique where we load placeholder types instead of the exact needed instantiations into the interface map
  2. Changing the constraint loading code to avoid loading the constraint instantiated over the formal generic parameters of the type/method which defines the constraint
  3. In the default interface method and virtual static method scenarios reducing the number of types loaded while attempting to find the actual implementing method.

Testing

The positive effect of this change was validated by a new series of performance tests written specifically to address this issue. Testing has shown that this change reduces startup time of small applications by as much as 20%. The correctness of this change was validated by running the various tests available to run in CI. The issue here was missed previously as the startup numbers under our pre-existing startup testing scenario did not restrict CPU, and we had also been making other changes to the runtime which resulted in small applications have a comparable startup time to older versions when not run in a mode where the CPU time available to the application was restricted.

Risk

High. This change affects all types loaded into the process and adds new logic and failure points to all interface casting. In addition, this change adds additional failure modes into customer applications such that a TypeLoadException may be thrown at unexpected moments due to invalid metadata instead of the exception occurring at the current locations.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

…erly - Reduce the set of constraints that need to be loaded for Bounds and cast checking
TODO:
There is a path in InitTypeContext which I have #ifdef'd out as I don't understand the comment
The accessibility checking needs full loading now, as we don't have a scheme to just look at all the typedefs in a signature, and instead need to do a load of the full type and work from there. This could be revisited.
This is DRAFT as we now have an unused state WhichConstraintsToLoad::TypeOrMethodVarsOnly which we never use. (It could be used for the Bounds algorithm, but that isn't actually used without doing the more expensive logic which does access validation)
…rrently it only handles interfaces defined on valuetypes - Change it to work for interfaces that are required implementation of other interfaces - (In that case, if the interface is generic, the special instantiation type is the first type parameter of the interface, not anything else.)
This change removes some safety checks that I can't find the rationale for. This may cause some entertaining failures in CI
… - Tweak the logic so that it will attempt to avoid loading types if they are cannot have implementations of the method we're looking for
…This test was no longer actually forcing the type which is supposed to throw a TypeLoadException to load within the test - Tweak the test to actually force the offending type to be loaded
… parameters to the TypeValidationChecker in crossgen2 - Add support for doing variance safety checks to the type loader in crossgen2 - Remove the circularity of type variables checks happening in generic method load, as it is redundant - Put all of the variance safety checks in the runtime under the SkipTypeValidation flag as crossgen2 can now do it reliably
… - Add test for constraints with function pointers in them
@davidwrightondavidwrighton added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Oct 14, 2025
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@EgorBot scenario-awslambda -arm -intel

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this PR is targeting release/10.0, this is a reminder that code complete is Monday November 17. If you want the changes in the PR in the release, please merge it on time.

@mangod9mangod9 added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) labels Nov 24, 2025
@ViktorHoferViktorHofer added this to the 10.0.2 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 1, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Test failure is a known issue #121940.

@JulieLeeMSFT
JulieLeeMSFT merged commit 1425a40 into release/10.0Dec 2, 2025
104 of 108 checks passed
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0 branch December 4, 2025 01:58
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@EgorBo@PranavSenthilnathan@JulieLeeMSFT@jkotas@ViktorHofer@davidwrighton@rbhanda@mangod9
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly - #120712

Merged
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly#120712
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #120459 to release/10.0

/cc @davidwrighton

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

There is a regression between .NET 9 and .NET 10 where the number of types loaded on startup has increased significantly due to greater use of static virtual methods and generics. This PR addresses the issue by changing the behavior of the type loader to not require as many instantiations of interface types to be loaded by using a variety of optimization techniques. This is not a regression in the correctness of the type loader, or in its behavior, but the overall issue being addressed is a regression.

Notably

  1. Using a technique where we load placeholder types instead of the exact needed instantiations into the interface map
  2. Changing the constraint loading code to avoid loading the constraint instantiated over the formal generic parameters of the type/method which defines the constraint
  3. In the default interface method and virtual static method scenarios reducing the number of types loaded while attempting to find the actual implementing method.

Testing

The positive effect of this change was validated by a new series of performance tests written specifically to address this issue. Testing has shown that this change reduces startup time of small applications by as much as 20%. The correctness of this change was validated by running the various tests available to run in CI. The issue here was missed previously as the startup numbers under our pre-existing startup testing scenario did not restrict CPU, and we had also been making other changes to the runtime which resulted in small applications have a comparable startup time to older versions when not run in a mode where the CPU time available to the application was restricted.

Risk

High. This change affects all types loaded into the process and adds new logic and failure points to all interface casting. In addition, this change adds additional failure modes into customer applications such that a TypeLoadException may be thrown at unexpected moments due to invalid metadata instead of the exception occurring at the current locations.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

…erly - Reduce the set of constraints that need to be loaded for Bounds and cast checking
TODO:
There is a path in InitTypeContext which I have #ifdef'd out as I don't understand the comment
The accessibility checking needs full loading now, as we don't have a scheme to just look at all the typedefs in a signature, and instead need to do a load of the full type and work from there. This could be revisited.
This is DRAFT as we now have an unused state WhichConstraintsToLoad::TypeOrMethodVarsOnly which we never use. (It could be used for the Bounds algorithm, but that isn't actually used without doing the more expensive logic which does access validation)
…rrently it only handles interfaces defined on valuetypes - Change it to work for interfaces that are required implementation of other interfaces - (In that case, if the interface is generic, the special instantiation type is the first type parameter of the interface, not anything else.)
This change removes some safety checks that I can't find the rationale for. This may cause some entertaining failures in CI
… - Tweak the logic so that it will attempt to avoid loading types if they are cannot have implementations of the method we're looking for
…This test was no longer actually forcing the type which is supposed to throw a TypeLoadException to load within the test - Tweak the test to actually force the offending type to be loaded
… parameters to the TypeValidationChecker in crossgen2 - Add support for doing variance safety checks to the type loader in crossgen2 - Remove the circularity of type variables checks happening in generic method load, as it is redundant - Put all of the variance safety checks in the runtime under the SkipTypeValidation flag as crossgen2 can now do it reliably
… - Add test for constraints with function pointers in them
@davidwrightondavidwrighton added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Oct 14, 2025
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@EgorBot scenario-awslambda -arm -intel

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this PR is targeting release/10.0, this is a reminder that code complete is Monday November 17. If you want the changes in the PR in the release, please merge it on time.

@mangod9mangod9 added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) labels Nov 24, 2025
@ViktorHoferViktorHofer added this to the 10.0.2 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 1, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Test failure is a known issue #121940.

@JulieLeeMSFT
JulieLeeMSFT merged commit 1425a40 into release/10.0Dec 2, 2025
104 of 108 checks passed
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0 branch December 4, 2025 01:58
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@EgorBo@PranavSenthilnathan@JulieLeeMSFT@jkotas@ViktorHofer@davidwrighton@rbhanda@mangod9
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly - #120712

Merged
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly#120712
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #120459 to release/10.0

/cc @davidwrighton

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

There is a regression between .NET 9 and .NET 10 where the number of types loaded on startup has increased significantly due to greater use of static virtual methods and generics. This PR addresses the issue by changing the behavior of the type loader to not require as many instantiations of interface types to be loaded by using a variety of optimization techniques. This is not a regression in the correctness of the type loader, or in its behavior, but the overall issue being addressed is a regression.

Notably

  1. Using a technique where we load placeholder types instead of the exact needed instantiations into the interface map
  2. Changing the constraint loading code to avoid loading the constraint instantiated over the formal generic parameters of the type/method which defines the constraint
  3. In the default interface method and virtual static method scenarios reducing the number of types loaded while attempting to find the actual implementing method.

Testing

The positive effect of this change was validated by a new series of performance tests written specifically to address this issue. Testing has shown that this change reduces startup time of small applications by as much as 20%. The correctness of this change was validated by running the various tests available to run in CI. The issue here was missed previously as the startup numbers under our pre-existing startup testing scenario did not restrict CPU, and we had also been making other changes to the runtime which resulted in small applications have a comparable startup time to older versions when not run in a mode where the CPU time available to the application was restricted.

Risk

High. This change affects all types loaded into the process and adds new logic and failure points to all interface casting. In addition, this change adds additional failure modes into customer applications such that a TypeLoadException may be thrown at unexpected moments due to invalid metadata instead of the exception occurring at the current locations.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

…erly - Reduce the set of constraints that need to be loaded for Bounds and cast checking
TODO:
There is a path in InitTypeContext which I have #ifdef'd out as I don't understand the comment
The accessibility checking needs full loading now, as we don't have a scheme to just look at all the typedefs in a signature, and instead need to do a load of the full type and work from there. This could be revisited.
This is DRAFT as we now have an unused state WhichConstraintsToLoad::TypeOrMethodVarsOnly which we never use. (It could be used for the Bounds algorithm, but that isn't actually used without doing the more expensive logic which does access validation)
…rrently it only handles interfaces defined on valuetypes - Change it to work for interfaces that are required implementation of other interfaces - (In that case, if the interface is generic, the special instantiation type is the first type parameter of the interface, not anything else.)
This change removes some safety checks that I can't find the rationale for. This may cause some entertaining failures in CI
… - Tweak the logic so that it will attempt to avoid loading types if they are cannot have implementations of the method we're looking for
…This test was no longer actually forcing the type which is supposed to throw a TypeLoadException to load within the test - Tweak the test to actually force the offending type to be loaded
… parameters to the TypeValidationChecker in crossgen2 - Add support for doing variance safety checks to the type loader in crossgen2 - Remove the circularity of type variables checks happening in generic method load, as it is redundant - Put all of the variance safety checks in the runtime under the SkipTypeValidation flag as crossgen2 can now do it reliably
… - Add test for constraints with function pointers in them
@davidwrightondavidwrighton added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Oct 14, 2025
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@EgorBot scenario-awslambda -arm -intel

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this PR is targeting release/10.0, this is a reminder that code complete is Monday November 17. If you want the changes in the PR in the release, please merge it on time.

@mangod9mangod9 added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) labels Nov 24, 2025
@ViktorHoferViktorHofer added this to the 10.0.2 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 1, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Test failure is a known issue #121940.

@JulieLeeMSFT
JulieLeeMSFT merged commit 1425a40 into release/10.0Dec 2, 2025
104 of 108 checks passed
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0 branch December 4, 2025 01:58
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@EgorBo@PranavSenthilnathan@JulieLeeMSFT@jkotas@ViktorHofer@davidwrighton@rbhanda@mangod9
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly - #120712

Merged
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly#120712
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #120459 to release/10.0

/cc @davidwrighton

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

There is a regression between .NET 9 and .NET 10 where the number of types loaded on startup has increased significantly due to greater use of static virtual methods and generics. This PR addresses the issue by changing the behavior of the type loader to not require as many instantiations of interface types to be loaded by using a variety of optimization techniques. This is not a regression in the correctness of the type loader, or in its behavior, but the overall issue being addressed is a regression.

Notably

  1. Using a technique where we load placeholder types instead of the exact needed instantiations into the interface map
  2. Changing the constraint loading code to avoid loading the constraint instantiated over the formal generic parameters of the type/method which defines the constraint
  3. In the default interface method and virtual static method scenarios reducing the number of types loaded while attempting to find the actual implementing method.

Testing

The positive effect of this change was validated by a new series of performance tests written specifically to address this issue. Testing has shown that this change reduces startup time of small applications by as much as 20%. The correctness of this change was validated by running the various tests available to run in CI. The issue here was missed previously as the startup numbers under our pre-existing startup testing scenario did not restrict CPU, and we had also been making other changes to the runtime which resulted in small applications have a comparable startup time to older versions when not run in a mode where the CPU time available to the application was restricted.

Risk

High. This change affects all types loaded into the process and adds new logic and failure points to all interface casting. In addition, this change adds additional failure modes into customer applications such that a TypeLoadException may be thrown at unexpected moments due to invalid metadata instead of the exception occurring at the current locations.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

…erly - Reduce the set of constraints that need to be loaded for Bounds and cast checking
TODO:
There is a path in InitTypeContext which I have #ifdef'd out as I don't understand the comment
The accessibility checking needs full loading now, as we don't have a scheme to just look at all the typedefs in a signature, and instead need to do a load of the full type and work from there. This could be revisited.
This is DRAFT as we now have an unused state WhichConstraintsToLoad::TypeOrMethodVarsOnly which we never use. (It could be used for the Bounds algorithm, but that isn't actually used without doing the more expensive logic which does access validation)
…rrently it only handles interfaces defined on valuetypes - Change it to work for interfaces that are required implementation of other interfaces - (In that case, if the interface is generic, the special instantiation type is the first type parameter of the interface, not anything else.)
This change removes some safety checks that I can't find the rationale for. This may cause some entertaining failures in CI
… - Tweak the logic so that it will attempt to avoid loading types if they are cannot have implementations of the method we're looking for
…This test was no longer actually forcing the type which is supposed to throw a TypeLoadException to load within the test - Tweak the test to actually force the offending type to be loaded
… parameters to the TypeValidationChecker in crossgen2 - Add support for doing variance safety checks to the type loader in crossgen2 - Remove the circularity of type variables checks happening in generic method load, as it is redundant - Put all of the variance safety checks in the runtime under the SkipTypeValidation flag as crossgen2 can now do it reliably
… - Add test for constraints with function pointers in them
@davidwrightondavidwrighton added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Oct 14, 2025
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@EgorBot scenario-awslambda -arm -intel

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this PR is targeting release/10.0, this is a reminder that code complete is Monday November 17. If you want the changes in the PR in the release, please merge it on time.

@mangod9mangod9 added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) labels Nov 24, 2025
@ViktorHoferViktorHofer added this to the 10.0.2 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 1, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Test failure is a known issue #121940.

@JulieLeeMSFT
JulieLeeMSFT merged commit 1425a40 into release/10.0Dec 2, 2025
104 of 108 checks passed
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0 branch December 4, 2025 01:58
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@EgorBo@PranavSenthilnathan@JulieLeeMSFT@jkotas@ViktorHofer@davidwrighton@rbhanda@mangod9
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly - #120712

Merged
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly#120712
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #120459 to release/10.0

/cc @davidwrighton

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

There is a regression between .NET 9 and .NET 10 where the number of types loaded on startup has increased significantly due to greater use of static virtual methods and generics. This PR addresses the issue by changing the behavior of the type loader to not require as many instantiations of interface types to be loaded by using a variety of optimization techniques. This is not a regression in the correctness of the type loader, or in its behavior, but the overall issue being addressed is a regression.

Notably

  1. Using a technique where we load placeholder types instead of the exact needed instantiations into the interface map
  2. Changing the constraint loading code to avoid loading the constraint instantiated over the formal generic parameters of the type/method which defines the constraint
  3. In the default interface method and virtual static method scenarios reducing the number of types loaded while attempting to find the actual implementing method.

Testing

The positive effect of this change was validated by a new series of performance tests written specifically to address this issue. Testing has shown that this change reduces startup time of small applications by as much as 20%. The correctness of this change was validated by running the various tests available to run in CI. The issue here was missed previously as the startup numbers under our pre-existing startup testing scenario did not restrict CPU, and we had also been making other changes to the runtime which resulted in small applications have a comparable startup time to older versions when not run in a mode where the CPU time available to the application was restricted.

Risk

High. This change affects all types loaded into the process and adds new logic and failure points to all interface casting. In addition, this change adds additional failure modes into customer applications such that a TypeLoadException may be thrown at unexpected moments due to invalid metadata instead of the exception occurring at the current locations.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

…erly - Reduce the set of constraints that need to be loaded for Bounds and cast checking
TODO:
There is a path in InitTypeContext which I have #ifdef'd out as I don't understand the comment
The accessibility checking needs full loading now, as we don't have a scheme to just look at all the typedefs in a signature, and instead need to do a load of the full type and work from there. This could be revisited.
This is DRAFT as we now have an unused state WhichConstraintsToLoad::TypeOrMethodVarsOnly which we never use. (It could be used for the Bounds algorithm, but that isn't actually used without doing the more expensive logic which does access validation)
…rrently it only handles interfaces defined on valuetypes - Change it to work for interfaces that are required implementation of other interfaces - (In that case, if the interface is generic, the special instantiation type is the first type parameter of the interface, not anything else.)
This change removes some safety checks that I can't find the rationale for. This may cause some entertaining failures in CI
… - Tweak the logic so that it will attempt to avoid loading types if they are cannot have implementations of the method we're looking for
…This test was no longer actually forcing the type which is supposed to throw a TypeLoadException to load within the test - Tweak the test to actually force the offending type to be loaded
… parameters to the TypeValidationChecker in crossgen2 - Add support for doing variance safety checks to the type loader in crossgen2 - Remove the circularity of type variables checks happening in generic method load, as it is redundant - Put all of the variance safety checks in the runtime under the SkipTypeValidation flag as crossgen2 can now do it reliably
… - Add test for constraints with function pointers in them
@davidwrightondavidwrighton added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Oct 14, 2025
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@EgorBot scenario-awslambda -arm -intel

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this PR is targeting release/10.0, this is a reminder that code complete is Monday November 17. If you want the changes in the PR in the release, please merge it on time.

@mangod9mangod9 added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) labels Nov 24, 2025
@ViktorHoferViktorHofer added this to the 10.0.2 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 1, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Test failure is a known issue #121940.

@JulieLeeMSFT
JulieLeeMSFT merged commit 1425a40 into release/10.0Dec 2, 2025
104 of 108 checks passed
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0 branch December 4, 2025 01:58
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@EgorBo@PranavSenthilnathan@JulieLeeMSFT@jkotas@ViktorHofer@davidwrighton@rbhanda@mangod9
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly - #120712

Merged
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly#120712
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #120459 to release/10.0

/cc @davidwrighton

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

There is a regression between .NET 9 and .NET 10 where the number of types loaded on startup has increased significantly due to greater use of static virtual methods and generics. This PR addresses the issue by changing the behavior of the type loader to not require as many instantiations of interface types to be loaded by using a variety of optimization techniques. This is not a regression in the correctness of the type loader, or in its behavior, but the overall issue being addressed is a regression.

Notably

  1. Using a technique where we load placeholder types instead of the exact needed instantiations into the interface map
  2. Changing the constraint loading code to avoid loading the constraint instantiated over the formal generic parameters of the type/method which defines the constraint
  3. In the default interface method and virtual static method scenarios reducing the number of types loaded while attempting to find the actual implementing method.

Testing

The positive effect of this change was validated by a new series of performance tests written specifically to address this issue. Testing has shown that this change reduces startup time of small applications by as much as 20%. The correctness of this change was validated by running the various tests available to run in CI. The issue here was missed previously as the startup numbers under our pre-existing startup testing scenario did not restrict CPU, and we had also been making other changes to the runtime which resulted in small applications have a comparable startup time to older versions when not run in a mode where the CPU time available to the application was restricted.

Risk

High. This change affects all types loaded into the process and adds new logic and failure points to all interface casting. In addition, this change adds additional failure modes into customer applications such that a TypeLoadException may be thrown at unexpected moments due to invalid metadata instead of the exception occurring at the current locations.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

…erly - Reduce the set of constraints that need to be loaded for Bounds and cast checking
TODO:
There is a path in InitTypeContext which I have #ifdef'd out as I don't understand the comment
The accessibility checking needs full loading now, as we don't have a scheme to just look at all the typedefs in a signature, and instead need to do a load of the full type and work from there. This could be revisited.
This is DRAFT as we now have an unused state WhichConstraintsToLoad::TypeOrMethodVarsOnly which we never use. (It could be used for the Bounds algorithm, but that isn't actually used without doing the more expensive logic which does access validation)
…rrently it only handles interfaces defined on valuetypes - Change it to work for interfaces that are required implementation of other interfaces - (In that case, if the interface is generic, the special instantiation type is the first type parameter of the interface, not anything else.)
This change removes some safety checks that I can't find the rationale for. This may cause some entertaining failures in CI
… - Tweak the logic so that it will attempt to avoid loading types if they are cannot have implementations of the method we're looking for
…This test was no longer actually forcing the type which is supposed to throw a TypeLoadException to load within the test - Tweak the test to actually force the offending type to be loaded
… parameters to the TypeValidationChecker in crossgen2 - Add support for doing variance safety checks to the type loader in crossgen2 - Remove the circularity of type variables checks happening in generic method load, as it is redundant - Put all of the variance safety checks in the runtime under the SkipTypeValidation flag as crossgen2 can now do it reliably
… - Add test for constraints with function pointers in them
@davidwrightondavidwrighton added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Oct 14, 2025
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@EgorBot scenario-awslambda -arm -intel

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this PR is targeting release/10.0, this is a reminder that code complete is Monday November 17. If you want the changes in the PR in the release, please merge it on time.

@mangod9mangod9 added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) labels Nov 24, 2025
@ViktorHoferViktorHofer added this to the 10.0.2 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 1, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Test failure is a known issue #121940.

@JulieLeeMSFT
JulieLeeMSFT merged commit 1425a40 into release/10.0Dec 2, 2025
104 of 108 checks passed
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0 branch December 4, 2025 01:58
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@EgorBo@PranavSenthilnathan@JulieLeeMSFT@jkotas@ViktorHofer@davidwrighton@rbhanda@mangod9
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly - #120712

Merged
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly#120712
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #120459 to release/10.0

/cc @davidwrighton

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

There is a regression between .NET 9 and .NET 10 where the number of types loaded on startup has increased significantly due to greater use of static virtual methods and generics. This PR addresses the issue by changing the behavior of the type loader to not require as many instantiations of interface types to be loaded by using a variety of optimization techniques. This is not a regression in the correctness of the type loader, or in its behavior, but the overall issue being addressed is a regression.

Notably

  1. Using a technique where we load placeholder types instead of the exact needed instantiations into the interface map
  2. Changing the constraint loading code to avoid loading the constraint instantiated over the formal generic parameters of the type/method which defines the constraint
  3. In the default interface method and virtual static method scenarios reducing the number of types loaded while attempting to find the actual implementing method.

Testing

The positive effect of this change was validated by a new series of performance tests written specifically to address this issue. Testing has shown that this change reduces startup time of small applications by as much as 20%. The correctness of this change was validated by running the various tests available to run in CI. The issue here was missed previously as the startup numbers under our pre-existing startup testing scenario did not restrict CPU, and we had also been making other changes to the runtime which resulted in small applications have a comparable startup time to older versions when not run in a mode where the CPU time available to the application was restricted.

Risk

High. This change affects all types loaded into the process and adds new logic and failure points to all interface casting. In addition, this change adds additional failure modes into customer applications such that a TypeLoadException may be thrown at unexpected moments due to invalid metadata instead of the exception occurring at the current locations.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

…erly - Reduce the set of constraints that need to be loaded for Bounds and cast checking
TODO:
There is a path in InitTypeContext which I have #ifdef'd out as I don't understand the comment
The accessibility checking needs full loading now, as we don't have a scheme to just look at all the typedefs in a signature, and instead need to do a load of the full type and work from there. This could be revisited.
This is DRAFT as we now have an unused state WhichConstraintsToLoad::TypeOrMethodVarsOnly which we never use. (It could be used for the Bounds algorithm, but that isn't actually used without doing the more expensive logic which does access validation)
…rrently it only handles interfaces defined on valuetypes - Change it to work for interfaces that are required implementation of other interfaces - (In that case, if the interface is generic, the special instantiation type is the first type parameter of the interface, not anything else.)
This change removes some safety checks that I can't find the rationale for. This may cause some entertaining failures in CI
… - Tweak the logic so that it will attempt to avoid loading types if they are cannot have implementations of the method we're looking for
…This test was no longer actually forcing the type which is supposed to throw a TypeLoadException to load within the test - Tweak the test to actually force the offending type to be loaded
… parameters to the TypeValidationChecker in crossgen2 - Add support for doing variance safety checks to the type loader in crossgen2 - Remove the circularity of type variables checks happening in generic method load, as it is redundant - Put all of the variance safety checks in the runtime under the SkipTypeValidation flag as crossgen2 can now do it reliably
… - Add test for constraints with function pointers in them
@davidwrightondavidwrighton added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Oct 14, 2025
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@EgorBot scenario-awslambda -arm -intel

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this PR is targeting release/10.0, this is a reminder that code complete is Monday November 17. If you want the changes in the PR in the release, please merge it on time.

@mangod9mangod9 added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) labels Nov 24, 2025
@ViktorHoferViktorHofer added this to the 10.0.2 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 1, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Test failure is a known issue #121940.

@JulieLeeMSFT
JulieLeeMSFT merged commit 1425a40 into release/10.0Dec 2, 2025
104 of 108 checks passed
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0 branch December 4, 2025 01:58
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@EgorBo@PranavSenthilnathan@JulieLeeMSFT@jkotas@ViktorHofer@davidwrighton@rbhanda@mangod9
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly - #120712

Merged
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0] Reduce types loaded on startup significantly#120712
JulieLeeMSFT merged 19 commits into
release/10.0from
backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #120459 to release/10.0

/cc @davidwrighton

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

There is a regression between .NET 9 and .NET 10 where the number of types loaded on startup has increased significantly due to greater use of static virtual methods and generics. This PR addresses the issue by changing the behavior of the type loader to not require as many instantiations of interface types to be loaded by using a variety of optimization techniques. This is not a regression in the correctness of the type loader, or in its behavior, but the overall issue being addressed is a regression.

Notably

  1. Using a technique where we load placeholder types instead of the exact needed instantiations into the interface map
  2. Changing the constraint loading code to avoid loading the constraint instantiated over the formal generic parameters of the type/method which defines the constraint
  3. In the default interface method and virtual static method scenarios reducing the number of types loaded while attempting to find the actual implementing method.

Testing

The positive effect of this change was validated by a new series of performance tests written specifically to address this issue. Testing has shown that this change reduces startup time of small applications by as much as 20%. The correctness of this change was validated by running the various tests available to run in CI. The issue here was missed previously as the startup numbers under our pre-existing startup testing scenario did not restrict CPU, and we had also been making other changes to the runtime which resulted in small applications have a comparable startup time to older versions when not run in a mode where the CPU time available to the application was restricted.

Risk

High. This change affects all types loaded into the process and adds new logic and failure points to all interface casting. In addition, this change adds additional failure modes into customer applications such that a TypeLoadException may be thrown at unexpected moments due to invalid metadata instead of the exception occurring at the current locations.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

…erly - Reduce the set of constraints that need to be loaded for Bounds and cast checking
TODO:
There is a path in InitTypeContext which I have #ifdef'd out as I don't understand the comment
The accessibility checking needs full loading now, as we don't have a scheme to just look at all the typedefs in a signature, and instead need to do a load of the full type and work from there. This could be revisited.
This is DRAFT as we now have an unused state WhichConstraintsToLoad::TypeOrMethodVarsOnly which we never use. (It could be used for the Bounds algorithm, but that isn't actually used without doing the more expensive logic which does access validation)
…rrently it only handles interfaces defined on valuetypes - Change it to work for interfaces that are required implementation of other interfaces - (In that case, if the interface is generic, the special instantiation type is the first type parameter of the interface, not anything else.)
This change removes some safety checks that I can't find the rationale for. This may cause some entertaining failures in CI
… - Tweak the logic so that it will attempt to avoid loading types if they are cannot have implementations of the method we're looking for
…This test was no longer actually forcing the type which is supposed to throw a TypeLoadException to load within the test - Tweak the test to actually force the offending type to be loaded
… parameters to the TypeValidationChecker in crossgen2 - Add support for doing variance safety checks to the type loader in crossgen2 - Remove the circularity of type variables checks happening in generic method load, as it is redundant - Put all of the variance safety checks in the runtime under the SkipTypeValidation flag as crossgen2 can now do it reliably
… - Add test for constraints with function pointers in them
@davidwrightondavidwrighton added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Oct 14, 2025
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@EgorBot scenario-awslambda -arm -intel

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this PR is targeting release/10.0, this is a reminder that code complete is Monday November 17. If you want the changes in the PR in the release, please merge it on time.

@mangod9mangod9 added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) labels Nov 24, 2025
@ViktorHoferViktorHofer added this to the 10.0.2 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 1, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Test failure is a known issue #121940.

@JulieLeeMSFT
JulieLeeMSFT merged commit 1425a40 into release/10.0Dec 2, 2025
104 of 108 checks passed
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-120459-to-release/10.0 branch December 4, 2025 01:58
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Servicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@EgorBo@PranavSenthilnathan@JulieLeeMSFT@jkotas@ViktorHofer@davidwrighton@rbhanda@mangod9