Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor - #131967

Merged
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor#131967
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments

Conversation

@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.

Close#130828

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
@janvorlijanvorli added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Aug 6, 2026
@janvorli
janvorli requested a review from kkokosaAugust 6, 2026 20:59
@janvorlijanvorli self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 20:59
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).
13 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 6, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ConditionalFact instead of auto-passing so it's correctly marked as "skipped"?

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 23:38
@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@jkoritzinsky thank you, I've moved to that way and also fixed the check that was actually incorrect.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:28

  • If you rename the condition to UsesGCWithRegions (to keep the GC initialism capitalized), update the [ConditionalFact] to reference the new member name as well.
 [ConditionalFact(typeof(Program), nameof(UsesGcWithRegions))]

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:11

  • Identifier uses mixed-case initialism (UsesGcWithRegions). In this repo, initialisms like GC are consistently all-caps (e.g., IsGCStress), so this should be UsesGCWithRegions for consistency and readability.

This issue also appears on line 28 of the same file.

 public static bool UsesGcWithRegions 

@janvorli
janvorli merged commit cb1b022 into dotnet:mainAug 7, 2026
81 of 84 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot modified the milestones: 11.0.0, 11.0-rc1Aug 7, 2026
jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
)
The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ci-scan] Test failure: GC/API/Refresh/Refresh/Refresh.cmd assertion Expected 100 Actual 101

4 participants

@janvorli@jkoritzinsky@kkokosa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor - #131967

Merged
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor#131967
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments

Conversation

@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.

Close#130828

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
@janvorlijanvorli added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Aug 6, 2026
@janvorli
janvorli requested a review from kkokosaAugust 6, 2026 20:59
@janvorlijanvorli self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 20:59
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).
13 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 6, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ConditionalFact instead of auto-passing so it's correctly marked as "skipped"?

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 23:38
@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@jkoritzinsky thank you, I've moved to that way and also fixed the check that was actually incorrect.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:28

  • If you rename the condition to UsesGCWithRegions (to keep the GC initialism capitalized), update the [ConditionalFact] to reference the new member name as well.
 [ConditionalFact(typeof(Program), nameof(UsesGcWithRegions))]

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:11

  • Identifier uses mixed-case initialism (UsesGcWithRegions). In this repo, initialisms like GC are consistently all-caps (e.g., IsGCStress), so this should be UsesGCWithRegions for consistency and readability.

This issue also appears on line 28 of the same file.

 public static bool UsesGcWithRegions 

@janvorli
janvorli merged commit cb1b022 into dotnet:mainAug 7, 2026
81 of 84 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot modified the milestones: 11.0.0, 11.0-rc1Aug 7, 2026
jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
)
The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ci-scan] Test failure: GC/API/Refresh/Refresh/Refresh.cmd assertion Expected 100 Actual 101

4 participants

@janvorli@jkoritzinsky@kkokosa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor - #131967

Merged
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor#131967
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments

Conversation

@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.

Close#130828

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
@janvorlijanvorli added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Aug 6, 2026
@janvorli
janvorli requested a review from kkokosaAugust 6, 2026 20:59
@janvorlijanvorli self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 20:59
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).
13 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 6, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ConditionalFact instead of auto-passing so it's correctly marked as "skipped"?

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 23:38
@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@jkoritzinsky thank you, I've moved to that way and also fixed the check that was actually incorrect.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:28

  • If you rename the condition to UsesGCWithRegions (to keep the GC initialism capitalized), update the [ConditionalFact] to reference the new member name as well.
 [ConditionalFact(typeof(Program), nameof(UsesGcWithRegions))]

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:11

  • Identifier uses mixed-case initialism (UsesGcWithRegions). In this repo, initialisms like GC are consistently all-caps (e.g., IsGCStress), so this should be UsesGCWithRegions for consistency and readability.

This issue also appears on line 28 of the same file.

 public static bool UsesGcWithRegions 

@janvorli
janvorli merged commit cb1b022 into dotnet:mainAug 7, 2026
81 of 84 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot modified the milestones: 11.0.0, 11.0-rc1Aug 7, 2026
jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
)
The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ci-scan] Test failure: GC/API/Refresh/Refresh/Refresh.cmd assertion Expected 100 Actual 101

4 participants

@janvorli@jkoritzinsky@kkokosa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor - #131967

Merged
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor#131967
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments

Conversation

@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.

Close#130828

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
@janvorlijanvorli added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Aug 6, 2026
@janvorli
janvorli requested a review from kkokosaAugust 6, 2026 20:59
@janvorlijanvorli self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 20:59
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).
13 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 6, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ConditionalFact instead of auto-passing so it's correctly marked as "skipped"?

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 23:38
@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@jkoritzinsky thank you, I've moved to that way and also fixed the check that was actually incorrect.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:28

  • If you rename the condition to UsesGCWithRegions (to keep the GC initialism capitalized), update the [ConditionalFact] to reference the new member name as well.
 [ConditionalFact(typeof(Program), nameof(UsesGcWithRegions))]

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:11

  • Identifier uses mixed-case initialism (UsesGcWithRegions). In this repo, initialisms like GC are consistently all-caps (e.g., IsGCStress), so this should be UsesGCWithRegions for consistency and readability.

This issue also appears on line 28 of the same file.

 public static bool UsesGcWithRegions 

@janvorli
janvorli merged commit cb1b022 into dotnet:mainAug 7, 2026
81 of 84 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot modified the milestones: 11.0.0, 11.0-rc1Aug 7, 2026
jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
)
The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ci-scan] Test failure: GC/API/Refresh/Refresh/Refresh.cmd assertion Expected 100 Actual 101

4 participants

@janvorli@jkoritzinsky@kkokosa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor - #131967

Merged
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor#131967
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments

Conversation

@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.

Close#130828

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
@janvorlijanvorli added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Aug 6, 2026
@janvorli
janvorli requested a review from kkokosaAugust 6, 2026 20:59
@janvorlijanvorli self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 20:59
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).
13 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 6, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ConditionalFact instead of auto-passing so it's correctly marked as "skipped"?

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 23:38
@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@jkoritzinsky thank you, I've moved to that way and also fixed the check that was actually incorrect.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:28

  • If you rename the condition to UsesGCWithRegions (to keep the GC initialism capitalized), update the [ConditionalFact] to reference the new member name as well.
 [ConditionalFact(typeof(Program), nameof(UsesGcWithRegions))]

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:11

  • Identifier uses mixed-case initialism (UsesGcWithRegions). In this repo, initialisms like GC are consistently all-caps (e.g., IsGCStress), so this should be UsesGCWithRegions for consistency and readability.

This issue also appears on line 28 of the same file.

 public static bool UsesGcWithRegions 

@janvorli
janvorli merged commit cb1b022 into dotnet:mainAug 7, 2026
81 of 84 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot modified the milestones: 11.0.0, 11.0-rc1Aug 7, 2026
jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
)
The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ci-scan] Test failure: GC/API/Refresh/Refresh/Refresh.cmd assertion Expected 100 Actual 101

4 participants

@janvorli@jkoritzinsky@kkokosa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor - #131967

Merged
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor#131967
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments

Conversation

@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.

Close#130828

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
@janvorlijanvorli added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Aug 6, 2026
@janvorli
janvorli requested a review from kkokosaAugust 6, 2026 20:59
@janvorlijanvorli self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 20:59
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).
13 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 6, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ConditionalFact instead of auto-passing so it's correctly marked as "skipped"?

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 23:38
@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@jkoritzinsky thank you, I've moved to that way and also fixed the check that was actually incorrect.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:28

  • If you rename the condition to UsesGCWithRegions (to keep the GC initialism capitalized), update the [ConditionalFact] to reference the new member name as well.
 [ConditionalFact(typeof(Program), nameof(UsesGcWithRegions))]

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:11

  • Identifier uses mixed-case initialism (UsesGcWithRegions). In this repo, initialisms like GC are consistently all-caps (e.g., IsGCStress), so this should be UsesGCWithRegions for consistency and readability.

This issue also appears on line 28 of the same file.

 public static bool UsesGcWithRegions 

@janvorli
janvorli merged commit cb1b022 into dotnet:mainAug 7, 2026
81 of 84 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot modified the milestones: 11.0.0, 11.0-rc1Aug 7, 2026
jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
)
The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ci-scan] Test failure: GC/API/Refresh/Refresh/Refresh.cmd assertion Expected 100 Actual 101

4 participants

@janvorli@jkoritzinsky@kkokosa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor - #131967

Merged
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor#131967
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments

Conversation

@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.

Close#130828

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
@janvorlijanvorli added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Aug 6, 2026
@janvorli
janvorli requested a review from kkokosaAugust 6, 2026 20:59
@janvorlijanvorli self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 20:59
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).
13 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 6, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ConditionalFact instead of auto-passing so it's correctly marked as "skipped"?

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 23:38
@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@jkoritzinsky thank you, I've moved to that way and also fixed the check that was actually incorrect.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:28

  • If you rename the condition to UsesGCWithRegions (to keep the GC initialism capitalized), update the [ConditionalFact] to reference the new member name as well.
 [ConditionalFact(typeof(Program), nameof(UsesGcWithRegions))]

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:11

  • Identifier uses mixed-case initialism (UsesGcWithRegions). In this repo, initialisms like GC are consistently all-caps (e.g., IsGCStress), so this should be UsesGCWithRegions for consistency and readability.

This issue also appears on line 28 of the same file.

 public static bool UsesGcWithRegions 

@janvorli
janvorli merged commit cb1b022 into dotnet:mainAug 7, 2026
81 of 84 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot modified the milestones: 11.0.0, 11.0-rc1Aug 7, 2026
jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
)
The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ci-scan] Test failure: GC/API/Refresh/Refresh/Refresh.cmd assertion Expected 100 Actual 101

4 participants

@janvorli@jkoritzinsky@kkokosa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor - #131967

Merged
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Disable GC/API/Refresh test when using segments GC flavor#131967
janvorli merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
janvorli:disable-gc-refresh-test-with-segments

Conversation

@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.

Close#130828

The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
@janvorlijanvorli added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Aug 6, 2026
@janvorli
janvorli requested a review from kkokosaAugust 6, 2026 20:59
@janvorlijanvorli self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 20:59
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).
13 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 6, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ConditionalFact instead of auto-passing so it's correctly marked as "skipped"?

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 6, 2026 23:38
@janvorli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@jkoritzinsky thank you, I've moved to that way and also fixed the check that was actually incorrect.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:28

  • If you rename the condition to UsesGCWithRegions (to keep the GC initialism capitalized), update the [ConditionalFact] to reference the new member name as well.
 [ConditionalFact(typeof(Program), nameof(UsesGcWithRegions))]

src/tests/GC/API/Refresh/Refresh.cs:11

  • Identifier uses mixed-case initialism (UsesGcWithRegions). In this repo, initialisms like GC are consistently all-caps (e.g., IsGCStress), so this should be UsesGCWithRegions for consistency and readability.

This issue also appears on line 28 of the same file.

 public static bool UsesGcWithRegions 

@janvorli
janvorli merged commit cb1b022 into dotnet:mainAug 7, 2026
81 of 84 checks passed
@dotnet-milestone-botdotnet-milestone-botBot modified the milestones: 11.0.0, 11.0-rc1Aug 7, 2026
jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
)
The test was disabled on architecture basis before for targets that
don't support regions GC, but that doesn't work when testing with the
clrgc.dll that is build with segments GC flavor on 64 bit architectures.
Closedotnet#130828
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ci-scan] Test failure: GC/API/Refresh/Refresh/Refresh.cmd assertion Expected 100 Actual 101

4 participants

@janvorli@jkoritzinsky@kkokosa