Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer - #127768

Merged
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer
May 25, 2026
Merged

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer#127768
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer

Conversation

@jjonescz

@jjonesczjjonescz commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjonescz
jjonescz requested review from agocke and CopilotMay 4, 2026 17:59
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the experimental RequiresUnsafe / UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafe analyzers and related code fixes from the ILLink Roslyn analyzer toolset, along with their tests and resource strings. This aligns ILLink’s analyzer/test infrastructure with the Roslyn direction that RequiresUnsafeAttribute should not be authored in source (favoring the unsafe modifier instead).

Changes:

  • Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer, plus their associated DiagnosticId entries and shared resource strings.
  • Remove corresponding code fix providers (RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider) and all related analyzer/code-fix tests.
  • Stop wiring the removed analyzer into analyzer/test composition and remove the EnableUnsafeAnalyzer compiler-visible property from the ILLink analyzer props.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeTests.csRemoves tests for the “missing RequiresUnsafe” analyzer and its code fix.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/TestCaseCompilation.csStops adding RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer to the supported analyzer set in tests.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixTests.csRemoves code fix tests that manipulate RequiresUnsafeAttribute usage.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerTests.csRemoves analyzer tests for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/SharedStrings.resxRemoves shared strings for RequiresUnsafe-related diagnostics/titles/messages.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/DiagnosticId.csRemoves DEBUG-only RequiresUnsafe diagnostic IDs and subcategory mapping.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer that suggested adding RequiresUnsafeAttribute for pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer producing RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/MSBuildPropertyOptionNames.csRemoves the DEBUG-only EnableUnsafeAnalyzer property constant.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DynamicallyAccessedMembersAnalyzer.csStops registering the removed RequiresUnsafe analyzer in the “requires analyzers” set.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.propsRemoves EnableUnsafeAnalyzer from compiler-visible properties list.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider that adds RequiresUnsafeAttribute to pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/Resources.resxRemoves code-fix resource strings tied to the deleted code fixes.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics (“add attribute” / “wrap in unsafe block”).

am11
am11 approved these changes May 6, 2026

@am11am11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jjonescz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

Per #128461 (comment) we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

Looks like the analyzer is now blocking codeflow in #127989 because Roslyn started emitting CS9379: Do not use 'RequiresUnsafeAttribute' in source; use the 'unsafe' modifier instead. on patterns used in the tests.

@jjonescz

jjonescz commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

I don't know how that would work. The code fixer is also using the [RequireUnsafe] attribute which is a compiler-reserved attribute now. It needs to be updated to use the unsafe keyword. I can try to do that in this PR. cc @EgorBo - I hope this won't conflict much with your code fixer from #128304.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 10:29
@jjonesczjjonescz changed the title Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerRemove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixerMay 25, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@agocke
agocke merged commit 5409a36 into dotnet:mainMay 25, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@jjonescz
jjonescz deleted the Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer branch May 26, 2026 07:21
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview6 milestone May 26, 2026
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzerslinkable-frameworkIssues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jjonescz@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@EgorBo@am11
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer - #127768

Merged
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer
May 25, 2026
Merged

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer#127768
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer

Conversation

@jjonescz

@jjonesczjjonescz commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjonescz
jjonescz requested review from agocke and CopilotMay 4, 2026 17:59
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the experimental RequiresUnsafe / UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafe analyzers and related code fixes from the ILLink Roslyn analyzer toolset, along with their tests and resource strings. This aligns ILLink’s analyzer/test infrastructure with the Roslyn direction that RequiresUnsafeAttribute should not be authored in source (favoring the unsafe modifier instead).

Changes:

  • Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer, plus their associated DiagnosticId entries and shared resource strings.
  • Remove corresponding code fix providers (RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider) and all related analyzer/code-fix tests.
  • Stop wiring the removed analyzer into analyzer/test composition and remove the EnableUnsafeAnalyzer compiler-visible property from the ILLink analyzer props.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeTests.csRemoves tests for the “missing RequiresUnsafe” analyzer and its code fix.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/TestCaseCompilation.csStops adding RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer to the supported analyzer set in tests.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixTests.csRemoves code fix tests that manipulate RequiresUnsafeAttribute usage.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerTests.csRemoves analyzer tests for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/SharedStrings.resxRemoves shared strings for RequiresUnsafe-related diagnostics/titles/messages.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/DiagnosticId.csRemoves DEBUG-only RequiresUnsafe diagnostic IDs and subcategory mapping.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer that suggested adding RequiresUnsafeAttribute for pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer producing RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/MSBuildPropertyOptionNames.csRemoves the DEBUG-only EnableUnsafeAnalyzer property constant.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DynamicallyAccessedMembersAnalyzer.csStops registering the removed RequiresUnsafe analyzer in the “requires analyzers” set.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.propsRemoves EnableUnsafeAnalyzer from compiler-visible properties list.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider that adds RequiresUnsafeAttribute to pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/Resources.resxRemoves code-fix resource strings tied to the deleted code fixes.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics (“add attribute” / “wrap in unsafe block”).

am11
am11 approved these changes May 6, 2026

@am11am11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jjonescz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

Per #128461 (comment) we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

Looks like the analyzer is now blocking codeflow in #127989 because Roslyn started emitting CS9379: Do not use 'RequiresUnsafeAttribute' in source; use the 'unsafe' modifier instead. on patterns used in the tests.

@jjonescz

jjonescz commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

I don't know how that would work. The code fixer is also using the [RequireUnsafe] attribute which is a compiler-reserved attribute now. It needs to be updated to use the unsafe keyword. I can try to do that in this PR. cc @EgorBo - I hope this won't conflict much with your code fixer from #128304.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 10:29
@jjonesczjjonescz changed the title Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerRemove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixerMay 25, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@agocke
agocke merged commit 5409a36 into dotnet:mainMay 25, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@jjonescz
jjonescz deleted the Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer branch May 26, 2026 07:21
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview6 milestone May 26, 2026
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzerslinkable-frameworkIssues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jjonescz@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@EgorBo@am11
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer - #127768

Merged
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer
May 25, 2026
Merged

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer#127768
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer

Conversation

@jjonescz

@jjonesczjjonescz commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjonescz
jjonescz requested review from agocke and CopilotMay 4, 2026 17:59
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the experimental RequiresUnsafe / UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafe analyzers and related code fixes from the ILLink Roslyn analyzer toolset, along with their tests and resource strings. This aligns ILLink’s analyzer/test infrastructure with the Roslyn direction that RequiresUnsafeAttribute should not be authored in source (favoring the unsafe modifier instead).

Changes:

  • Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer, plus their associated DiagnosticId entries and shared resource strings.
  • Remove corresponding code fix providers (RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider) and all related analyzer/code-fix tests.
  • Stop wiring the removed analyzer into analyzer/test composition and remove the EnableUnsafeAnalyzer compiler-visible property from the ILLink analyzer props.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeTests.csRemoves tests for the “missing RequiresUnsafe” analyzer and its code fix.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/TestCaseCompilation.csStops adding RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer to the supported analyzer set in tests.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixTests.csRemoves code fix tests that manipulate RequiresUnsafeAttribute usage.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerTests.csRemoves analyzer tests for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/SharedStrings.resxRemoves shared strings for RequiresUnsafe-related diagnostics/titles/messages.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/DiagnosticId.csRemoves DEBUG-only RequiresUnsafe diagnostic IDs and subcategory mapping.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer that suggested adding RequiresUnsafeAttribute for pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer producing RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/MSBuildPropertyOptionNames.csRemoves the DEBUG-only EnableUnsafeAnalyzer property constant.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DynamicallyAccessedMembersAnalyzer.csStops registering the removed RequiresUnsafe analyzer in the “requires analyzers” set.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.propsRemoves EnableUnsafeAnalyzer from compiler-visible properties list.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider that adds RequiresUnsafeAttribute to pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/Resources.resxRemoves code-fix resource strings tied to the deleted code fixes.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics (“add attribute” / “wrap in unsafe block”).

am11
am11 approved these changes May 6, 2026

@am11am11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jjonescz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

Per #128461 (comment) we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

Looks like the analyzer is now blocking codeflow in #127989 because Roslyn started emitting CS9379: Do not use 'RequiresUnsafeAttribute' in source; use the 'unsafe' modifier instead. on patterns used in the tests.

@jjonescz

jjonescz commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

I don't know how that would work. The code fixer is also using the [RequireUnsafe] attribute which is a compiler-reserved attribute now. It needs to be updated to use the unsafe keyword. I can try to do that in this PR. cc @EgorBo - I hope this won't conflict much with your code fixer from #128304.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 10:29
@jjonesczjjonescz changed the title Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerRemove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixerMay 25, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@agocke
agocke merged commit 5409a36 into dotnet:mainMay 25, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@jjonescz
jjonescz deleted the Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer branch May 26, 2026 07:21
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview6 milestone May 26, 2026
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzerslinkable-frameworkIssues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jjonescz@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@EgorBo@am11
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer - #127768

Merged
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer
May 25, 2026
Merged

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer#127768
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer

Conversation

@jjonescz

@jjonesczjjonescz commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjonescz
jjonescz requested review from agocke and CopilotMay 4, 2026 17:59
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the experimental RequiresUnsafe / UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafe analyzers and related code fixes from the ILLink Roslyn analyzer toolset, along with their tests and resource strings. This aligns ILLink’s analyzer/test infrastructure with the Roslyn direction that RequiresUnsafeAttribute should not be authored in source (favoring the unsafe modifier instead).

Changes:

  • Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer, plus their associated DiagnosticId entries and shared resource strings.
  • Remove corresponding code fix providers (RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider) and all related analyzer/code-fix tests.
  • Stop wiring the removed analyzer into analyzer/test composition and remove the EnableUnsafeAnalyzer compiler-visible property from the ILLink analyzer props.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeTests.csRemoves tests for the “missing RequiresUnsafe” analyzer and its code fix.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/TestCaseCompilation.csStops adding RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer to the supported analyzer set in tests.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixTests.csRemoves code fix tests that manipulate RequiresUnsafeAttribute usage.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerTests.csRemoves analyzer tests for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/SharedStrings.resxRemoves shared strings for RequiresUnsafe-related diagnostics/titles/messages.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/DiagnosticId.csRemoves DEBUG-only RequiresUnsafe diagnostic IDs and subcategory mapping.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer that suggested adding RequiresUnsafeAttribute for pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer producing RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/MSBuildPropertyOptionNames.csRemoves the DEBUG-only EnableUnsafeAnalyzer property constant.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DynamicallyAccessedMembersAnalyzer.csStops registering the removed RequiresUnsafe analyzer in the “requires analyzers” set.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.propsRemoves EnableUnsafeAnalyzer from compiler-visible properties list.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider that adds RequiresUnsafeAttribute to pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/Resources.resxRemoves code-fix resource strings tied to the deleted code fixes.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics (“add attribute” / “wrap in unsafe block”).

am11
am11 approved these changes May 6, 2026

@am11am11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jjonescz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

Per #128461 (comment) we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

Looks like the analyzer is now blocking codeflow in #127989 because Roslyn started emitting CS9379: Do not use 'RequiresUnsafeAttribute' in source; use the 'unsafe' modifier instead. on patterns used in the tests.

@jjonescz

jjonescz commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

I don't know how that would work. The code fixer is also using the [RequireUnsafe] attribute which is a compiler-reserved attribute now. It needs to be updated to use the unsafe keyword. I can try to do that in this PR. cc @EgorBo - I hope this won't conflict much with your code fixer from #128304.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 10:29
@jjonesczjjonescz changed the title Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerRemove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixerMay 25, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@agocke
agocke merged commit 5409a36 into dotnet:mainMay 25, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@jjonescz
jjonescz deleted the Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer branch May 26, 2026 07:21
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview6 milestone May 26, 2026
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzerslinkable-frameworkIssues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jjonescz@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@EgorBo@am11
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer - #127768

Merged
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer
May 25, 2026
Merged

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer#127768
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer

Conversation

@jjonescz

@jjonesczjjonescz commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjonescz
jjonescz requested review from agocke and CopilotMay 4, 2026 17:59
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the experimental RequiresUnsafe / UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafe analyzers and related code fixes from the ILLink Roslyn analyzer toolset, along with their tests and resource strings. This aligns ILLink’s analyzer/test infrastructure with the Roslyn direction that RequiresUnsafeAttribute should not be authored in source (favoring the unsafe modifier instead).

Changes:

  • Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer, plus their associated DiagnosticId entries and shared resource strings.
  • Remove corresponding code fix providers (RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider) and all related analyzer/code-fix tests.
  • Stop wiring the removed analyzer into analyzer/test composition and remove the EnableUnsafeAnalyzer compiler-visible property from the ILLink analyzer props.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeTests.csRemoves tests for the “missing RequiresUnsafe” analyzer and its code fix.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/TestCaseCompilation.csStops adding RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer to the supported analyzer set in tests.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixTests.csRemoves code fix tests that manipulate RequiresUnsafeAttribute usage.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerTests.csRemoves analyzer tests for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/SharedStrings.resxRemoves shared strings for RequiresUnsafe-related diagnostics/titles/messages.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/DiagnosticId.csRemoves DEBUG-only RequiresUnsafe diagnostic IDs and subcategory mapping.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer that suggested adding RequiresUnsafeAttribute for pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer producing RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/MSBuildPropertyOptionNames.csRemoves the DEBUG-only EnableUnsafeAnalyzer property constant.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DynamicallyAccessedMembersAnalyzer.csStops registering the removed RequiresUnsafe analyzer in the “requires analyzers” set.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.propsRemoves EnableUnsafeAnalyzer from compiler-visible properties list.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider that adds RequiresUnsafeAttribute to pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/Resources.resxRemoves code-fix resource strings tied to the deleted code fixes.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics (“add attribute” / “wrap in unsafe block”).

am11
am11 approved these changes May 6, 2026

@am11am11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jjonescz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

Per #128461 (comment) we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

Looks like the analyzer is now blocking codeflow in #127989 because Roslyn started emitting CS9379: Do not use 'RequiresUnsafeAttribute' in source; use the 'unsafe' modifier instead. on patterns used in the tests.

@jjonescz

jjonescz commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

I don't know how that would work. The code fixer is also using the [RequireUnsafe] attribute which is a compiler-reserved attribute now. It needs to be updated to use the unsafe keyword. I can try to do that in this PR. cc @EgorBo - I hope this won't conflict much with your code fixer from #128304.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 10:29
@jjonesczjjonescz changed the title Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerRemove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixerMay 25, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@agocke
agocke merged commit 5409a36 into dotnet:mainMay 25, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@jjonescz
jjonescz deleted the Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer branch May 26, 2026 07:21
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview6 milestone May 26, 2026
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzerslinkable-frameworkIssues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jjonescz@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@EgorBo@am11
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer - #127768

Merged
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer
May 25, 2026
Merged

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer#127768
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer

Conversation

@jjonescz

@jjonesczjjonescz commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjonescz
jjonescz requested review from agocke and CopilotMay 4, 2026 17:59
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the experimental RequiresUnsafe / UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafe analyzers and related code fixes from the ILLink Roslyn analyzer toolset, along with their tests and resource strings. This aligns ILLink’s analyzer/test infrastructure with the Roslyn direction that RequiresUnsafeAttribute should not be authored in source (favoring the unsafe modifier instead).

Changes:

  • Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer, plus their associated DiagnosticId entries and shared resource strings.
  • Remove corresponding code fix providers (RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider) and all related analyzer/code-fix tests.
  • Stop wiring the removed analyzer into analyzer/test composition and remove the EnableUnsafeAnalyzer compiler-visible property from the ILLink analyzer props.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeTests.csRemoves tests for the “missing RequiresUnsafe” analyzer and its code fix.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/TestCaseCompilation.csStops adding RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer to the supported analyzer set in tests.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixTests.csRemoves code fix tests that manipulate RequiresUnsafeAttribute usage.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerTests.csRemoves analyzer tests for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/SharedStrings.resxRemoves shared strings for RequiresUnsafe-related diagnostics/titles/messages.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/DiagnosticId.csRemoves DEBUG-only RequiresUnsafe diagnostic IDs and subcategory mapping.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer that suggested adding RequiresUnsafeAttribute for pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer producing RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/MSBuildPropertyOptionNames.csRemoves the DEBUG-only EnableUnsafeAnalyzer property constant.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DynamicallyAccessedMembersAnalyzer.csStops registering the removed RequiresUnsafe analyzer in the “requires analyzers” set.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.propsRemoves EnableUnsafeAnalyzer from compiler-visible properties list.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider that adds RequiresUnsafeAttribute to pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/Resources.resxRemoves code-fix resource strings tied to the deleted code fixes.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics (“add attribute” / “wrap in unsafe block”).

am11
am11 approved these changes May 6, 2026

@am11am11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jjonescz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

Per #128461 (comment) we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

Looks like the analyzer is now blocking codeflow in #127989 because Roslyn started emitting CS9379: Do not use 'RequiresUnsafeAttribute' in source; use the 'unsafe' modifier instead. on patterns used in the tests.

@jjonescz

jjonescz commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

I don't know how that would work. The code fixer is also using the [RequireUnsafe] attribute which is a compiler-reserved attribute now. It needs to be updated to use the unsafe keyword. I can try to do that in this PR. cc @EgorBo - I hope this won't conflict much with your code fixer from #128304.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 10:29
@jjonesczjjonescz changed the title Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerRemove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixerMay 25, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@agocke
agocke merged commit 5409a36 into dotnet:mainMay 25, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@jjonescz
jjonescz deleted the Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer branch May 26, 2026 07:21
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview6 milestone May 26, 2026
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzerslinkable-frameworkIssues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jjonescz@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@EgorBo@am11
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer - #127768

Merged
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer
May 25, 2026
Merged

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer#127768
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer

Conversation

@jjonescz

@jjonesczjjonescz commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjonescz
jjonescz requested review from agocke and CopilotMay 4, 2026 17:59
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the experimental RequiresUnsafe / UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafe analyzers and related code fixes from the ILLink Roslyn analyzer toolset, along with their tests and resource strings. This aligns ILLink’s analyzer/test infrastructure with the Roslyn direction that RequiresUnsafeAttribute should not be authored in source (favoring the unsafe modifier instead).

Changes:

  • Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer, plus their associated DiagnosticId entries and shared resource strings.
  • Remove corresponding code fix providers (RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider) and all related analyzer/code-fix tests.
  • Stop wiring the removed analyzer into analyzer/test composition and remove the EnableUnsafeAnalyzer compiler-visible property from the ILLink analyzer props.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeTests.csRemoves tests for the “missing RequiresUnsafe” analyzer and its code fix.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/TestCaseCompilation.csStops adding RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer to the supported analyzer set in tests.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixTests.csRemoves code fix tests that manipulate RequiresUnsafeAttribute usage.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerTests.csRemoves analyzer tests for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/SharedStrings.resxRemoves shared strings for RequiresUnsafe-related diagnostics/titles/messages.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/DiagnosticId.csRemoves DEBUG-only RequiresUnsafe diagnostic IDs and subcategory mapping.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer that suggested adding RequiresUnsafeAttribute for pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer producing RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/MSBuildPropertyOptionNames.csRemoves the DEBUG-only EnableUnsafeAnalyzer property constant.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DynamicallyAccessedMembersAnalyzer.csStops registering the removed RequiresUnsafe analyzer in the “requires analyzers” set.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.propsRemoves EnableUnsafeAnalyzer from compiler-visible properties list.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider that adds RequiresUnsafeAttribute to pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/Resources.resxRemoves code-fix resource strings tied to the deleted code fixes.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics (“add attribute” / “wrap in unsafe block”).

am11
am11 approved these changes May 6, 2026

@am11am11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jjonescz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

Per #128461 (comment) we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

Looks like the analyzer is now blocking codeflow in #127989 because Roslyn started emitting CS9379: Do not use 'RequiresUnsafeAttribute' in source; use the 'unsafe' modifier instead. on patterns used in the tests.

@jjonescz

jjonescz commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

I don't know how that would work. The code fixer is also using the [RequireUnsafe] attribute which is a compiler-reserved attribute now. It needs to be updated to use the unsafe keyword. I can try to do that in this PR. cc @EgorBo - I hope this won't conflict much with your code fixer from #128304.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 10:29
@jjonesczjjonescz changed the title Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerRemove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixerMay 25, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@agocke
agocke merged commit 5409a36 into dotnet:mainMay 25, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@jjonescz
jjonescz deleted the Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer branch May 26, 2026 07:21
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview6 milestone May 26, 2026
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzerslinkable-frameworkIssues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jjonescz@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@EgorBo@am11
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer - #127768

Merged
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer
May 25, 2026
Merged

Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixer#127768
agocke merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jjonescz:Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer

Conversation

@jjonescz

@jjonesczjjonescz commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjonescz
jjonescz requested review from agocke and CopilotMay 4, 2026 17:59
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-servicedotnet-policy-serviceBot added the linkable-framework Issues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework label May 4, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the experimental RequiresUnsafe / UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafe analyzers and related code fixes from the ILLink Roslyn analyzer toolset, along with their tests and resource strings. This aligns ILLink’s analyzer/test infrastructure with the Roslyn direction that RequiresUnsafeAttribute should not be authored in source (favoring the unsafe modifier instead).

Changes:

  • Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer, plus their associated DiagnosticId entries and shared resource strings.
  • Remove corresponding code fix providers (RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider and UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider) and all related analyzer/code-fix tests.
  • Stop wiring the removed analyzer into analyzer/test composition and remove the EnableUnsafeAnalyzer compiler-visible property from the ILLink analyzer props.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeTests.csRemoves tests for the “missing RequiresUnsafe” analyzer and its code fix.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/TestCaseCompilation.csStops adding RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer to the supported analyzer set in tests.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixTests.csRemoves code fix tests that manipulate RequiresUnsafeAttribute usage.
src/tools/illink/test/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer.Tests/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerTests.csRemoves analyzer tests for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/SharedStrings.resxRemoves shared strings for RequiresUnsafe-related diagnostics/titles/messages.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.Shared/DiagnosticId.csRemoves DEBUG-only RequiresUnsafe diagnostic IDs and subcategory mapping.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer that suggested adding RequiresUnsafeAttribute for pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer.csDeletes the analyzer producing RequiresUnsafe diagnostics.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/MSBuildPropertyOptionNames.csRemoves the DEBUG-only EnableUnsafeAnalyzer property constant.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DynamicallyAccessedMembersAnalyzer.csStops registering the removed RequiresUnsafe analyzer in the “requires analyzers” set.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.propsRemoves EnableUnsafeAnalyzer from compiler-visible properties list.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/UnsafeMethodMissingRequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider that adds RequiresUnsafeAttribute to pointer-signature members.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/Resources.resxRemoves code-fix resource strings tied to the deleted code fixes.
src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.CodeFix/RequiresUnsafeCodeFixProvider.csDeletes the code fix provider for RequiresUnsafe diagnostics (“add attribute” / “wrap in unsafe block”).

am11
am11 approved these changes May 6, 2026

@am11am11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jjonescz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agocke had some concerns about this offline, I'll let him speak to this

Per #128461 (comment) we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

Looks like the analyzer is now blocking codeflow in #127989 because Roslyn started emitting CS9379: Do not use 'RequiresUnsafeAttribute' in source; use the 'unsafe' modifier instead. on patterns used in the tests.

@jjonescz

jjonescz commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

we can delete the analyzer, but keep the fixer.

I don't know how that would work. The code fixer is also using the [RequireUnsafe] attribute which is a compiler-reserved attribute now. It needs to be updated to use the unsafe keyword. I can try to do that in this PR. cc @EgorBo - I hope this won't conflict much with your code fixer from #128304.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 10:29
@jjonesczjjonescz changed the title Remove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzerRemove RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer and update the fixerMay 25, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@agocke
agocke merged commit 5409a36 into dotnet:mainMay 25, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@jjonescz
jjonescz deleted the Unsafe-RemoveAnalyzer branch May 26, 2026 07:21
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview6 milestone May 26, 2026
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
dsplaisted added a commit to dotnet/sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers.props removed the
EnableUnsafeAnalyzer CompilerVisibleProperty registration in
dotnet/runtime#127768 (when the RequiresUnsafeAnalyzer was
removed). MSBuild therefore no longer emits this property in the
generated editorconfig, but the CSC-only template in
CSharpCompilerCommand.Generated.cs still hardcoded it, causing
RunFileTests_CscOnlyAndApi.CscVsMSBuild to fail with an
editorconfig diff.
This regenerates the template to match what the
preview.6.26277.111 runtime SDK now produces.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzerslinkable-frameworkIssues associated with delivering a linker friendly framework

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jjonescz@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@EgorBo@am11