Skip to content

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges - #128250

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async
May 18, 2026
Merged

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges#128250
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async

Conversation

@jakobbotsch

@jakobbotschjakobbotsch commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async calls.

Prerequisite for #128152 since it ensures we do not lift LCL_ADDR defs.

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async
calls.
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 15, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CoreCLR JIT async state machine lowering (AsyncTransformation::LiftLIREdges) to avoid lifting certain “live LIR edge” values across async suspension points by moving them closer to their use instead of materializing spill locals.

Changes:

  • Move invariant nodes (GenTree::IsInvariant) to just before their use so they are no longer live across the async call.
  • Attempt to treat some GT_LCL_VAR nodes similarly (skip lift if the local isn’t address-exposed) by relocating the node instead of spilling to a new temp local.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp Outdated
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 07:46
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 07:46
@jakobbotsch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @EgorBo

No actual diffs. That's because we spill runtime async calls aggressively in the frontend. But addresses the TODO, and more importantly, fixes an assert that I am seeing in #128152 where we have a LCL_ADDR that we end up spilling around an async call in another argument.

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch requested a review from EgorBoMay 18, 2026 07:48

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jakobbotsch@EgorBo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges by jakobbotsch · Pull Request #128250 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges - #128250

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async
May 18, 2026
Merged

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges#128250
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async

Conversation

@jakobbotsch

@jakobbotschjakobbotsch commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async calls.

Prerequisite for #128152 since it ensures we do not lift LCL_ADDR defs.

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async
calls.
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 15, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CoreCLR JIT async state machine lowering (AsyncTransformation::LiftLIREdges) to avoid lifting certain “live LIR edge” values across async suspension points by moving them closer to their use instead of materializing spill locals.

Changes:

  • Move invariant nodes (GenTree::IsInvariant) to just before their use so they are no longer live across the async call.
  • Attempt to treat some GT_LCL_VAR nodes similarly (skip lift if the local isn’t address-exposed) by relocating the node instead of spilling to a new temp local.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp Outdated
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 07:46
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 07:46
@jakobbotsch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @EgorBo

No actual diffs. That's because we spill runtime async calls aggressively in the frontend. But addresses the TODO, and more importantly, fixes an assert that I am seeing in #128152 where we have a LCL_ADDR that we end up spilling around an async call in another argument.

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch requested a review from EgorBoMay 18, 2026 07:48

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jakobbotsch@EgorBo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges by jakobbotsch · Pull Request #128250 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges - #128250

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async
May 18, 2026
Merged

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges#128250
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async

Conversation

@jakobbotsch

@jakobbotschjakobbotsch commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async calls.

Prerequisite for #128152 since it ensures we do not lift LCL_ADDR defs.

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async
calls.
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 15, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CoreCLR JIT async state machine lowering (AsyncTransformation::LiftLIREdges) to avoid lifting certain “live LIR edge” values across async suspension points by moving them closer to their use instead of materializing spill locals.

Changes:

  • Move invariant nodes (GenTree::IsInvariant) to just before their use so they are no longer live across the async call.
  • Attempt to treat some GT_LCL_VAR nodes similarly (skip lift if the local isn’t address-exposed) by relocating the node instead of spilling to a new temp local.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp Outdated
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 07:46
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 07:46
@jakobbotsch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @EgorBo

No actual diffs. That's because we spill runtime async calls aggressively in the frontend. But addresses the TODO, and more importantly, fixes an assert that I am seeing in #128152 where we have a LCL_ADDR that we end up spilling around an async call in another argument.

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch requested a review from EgorBoMay 18, 2026 07:48

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jakobbotsch@EgorBo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges by jakobbotsch · Pull Request #128250 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges - #128250

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async
May 18, 2026
Merged

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges#128250
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async

Conversation

@jakobbotsch

@jakobbotschjakobbotsch commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async calls.

Prerequisite for #128152 since it ensures we do not lift LCL_ADDR defs.

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async
calls.
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 15, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CoreCLR JIT async state machine lowering (AsyncTransformation::LiftLIREdges) to avoid lifting certain “live LIR edge” values across async suspension points by moving them closer to their use instead of materializing spill locals.

Changes:

  • Move invariant nodes (GenTree::IsInvariant) to just before their use so they are no longer live across the async call.
  • Attempt to treat some GT_LCL_VAR nodes similarly (skip lift if the local isn’t address-exposed) by relocating the node instead of spilling to a new temp local.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp Outdated
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 07:46
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 07:46
@jakobbotsch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @EgorBo

No actual diffs. That's because we spill runtime async calls aggressively in the frontend. But addresses the TODO, and more importantly, fixes an assert that I am seeing in #128152 where we have a LCL_ADDR that we end up spilling around an async call in another argument.

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch requested a review from EgorBoMay 18, 2026 07:48

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jakobbotsch@EgorBo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges by jakobbotsch · Pull Request #128250 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges - #128250

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async
May 18, 2026
Merged

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges#128250
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async

Conversation

@jakobbotsch

@jakobbotschjakobbotsch commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async calls.

Prerequisite for #128152 since it ensures we do not lift LCL_ADDR defs.

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async
calls.
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 15, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CoreCLR JIT async state machine lowering (AsyncTransformation::LiftLIREdges) to avoid lifting certain “live LIR edge” values across async suspension points by moving them closer to their use instead of materializing spill locals.

Changes:

  • Move invariant nodes (GenTree::IsInvariant) to just before their use so they are no longer live across the async call.
  • Attempt to treat some GT_LCL_VAR nodes similarly (skip lift if the local isn’t address-exposed) by relocating the node instead of spilling to a new temp local.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp Outdated
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 07:46
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 07:46
@jakobbotsch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @EgorBo

No actual diffs. That's because we spill runtime async calls aggressively in the frontend. But addresses the TODO, and more importantly, fixes an assert that I am seeing in #128152 where we have a LCL_ADDR that we end up spilling around an async call in another argument.

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch requested a review from EgorBoMay 18, 2026 07:48

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jakobbotsch@EgorBo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges by jakobbotsch · Pull Request #128250 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges - #128250

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async
May 18, 2026
Merged

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges#128250
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async

Conversation

@jakobbotsch

@jakobbotschjakobbotsch commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async calls.

Prerequisite for #128152 since it ensures we do not lift LCL_ADDR defs.

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async
calls.
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 15, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CoreCLR JIT async state machine lowering (AsyncTransformation::LiftLIREdges) to avoid lifting certain “live LIR edge” values across async suspension points by moving them closer to their use instead of materializing spill locals.

Changes:

  • Move invariant nodes (GenTree::IsInvariant) to just before their use so they are no longer live across the async call.
  • Attempt to treat some GT_LCL_VAR nodes similarly (skip lift if the local isn’t address-exposed) by relocating the node instead of spilling to a new temp local.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp Outdated
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 07:46
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 07:46
@jakobbotsch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @EgorBo

No actual diffs. That's because we spill runtime async calls aggressively in the frontend. But addresses the TODO, and more importantly, fixes an assert that I am seeing in #128152 where we have a LCL_ADDR that we end up spilling around an async call in another argument.

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch requested a review from EgorBoMay 18, 2026 07:48

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jakobbotsch@EgorBo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges by jakobbotsch · Pull Request #128250 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges - #128250

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async
May 18, 2026
Merged

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges#128250
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async

Conversation

@jakobbotsch

@jakobbotschjakobbotsch commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async calls.

Prerequisite for #128152 since it ensures we do not lift LCL_ADDR defs.

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async
calls.
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 15, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CoreCLR JIT async state machine lowering (AsyncTransformation::LiftLIREdges) to avoid lifting certain “live LIR edge” values across async suspension points by moving them closer to their use instead of materializing spill locals.

Changes:

  • Move invariant nodes (GenTree::IsInvariant) to just before their use so they are no longer live across the async call.
  • Attempt to treat some GT_LCL_VAR nodes similarly (skip lift if the local isn’t address-exposed) by relocating the node instead of spilling to a new temp local.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp Outdated
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 07:46
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 07:46
@jakobbotsch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @EgorBo

No actual diffs. That's because we spill runtime async calls aggressively in the frontend. But addresses the TODO, and more importantly, fixes an assert that I am seeing in #128152 where we have a LCL_ADDR that we end up spilling around an async call in another argument.

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch requested a review from EgorBoMay 18, 2026 07:48

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jakobbotsch@EgorBo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges by jakobbotsch · Pull Request #128250 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges - #128250

Merged
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async
May 18, 2026
Merged

JIT: Move invariant nodes and LCL_VARs in LiftLIREdges#128250
jakobbotsch merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jakobbotsch:move-invariant-nodes-async

Conversation

@jakobbotsch

@jakobbotschjakobbotsch commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async calls.

Prerequisite for #128152 since it ensures we do not lift LCL_ADDR defs.

Invariant nodes and LCL_VARs do not need to be lifted across async
calls.
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 15, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CoreCLR JIT async state machine lowering (AsyncTransformation::LiftLIREdges) to avoid lifting certain “live LIR edge” values across async suspension points by moving them closer to their use instead of materializing spill locals.

Changes:

  • Move invariant nodes (GenTree::IsInvariant) to just before their use so they are no longer live across the async call.
  • Attempt to treat some GT_LCL_VAR nodes similarly (skip lift if the local isn’t address-exposed) by relocating the node instead of spilling to a new temp local.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp Outdated
@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 07:46
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 07:46
@jakobbotsch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @EgorBo

No actual diffs. That's because we spill runtime async calls aggressively in the frontend. But addresses the TODO, and more importantly, fixes an assert that I am seeing in #128152 where we have a LCL_ADDR that we end up spilling around an async call in another argument.

@jakobbotsch
jakobbotsch requested a review from EgorBoMay 18, 2026 07:48

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/async.cpp
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIruntime-async

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jakobbotsch@EgorBo