Skip to content

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection - #129141

Merged
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection#129141
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim

Conversation

@BoyBaykiller

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, crossJumpVictim selection logic was dependent on the order of candidates which can lead to random diffs.

I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum. This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJun 8, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 8, 2026
@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selectionJun 9, 2026
@BoyBaykiller
BoyBaykillerforce-pushed the robust-crossJumpVictim branch from 4ef215d to cba2e61CompareJune 11, 2026 02:17
* don't early out
* make NoGcPoll preference explicit
@BoyBaykiller

BoyBaykiller commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@AndyAyersMS PTAL. Makes the crossJumpVictim selection robust by introducing a tie-break and removing early out. Now, no matter the order of candidates, we always pick the same. This avoids spurious diffs in future changes. In particular, my goal is to follow up with a zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.

There are some few good diffs from avoiding splitting of from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp

@AndyAyersMSAndyAyersMS left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EgorBo can you also review


bool const isNoSplit = stmt == predBlock->firstStmt();
bool const isFallThrough = (predBlock->KindIs(BBJ_ALWAYS) && predBlock->JumpsToNext());
auto getRank = [=]() -> unsigned {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure I understand why you wrapped it to a single-use lambda, not a big fan of this approach.

@EgorBo
EgorBo enabled auto-merge (squash) June 29, 2026 19:45
@EgorBo
EgorBo merged commit b6f8d20 into dotnet:mainJun 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview7 milestone Jun 30, 2026
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Previously, `crossJumpVictim` selection logic was dependent on the order
of candidates which can lead to random diffs.
I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order
independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that
processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: `predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum`.
This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from
`BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL` blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a
seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BoyBaykiller@EgorBo@AndyAyersMS
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
JIT: Tail-merge robust `crossJumpVictim` selection by BoyBaykiller · Pull Request #129141 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection - #129141

Merged
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection#129141
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim

Conversation

@BoyBaykiller

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, crossJumpVictim selection logic was dependent on the order of candidates which can lead to random diffs.

I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum. This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJun 8, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 8, 2026
@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selectionJun 9, 2026
@BoyBaykiller
BoyBaykillerforce-pushed the robust-crossJumpVictim branch from 4ef215d to cba2e61CompareJune 11, 2026 02:17
* don't early out
* make NoGcPoll preference explicit
@BoyBaykiller

BoyBaykiller commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@AndyAyersMS PTAL. Makes the crossJumpVictim selection robust by introducing a tie-break and removing early out. Now, no matter the order of candidates, we always pick the same. This avoids spurious diffs in future changes. In particular, my goal is to follow up with a zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.

There are some few good diffs from avoiding splitting of from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp

@AndyAyersMSAndyAyersMS left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EgorBo can you also review


bool const isNoSplit = stmt == predBlock->firstStmt();
bool const isFallThrough = (predBlock->KindIs(BBJ_ALWAYS) && predBlock->JumpsToNext());
auto getRank = [=]() -> unsigned {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure I understand why you wrapped it to a single-use lambda, not a big fan of this approach.

@EgorBo
EgorBo enabled auto-merge (squash) June 29, 2026 19:45
@EgorBo
EgorBo merged commit b6f8d20 into dotnet:mainJun 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview7 milestone Jun 30, 2026
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Previously, `crossJumpVictim` selection logic was dependent on the order
of candidates which can lead to random diffs.
I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order
independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that
processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: `predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum`.
This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from
`BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL` blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a
seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BoyBaykiller@EgorBo@AndyAyersMS
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' JIT: Tail-merge robust `crossJumpVictim` selection by BoyBaykiller · Pull Request #129141 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection - #129141

Merged
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection#129141
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim

Conversation

@BoyBaykiller

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, crossJumpVictim selection logic was dependent on the order of candidates which can lead to random diffs.

I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum. This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJun 8, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 8, 2026
@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selectionJun 9, 2026
@BoyBaykiller
BoyBaykillerforce-pushed the robust-crossJumpVictim branch from 4ef215d to cba2e61CompareJune 11, 2026 02:17
* don't early out
* make NoGcPoll preference explicit
@BoyBaykiller

BoyBaykiller commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@AndyAyersMS PTAL. Makes the crossJumpVictim selection robust by introducing a tie-break and removing early out. Now, no matter the order of candidates, we always pick the same. This avoids spurious diffs in future changes. In particular, my goal is to follow up with a zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.

There are some few good diffs from avoiding splitting of from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp

@AndyAyersMSAndyAyersMS left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EgorBo can you also review


bool const isNoSplit = stmt == predBlock->firstStmt();
bool const isFallThrough = (predBlock->KindIs(BBJ_ALWAYS) && predBlock->JumpsToNext());
auto getRank = [=]() -> unsigned {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure I understand why you wrapped it to a single-use lambda, not a big fan of this approach.

@EgorBo
EgorBo enabled auto-merge (squash) June 29, 2026 19:45
@EgorBo
EgorBo merged commit b6f8d20 into dotnet:mainJun 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview7 milestone Jun 30, 2026
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Previously, `crossJumpVictim` selection logic was dependent on the order
of candidates which can lead to random diffs.
I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order
independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that
processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: `predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum`.
This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from
`BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL` blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a
seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BoyBaykiller@EgorBo@AndyAyersMS
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' JIT: Tail-merge robust `crossJumpVictim` selection by BoyBaykiller · Pull Request #129141 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection - #129141

Merged
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection#129141
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim

Conversation

@BoyBaykiller

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, crossJumpVictim selection logic was dependent on the order of candidates which can lead to random diffs.

I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum. This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJun 8, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 8, 2026
@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selectionJun 9, 2026
@BoyBaykiller
BoyBaykillerforce-pushed the robust-crossJumpVictim branch from 4ef215d to cba2e61CompareJune 11, 2026 02:17
* don't early out
* make NoGcPoll preference explicit
@BoyBaykiller

BoyBaykiller commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@AndyAyersMS PTAL. Makes the crossJumpVictim selection robust by introducing a tie-break and removing early out. Now, no matter the order of candidates, we always pick the same. This avoids spurious diffs in future changes. In particular, my goal is to follow up with a zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.

There are some few good diffs from avoiding splitting of from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp

@AndyAyersMSAndyAyersMS left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EgorBo can you also review


bool const isNoSplit = stmt == predBlock->firstStmt();
bool const isFallThrough = (predBlock->KindIs(BBJ_ALWAYS) && predBlock->JumpsToNext());
auto getRank = [=]() -> unsigned {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure I understand why you wrapped it to a single-use lambda, not a big fan of this approach.

@EgorBo
EgorBo enabled auto-merge (squash) June 29, 2026 19:45
@EgorBo
EgorBo merged commit b6f8d20 into dotnet:mainJun 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview7 milestone Jun 30, 2026
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Previously, `crossJumpVictim` selection logic was dependent on the order
of candidates which can lead to random diffs.
I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order
independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that
processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: `predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum`.
This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from
`BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL` blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a
seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BoyBaykiller@EgorBo@AndyAyersMS
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' JIT: Tail-merge robust `crossJumpVictim` selection by BoyBaykiller · Pull Request #129141 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection - #129141

Merged
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection#129141
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim

Conversation

@BoyBaykiller

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, crossJumpVictim selection logic was dependent on the order of candidates which can lead to random diffs.

I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum. This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJun 8, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 8, 2026
@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selectionJun 9, 2026
@BoyBaykiller
BoyBaykillerforce-pushed the robust-crossJumpVictim branch from 4ef215d to cba2e61CompareJune 11, 2026 02:17
* don't early out
* make NoGcPoll preference explicit
@BoyBaykiller

BoyBaykiller commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@AndyAyersMS PTAL. Makes the crossJumpVictim selection robust by introducing a tie-break and removing early out. Now, no matter the order of candidates, we always pick the same. This avoids spurious diffs in future changes. In particular, my goal is to follow up with a zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.

There are some few good diffs from avoiding splitting of from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp

@AndyAyersMSAndyAyersMS left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EgorBo can you also review


bool const isNoSplit = stmt == predBlock->firstStmt();
bool const isFallThrough = (predBlock->KindIs(BBJ_ALWAYS) && predBlock->JumpsToNext());
auto getRank = [=]() -> unsigned {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure I understand why you wrapped it to a single-use lambda, not a big fan of this approach.

@EgorBo
EgorBo enabled auto-merge (squash) June 29, 2026 19:45
@EgorBo
EgorBo merged commit b6f8d20 into dotnet:mainJun 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview7 milestone Jun 30, 2026
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Previously, `crossJumpVictim` selection logic was dependent on the order
of candidates which can lead to random diffs.
I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order
independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that
processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: `predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum`.
This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from
`BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL` blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a
seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BoyBaykiller@EgorBo@AndyAyersMS
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' JIT: Tail-merge robust `crossJumpVictim` selection by BoyBaykiller · Pull Request #129141 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection - #129141

Merged
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection#129141
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim

Conversation

@BoyBaykiller

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, crossJumpVictim selection logic was dependent on the order of candidates which can lead to random diffs.

I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum. This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJun 8, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 8, 2026
@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selectionJun 9, 2026
@BoyBaykiller
BoyBaykillerforce-pushed the robust-crossJumpVictim branch from 4ef215d to cba2e61CompareJune 11, 2026 02:17
* don't early out
* make NoGcPoll preference explicit
@BoyBaykiller

BoyBaykiller commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@AndyAyersMS PTAL. Makes the crossJumpVictim selection robust by introducing a tie-break and removing early out. Now, no matter the order of candidates, we always pick the same. This avoids spurious diffs in future changes. In particular, my goal is to follow up with a zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.

There are some few good diffs from avoiding splitting of from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp

@AndyAyersMSAndyAyersMS left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EgorBo can you also review


bool const isNoSplit = stmt == predBlock->firstStmt();
bool const isFallThrough = (predBlock->KindIs(BBJ_ALWAYS) && predBlock->JumpsToNext());
auto getRank = [=]() -> unsigned {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure I understand why you wrapped it to a single-use lambda, not a big fan of this approach.

@EgorBo
EgorBo enabled auto-merge (squash) June 29, 2026 19:45
@EgorBo
EgorBo merged commit b6f8d20 into dotnet:mainJun 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview7 milestone Jun 30, 2026
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Previously, `crossJumpVictim` selection logic was dependent on the order
of candidates which can lead to random diffs.
I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order
independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that
processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: `predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum`.
This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from
`BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL` blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a
seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BoyBaykiller@EgorBo@AndyAyersMS
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); })(); JIT: Tail-merge robust `crossJumpVictim` selection by BoyBaykiller · Pull Request #129141 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection - #129141

Merged
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selection#129141
EgorBo merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
BoyBaykiller:robust-crossJumpVictim

Conversation

@BoyBaykiller

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, crossJumpVictim selection logic was dependent on the order of candidates which can lead to random diffs.

I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum. This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.

@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJun 8, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 8, 2026
@BoyBaykillerBoyBaykiller changed the title JIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictimJIT: Tail-merge robust crossJumpVictim selectionJun 9, 2026
@BoyBaykiller
BoyBaykillerforce-pushed the robust-crossJumpVictim branch from 4ef215d to cba2e61CompareJune 11, 2026 02:17
* don't early out
* make NoGcPoll preference explicit
@BoyBaykiller

BoyBaykiller commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@AndyAyersMS PTAL. Makes the crossJumpVictim selection robust by introducing a tie-break and removing early out. Now, no matter the order of candidates, we always pick the same. This avoids spurious diffs in future changes. In particular, my goal is to follow up with a zero-diff PR that processes all sets at once.

There are some few good diffs from avoiding splitting of from BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL blocks.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/jit/fgopt.cpp

@AndyAyersMSAndyAyersMS left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EgorBo can you also review


bool const isNoSplit = stmt == predBlock->firstStmt();
bool const isFallThrough = (predBlock->KindIs(BBJ_ALWAYS) && predBlock->JumpsToNext());
auto getRank = [=]() -> unsigned {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure I understand why you wrapped it to a single-use lambda, not a big fan of this approach.

@EgorBo
EgorBo enabled auto-merge (squash) June 29, 2026 19:45
@EgorBo
EgorBo merged commit b6f8d20 into dotnet:mainJun 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot added this to the 11.0-preview7 milestone Jun 30, 2026
eiriktsarpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
Previously, `crossJumpVictim` selection logic was dependent on the order
of candidates which can lead to random diffs.
I removed the early out and added a tie-break which makes it order
independent and sets the stage for a follow up zero-diff PR that
processes all sets at once.
For the tie-break I used: `predBlock->bbNum < crossJumpVictim->bbNum`.
This actually has few good diffs because it preferences away from
`BBF_NEEDS_GCPOLL` blocks for some reason. I'd be nice to add that as a
seperate heuristic instead of being implicitly encoded in the tie-break.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@BoyBaykiller@EgorBo@AndyAyersMS