Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events - #124410

Merged
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events#124410
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression

Conversation

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow up on #124019

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a regression test to validate that the SampleProfiler correctly reports the SampleType field in ThreadSample events. The test ensures that when threads are executing managed code, the SampleType is reported as "Managed" (value 2) rather than incorrectly reporting "External" (value 1), which was a regression introduced in .NET 9.

Changes:

  • Added a new test project SampleProfilerSampleType that validates ThreadSample events report correct SampleType values
  • Test spins doing managed work and verifies at least some samples are marked as Managed type
  • Follows the established pattern for EventPipe validation tests in the repository

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csprojTest project file with standard configuration for tracing tests (GCStressIncompatible, JitOptimizationSensitive)
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csRegression test that validates ThreadSample events report SampleType=Managed when executing managed code

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@noahfalk
noahfalkforce-pushed the eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression branch from 52b498f to c09d9d1CompareMarch 4, 2026 02:55
@noahfalk
noahfalk enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2026 02:56
@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/ba-g - This PR already passed CI earlier but everything got reset trying to rebase it at the end. I don't think its meaningful to re-run.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@noahfalk@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events - #124410

Merged
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events#124410
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression

Conversation

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow up on #124019

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a regression test to validate that the SampleProfiler correctly reports the SampleType field in ThreadSample events. The test ensures that when threads are executing managed code, the SampleType is reported as "Managed" (value 2) rather than incorrectly reporting "External" (value 1), which was a regression introduced in .NET 9.

Changes:

  • Added a new test project SampleProfilerSampleType that validates ThreadSample events report correct SampleType values
  • Test spins doing managed work and verifies at least some samples are marked as Managed type
  • Follows the established pattern for EventPipe validation tests in the repository

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csprojTest project file with standard configuration for tracing tests (GCStressIncompatible, JitOptimizationSensitive)
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csRegression test that validates ThreadSample events report SampleType=Managed when executing managed code

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@noahfalk
noahfalkforce-pushed the eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression branch from 52b498f to c09d9d1CompareMarch 4, 2026 02:55
@noahfalk
noahfalk enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2026 02:56
@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/ba-g - This PR already passed CI earlier but everything got reset trying to rebase it at the end. I don't think its meaningful to re-run.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@noahfalk@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events - #124410

Merged
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events#124410
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression

Conversation

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow up on #124019

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a regression test to validate that the SampleProfiler correctly reports the SampleType field in ThreadSample events. The test ensures that when threads are executing managed code, the SampleType is reported as "Managed" (value 2) rather than incorrectly reporting "External" (value 1), which was a regression introduced in .NET 9.

Changes:

  • Added a new test project SampleProfilerSampleType that validates ThreadSample events report correct SampleType values
  • Test spins doing managed work and verifies at least some samples are marked as Managed type
  • Follows the established pattern for EventPipe validation tests in the repository

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csprojTest project file with standard configuration for tracing tests (GCStressIncompatible, JitOptimizationSensitive)
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csRegression test that validates ThreadSample events report SampleType=Managed when executing managed code

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@noahfalk
noahfalkforce-pushed the eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression branch from 52b498f to c09d9d1CompareMarch 4, 2026 02:55
@noahfalk
noahfalk enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2026 02:56
@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/ba-g - This PR already passed CI earlier but everything got reset trying to rebase it at the end. I don't think its meaningful to re-run.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@noahfalk@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events - #124410

Merged
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events#124410
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression

Conversation

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow up on #124019

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a regression test to validate that the SampleProfiler correctly reports the SampleType field in ThreadSample events. The test ensures that when threads are executing managed code, the SampleType is reported as "Managed" (value 2) rather than incorrectly reporting "External" (value 1), which was a regression introduced in .NET 9.

Changes:

  • Added a new test project SampleProfilerSampleType that validates ThreadSample events report correct SampleType values
  • Test spins doing managed work and verifies at least some samples are marked as Managed type
  • Follows the established pattern for EventPipe validation tests in the repository

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csprojTest project file with standard configuration for tracing tests (GCStressIncompatible, JitOptimizationSensitive)
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csRegression test that validates ThreadSample events report SampleType=Managed when executing managed code

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@noahfalk
noahfalkforce-pushed the eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression branch from 52b498f to c09d9d1CompareMarch 4, 2026 02:55
@noahfalk
noahfalk enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2026 02:56
@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/ba-g - This PR already passed CI earlier but everything got reset trying to rebase it at the end. I don't think its meaningful to re-run.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@noahfalk@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events - #124410

Merged
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events#124410
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression

Conversation

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow up on #124019

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a regression test to validate that the SampleProfiler correctly reports the SampleType field in ThreadSample events. The test ensures that when threads are executing managed code, the SampleType is reported as "Managed" (value 2) rather than incorrectly reporting "External" (value 1), which was a regression introduced in .NET 9.

Changes:

  • Added a new test project SampleProfilerSampleType that validates ThreadSample events report correct SampleType values
  • Test spins doing managed work and verifies at least some samples are marked as Managed type
  • Follows the established pattern for EventPipe validation tests in the repository

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csprojTest project file with standard configuration for tracing tests (GCStressIncompatible, JitOptimizationSensitive)
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csRegression test that validates ThreadSample events report SampleType=Managed when executing managed code

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@noahfalk
noahfalkforce-pushed the eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression branch from 52b498f to c09d9d1CompareMarch 4, 2026 02:55
@noahfalk
noahfalk enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2026 02:56
@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/ba-g - This PR already passed CI earlier but everything got reset trying to rebase it at the end. I don't think its meaningful to re-run.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@noahfalk@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events - #124410

Merged
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events#124410
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression

Conversation

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow up on #124019

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a regression test to validate that the SampleProfiler correctly reports the SampleType field in ThreadSample events. The test ensures that when threads are executing managed code, the SampleType is reported as "Managed" (value 2) rather than incorrectly reporting "External" (value 1), which was a regression introduced in .NET 9.

Changes:

  • Added a new test project SampleProfilerSampleType that validates ThreadSample events report correct SampleType values
  • Test spins doing managed work and verifies at least some samples are marked as Managed type
  • Follows the established pattern for EventPipe validation tests in the repository

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csprojTest project file with standard configuration for tracing tests (GCStressIncompatible, JitOptimizationSensitive)
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csRegression test that validates ThreadSample events report SampleType=Managed when executing managed code

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@noahfalk
noahfalkforce-pushed the eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression branch from 52b498f to c09d9d1CompareMarch 4, 2026 02:55
@noahfalk
noahfalk enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2026 02:56
@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/ba-g - This PR already passed CI earlier but everything got reset trying to rebase it at the end. I don't think its meaningful to re-run.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@noahfalk@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events - #124410

Merged
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events#124410
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression

Conversation

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow up on #124019

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a regression test to validate that the SampleProfiler correctly reports the SampleType field in ThreadSample events. The test ensures that when threads are executing managed code, the SampleType is reported as "Managed" (value 2) rather than incorrectly reporting "External" (value 1), which was a regression introduced in .NET 9.

Changes:

  • Added a new test project SampleProfilerSampleType that validates ThreadSample events report correct SampleType values
  • Test spins doing managed work and verifies at least some samples are marked as Managed type
  • Follows the established pattern for EventPipe validation tests in the repository

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csprojTest project file with standard configuration for tracing tests (GCStressIncompatible, JitOptimizationSensitive)
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csRegression test that validates ThreadSample events report SampleType=Managed when executing managed code

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@noahfalk
noahfalkforce-pushed the eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression branch from 52b498f to c09d9d1CompareMarch 4, 2026 02:55
@noahfalk
noahfalk enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2026 02:56
@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/ba-g - This PR already passed CI earlier but everything got reset trying to rebase it at the end. I don't think its meaningful to re-run.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@noahfalk@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events - #124410

Merged
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Add a regression test to validate sample profiling events#124410
noahfalk merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
noahfalk:eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression

Conversation

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow up on #124019

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a regression test to validate that the SampleProfiler correctly reports the SampleType field in ThreadSample events. The test ensures that when threads are executing managed code, the SampleType is reported as "Managed" (value 2) rather than incorrectly reporting "External" (value 1), which was a regression introduced in .NET 9.

Changes:

  • Added a new test project SampleProfilerSampleType that validates ThreadSample events report correct SampleType values
  • Test spins doing managed work and verifies at least some samples are marked as Managed type
  • Follows the established pattern for EventPipe validation tests in the repository

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csprojTest project file with standard configuration for tracing tests (GCStressIncompatible, JitOptimizationSensitive)
src/tests/tracing/eventpipe/eventsvalidation/SampleProfilerSampleType.csRegression test that validates ThreadSample events report SampleType=Managed when executing managed code

@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@noahfalk
noahfalkforce-pushed the eventpipe_sampleprofiler_regression branch from 52b498f to c09d9d1CompareMarch 4, 2026 02:55
@noahfalk
noahfalk enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2026 02:56
@noahfalk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/ba-g - This PR already passed CI earlier but everything got reset trying to rebase it at the end. I don't think its meaningful to re-run.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@noahfalk@hoyosjs