Support COM objects with dynamic keyword - #33060

Merged
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword#33060
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport

Conversation

@elinor-fung

@elinor-fungelinor-fung commented Mar 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is a port of the support (which is in Framework and the IronLanguages DLR) for using the dynamic keyword with COM objects.

The actual support is in Microsoft.CSharp. The tests are under coreclr, since that is set up to test against a native COM server. I did a couple passes to make the ported sources fit in the runtime repo (I'm sure there's more that could be done).

The vast majority of this is a simple copy of the previous support. The commits in this PR are:

  • Straight copy of all the sources (first commit 21a9e9a)
  • Changes (next 15 commits) to get it building and working
  • New tests
  • Additional clean-up/consolidation to make it fit a bit better in this repo.

cc @jaredpar@cston

Resolves#12587

Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/ComEventsMethod.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/Variant.cs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This prevents ComEventsSink in Microsoft.CSharp.dll from being trimmed out. Is it being accessed by reflection somewhere and that's why this is needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parts of it will be accessed by whatever COM server is firing the events for which a handler has been added. Specifically, it is the ComEventsSink's implementation of IDispatch that is not explicitly used (directly or via reflection), but is necessary for handling COM events.

Is there a better way to prevent that from being trimmed out? I know there is PreserveDependency, but since we are not actually the ones that call into it, we don't actually have another method that is using it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I think what you have is the best we can currently do. That said, are you actually seeing the interface implementation get removed? I didn't think the linker would do that if the interface is used anywhere, but my knowledge may be out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I hit this because the implementation of IDispatch.Invoke was getting removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// managed delegates to COM's connection point based events.
/// </summary>
internal class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface
internal partial class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface [](start = 43, length = 32)

Nice! In olden time this had to use IReflect/RealProxy stuff to pretend it implements interfaces.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Server/DispatchImpl.h Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs
Fix delegate removal by index
Remove unnecessary comments and attributes
@VSadov

VSadov commented Mar 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I left some comments, but there is nothing that is blocking. The change looks good.

  • I like that the remoting/proxy pieces are no longer needed.
  • It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

LGTM

Remove exclusion list for dynamic member debug view
Simplify handling of ref enum parameter for events
@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VSadov

It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

Is this something that function pointers will help out with? @333fred

@VSadov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaredpar - Yes, I think the whole point of function pointers is to make CALLI expressible in C# and handle scenarios like this.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic keyword not working against COM objects

8 participants

@elinor-fung@VSadov@jaredpar@stephentoub@jkotas@cston@AaronRobinsonMSFT@danmoseley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword - #33060

Merged
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword#33060
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport

Conversation

@elinor-fung

@elinor-fungelinor-fung commented Mar 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is a port of the support (which is in Framework and the IronLanguages DLR) for using the dynamic keyword with COM objects.

The actual support is in Microsoft.CSharp. The tests are under coreclr, since that is set up to test against a native COM server. I did a couple passes to make the ported sources fit in the runtime repo (I'm sure there's more that could be done).

The vast majority of this is a simple copy of the previous support. The commits in this PR are:

  • Straight copy of all the sources (first commit 21a9e9a)
  • Changes (next 15 commits) to get it building and working
  • New tests
  • Additional clean-up/consolidation to make it fit a bit better in this repo.

cc @jaredpar@cston

Resolves#12587

Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/ComEventsMethod.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/Variant.cs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This prevents ComEventsSink in Microsoft.CSharp.dll from being trimmed out. Is it being accessed by reflection somewhere and that's why this is needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parts of it will be accessed by whatever COM server is firing the events for which a handler has been added. Specifically, it is the ComEventsSink's implementation of IDispatch that is not explicitly used (directly or via reflection), but is necessary for handling COM events.

Is there a better way to prevent that from being trimmed out? I know there is PreserveDependency, but since we are not actually the ones that call into it, we don't actually have another method that is using it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I think what you have is the best we can currently do. That said, are you actually seeing the interface implementation get removed? I didn't think the linker would do that if the interface is used anywhere, but my knowledge may be out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I hit this because the implementation of IDispatch.Invoke was getting removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// managed delegates to COM's connection point based events.
/// </summary>
internal class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface
internal partial class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface [](start = 43, length = 32)

Nice! In olden time this had to use IReflect/RealProxy stuff to pretend it implements interfaces.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Server/DispatchImpl.h Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs
Fix delegate removal by index
Remove unnecessary comments and attributes
@VSadov

VSadov commented Mar 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I left some comments, but there is nothing that is blocking. The change looks good.

  • I like that the remoting/proxy pieces are no longer needed.
  • It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

LGTM

Remove exclusion list for dynamic member debug view
Simplify handling of ref enum parameter for events
@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VSadov

It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

Is this something that function pointers will help out with? @333fred

@VSadov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaredpar - Yes, I think the whole point of function pointers is to make CALLI expressible in C# and handle scenarios like this.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic keyword not working against COM objects

8 participants

@elinor-fung@VSadov@jaredpar@stephentoub@jkotas@cston@AaronRobinsonMSFT@danmoseley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword - #33060

Merged
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword#33060
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport

Conversation

@elinor-fung

@elinor-fungelinor-fung commented Mar 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is a port of the support (which is in Framework and the IronLanguages DLR) for using the dynamic keyword with COM objects.

The actual support is in Microsoft.CSharp. The tests are under coreclr, since that is set up to test against a native COM server. I did a couple passes to make the ported sources fit in the runtime repo (I'm sure there's more that could be done).

The vast majority of this is a simple copy of the previous support. The commits in this PR are:

  • Straight copy of all the sources (first commit 21a9e9a)
  • Changes (next 15 commits) to get it building and working
  • New tests
  • Additional clean-up/consolidation to make it fit a bit better in this repo.

cc @jaredpar@cston

Resolves#12587

Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/ComEventsMethod.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/Variant.cs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This prevents ComEventsSink in Microsoft.CSharp.dll from being trimmed out. Is it being accessed by reflection somewhere and that's why this is needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parts of it will be accessed by whatever COM server is firing the events for which a handler has been added. Specifically, it is the ComEventsSink's implementation of IDispatch that is not explicitly used (directly or via reflection), but is necessary for handling COM events.

Is there a better way to prevent that from being trimmed out? I know there is PreserveDependency, but since we are not actually the ones that call into it, we don't actually have another method that is using it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I think what you have is the best we can currently do. That said, are you actually seeing the interface implementation get removed? I didn't think the linker would do that if the interface is used anywhere, but my knowledge may be out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I hit this because the implementation of IDispatch.Invoke was getting removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// managed delegates to COM's connection point based events.
/// </summary>
internal class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface
internal partial class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface [](start = 43, length = 32)

Nice! In olden time this had to use IReflect/RealProxy stuff to pretend it implements interfaces.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Server/DispatchImpl.h Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs
Fix delegate removal by index
Remove unnecessary comments and attributes
@VSadov

VSadov commented Mar 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I left some comments, but there is nothing that is blocking. The change looks good.

  • I like that the remoting/proxy pieces are no longer needed.
  • It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

LGTM

Remove exclusion list for dynamic member debug view
Simplify handling of ref enum parameter for events
@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VSadov

It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

Is this something that function pointers will help out with? @333fred

@VSadov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaredpar - Yes, I think the whole point of function pointers is to make CALLI expressible in C# and handle scenarios like this.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic keyword not working against COM objects

8 participants

@elinor-fung@VSadov@jaredpar@stephentoub@jkotas@cston@AaronRobinsonMSFT@danmoseley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword - #33060

Merged
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword#33060
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport

Conversation

@elinor-fung

@elinor-fungelinor-fung commented Mar 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is a port of the support (which is in Framework and the IronLanguages DLR) for using the dynamic keyword with COM objects.

The actual support is in Microsoft.CSharp. The tests are under coreclr, since that is set up to test against a native COM server. I did a couple passes to make the ported sources fit in the runtime repo (I'm sure there's more that could be done).

The vast majority of this is a simple copy of the previous support. The commits in this PR are:

  • Straight copy of all the sources (first commit 21a9e9a)
  • Changes (next 15 commits) to get it building and working
  • New tests
  • Additional clean-up/consolidation to make it fit a bit better in this repo.

cc @jaredpar@cston

Resolves#12587

Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/ComEventsMethod.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/Variant.cs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This prevents ComEventsSink in Microsoft.CSharp.dll from being trimmed out. Is it being accessed by reflection somewhere and that's why this is needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parts of it will be accessed by whatever COM server is firing the events for which a handler has been added. Specifically, it is the ComEventsSink's implementation of IDispatch that is not explicitly used (directly or via reflection), but is necessary for handling COM events.

Is there a better way to prevent that from being trimmed out? I know there is PreserveDependency, but since we are not actually the ones that call into it, we don't actually have another method that is using it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I think what you have is the best we can currently do. That said, are you actually seeing the interface implementation get removed? I didn't think the linker would do that if the interface is used anywhere, but my knowledge may be out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I hit this because the implementation of IDispatch.Invoke was getting removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// managed delegates to COM's connection point based events.
/// </summary>
internal class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface
internal partial class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface [](start = 43, length = 32)

Nice! In olden time this had to use IReflect/RealProxy stuff to pretend it implements interfaces.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Server/DispatchImpl.h Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs
Fix delegate removal by index
Remove unnecessary comments and attributes
@VSadov

VSadov commented Mar 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I left some comments, but there is nothing that is blocking. The change looks good.

  • I like that the remoting/proxy pieces are no longer needed.
  • It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

LGTM

Remove exclusion list for dynamic member debug view
Simplify handling of ref enum parameter for events
@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VSadov

It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

Is this something that function pointers will help out with? @333fred

@VSadov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaredpar - Yes, I think the whole point of function pointers is to make CALLI expressible in C# and handle scenarios like this.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic keyword not working against COM objects

8 participants

@elinor-fung@VSadov@jaredpar@stephentoub@jkotas@cston@AaronRobinsonMSFT@danmoseley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword - #33060

Merged
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword#33060
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport

Conversation

@elinor-fung

@elinor-fungelinor-fung commented Mar 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is a port of the support (which is in Framework and the IronLanguages DLR) for using the dynamic keyword with COM objects.

The actual support is in Microsoft.CSharp. The tests are under coreclr, since that is set up to test against a native COM server. I did a couple passes to make the ported sources fit in the runtime repo (I'm sure there's more that could be done).

The vast majority of this is a simple copy of the previous support. The commits in this PR are:

  • Straight copy of all the sources (first commit 21a9e9a)
  • Changes (next 15 commits) to get it building and working
  • New tests
  • Additional clean-up/consolidation to make it fit a bit better in this repo.

cc @jaredpar@cston

Resolves#12587

Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/ComEventsMethod.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/Variant.cs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This prevents ComEventsSink in Microsoft.CSharp.dll from being trimmed out. Is it being accessed by reflection somewhere and that's why this is needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parts of it will be accessed by whatever COM server is firing the events for which a handler has been added. Specifically, it is the ComEventsSink's implementation of IDispatch that is not explicitly used (directly or via reflection), but is necessary for handling COM events.

Is there a better way to prevent that from being trimmed out? I know there is PreserveDependency, but since we are not actually the ones that call into it, we don't actually have another method that is using it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I think what you have is the best we can currently do. That said, are you actually seeing the interface implementation get removed? I didn't think the linker would do that if the interface is used anywhere, but my knowledge may be out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I hit this because the implementation of IDispatch.Invoke was getting removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// managed delegates to COM's connection point based events.
/// </summary>
internal class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface
internal partial class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface [](start = 43, length = 32)

Nice! In olden time this had to use IReflect/RealProxy stuff to pretend it implements interfaces.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Server/DispatchImpl.h Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs
Fix delegate removal by index
Remove unnecessary comments and attributes
@VSadov

VSadov commented Mar 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I left some comments, but there is nothing that is blocking. The change looks good.

  • I like that the remoting/proxy pieces are no longer needed.
  • It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

LGTM

Remove exclusion list for dynamic member debug view
Simplify handling of ref enum parameter for events
@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VSadov

It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

Is this something that function pointers will help out with? @333fred

@VSadov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaredpar - Yes, I think the whole point of function pointers is to make CALLI expressible in C# and handle scenarios like this.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic keyword not working against COM objects

8 participants

@elinor-fung@VSadov@jaredpar@stephentoub@jkotas@cston@AaronRobinsonMSFT@danmoseley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword - #33060

Merged
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword#33060
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport

Conversation

@elinor-fung

@elinor-fungelinor-fung commented Mar 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is a port of the support (which is in Framework and the IronLanguages DLR) for using the dynamic keyword with COM objects.

The actual support is in Microsoft.CSharp. The tests are under coreclr, since that is set up to test against a native COM server. I did a couple passes to make the ported sources fit in the runtime repo (I'm sure there's more that could be done).

The vast majority of this is a simple copy of the previous support. The commits in this PR are:

  • Straight copy of all the sources (first commit 21a9e9a)
  • Changes (next 15 commits) to get it building and working
  • New tests
  • Additional clean-up/consolidation to make it fit a bit better in this repo.

cc @jaredpar@cston

Resolves#12587

Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/ComEventsMethod.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/Variant.cs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This prevents ComEventsSink in Microsoft.CSharp.dll from being trimmed out. Is it being accessed by reflection somewhere and that's why this is needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parts of it will be accessed by whatever COM server is firing the events for which a handler has been added. Specifically, it is the ComEventsSink's implementation of IDispatch that is not explicitly used (directly or via reflection), but is necessary for handling COM events.

Is there a better way to prevent that from being trimmed out? I know there is PreserveDependency, but since we are not actually the ones that call into it, we don't actually have another method that is using it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I think what you have is the best we can currently do. That said, are you actually seeing the interface implementation get removed? I didn't think the linker would do that if the interface is used anywhere, but my knowledge may be out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I hit this because the implementation of IDispatch.Invoke was getting removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// managed delegates to COM's connection point based events.
/// </summary>
internal class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface
internal partial class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface [](start = 43, length = 32)

Nice! In olden time this had to use IReflect/RealProxy stuff to pretend it implements interfaces.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Server/DispatchImpl.h Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs
Fix delegate removal by index
Remove unnecessary comments and attributes
@VSadov

VSadov commented Mar 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I left some comments, but there is nothing that is blocking. The change looks good.

  • I like that the remoting/proxy pieces are no longer needed.
  • It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

LGTM

Remove exclusion list for dynamic member debug view
Simplify handling of ref enum parameter for events
@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VSadov

It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

Is this something that function pointers will help out with? @333fred

@VSadov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaredpar - Yes, I think the whole point of function pointers is to make CALLI expressible in C# and handle scenarios like this.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic keyword not working against COM objects

8 participants

@elinor-fung@VSadov@jaredpar@stephentoub@jkotas@cston@AaronRobinsonMSFT@danmoseley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword - #33060

Merged
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword#33060
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport

Conversation

@elinor-fung

@elinor-fungelinor-fung commented Mar 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is a port of the support (which is in Framework and the IronLanguages DLR) for using the dynamic keyword with COM objects.

The actual support is in Microsoft.CSharp. The tests are under coreclr, since that is set up to test against a native COM server. I did a couple passes to make the ported sources fit in the runtime repo (I'm sure there's more that could be done).

The vast majority of this is a simple copy of the previous support. The commits in this PR are:

  • Straight copy of all the sources (first commit 21a9e9a)
  • Changes (next 15 commits) to get it building and working
  • New tests
  • Additional clean-up/consolidation to make it fit a bit better in this repo.

cc @jaredpar@cston

Resolves#12587

Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/ComEventsMethod.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/Variant.cs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This prevents ComEventsSink in Microsoft.CSharp.dll from being trimmed out. Is it being accessed by reflection somewhere and that's why this is needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parts of it will be accessed by whatever COM server is firing the events for which a handler has been added. Specifically, it is the ComEventsSink's implementation of IDispatch that is not explicitly used (directly or via reflection), but is necessary for handling COM events.

Is there a better way to prevent that from being trimmed out? I know there is PreserveDependency, but since we are not actually the ones that call into it, we don't actually have another method that is using it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I think what you have is the best we can currently do. That said, are you actually seeing the interface implementation get removed? I didn't think the linker would do that if the interface is used anywhere, but my knowledge may be out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I hit this because the implementation of IDispatch.Invoke was getting removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// managed delegates to COM's connection point based events.
/// </summary>
internal class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface
internal partial class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface [](start = 43, length = 32)

Nice! In olden time this had to use IReflect/RealProxy stuff to pretend it implements interfaces.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Server/DispatchImpl.h Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs
Fix delegate removal by index
Remove unnecessary comments and attributes
@VSadov

VSadov commented Mar 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I left some comments, but there is nothing that is blocking. The change looks good.

  • I like that the remoting/proxy pieces are no longer needed.
  • It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

LGTM

Remove exclusion list for dynamic member debug view
Simplify handling of ref enum parameter for events
@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VSadov

It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

Is this something that function pointers will help out with? @333fred

@VSadov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaredpar - Yes, I think the whole point of function pointers is to make CALLI expressible in C# and handle scenarios like this.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic keyword not working against COM objects

8 participants

@elinor-fung@VSadov@jaredpar@stephentoub@jkotas@cston@AaronRobinsonMSFT@danmoseley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword - #33060

Merged
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Support COM objects with dynamic keyword#33060
elinor-fung merged 29 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
elinor-fung:comDynamicSupport

Conversation

@elinor-fung

@elinor-fungelinor-fung commented Mar 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is a port of the support (which is in Framework and the IronLanguages DLR) for using the dynamic keyword with COM objects.

The actual support is in Microsoft.CSharp. The tests are under coreclr, since that is set up to test against a native COM server. I did a couple passes to make the ported sources fit in the runtime repo (I'm sure there's more that could be done).

The vast majority of this is a simple copy of the previous support. The commits in this PR are:

  • Straight copy of all the sources (first commit 21a9e9a)
  • Changes (next 15 commits) to get it building and working
  • New tests
  • Additional clean-up/consolidation to make it fit a bit better in this repo.

cc @jaredpar@cston

Resolves#12587

Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/ComEventsMethod.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/Common/src/System/Runtime/InteropServices/Variant.cs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This prevents ComEventsSink in Microsoft.CSharp.dll from being trimmed out. Is it being accessed by reflection somewhere and that's why this is needed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parts of it will be accessed by whatever COM server is firing the events for which a handler has been added. Specifically, it is the ComEventsSink's implementation of IDispatch that is not explicitly used (directly or via reflection), but is necessary for handling COM events.

Is there a better way to prevent that from being trimmed out? I know there is PreserveDependency, but since we are not actually the ones that call into it, we don't actually have another method that is using it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I think what you have is the best we can currently do. That said, are you actually seeing the interface implementation get removed? I didn't think the linker would do that if the interface is used anywhere, but my knowledge may be out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I hit this because the implementation of IDispatch.Invoke was getting removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// managed delegates to COM's connection point based events.
/// </summary>
internal class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface
internal partial class ComEventsSink : IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IDispatch, ICustomQueryInterface [](start = 43, length = 32)

Nice! In olden time this had to use IReflect/RealProxy stuff to pretend it implements interfaces.

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Server/DispatchImpl.h Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/tests/src/Interop/COM/Dynamic/Program.cs
Fix delegate removal by index
Remove unnecessary comments and attributes
@VSadov

VSadov commented Mar 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I left some comments, but there is nothing that is blocking. The change looks good.

  • I like that the remoting/proxy pieces are no longer needed.
  • It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

LGTM

Remove exclusion list for dynamic member debug view
Simplify handling of ref enum parameter for events
@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VSadov

It is nice to see that most IL-generated helpers (like ConvertByrefToPtr flavors) are gone. Maybe one day we can get rid of the helpers that wrap CALLI as well.

Is this something that function pointers will help out with? @333fred

@VSadov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaredpar - Yes, I think the whole point of function pointers is to make CALLI expressible in C# and handle scenarios like this.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic keyword not working against COM objects

8 participants

@elinor-fung@VSadov@jaredpar@stephentoub@jkotas@cston@AaronRobinsonMSFT@danmoseley