[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433 - #124213

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Mar 11, 2026
Merged

[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433#124213
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64

Conversation

@shushanhf

@shushanhfshushanhf commented Feb 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

dotnet-policy-serviceBot commented Feb 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@shushanhf
shushanhf marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2026 12:29
@shushanhf

shushanhf commented Feb 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, @jakobbotsch
after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this

Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks

@jakobbotsch

jakobbotsch commented Feb 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi, @jakobbotsch after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this

Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks

Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.

Note that the read-write section is specifically for NativeAOT (when emitting ELF format). For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.

@shushanhf

shushanhf commented Feb 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.

This is not the finally real instruction name.

For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.

Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.

@jakobbotsch

jakobbotsch commented Feb 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.

This is not the finally real instruction name.

For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.

Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.

You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

This was referenced Feb 10, 2026
Closed
Closed
Closed
@shushanhf

shushanhf commented Feb 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.

This is not the finally real instruction name.

For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.

Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.

You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

OK, thanks very much.
sorry for late response as the Chinese Spring Festival.

@shushanhf
shushanhf marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2026 08:17
@shushanhf

shushanhf commented Mar 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

#125114
Thanks @LuckyXu-HF for reviewing and advices.

@LuckyXu-HFLuckyXu-HF mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2026
Merged
@shushanhf
shushanhf marked this pull request as draft March 10, 2026 09:43
@shushanhf
shushanhf marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2026 10:23
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch self-requested a review March 10, 2026 11:11
@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2026
Open
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch merged commit 3090433 into dotnet:mainMar 11, 2026
129 of 131 checks passed
jakobbotsch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
a6d3a3e
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
@shushanhf
shushanhf deleted the async_resumption_LA64 branch March 11, 2026 09:26
@am11am11 mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2026
Merged
@dotnet-maestrodotnet-maestroBot mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2026
Merged
CopilotAI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2026
@shushanhf
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which…
1e26335
… reference #123433 (#124213)
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which
reference #123433
CopilotAI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
bf41314
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
jakobbotsch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2026
@am11
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
f8e0698
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2026
@am11@eiriktsarpalis
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
cbc816e
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 11, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@jakobbotschjakobbotschjakobbotsch approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

arch-loongarch64area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shushanhf@jakobbotsch
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433 - #124213
Merged
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Mar 11, 2026
Merged
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433#124213
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Conversation
@shushanhf
@shushanhfshushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
February 10, 2026 12:29
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hi, @jakobbotsch

after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hi, @jakobbotsch after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
Note that the read-write section is specifically for NativeAOT (when emitting ELF format). For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

This was referenced Feb 10, 2026

Closed


Closed


Closed

@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.
OK, thanks very much.

sorry for late response as the Chinese Spring Festival.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 08:17
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Mar 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
#125114

Thanks @LuckyXu-HF for reviewing and advices.
@LuckyXu-HFLuckyXu-HF
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
 Merged

@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
March 10, 2026 09:43
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 10:23
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
self-requested a review
March 10, 2026 11:11
@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026

Open

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
merged commit 3090433
into
dotnet:mainMar 11, 2026

129 of 131 checks passed

jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
a6d3a3e
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
@shushanhf
shushanhf
deleted the

async_resumption_LA64

branch
March 11, 2026 09:26
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
 Merged

@dotnet-maestrodotnet-maestroBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 12, 2026
 Merged

CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@shushanhf
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which…
1e26335
… reference #123433 (#124213)
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which
reference #123433
CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
bf41314
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2026
@am11
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
f8e0698
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2026
@am11@eiriktsarpalis
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
cbc816e
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 11, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jakobbotschjakobbotschjakobbotsch approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shushanhf@jakobbotsch

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433 - #124213
Merged
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Mar 11, 2026
Merged
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433#124213
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Conversation
@shushanhf
@shushanhfshushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
February 10, 2026 12:29
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hi, @jakobbotsch

after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hi, @jakobbotsch after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
Note that the read-write section is specifically for NativeAOT (when emitting ELF format). For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

This was referenced Feb 10, 2026

Closed


Closed


Closed

@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.
OK, thanks very much.

sorry for late response as the Chinese Spring Festival.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 08:17
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Mar 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
#125114

Thanks @LuckyXu-HF for reviewing and advices.
@LuckyXu-HFLuckyXu-HF
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
 Merged

@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
March 10, 2026 09:43
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 10:23
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
self-requested a review
March 10, 2026 11:11
@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026

Open

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
merged commit 3090433
into
dotnet:mainMar 11, 2026

129 of 131 checks passed

jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
a6d3a3e
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
@shushanhf
shushanhf
deleted the

async_resumption_LA64

branch
March 11, 2026 09:26
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
 Merged

@dotnet-maestrodotnet-maestroBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 12, 2026
 Merged

CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@shushanhf
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which…
1e26335
… reference #123433 (#124213)
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which
reference #123433
CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
bf41314
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2026
@am11
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
f8e0698
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2026
@am11@eiriktsarpalis
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
cbc816e
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 11, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jakobbotschjakobbotschjakobbotsch approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shushanhf@jakobbotsch

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433 - #124213
Merged
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Mar 11, 2026
Merged
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433#124213
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Conversation
@shushanhf
@shushanhfshushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
February 10, 2026 12:29
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hi, @jakobbotsch

after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hi, @jakobbotsch after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
Note that the read-write section is specifically for NativeAOT (when emitting ELF format). For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

This was referenced Feb 10, 2026

Closed


Closed


Closed

@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.
OK, thanks very much.

sorry for late response as the Chinese Spring Festival.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 08:17
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Mar 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
#125114

Thanks @LuckyXu-HF for reviewing and advices.
@LuckyXu-HFLuckyXu-HF
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
 Merged

@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
March 10, 2026 09:43
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 10:23
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
self-requested a review
March 10, 2026 11:11
@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026

Open

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
merged commit 3090433
into
dotnet:mainMar 11, 2026

129 of 131 checks passed

jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
a6d3a3e
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
@shushanhf
shushanhf
deleted the

async_resumption_LA64

branch
March 11, 2026 09:26
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
 Merged

@dotnet-maestrodotnet-maestroBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 12, 2026
 Merged

CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@shushanhf
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which…
1e26335
… reference #123433 (#124213)
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which
reference #123433
CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
bf41314
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2026
@am11
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
f8e0698
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2026
@am11@eiriktsarpalis
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
cbc816e
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 11, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jakobbotschjakobbotschjakobbotsch approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shushanhf@jakobbotsch

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433 - #124213
Merged
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Mar 11, 2026
Merged
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433#124213
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Conversation
@shushanhf
@shushanhfshushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
February 10, 2026 12:29
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hi, @jakobbotsch

after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hi, @jakobbotsch after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
Note that the read-write section is specifically for NativeAOT (when emitting ELF format). For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

This was referenced Feb 10, 2026

Closed


Closed


Closed

@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.
OK, thanks very much.

sorry for late response as the Chinese Spring Festival.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 08:17
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Mar 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
#125114

Thanks @LuckyXu-HF for reviewing and advices.
@LuckyXu-HFLuckyXu-HF
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
 Merged

@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
March 10, 2026 09:43
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 10:23
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
self-requested a review
March 10, 2026 11:11
@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026

Open

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
merged commit 3090433
into
dotnet:mainMar 11, 2026

129 of 131 checks passed

jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
a6d3a3e
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
@shushanhf
shushanhf
deleted the

async_resumption_LA64

branch
March 11, 2026 09:26
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
 Merged

@dotnet-maestrodotnet-maestroBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 12, 2026
 Merged

CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@shushanhf
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which…
1e26335
… reference #123433 (#124213)
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which
reference #123433
CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
bf41314
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2026
@am11
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
f8e0698
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2026
@am11@eiriktsarpalis
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
cbc816e
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 11, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jakobbotschjakobbotschjakobbotsch approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shushanhf@jakobbotsch

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433 - #124213
Merged
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Mar 11, 2026
Merged
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433#124213
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Conversation
@shushanhf
@shushanhfshushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
February 10, 2026 12:29
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hi, @jakobbotsch

after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hi, @jakobbotsch after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
Note that the read-write section is specifically for NativeAOT (when emitting ELF format). For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

This was referenced Feb 10, 2026

Closed


Closed


Closed

@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.
OK, thanks very much.

sorry for late response as the Chinese Spring Festival.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 08:17
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Mar 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
#125114

Thanks @LuckyXu-HF for reviewing and advices.
@LuckyXu-HFLuckyXu-HF
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
 Merged

@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
March 10, 2026 09:43
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 10:23
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
self-requested a review
March 10, 2026 11:11
@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026

Open

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
merged commit 3090433
into
dotnet:mainMar 11, 2026

129 of 131 checks passed

jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
a6d3a3e
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
@shushanhf
shushanhf
deleted the

async_resumption_LA64

branch
March 11, 2026 09:26
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
 Merged

@dotnet-maestrodotnet-maestroBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 12, 2026
 Merged

CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@shushanhf
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which…
1e26335
… reference #123433 (#124213)
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which
reference #123433
CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
bf41314
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2026
@am11
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
f8e0698
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2026
@am11@eiriktsarpalis
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
cbc816e
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 11, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jakobbotschjakobbotschjakobbotsch approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shushanhf@jakobbotsch

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433 - #124213
Merged
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Mar 11, 2026
Merged
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433#124213
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Conversation
@shushanhf
@shushanhfshushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
February 10, 2026 12:29
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hi, @jakobbotsch

after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hi, @jakobbotsch after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
Note that the read-write section is specifically for NativeAOT (when emitting ELF format). For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

This was referenced Feb 10, 2026

Closed


Closed


Closed

@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.
OK, thanks very much.

sorry for late response as the Chinese Spring Festival.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 08:17
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Mar 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
#125114

Thanks @LuckyXu-HF for reviewing and advices.
@LuckyXu-HFLuckyXu-HF
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
 Merged

@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
March 10, 2026 09:43
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 10:23
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
self-requested a review
March 10, 2026 11:11
@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026

Open

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
merged commit 3090433
into
dotnet:mainMar 11, 2026

129 of 131 checks passed

jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
a6d3a3e
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
@shushanhf
shushanhf
deleted the

async_resumption_LA64

branch
March 11, 2026 09:26
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
 Merged

@dotnet-maestrodotnet-maestroBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 12, 2026
 Merged

CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@shushanhf
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which…
1e26335
… reference #123433 (#124213)
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which
reference #123433
CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
bf41314
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2026
@am11
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
f8e0698
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2026
@am11@eiriktsarpalis
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
cbc816e
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 11, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jakobbotschjakobbotschjakobbotsch approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shushanhf@jakobbotsch

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433 - #124213
Merged
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Mar 11, 2026
Merged
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433#124213
jakobbotsch merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
shushanhf:async_resumption_LA64
Conversation
@shushanhf
@shushanhfshushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which reference #123433
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
area-CodeGen-coreclr
CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot
added
the 
community-contribution
Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
label
Feb 10, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
February 10, 2026 12:29
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hi, @jakobbotsch

after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hi, @jakobbotsch after add this PR, the async test case failed liking this
Assert failure(PID 3342786 [0x003301c2], Thread: 3342786 [0x3301c2]): Assertion failed '!"Duplicate slots definitions found in GC information!"' in 'AwaitNotAsync:AsyncEntryPoint()' during 'Emit GC+EH tables ' (IL size 123; hash 0xfcda73b9; MinOpts)
File: /data/qiao/runtime/src/coreclr/gcinfo/gcinfoencoder.cpp:820

Can you give me some help? thanks
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
Note that the read-write section is specifically for NativeAOT (when emitting ELF format). For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.
Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
commented
Feb 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.

This was referenced Feb 10, 2026

Closed


Closed


Closed

@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Feb 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Hmm, I have never seen this assert before.

Did it only start failing with this PR? I notice that genAsyncResumeInfo emits INS_bl, but that seems wrong, isn't that a branch? It is supposed to compute the address of the data.
This is not the finally real instruction name.
For corerun/coreclr it should work without the relocations.
Befor this PR the async test cases are also failed.
You may want to double check the LA64 handling for the runtime async specific nodes (GT_RETURN_SUSPEND, GT_ASYNC_RESUME_INFO, GT_RECORD_ASYNC_RESUME, GT_ASYNC_CONTINUATION) in LSRA and codegen.
OK, thanks very much.

sorry for late response as the Chinese Spring Festival.
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 08:17
@shushanhf
shushanhf
commented
Mar 10, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
#125114

Thanks @LuckyXu-HF for reviewing and advices.
@LuckyXu-HFLuckyXu-HF
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
 Merged

@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as draft
March 10, 2026 09:43
@shushanhf
shushanhf
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 10, 2026 10:23
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
self-requested a review
March 10, 2026 11:11
@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 10, 2026

Open

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch
merged commit 3090433
into
dotnet:mainMar 11, 2026

129 of 131 checks passed

jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
a6d3a3e
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
@shushanhf
shushanhf
deleted the

async_resumption_LA64

branch
March 11, 2026 09:26
@am11am11
mentioned this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
 Merged

@dotnet-maestrodotnet-maestroBot
mentioned this pull request
Mar 12, 2026
 Merged

CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@shushanhf
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which…
1e26335
… reference #123433 (#124213)
[LoongArch64] Place async resumption info in read-write section which
reference #123433
CopilotAI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2026
@LuckyXu-HF
[LoongArch64] Enable Runtime Async. (issue#124935) (#125114)
bf41314
* Contributes to #124935
* Fix up hijacking on loongarch64 (preserve async continuation
register).
* Revert #121672 relate change of
LA64 as `FEATURE_REMAP_FUNCTION` is not enabled on LA64.
* Another part Place async resumption info in read-write section for
LA64 is in #124213
jakobbotsch pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2026
@am11
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
f8e0698
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2026
@am11@eiriktsarpalis
Improve runtime-async support on linux-riscv64 (#125446)
cbc816e
Syncs with LA64's #125114 and
#124213.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 11, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jakobbotschjakobbotschjakobbotsch approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

arch-loongarch64area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIcommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shushanhf@jakobbotsch