Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method - #127660

Merged
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions
May 2, 2026
Merged

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method#127660
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.

Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj which regressed after #126509 on interpreter.

…ke method
We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.
Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-interpreter

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @BrzVlad, @janvorli, @kg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts CoreCLR interpreter profiling transition reporting to avoid double-counting managed↔unmanaged transition events when the interpreter executes transient-IL-backed P/Invoke methods (post-#126509). This restores expected behavior for profiler transition tests by suppressing interpreter-side transition callbacks in cases where the P/Invoke body already performs the transition notifications.

Changes:

  • Suppress ProfilerManagedToUnmanagedTransitionMD / ProfilerUnmanagedToManagedTransitionMD callbacks in the interpreter calli-with-transition path when the currently interpreted method is a P/Invoke.
  • Preserve the existing suppression for IL stubs, extending it to P/Invoke methods now that the transient IL is attributed to the P/Invoke MethodDesc.

@BrzVlad
BrzVlad merged commit 11a3209 into dotnet:mainMay 2, 2026
126 of 132 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BrzVlad@jkoritzinsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method - #127660

Merged
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions
May 2, 2026
Merged

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method#127660
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.

Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj which regressed after #126509 on interpreter.

…ke method
We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.
Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-interpreter

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @BrzVlad, @janvorli, @kg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts CoreCLR interpreter profiling transition reporting to avoid double-counting managed↔unmanaged transition events when the interpreter executes transient-IL-backed P/Invoke methods (post-#126509). This restores expected behavior for profiler transition tests by suppressing interpreter-side transition callbacks in cases where the P/Invoke body already performs the transition notifications.

Changes:

  • Suppress ProfilerManagedToUnmanagedTransitionMD / ProfilerUnmanagedToManagedTransitionMD callbacks in the interpreter calli-with-transition path when the currently interpreted method is a P/Invoke.
  • Preserve the existing suppression for IL stubs, extending it to P/Invoke methods now that the transient IL is attributed to the P/Invoke MethodDesc.

@BrzVlad
BrzVlad merged commit 11a3209 into dotnet:mainMay 2, 2026
126 of 132 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BrzVlad@jkoritzinsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method - #127660

Merged
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions
May 2, 2026
Merged

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method#127660
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.

Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj which regressed after #126509 on interpreter.

…ke method
We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.
Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-interpreter

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @BrzVlad, @janvorli, @kg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts CoreCLR interpreter profiling transition reporting to avoid double-counting managed↔unmanaged transition events when the interpreter executes transient-IL-backed P/Invoke methods (post-#126509). This restores expected behavior for profiler transition tests by suppressing interpreter-side transition callbacks in cases where the P/Invoke body already performs the transition notifications.

Changes:

  • Suppress ProfilerManagedToUnmanagedTransitionMD / ProfilerUnmanagedToManagedTransitionMD callbacks in the interpreter calli-with-transition path when the currently interpreted method is a P/Invoke.
  • Preserve the existing suppression for IL stubs, extending it to P/Invoke methods now that the transient IL is attributed to the P/Invoke MethodDesc.

@BrzVlad
BrzVlad merged commit 11a3209 into dotnet:mainMay 2, 2026
126 of 132 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BrzVlad@jkoritzinsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method - #127660

Merged
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions
May 2, 2026
Merged

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method#127660
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.

Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj which regressed after #126509 on interpreter.

…ke method
We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.
Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-interpreter

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @BrzVlad, @janvorli, @kg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts CoreCLR interpreter profiling transition reporting to avoid double-counting managed↔unmanaged transition events when the interpreter executes transient-IL-backed P/Invoke methods (post-#126509). This restores expected behavior for profiler transition tests by suppressing interpreter-side transition callbacks in cases where the P/Invoke body already performs the transition notifications.

Changes:

  • Suppress ProfilerManagedToUnmanagedTransitionMD / ProfilerUnmanagedToManagedTransitionMD callbacks in the interpreter calli-with-transition path when the currently interpreted method is a P/Invoke.
  • Preserve the existing suppression for IL stubs, extending it to P/Invoke methods now that the transient IL is attributed to the P/Invoke MethodDesc.

@BrzVlad
BrzVlad merged commit 11a3209 into dotnet:mainMay 2, 2026
126 of 132 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BrzVlad@jkoritzinsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method - #127660

Merged
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions
May 2, 2026
Merged

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method#127660
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.

Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj which regressed after #126509 on interpreter.

…ke method
We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.
Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-interpreter

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @BrzVlad, @janvorli, @kg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts CoreCLR interpreter profiling transition reporting to avoid double-counting managed↔unmanaged transition events when the interpreter executes transient-IL-backed P/Invoke methods (post-#126509). This restores expected behavior for profiler transition tests by suppressing interpreter-side transition callbacks in cases where the P/Invoke body already performs the transition notifications.

Changes:

  • Suppress ProfilerManagedToUnmanagedTransitionMD / ProfilerUnmanagedToManagedTransitionMD callbacks in the interpreter calli-with-transition path when the currently interpreted method is a P/Invoke.
  • Preserve the existing suppression for IL stubs, extending it to P/Invoke methods now that the transient IL is attributed to the P/Invoke MethodDesc.

@BrzVlad
BrzVlad merged commit 11a3209 into dotnet:mainMay 2, 2026
126 of 132 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BrzVlad@jkoritzinsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method - #127660

Merged
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions
May 2, 2026
Merged

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method#127660
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.

Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj which regressed after #126509 on interpreter.

…ke method
We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.
Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-interpreter

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @BrzVlad, @janvorli, @kg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts CoreCLR interpreter profiling transition reporting to avoid double-counting managed↔unmanaged transition events when the interpreter executes transient-IL-backed P/Invoke methods (post-#126509). This restores expected behavior for profiler transition tests by suppressing interpreter-side transition callbacks in cases where the P/Invoke body already performs the transition notifications.

Changes:

  • Suppress ProfilerManagedToUnmanagedTransitionMD / ProfilerUnmanagedToManagedTransitionMD callbacks in the interpreter calli-with-transition path when the currently interpreted method is a P/Invoke.
  • Preserve the existing suppression for IL stubs, extending it to P/Invoke methods now that the transient IL is attributed to the P/Invoke MethodDesc.

@BrzVlad
BrzVlad merged commit 11a3209 into dotnet:mainMay 2, 2026
126 of 132 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BrzVlad@jkoritzinsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method - #127660

Merged
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions
May 2, 2026
Merged

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method#127660
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.

Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj which regressed after #126509 on interpreter.

…ke method
We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.
Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-interpreter

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @BrzVlad, @janvorli, @kg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts CoreCLR interpreter profiling transition reporting to avoid double-counting managed↔unmanaged transition events when the interpreter executes transient-IL-backed P/Invoke methods (post-#126509). This restores expected behavior for profiler transition tests by suppressing interpreter-side transition callbacks in cases where the P/Invoke body already performs the transition notifications.

Changes:

  • Suppress ProfilerManagedToUnmanagedTransitionMD / ProfilerUnmanagedToManagedTransitionMD callbacks in the interpreter calli-with-transition path when the currently interpreted method is a P/Invoke.
  • Preserve the existing suppression for IL stubs, extending it to P/Invoke methods now that the transient IL is attributed to the P/Invoke MethodDesc.

@BrzVlad
BrzVlad merged commit 11a3209 into dotnet:mainMay 2, 2026
126 of 132 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BrzVlad@jkoritzinsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method - #127660

Merged
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions
May 2, 2026
Merged

Don't report a interp->native transition when it is done from a pinvoke method#127660
BrzVlad merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BrzVlad:fix-clrinterp-profiler-transitions

Conversation

@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.

Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj which regressed after #126509 on interpreter.

…ke method
We didn't report these transitions when they were triggered from ILStubs because they already explicitly do this. Following the change of using transient IL belonging to the actual PInvoke method rather than separate ILStub methods (which should contain the same logic as the ILStub used to), we would now report the same event twice. We need therefore to also ignore the case where we are doing a PInvoke call from an actual PInvoke method.
Fixes src/tests/profiler/transitions/transitions.csproj.
@BrzVlad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-interpreter

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @BrzVlad, @janvorli, @kg
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adjusts CoreCLR interpreter profiling transition reporting to avoid double-counting managed↔unmanaged transition events when the interpreter executes transient-IL-backed P/Invoke methods (post-#126509). This restores expected behavior for profiler transition tests by suppressing interpreter-side transition callbacks in cases where the P/Invoke body already performs the transition notifications.

Changes:

  • Suppress ProfilerManagedToUnmanagedTransitionMD / ProfilerUnmanagedToManagedTransitionMD callbacks in the interpreter calli-with-transition path when the currently interpreted method is a P/Invoke.
  • Preserve the existing suppression for IL stubs, extending it to P/Invoke methods now that the transient IL is attributed to the P/Invoke MethodDesc.

@BrzVlad
BrzVlad merged commit 11a3209 into dotnet:mainMay 2, 2026
126 of 132 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BrzVlad@jkoritzinsky