Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT - #121895

Closed
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Closed

Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT#121895
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async

Conversation

@am11

@am11am11 commented Nov 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Nov 22, 2025
@am11am11 added arch-loongarch64 arch-riscv Related to the RISC-V architecture labels Nov 22, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

dotnet-policy-serviceBot commented Nov 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@am11
am11force-pushed the chore/smoketess-runtime-async branch from db33a0d to 0b92a72CompareNovember 22, 2025 21:19
@am11

am11 commented Nov 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Smoketest results on QEMU:

linux-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601387216
linux-musl-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601394433
linux-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601408913
linux-musl-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601400910

cc @tomeksowi, @LuckyXu-HF

@MichalStrehovsky

MichalStrehovsky commented Nov 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT

Is runtime async tested anywhere in this PR? From what I can see this enables runtime-async in the C# compiler and then uses the custom attribute to turn it off everywhere (we would see Linux being broken in the CI runs if this was testing runtime async, because it's broken on Linux as of tip of main).

Also to clarify what I meant with "slowly moving away from adding AOT-specific testing for things that are not AOT specific" (#121857 (comment)) so that we're on the same page - we are actively deleting native AOT tests that don't test any AOT specific behaviors. E.g. #120949 is deleting the ComWrappers test. The PInvoke.cs and Threading.cs tests will likely follow too, once we confirm we're not losing coverage. We are aligning testing strategy with JIT-based CoreCLR. Full VM also doesn't have smoke tests; the testing strategies should be the same. The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.

@am11

am11 commented Nov 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.

We are relying on smoke tests for community-platform where testing is blocked #121857 (comment). If it isn't causing major overheads, I suggest we keep them for now.

@am11am11 mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2025
Merged
@jkotas

jkotas commented Nov 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree with @MichalStrehovsky. We should not be adding more redundant testing to native smoke tests.

blocked #121857 (comment)

It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.

Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?

@am11

am11 commented Nov 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, I will keep these tests in local branch for a while for quick validation once reloc issues are sorted out (we will need to remove [RuntimeAsyncMethodGeneration(false)] lines to actually make it fail).

It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.

The proper way would be to hook into bootstrap ridgraph mechanism for tests. I will try to work on it next.

Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?

F# is one of (many) nuget feeds there, the failing tests are due to tests infra not using the bootstrapped runtime packs. Previously, we fixed that by adding -p:UseLocalAppHostPack=true: #99354 but we should try to do it properly by importing eng/targetingpacks.targets and wire it up with UseBootstrapLayout.

@am11am11 closed this Nov 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

arch-loongarch64arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-NativeAOT-coreclrcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community memberruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@am11@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT - #121895
Closed
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Closed
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT#121895
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Conversation
@am11
@am11am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
 No description provided. 
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Nov 22, 2025
@am11am11
added

arch-loongarch64

arch-riscv
Related to the RISC-V architecture
labels
Nov 22, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@am11
am11force-pushed
the
chore/smoketess-runtime-async
branch
from
db33a0d to
0b92a72CompareNovember 22, 2025 21:19
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Smoketest results on QEMU:
linux-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601387216

linux-musl-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601394433

linux-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601408913

linux-musl-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601400910
cc @tomeksowi, @LuckyXu-HF
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT
Is runtime async tested anywhere in this PR? From what I can see this enables runtime-async in the C# compiler and then uses the custom attribute to turn it off everywhere (we would see Linux being broken in the CI runs if this was testing runtime async, because it's broken on Linux as of tip of main).
Also to clarify what I meant with "slowly moving away from adding AOT-specific testing for things that are not AOT specific" (#121857 (comment)) so that we're on the same page - we are actively deleting native AOT tests that don't test any AOT specific behaviors. E.g. #120949 is deleting the ComWrappers test. The PInvoke.cs and Threading.cs tests will likely follow too, once we confirm we're not losing coverage. We are aligning testing strategy with JIT-based CoreCLR. Full VM also doesn't have smoke tests; the testing strategies should be the same. The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
We are relying on smoke tests for community-platform where testing is blocked #121857 (comment). If it isn't causing major overheads, I suggest we keep them for now.
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
 Merged

@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I agree with @MichalStrehovsky. We should not be adding more redundant testing to native smoke tests.
blocked #121857 (comment)
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Ok, I will keep these tests in local branch for a while for quick validation once reloc issues are sorted out (we will need to remove [RuntimeAsyncMethodGeneration(false)] lines to actually make it fail).
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
The proper way would be to hook into bootstrap ridgraph mechanism for tests. I will try to work on it next.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
F# is one of (many) nuget feeds there, the failing tests are due to tests infra not using the bootstrapped runtime packs. Previously, we fixed that by adding -p:UseLocalAppHostPack=true: #99354 but we should try to do it properly by importing eng/targetingpacks.targets and wire it up with UseBootstrapLayout.
@am11am11
closed this
Nov 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-NativeAOT-coreclrcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community memberruntime-async

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@am11@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT - #121895
Closed
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Closed
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT#121895
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Conversation
@am11
@am11am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
 No description provided. 
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Nov 22, 2025
@am11am11
added

arch-loongarch64

arch-riscv
Related to the RISC-V architecture
labels
Nov 22, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@am11
am11force-pushed
the
chore/smoketess-runtime-async
branch
from
db33a0d to
0b92a72CompareNovember 22, 2025 21:19
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Smoketest results on QEMU:
linux-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601387216

linux-musl-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601394433

linux-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601408913

linux-musl-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601400910
cc @tomeksowi, @LuckyXu-HF
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT
Is runtime async tested anywhere in this PR? From what I can see this enables runtime-async in the C# compiler and then uses the custom attribute to turn it off everywhere (we would see Linux being broken in the CI runs if this was testing runtime async, because it's broken on Linux as of tip of main).
Also to clarify what I meant with "slowly moving away from adding AOT-specific testing for things that are not AOT specific" (#121857 (comment)) so that we're on the same page - we are actively deleting native AOT tests that don't test any AOT specific behaviors. E.g. #120949 is deleting the ComWrappers test. The PInvoke.cs and Threading.cs tests will likely follow too, once we confirm we're not losing coverage. We are aligning testing strategy with JIT-based CoreCLR. Full VM also doesn't have smoke tests; the testing strategies should be the same. The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
We are relying on smoke tests for community-platform where testing is blocked #121857 (comment). If it isn't causing major overheads, I suggest we keep them for now.
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
 Merged

@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I agree with @MichalStrehovsky. We should not be adding more redundant testing to native smoke tests.
blocked #121857 (comment)
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Ok, I will keep these tests in local branch for a while for quick validation once reloc issues are sorted out (we will need to remove [RuntimeAsyncMethodGeneration(false)] lines to actually make it fail).
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
The proper way would be to hook into bootstrap ridgraph mechanism for tests. I will try to work on it next.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
F# is one of (many) nuget feeds there, the failing tests are due to tests infra not using the bootstrapped runtime packs. Previously, we fixed that by adding -p:UseLocalAppHostPack=true: #99354 but we should try to do it properly by importing eng/targetingpacks.targets and wire it up with UseBootstrapLayout.
@am11am11
closed this
Nov 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-NativeAOT-coreclrcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community memberruntime-async

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@am11@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT - #121895
Closed
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Closed
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT#121895
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Conversation
@am11
@am11am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
 No description provided. 
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Nov 22, 2025
@am11am11
added

arch-loongarch64

arch-riscv
Related to the RISC-V architecture
labels
Nov 22, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@am11
am11force-pushed
the
chore/smoketess-runtime-async
branch
from
db33a0d to
0b92a72CompareNovember 22, 2025 21:19
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Smoketest results on QEMU:
linux-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601387216

linux-musl-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601394433

linux-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601408913

linux-musl-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601400910
cc @tomeksowi, @LuckyXu-HF
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT
Is runtime async tested anywhere in this PR? From what I can see this enables runtime-async in the C# compiler and then uses the custom attribute to turn it off everywhere (we would see Linux being broken in the CI runs if this was testing runtime async, because it's broken on Linux as of tip of main).
Also to clarify what I meant with "slowly moving away from adding AOT-specific testing for things that are not AOT specific" (#121857 (comment)) so that we're on the same page - we are actively deleting native AOT tests that don't test any AOT specific behaviors. E.g. #120949 is deleting the ComWrappers test. The PInvoke.cs and Threading.cs tests will likely follow too, once we confirm we're not losing coverage. We are aligning testing strategy with JIT-based CoreCLR. Full VM also doesn't have smoke tests; the testing strategies should be the same. The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
We are relying on smoke tests for community-platform where testing is blocked #121857 (comment). If it isn't causing major overheads, I suggest we keep them for now.
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
 Merged

@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I agree with @MichalStrehovsky. We should not be adding more redundant testing to native smoke tests.
blocked #121857 (comment)
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Ok, I will keep these tests in local branch for a while for quick validation once reloc issues are sorted out (we will need to remove [RuntimeAsyncMethodGeneration(false)] lines to actually make it fail).
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
The proper way would be to hook into bootstrap ridgraph mechanism for tests. I will try to work on it next.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
F# is one of (many) nuget feeds there, the failing tests are due to tests infra not using the bootstrapped runtime packs. Previously, we fixed that by adding -p:UseLocalAppHostPack=true: #99354 but we should try to do it properly by importing eng/targetingpacks.targets and wire it up with UseBootstrapLayout.
@am11am11
closed this
Nov 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-NativeAOT-coreclrcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community memberruntime-async

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@am11@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT - #121895
Closed
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Closed
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT#121895
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Conversation
@am11
@am11am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
 No description provided. 
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Nov 22, 2025
@am11am11
added

arch-loongarch64

arch-riscv
Related to the RISC-V architecture
labels
Nov 22, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@am11
am11force-pushed
the
chore/smoketess-runtime-async
branch
from
db33a0d to
0b92a72CompareNovember 22, 2025 21:19
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Smoketest results on QEMU:
linux-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601387216

linux-musl-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601394433

linux-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601408913

linux-musl-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601400910
cc @tomeksowi, @LuckyXu-HF
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT
Is runtime async tested anywhere in this PR? From what I can see this enables runtime-async in the C# compiler and then uses the custom attribute to turn it off everywhere (we would see Linux being broken in the CI runs if this was testing runtime async, because it's broken on Linux as of tip of main).
Also to clarify what I meant with "slowly moving away from adding AOT-specific testing for things that are not AOT specific" (#121857 (comment)) so that we're on the same page - we are actively deleting native AOT tests that don't test any AOT specific behaviors. E.g. #120949 is deleting the ComWrappers test. The PInvoke.cs and Threading.cs tests will likely follow too, once we confirm we're not losing coverage. We are aligning testing strategy with JIT-based CoreCLR. Full VM also doesn't have smoke tests; the testing strategies should be the same. The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
We are relying on smoke tests for community-platform where testing is blocked #121857 (comment). If it isn't causing major overheads, I suggest we keep them for now.
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
 Merged

@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I agree with @MichalStrehovsky. We should not be adding more redundant testing to native smoke tests.
blocked #121857 (comment)
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Ok, I will keep these tests in local branch for a while for quick validation once reloc issues are sorted out (we will need to remove [RuntimeAsyncMethodGeneration(false)] lines to actually make it fail).
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
The proper way would be to hook into bootstrap ridgraph mechanism for tests. I will try to work on it next.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
F# is one of (many) nuget feeds there, the failing tests are due to tests infra not using the bootstrapped runtime packs. Previously, we fixed that by adding -p:UseLocalAppHostPack=true: #99354 but we should try to do it properly by importing eng/targetingpacks.targets and wire it up with UseBootstrapLayout.
@am11am11
closed this
Nov 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-NativeAOT-coreclrcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community memberruntime-async

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@am11@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT - #121895
Closed
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Closed
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT#121895
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Conversation
@am11
@am11am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
 No description provided. 
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Nov 22, 2025
@am11am11
added

arch-loongarch64

arch-riscv
Related to the RISC-V architecture
labels
Nov 22, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@am11
am11force-pushed
the
chore/smoketess-runtime-async
branch
from
db33a0d to
0b92a72CompareNovember 22, 2025 21:19
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Smoketest results on QEMU:
linux-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601387216

linux-musl-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601394433

linux-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601408913

linux-musl-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601400910
cc @tomeksowi, @LuckyXu-HF
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT
Is runtime async tested anywhere in this PR? From what I can see this enables runtime-async in the C# compiler and then uses the custom attribute to turn it off everywhere (we would see Linux being broken in the CI runs if this was testing runtime async, because it's broken on Linux as of tip of main).
Also to clarify what I meant with "slowly moving away from adding AOT-specific testing for things that are not AOT specific" (#121857 (comment)) so that we're on the same page - we are actively deleting native AOT tests that don't test any AOT specific behaviors. E.g. #120949 is deleting the ComWrappers test. The PInvoke.cs and Threading.cs tests will likely follow too, once we confirm we're not losing coverage. We are aligning testing strategy with JIT-based CoreCLR. Full VM also doesn't have smoke tests; the testing strategies should be the same. The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
We are relying on smoke tests for community-platform where testing is blocked #121857 (comment). If it isn't causing major overheads, I suggest we keep them for now.
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
 Merged

@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I agree with @MichalStrehovsky. We should not be adding more redundant testing to native smoke tests.
blocked #121857 (comment)
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Ok, I will keep these tests in local branch for a while for quick validation once reloc issues are sorted out (we will need to remove [RuntimeAsyncMethodGeneration(false)] lines to actually make it fail).
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
The proper way would be to hook into bootstrap ridgraph mechanism for tests. I will try to work on it next.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
F# is one of (many) nuget feeds there, the failing tests are due to tests infra not using the bootstrapped runtime packs. Previously, we fixed that by adding -p:UseLocalAppHostPack=true: #99354 but we should try to do it properly by importing eng/targetingpacks.targets and wire it up with UseBootstrapLayout.
@am11am11
closed this
Nov 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-NativeAOT-coreclrcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community memberruntime-async

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@am11@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT - #121895
Closed
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Closed
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT#121895
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Conversation
@am11
@am11am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
 No description provided. 
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Nov 22, 2025
@am11am11
added

arch-loongarch64

arch-riscv
Related to the RISC-V architecture
labels
Nov 22, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@am11
am11force-pushed
the
chore/smoketess-runtime-async
branch
from
db33a0d to
0b92a72CompareNovember 22, 2025 21:19
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Smoketest results on QEMU:
linux-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601387216

linux-musl-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601394433

linux-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601408913

linux-musl-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601400910
cc @tomeksowi, @LuckyXu-HF
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT
Is runtime async tested anywhere in this PR? From what I can see this enables runtime-async in the C# compiler and then uses the custom attribute to turn it off everywhere (we would see Linux being broken in the CI runs if this was testing runtime async, because it's broken on Linux as of tip of main).
Also to clarify what I meant with "slowly moving away from adding AOT-specific testing for things that are not AOT specific" (#121857 (comment)) so that we're on the same page - we are actively deleting native AOT tests that don't test any AOT specific behaviors. E.g. #120949 is deleting the ComWrappers test. The PInvoke.cs and Threading.cs tests will likely follow too, once we confirm we're not losing coverage. We are aligning testing strategy with JIT-based CoreCLR. Full VM also doesn't have smoke tests; the testing strategies should be the same. The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
We are relying on smoke tests for community-platform where testing is blocked #121857 (comment). If it isn't causing major overheads, I suggest we keep them for now.
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
 Merged

@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I agree with @MichalStrehovsky. We should not be adding more redundant testing to native smoke tests.
blocked #121857 (comment)
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Ok, I will keep these tests in local branch for a while for quick validation once reloc issues are sorted out (we will need to remove [RuntimeAsyncMethodGeneration(false)] lines to actually make it fail).
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
The proper way would be to hook into bootstrap ridgraph mechanism for tests. I will try to work on it next.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
F# is one of (many) nuget feeds there, the failing tests are due to tests infra not using the bootstrapped runtime packs. Previously, we fixed that by adding -p:UseLocalAppHostPack=true: #99354 but we should try to do it properly by importing eng/targetingpacks.targets and wire it up with UseBootstrapLayout.
@am11am11
closed this
Nov 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-NativeAOT-coreclrcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community memberruntime-async

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@am11@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT - #121895
Closed
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Closed
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT#121895
am11 wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom 
am11:chore/smoketess-runtime-async
Conversation
@am11
@am11am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
 No description provided. 
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Nov 22, 2025
@am11am11
added

arch-loongarch64

arch-riscv
Related to the RISC-V architecture
labels
Nov 22, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@am11
am11force-pushed
the
chore/smoketess-runtime-async
branch
from
db33a0d to
0b92a72CompareNovember 22, 2025 21:19
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 22, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Smoketest results on QEMU:
linux-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601387216

linux-musl-riscv64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601394433

linux-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601408913

linux-musl-loongarch64 aot: https://github.com/am11/CrossRepoCITesting/actions/runs/19601400910
cc @tomeksowi, @LuckyXu-HF
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Add runtime-async smoke tests for NativeAOT
Is runtime async tested anywhere in this PR? From what I can see this enables runtime-async in the C# compiler and then uses the custom attribute to turn it off everywhere (we would see Linux being broken in the CI runs if this was testing runtime async, because it's broken on Linux as of tip of main).
Also to clarify what I meant with "slowly moving away from adding AOT-specific testing for things that are not AOT specific" (#121857 (comment)) so that we're on the same page - we are actively deleting native AOT tests that don't test any AOT specific behaviors. E.g. #120949 is deleting the ComWrappers test. The PInvoke.cs and Threading.cs tests will likely follow too, once we confirm we're not losing coverage. We are aligning testing strategy with JIT-based CoreCLR. Full VM also doesn't have smoke tests; the testing strategies should be the same. The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
The nativeaot subtree should eventually only have AOT-specific testing.
We are relying on smoke tests for community-platform where testing is blocked #121857 (comment). If it isn't causing major overheads, I suggest we keep them for now.
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
 Merged

@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I agree with @MichalStrehovsky. We should not be adding more redundant testing to native smoke tests.
blocked #121857 (comment)
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
@am11
am11
commented
Nov 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
Ok, I will keep these tests in local branch for a while for quick validation once reloc issues are sorted out (we will need to remove [RuntimeAsyncMethodGeneration(false)] lines to actually make it fail).
It would be better to spend the energy on getting this unblocked.
The proper way would be to hook into bootstrap ridgraph mechanism for tests. I will try to work on it next.
Are the F# tests the only ones that are causing problems (#115622) - does the rest work if you disable the F# tests?
F# is one of (many) nuget feeds there, the failing tests are due to tests infra not using the bootstrapped runtime packs. Previously, we fixed that by adding -p:UseLocalAppHostPack=true: #99354 but we should try to do it properly by importing eng/targetingpacks.targets and wire it up with UseBootstrapLayout.
@am11am11
closed this
Nov 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64arch-riscvRelated to the RISC-V architecturearea-NativeAOT-coreclrcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community memberruntime-async

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@am11@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas