Skip to content

[mono] Run full mobile library tests - #132887

Open
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Open

[mono] Run full mobile library tests#132887
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests

Conversation

@matouskozak

@matouskozakmatouskozak commented Aug 28, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • run the full Mono library suite on the iOS Simulator arm64 interpreter leg instead of the smoke subset
  • restore the full Mono library suite on Android arm64 devices in runtime-extra-platforms
  • use the existing compatibility override for Mono mobile targets on the .NET 11 SDK

Note

This pull request description was generated by GitHub Copilot.

@matouskozak
Run full Mono mobile library tests
f21a12d
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 972fe987-edc4-4e1f-a9e7-18da51c0ee18
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 28, 2026 12:51
@azure-pipelines

azure-pipelinesBot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).
11 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

@matouskozak

matouskozak commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

azure-pipelinesBot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet-policy-service

dotnet-policy-serviceBot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @akoeplinger, @matouskozak, @simonrozsival
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the runtime extra-platforms Azure Pipelines definitions to run the full Mono libraries test suite (instead of smoke subsets) on key mobile legs, increasing test coverage on iOS simulator (arm64 interpreter) and Android arm64 devices.

Changes:

  • iOS simulator (arm64, Mono interpreter): switch from forcing /p:RunSmokeTestsOnly=true to using $(_runSmokeTestsOnlyArg) (which evaluates to full-suite on these pipelines) and update the header comment accordingly.
  • Android devices (arm64, Mono): add a new platform-matrix job to run Mono libraries tests on android_arm64, using the same smoke/full toggle mechanism.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-ioslikesimulator.ymlRemoves the hardcoded smoke-only flag for the Mono iOS simulator interpreter leg so it runs the full libraries tests suite.
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-android.ymlAdds a new Mono Android arm64 devices job to run the full libraries test suite on runtime-extra-platforms/runtime-android.

This was referenced Aug 28, 2026
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Closed
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings August 31, 2026 18:57
@matouskozak

matouskozak commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

azure-pipelinesBot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

CopilotAI reviewed Aug 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite

@jkotas

jkotas commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.

@matouskozak

matouskozak commented Aug 31, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.

The goal is to gain coverage until we're done ± with .NET 11 and then revert this in a month or two. I wanted to put it in main because we have all the CI tracking systems setup here and in case someone is backporting to .NET 11, they will likely merge to main first anyways.

Would merging to .NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.
We could merge it to release/net11 branch but we should also enable the CI scan there to make it automatic.

@jkotas

jkotas commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keeps working in .NET 11, we should make sure that there is right coverage in .NET 11. I assume we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keep working in .NET 11 for more than a month or two.

.NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.

RC1 is "done". We have release/11.0 branch that all servicing fixes are going into.

This was referenced Aug 31, 2026
Open
Open
Open
@matouskozakmatouskozak mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2026
Open
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok
@vitek-karasvitek-karasAwaiting requested review from vitek-karas

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@matouskozakmatouskozak

Labels

area-Infrastructure-mono

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matouskozak@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[mono] Run full mobile library tests by matouskozak · Pull Request #132887 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
[mono] Run full mobile library tests - #132887
Open
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Open
[mono] Run full mobile library tests#132887
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Conversation
@matouskozak
@matouskozakmatouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Summary
  • run the full Mono library suite on the iOS Simulator arm64 interpreter leg instead of the smoke subset
  • restore the full Mono library suite on Android arm64 devices in runtime-extra-platforms
  • use the existing compatibility override for Mono mobile targets on the .NET 11 SDK
Note
This pull request description was generated by GitHub Copilot.
@matouskozak
Run full Mono mobile library tests
f21a12d
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 972fe987-edc4-4e1f-a9e7-18da51c0ee18
CopilotAI
lite review requested due to automatic review settings
August 28, 2026 12:51
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

11 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.

There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @akoeplinger, @matouskozak, @simonrozsival

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the runtime extra-platforms Azure Pipelines definitions to run the full Mono libraries test suite (instead of smoke subsets) on key mobile legs, increasing test coverage on iOS simulator (arm64 interpreter) and Android arm64 devices.
Changes:
  • iOS simulator (arm64, Mono interpreter): switch from forcing /p:RunSmokeTestsOnly=true to using $(_runSmokeTestsOnlyArg) (which evaluates to full-suite on these pipelines) and update the header comment accordingly.
  • Android devices (arm64, Mono): add a new platform-matrix job to run Mono libraries tests on android_arm64, using the same smoke/full toggle mechanism.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-ioslikesimulator.ymlRemoves the hardcoded smoke-only flag for the Mono iOS simulator interpreter leg so it runs the full libraries tests suite.
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-android.ymlAdds a new Mono Android arm64 devices job to run the full libraries test suite on runtime-extra-platforms/runtime-android.

This was referenced Aug 28, 2026

Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Closed


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open

CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
August 31, 2026 18:57
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 31, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
The goal is to gain coverage until we're done ± with .NET 11 and then revert this in a month or two. I wanted to put it in main because we have all the CI tracking systems setup here and in case someone is backporting to .NET 11, they will likely merge to main first anyways.
Would merging to .NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.

We could merge it to release/net11 branch but we should also enable the CI scan there to make it automatic.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
If we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keeps working in .NET 11, we should make sure that there is right coverage in .NET 11. I assume we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keep working in .NET 11 for more than a month or two.
.NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.
RC1 is "done". We have release/11.0 branch that all servicing fixes are going into.

This was referenced Aug 31, 2026

Open


Open


Open

@matouskozakmatouskozak
mentioned this pull request
Sep 1, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok
@vitek-karasvitek-karasAwaiting requested review from vitek-karas

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.


Assignees

@matouskozakmatouskozak

Labels

area-Infrastructure-mono

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matouskozak@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[mono] Run full mobile library tests by matouskozak · Pull Request #132887 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
[mono] Run full mobile library tests - #132887
Open
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Open
[mono] Run full mobile library tests#132887
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Conversation
@matouskozak
@matouskozakmatouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Summary
  • run the full Mono library suite on the iOS Simulator arm64 interpreter leg instead of the smoke subset
  • restore the full Mono library suite on Android arm64 devices in runtime-extra-platforms
  • use the existing compatibility override for Mono mobile targets on the .NET 11 SDK
Note
This pull request description was generated by GitHub Copilot.
@matouskozak
Run full Mono mobile library tests
f21a12d
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 972fe987-edc4-4e1f-a9e7-18da51c0ee18
CopilotAI
lite review requested due to automatic review settings
August 28, 2026 12:51
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

11 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.

There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @akoeplinger, @matouskozak, @simonrozsival

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the runtime extra-platforms Azure Pipelines definitions to run the full Mono libraries test suite (instead of smoke subsets) on key mobile legs, increasing test coverage on iOS simulator (arm64 interpreter) and Android arm64 devices.
Changes:
  • iOS simulator (arm64, Mono interpreter): switch from forcing /p:RunSmokeTestsOnly=true to using $(_runSmokeTestsOnlyArg) (which evaluates to full-suite on these pipelines) and update the header comment accordingly.
  • Android devices (arm64, Mono): add a new platform-matrix job to run Mono libraries tests on android_arm64, using the same smoke/full toggle mechanism.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-ioslikesimulator.ymlRemoves the hardcoded smoke-only flag for the Mono iOS simulator interpreter leg so it runs the full libraries tests suite.
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-android.ymlAdds a new Mono Android arm64 devices job to run the full libraries test suite on runtime-extra-platforms/runtime-android.

This was referenced Aug 28, 2026

Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Closed


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open

CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
August 31, 2026 18:57
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 31, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
The goal is to gain coverage until we're done ± with .NET 11 and then revert this in a month or two. I wanted to put it in main because we have all the CI tracking systems setup here and in case someone is backporting to .NET 11, they will likely merge to main first anyways.
Would merging to .NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.

We could merge it to release/net11 branch but we should also enable the CI scan there to make it automatic.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
If we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keeps working in .NET 11, we should make sure that there is right coverage in .NET 11. I assume we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keep working in .NET 11 for more than a month or two.
.NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.
RC1 is "done". We have release/11.0 branch that all servicing fixes are going into.

This was referenced Aug 31, 2026

Open


Open


Open

@matouskozakmatouskozak
mentioned this pull request
Sep 1, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok
@vitek-karasvitek-karasAwaiting requested review from vitek-karas

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.


Assignees

@matouskozakmatouskozak

Labels

area-Infrastructure-mono

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matouskozak@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[mono] Run full mobile library tests by matouskozak · Pull Request #132887 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
[mono] Run full mobile library tests - #132887
Open
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Open
[mono] Run full mobile library tests#132887
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Conversation
@matouskozak
@matouskozakmatouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Summary
  • run the full Mono library suite on the iOS Simulator arm64 interpreter leg instead of the smoke subset
  • restore the full Mono library suite on Android arm64 devices in runtime-extra-platforms
  • use the existing compatibility override for Mono mobile targets on the .NET 11 SDK
Note
This pull request description was generated by GitHub Copilot.
@matouskozak
Run full Mono mobile library tests
f21a12d
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 972fe987-edc4-4e1f-a9e7-18da51c0ee18
CopilotAI
lite review requested due to automatic review settings
August 28, 2026 12:51
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

11 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.

There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @akoeplinger, @matouskozak, @simonrozsival

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the runtime extra-platforms Azure Pipelines definitions to run the full Mono libraries test suite (instead of smoke subsets) on key mobile legs, increasing test coverage on iOS simulator (arm64 interpreter) and Android arm64 devices.
Changes:
  • iOS simulator (arm64, Mono interpreter): switch from forcing /p:RunSmokeTestsOnly=true to using $(_runSmokeTestsOnlyArg) (which evaluates to full-suite on these pipelines) and update the header comment accordingly.
  • Android devices (arm64, Mono): add a new platform-matrix job to run Mono libraries tests on android_arm64, using the same smoke/full toggle mechanism.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-ioslikesimulator.ymlRemoves the hardcoded smoke-only flag for the Mono iOS simulator interpreter leg so it runs the full libraries tests suite.
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-android.ymlAdds a new Mono Android arm64 devices job to run the full libraries test suite on runtime-extra-platforms/runtime-android.

This was referenced Aug 28, 2026

Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Closed


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open

CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
August 31, 2026 18:57
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 31, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
The goal is to gain coverage until we're done ± with .NET 11 and then revert this in a month or two. I wanted to put it in main because we have all the CI tracking systems setup here and in case someone is backporting to .NET 11, they will likely merge to main first anyways.
Would merging to .NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.

We could merge it to release/net11 branch but we should also enable the CI scan there to make it automatic.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
If we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keeps working in .NET 11, we should make sure that there is right coverage in .NET 11. I assume we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keep working in .NET 11 for more than a month or two.
.NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.
RC1 is "done". We have release/11.0 branch that all servicing fixes are going into.

This was referenced Aug 31, 2026

Open


Open


Open

@matouskozakmatouskozak
mentioned this pull request
Sep 1, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok
@vitek-karasvitek-karasAwaiting requested review from vitek-karas

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.


Assignees

@matouskozakmatouskozak

Labels

area-Infrastructure-mono

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matouskozak@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
[mono] Run full mobile library tests by matouskozak · Pull Request #132887 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
[mono] Run full mobile library tests - #132887
Open
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Open
[mono] Run full mobile library tests#132887
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Conversation
@matouskozak
@matouskozakmatouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Summary
  • run the full Mono library suite on the iOS Simulator arm64 interpreter leg instead of the smoke subset
  • restore the full Mono library suite on Android arm64 devices in runtime-extra-platforms
  • use the existing compatibility override for Mono mobile targets on the .NET 11 SDK
Note
This pull request description was generated by GitHub Copilot.
@matouskozak
Run full Mono mobile library tests
f21a12d
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 972fe987-edc4-4e1f-a9e7-18da51c0ee18
CopilotAI
lite review requested due to automatic review settings
August 28, 2026 12:51
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

11 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.

There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @akoeplinger, @matouskozak, @simonrozsival

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the runtime extra-platforms Azure Pipelines definitions to run the full Mono libraries test suite (instead of smoke subsets) on key mobile legs, increasing test coverage on iOS simulator (arm64 interpreter) and Android arm64 devices.
Changes:
  • iOS simulator (arm64, Mono interpreter): switch from forcing /p:RunSmokeTestsOnly=true to using $(_runSmokeTestsOnlyArg) (which evaluates to full-suite on these pipelines) and update the header comment accordingly.
  • Android devices (arm64, Mono): add a new platform-matrix job to run Mono libraries tests on android_arm64, using the same smoke/full toggle mechanism.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-ioslikesimulator.ymlRemoves the hardcoded smoke-only flag for the Mono iOS simulator interpreter leg so it runs the full libraries tests suite.
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-android.ymlAdds a new Mono Android arm64 devices job to run the full libraries test suite on runtime-extra-platforms/runtime-android.

This was referenced Aug 28, 2026

Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Closed


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open

CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
August 31, 2026 18:57
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 31, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
The goal is to gain coverage until we're done ± with .NET 11 and then revert this in a month or two. I wanted to put it in main because we have all the CI tracking systems setup here and in case someone is backporting to .NET 11, they will likely merge to main first anyways.
Would merging to .NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.

We could merge it to release/net11 branch but we should also enable the CI scan there to make it automatic.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
If we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keeps working in .NET 11, we should make sure that there is right coverage in .NET 11. I assume we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keep working in .NET 11 for more than a month or two.
.NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.
RC1 is "done". We have release/11.0 branch that all servicing fixes are going into.

This was referenced Aug 31, 2026

Open


Open


Open

@matouskozakmatouskozak
mentioned this pull request
Sep 1, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok
@vitek-karasvitek-karasAwaiting requested review from vitek-karas

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.


Assignees

@matouskozakmatouskozak

Labels

area-Infrastructure-mono

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matouskozak@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[mono] Run full mobile library tests by matouskozak · Pull Request #132887 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
[mono] Run full mobile library tests - #132887
Open
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Open
[mono] Run full mobile library tests#132887
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Conversation
@matouskozak
@matouskozakmatouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Summary
  • run the full Mono library suite on the iOS Simulator arm64 interpreter leg instead of the smoke subset
  • restore the full Mono library suite on Android arm64 devices in runtime-extra-platforms
  • use the existing compatibility override for Mono mobile targets on the .NET 11 SDK
Note
This pull request description was generated by GitHub Copilot.
@matouskozak
Run full Mono mobile library tests
f21a12d
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 972fe987-edc4-4e1f-a9e7-18da51c0ee18
CopilotAI
lite review requested due to automatic review settings
August 28, 2026 12:51
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

11 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.

There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @akoeplinger, @matouskozak, @simonrozsival

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the runtime extra-platforms Azure Pipelines definitions to run the full Mono libraries test suite (instead of smoke subsets) on key mobile legs, increasing test coverage on iOS simulator (arm64 interpreter) and Android arm64 devices.
Changes:
  • iOS simulator (arm64, Mono interpreter): switch from forcing /p:RunSmokeTestsOnly=true to using $(_runSmokeTestsOnlyArg) (which evaluates to full-suite on these pipelines) and update the header comment accordingly.
  • Android devices (arm64, Mono): add a new platform-matrix job to run Mono libraries tests on android_arm64, using the same smoke/full toggle mechanism.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-ioslikesimulator.ymlRemoves the hardcoded smoke-only flag for the Mono iOS simulator interpreter leg so it runs the full libraries tests suite.
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-android.ymlAdds a new Mono Android arm64 devices job to run the full libraries test suite on runtime-extra-platforms/runtime-android.

This was referenced Aug 28, 2026

Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Closed


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open

CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
August 31, 2026 18:57
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 31, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
The goal is to gain coverage until we're done ± with .NET 11 and then revert this in a month or two. I wanted to put it in main because we have all the CI tracking systems setup here and in case someone is backporting to .NET 11, they will likely merge to main first anyways.
Would merging to .NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.

We could merge it to release/net11 branch but we should also enable the CI scan there to make it automatic.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
If we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keeps working in .NET 11, we should make sure that there is right coverage in .NET 11. I assume we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keep working in .NET 11 for more than a month or two.
.NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.
RC1 is "done". We have release/11.0 branch that all servicing fixes are going into.

This was referenced Aug 31, 2026

Open


Open


Open

@matouskozakmatouskozak
mentioned this pull request
Sep 1, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok
@vitek-karasvitek-karasAwaiting requested review from vitek-karas

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.


Assignees

@matouskozakmatouskozak

Labels

area-Infrastructure-mono

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matouskozak@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[mono] Run full mobile library tests by matouskozak · Pull Request #132887 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
[mono] Run full mobile library tests - #132887
Open
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Open
[mono] Run full mobile library tests#132887
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Conversation
@matouskozak
@matouskozakmatouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Summary
  • run the full Mono library suite on the iOS Simulator arm64 interpreter leg instead of the smoke subset
  • restore the full Mono library suite on Android arm64 devices in runtime-extra-platforms
  • use the existing compatibility override for Mono mobile targets on the .NET 11 SDK
Note
This pull request description was generated by GitHub Copilot.
@matouskozak
Run full Mono mobile library tests
f21a12d
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 972fe987-edc4-4e1f-a9e7-18da51c0ee18
CopilotAI
lite review requested due to automatic review settings
August 28, 2026 12:51
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

11 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.

There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @akoeplinger, @matouskozak, @simonrozsival

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the runtime extra-platforms Azure Pipelines definitions to run the full Mono libraries test suite (instead of smoke subsets) on key mobile legs, increasing test coverage on iOS simulator (arm64 interpreter) and Android arm64 devices.
Changes:
  • iOS simulator (arm64, Mono interpreter): switch from forcing /p:RunSmokeTestsOnly=true to using $(_runSmokeTestsOnlyArg) (which evaluates to full-suite on these pipelines) and update the header comment accordingly.
  • Android devices (arm64, Mono): add a new platform-matrix job to run Mono libraries tests on android_arm64, using the same smoke/full toggle mechanism.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-ioslikesimulator.ymlRemoves the hardcoded smoke-only flag for the Mono iOS simulator interpreter leg so it runs the full libraries tests suite.
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-android.ymlAdds a new Mono Android arm64 devices job to run the full libraries test suite on runtime-extra-platforms/runtime-android.

This was referenced Aug 28, 2026

Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Closed


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open

CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
August 31, 2026 18:57
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 31, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
The goal is to gain coverage until we're done ± with .NET 11 and then revert this in a month or two. I wanted to put it in main because we have all the CI tracking systems setup here and in case someone is backporting to .NET 11, they will likely merge to main first anyways.
Would merging to .NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.

We could merge it to release/net11 branch but we should also enable the CI scan there to make it automatic.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
If we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keeps working in .NET 11, we should make sure that there is right coverage in .NET 11. I assume we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keep working in .NET 11 for more than a month or two.
.NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.
RC1 is "done". We have release/11.0 branch that all servicing fixes are going into.

This was referenced Aug 31, 2026

Open


Open


Open

@matouskozakmatouskozak
mentioned this pull request
Sep 1, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok
@vitek-karasvitek-karasAwaiting requested review from vitek-karas

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.


Assignees

@matouskozakmatouskozak

Labels

area-Infrastructure-mono

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matouskozak@jkotas

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
[mono] Run full mobile library tests by matouskozak · Pull Request #132887 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
[mono] Run full mobile library tests - #132887
Open
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Open
[mono] Run full mobile library tests#132887
matouskozak wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
matouskozak:matouskozak-mobile-full-library-tests
Conversation
@matouskozak
@matouskozakmatouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Summary
  • run the full Mono library suite on the iOS Simulator arm64 interpreter leg instead of the smoke subset
  • restore the full Mono library suite on Android arm64 devices in runtime-extra-platforms
  • use the existing compatibility override for Mono mobile targets on the .NET 11 SDK
Note
This pull request description was generated by GitHub Copilot.
@matouskozak
Run full Mono mobile library tests
f21a12d
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 972fe987-edc4-4e1f-a9e7-18da51c0ee18
CopilotAI
lite review requested due to automatic review settings
August 28, 2026 12:51
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

11 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.

There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
@dotnet-policy-service
dotnet-policy-serviceBot
commented
Aug 28, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Tagging subscribers to this area: @akoeplinger, @matouskozak, @simonrozsival

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the runtime extra-platforms Azure Pipelines definitions to run the full Mono libraries test suite (instead of smoke subsets) on key mobile legs, increasing test coverage on iOS simulator (arm64 interpreter) and Android arm64 devices.
Changes:
  • iOS simulator (arm64, Mono interpreter): switch from forcing /p:RunSmokeTestsOnly=true to using $(_runSmokeTestsOnlyArg) (which evaluates to full-suite on these pipelines) and update the header comment accordingly.
  • Android devices (arm64, Mono): add a new platform-matrix job to run Mono libraries tests on android_arm64, using the same smoke/full toggle mechanism.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-ioslikesimulator.ymlRemoves the hardcoded smoke-only flag for the Mono iOS simulator interpreter leg so it runs the full libraries tests suite.
eng/pipelines/extra-platforms/runtime-extra-platforms-android.ymlAdds a new Mono Android arm64 devices job to run the full libraries test suite on runtime-extra-platforms/runtime-android.

This was referenced Aug 28, 2026

Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Closed


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open


Open

CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
August 31, 2026 18:57
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms
@azure-pipelines
azure-pipelinesBot
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown


Azure Pipelines:

Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
CopilotAI
reviewed
Aug 31, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new
  • Review effort level: Lite
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
@matouskozak
matouskozak
commented
Aug 31, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

MemberAuthor
What's the point of adding more Mono test coverage in main (.NET 12)? I would expect us doing the opposite.
The goal is to gain coverage until we're done ± with .NET 11 and then revert this in a month or two. I wanted to put it in main because we have all the CI tracking systems setup here and in case someone is backporting to .NET 11, they will likely merge to main first anyways.
Would merging to .NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.

We could merge it to release/net11 branch but we should also enable the CI scan there to make it automatic.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Aug 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
If we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keeps working in .NET 11, we should make sure that there is right coverage in .NET 11. I assume we want to make sure that Mono on mobile keep working in .NET 11 for more than a month or two.
.NET 11 RC1 be better? I don't think we have RC2 branch yet.
RC1 is "done". We have release/11.0 branch that all servicing fixes are going into.

This was referenced Aug 31, 2026

Open


Open


Open

@matouskozakmatouskozak
mentioned this pull request
Sep 1, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@steveisoksteveisokAwaiting requested review from steveisok
@vitek-karasvitek-karasAwaiting requested review from vitek-karas

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.


Assignees

@matouskozakmatouskozak

Labels

area-Infrastructure-mono

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matouskozak@jkotas