Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Implement cDAC TraverseLoaderHeap via Loader contract - #125129
Conversation
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke |
Co-authored-by: rcj1 <77995559+rcj1@users.noreply.github.com>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
… typo fix Co-authored-by: rcj1 <77995559+rcj1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rcj1 <77995559+rcj1@users.noreply.github.com>
…ructs for LoaderHeap types Co-authored-by: rcj1 <77995559+rcj1@users.noreply.github.com>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…loaderheap.h Co-authored-by: rcj1 <77995559+rcj1@users.noreply.github.com>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…ype; embed kind check in GetFirstLoaderHeapBlock Co-authored-by: rcj1 <77995559+rcj1@users.noreply.github.com>
…to loaderheap.h Co-authored-by: rcj1 <77995559+rcj1@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
docs/design/datacontracts/GC.md:118
- GC.md no longer documents several APIs that are still part of the IGC contract (e.g., GetHandleExtraInfo, GetHandleTableMemoryRegions/GetGCBookkeepingMemoryRegions/GetGCFreeRegions), nor their associated data descriptors/globals/pseudocode. This looks like an accidental deletion during the intended reordering; please restore/move those sections so the doc matches the current IGC interface surface.
// Gets the supported handle types
HandleType[] GetSupportedHandleTypes();
// Converts integer types into HandleType enum
HandleType[] GetHandleTypes(uint[] types);
// Gets the extra info (user data) associated with a dependent handle
TargetNUInt GetHandleExtraInfo(TargetPointer handle);
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Removed details about Webcil section headers from the documentation.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
max-charlamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm mod couple of suggestions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🤖 Copilot Code Review — PR #125129Note This review was generated by GitHub Copilot. Holistic AssessmentMotivation: This PR simplifies the ILoader contract by consolidating three per-field accessor methods into a single Approach: The approach is clean and minimal. A new Summary: ✅ LGTM. The refactoring is behavior-preserving, well-tested, and improves the codebase by reducing duplication and interface surface. No correctness, safety, or performance concerns. Detailed Findings✅ Correctness — Behavior is preservedVerified that The ✅ Code Deduplication — TraverseLoaderHeapCore extraction is correctThe ✅ API Design — LoaderHeapBlockData is appropriateThe ✅ Test Quality — Tests are adequate and follow conventions
✅ Documentation — Loader.md updates are consistent
💡 Minor — PR description is emptyThe PR body contains only the Copilot boilerplate. A brief description of the consolidation rationale would help future readers, but this is not blocking. Models contributing to this review: claude-opus-4.6 (primary), gpt-5.3-codex, claude-haiku-4.5. All models agreed on correctness; one false positive (read-failure behavior change) was investigated and dismissed after verifying the
|
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.