Skip to content

Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection - #37849

Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
jkotas:initonly
Jun 15, 2020
Merged

Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection#37849
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
jkotas:initonly

Conversation

@jkotas

@jkotasjkotas commented Jun 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.

Fixes#37796

am11
am11 reviewed Jun 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp Outdated
@marek-safar

marek-safar commented Jun 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side

@jkotasjkotas mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2020
Closed
@jkotas
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection
5af8287
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixesdotnet#37796
@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from janvorliJune 15, 2020 13:14
janvorli
janvorli approved these changes Jun 15, 2020
View reviewed changes

@janvorlijanvorli left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp Outdated
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp Outdated
@lambdageeklambdageek mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2020
Closed
@lambdageek

lambdageek commented Jun 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side

I created an issue #37903 Looks like mono doesn't have a check in SetValue for static field reinit at all

@jkotas@janvorli
Apply suggestions from code review
2a580ac
Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
@jaredparjaredpar mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2020
Closed
@jkotas
jkotas merged commit d629976 into dotnet:masterJun 15, 2020
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the initonly branch June 15, 2020 22:27
sandreenko pushed a commit to sandreenko/runtime that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2020
Sergey Andreenko
Revert "Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via …
ef42c56
…reflection (dotnet#37849)"
This reverts commit d629976.
erozenfeld added a commit to erozenfeld/jitutils that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround.
04f7602
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255.
See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixesdotnet#271.
@erozenfelderozenfeld mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2020
Merged
erozenfeld added a commit to dotnet/jitutils that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround. (#272)
1561547
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255.
See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixes#271.
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@janvorlijanvorlijanvorli approved these changes
+1 more reviewer
@am11am11am11 left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area-System.Reflection

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflection is able to set initonly static fields in some situation

6 participants

@jkotas@marek-safar@lambdageek@am11@janvorli@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection by jkotas · Pull Request #37849 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection - #37849
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Jun 15, 2020
Merged
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection#37849
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Conversation
@jkotas
@jkotasjkotas
commented
Jun 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixes#37796
am11
am11
reviewed
Jun 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@marek-safar
marek-safar
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
@jkotasjkotas
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection
5af8287
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixesdotnet#37796
@jkotas
jkotas
requested a review
from janvorliJune 15, 2020 13:14
janvorli
janvorli
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@janvorlijanvorli
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@lambdageeklambdageek
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@lambdageek
lambdageek
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
I created an issue #37903 Looks like mono doesn't have a check in SetValue for static field reinit at all
@jkotas@janvorli
Apply suggestions from code review
2a580ac
Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
@jaredparjaredpar
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit d629976
into
dotnet:masterJun 15, 2020
@jkotas
jkotas
deleted the

initonly

branch
June 15, 2020 22:27
sandreenko pushed a commit
to sandreenko/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2020
Sergey Andreenko
Revert "Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via …
ef42c56
…reflection (dotnet#37849)"
This reverts commit d629976.
erozenfeld added a commit
to erozenfeld/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround.
04f7602
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255.
See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixesdotnet#271.
@erozenfelderozenfeld
mentioned this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
 Merged

erozenfeld added a commit
to dotnet/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround. (#272)
1561547
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255.
See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixes#271.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@janvorlijanvorlijanvorli approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@am11am11am11 left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Reflection

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflection is able to set initonly static fields in some situation


6 participants

@jkotas@marek-safar@lambdageek@am11@janvorli@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection by jkotas · Pull Request #37849 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection - #37849
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Jun 15, 2020
Merged
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection#37849
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Conversation
@jkotas
@jkotasjkotas
commented
Jun 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixes#37796
am11
am11
reviewed
Jun 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@marek-safar
marek-safar
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
@jkotasjkotas
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection
5af8287
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixesdotnet#37796
@jkotas
jkotas
requested a review
from janvorliJune 15, 2020 13:14
janvorli
janvorli
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@janvorlijanvorli
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@lambdageeklambdageek
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@lambdageek
lambdageek
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
I created an issue #37903 Looks like mono doesn't have a check in SetValue for static field reinit at all
@jkotas@janvorli
Apply suggestions from code review
2a580ac
Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
@jaredparjaredpar
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit d629976
into
dotnet:masterJun 15, 2020
@jkotas
jkotas
deleted the

initonly

branch
June 15, 2020 22:27
sandreenko pushed a commit
to sandreenko/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2020
Sergey Andreenko
Revert "Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via …
ef42c56
…reflection (dotnet#37849)"
This reverts commit d629976.
erozenfeld added a commit
to erozenfeld/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround.
04f7602
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255.
See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixesdotnet#271.
@erozenfelderozenfeld
mentioned this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
 Merged

erozenfeld added a commit
to dotnet/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround. (#272)
1561547
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255.
See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixes#271.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@janvorlijanvorlijanvorli approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@am11am11am11 left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Reflection

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflection is able to set initonly static fields in some situation


6 participants

@jkotas@marek-safar@lambdageek@am11@janvorli@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection by jkotas · Pull Request #37849 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection - #37849
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Jun 15, 2020
Merged
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection#37849
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Conversation
@jkotas
@jkotasjkotas
commented
Jun 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixes#37796
am11
am11
reviewed
Jun 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@marek-safar
marek-safar
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
@jkotasjkotas
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection
5af8287
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixesdotnet#37796
@jkotas
jkotas
requested a review
from janvorliJune 15, 2020 13:14
janvorli
janvorli
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@janvorlijanvorli
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@lambdageeklambdageek
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@lambdageek
lambdageek
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
I created an issue #37903 Looks like mono doesn't have a check in SetValue for static field reinit at all
@jkotas@janvorli
Apply suggestions from code review
2a580ac
Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
@jaredparjaredpar
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit d629976
into
dotnet:masterJun 15, 2020
@jkotas
jkotas
deleted the

initonly

branch
June 15, 2020 22:27
sandreenko pushed a commit
to sandreenko/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2020
Sergey Andreenko
Revert "Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via …
ef42c56
…reflection (dotnet#37849)"
This reverts commit d629976.
erozenfeld added a commit
to erozenfeld/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround.
04f7602
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255.
See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixesdotnet#271.
@erozenfelderozenfeld
mentioned this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
 Merged

erozenfeld added a commit
to dotnet/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround. (#272)
1561547
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255.
See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixes#271.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@janvorlijanvorlijanvorli approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@am11am11am11 left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Reflection

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflection is able to set initonly static fields in some situation


6 participants

@jkotas@marek-safar@lambdageek@am11@janvorli@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection by jkotas · Pull Request #37849 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection - #37849
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Jun 15, 2020
Merged
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection#37849
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Conversation
@jkotas
@jkotasjkotas
commented
Jun 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixes#37796
am11
am11
reviewed
Jun 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@marek-safar
marek-safar
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
@jkotasjkotas
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection
5af8287
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixesdotnet#37796
@jkotas
jkotas
requested a review
from janvorliJune 15, 2020 13:14
janvorli
janvorli
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@janvorlijanvorli
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@lambdageeklambdageek
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@lambdageek
lambdageek
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
I created an issue #37903 Looks like mono doesn't have a check in SetValue for static field reinit at all
@jkotas@janvorli
Apply suggestions from code review
2a580ac
Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
@jaredparjaredpar
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit d629976
into
dotnet:masterJun 15, 2020
@jkotas
jkotas
deleted the

initonly

branch
June 15, 2020 22:27
sandreenko pushed a commit
to sandreenko/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2020
Sergey Andreenko
Revert "Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via …
ef42c56
…reflection (dotnet#37849)"
This reverts commit d629976.
erozenfeld added a commit
to erozenfeld/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround.
04f7602
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255.
See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixesdotnet#271.
@erozenfelderozenfeld
mentioned this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
 Merged

erozenfeld added a commit
to dotnet/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround. (#272)
1561547
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255.
See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixes#271.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@janvorlijanvorlijanvorli approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@am11am11am11 left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Reflection

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflection is able to set initonly static fields in some situation


6 participants

@jkotas@marek-safar@lambdageek@am11@janvorli@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection by jkotas · Pull Request #37849 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection - #37849
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Jun 15, 2020
Merged
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection#37849
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Conversation
@jkotas
@jkotasjkotas
commented
Jun 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixes#37796
am11
am11
reviewed
Jun 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@marek-safar
marek-safar
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
@jkotasjkotas
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection
5af8287
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixesdotnet#37796
@jkotas
jkotas
requested a review
from janvorliJune 15, 2020 13:14
janvorli
janvorli
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@janvorlijanvorli
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@lambdageeklambdageek
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@lambdageek
lambdageek
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
I created an issue #37903 Looks like mono doesn't have a check in SetValue for static field reinit at all
@jkotas@janvorli
Apply suggestions from code review
2a580ac
Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
@jaredparjaredpar
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit d629976
into
dotnet:masterJun 15, 2020
@jkotas
jkotas
deleted the

initonly

branch
June 15, 2020 22:27
sandreenko pushed a commit
to sandreenko/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2020
Sergey Andreenko
Revert "Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via …
ef42c56
…reflection (dotnet#37849)"
This reverts commit d629976.
erozenfeld added a commit
to erozenfeld/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround.
04f7602
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255.
See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixesdotnet#271.
@erozenfelderozenfeld
mentioned this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
 Merged

erozenfeld added a commit
to dotnet/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround. (#272)
1561547
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255.
See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixes#271.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@janvorlijanvorlijanvorli approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@am11am11am11 left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Reflection

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflection is able to set initonly static fields in some situation


6 participants

@jkotas@marek-safar@lambdageek@am11@janvorli@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection by jkotas · Pull Request #37849 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection - #37849
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Jun 15, 2020
Merged
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection#37849
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Conversation
@jkotas
@jkotasjkotas
commented
Jun 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixes#37796
am11
am11
reviewed
Jun 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@marek-safar
marek-safar
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
@jkotasjkotas
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection
5af8287
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixesdotnet#37796
@jkotas
jkotas
requested a review
from janvorliJune 15, 2020 13:14
janvorli
janvorli
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@janvorlijanvorli
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@lambdageeklambdageek
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@lambdageek
lambdageek
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
I created an issue #37903 Looks like mono doesn't have a check in SetValue for static field reinit at all
@jkotas@janvorli
Apply suggestions from code review
2a580ac
Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
@jaredparjaredpar
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit d629976
into
dotnet:masterJun 15, 2020
@jkotas
jkotas
deleted the

initonly

branch
June 15, 2020 22:27
sandreenko pushed a commit
to sandreenko/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2020
Sergey Andreenko
Revert "Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via …
ef42c56
…reflection (dotnet#37849)"
This reverts commit d629976.
erozenfeld added a commit
to erozenfeld/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround.
04f7602
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255.
See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixesdotnet#271.
@erozenfelderozenfeld
mentioned this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
 Merged

erozenfeld added a commit
to dotnet/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround. (#272)
1561547
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255.
See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixes#271.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@janvorlijanvorlijanvorli approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@am11am11am11 left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Reflection

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflection is able to set initonly static fields in some situation


6 participants

@jkotas@marek-safar@lambdageek@am11@janvorli@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection by jkotas · Pull Request #37849 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection - #37849
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Jun 15, 2020
Merged
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection#37849
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom 
jkotas:initonly
Conversation
@jkotas
@jkotasjkotas
commented
Jun 13, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixes#37796
am11
am11
reviewed
Jun 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@marek-safar
marek-safar
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
@jkotasjkotas
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via reflection
5af8287
Move the check for static readonly field re-initialization after the static constructor is triggered.
Fixesdotnet#37796
@jkotas
jkotas
requested a review
from janvorliJune 15, 2020 13:14
janvorli
janvorli
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2020
View reviewed changes
@janvorlijanvorli
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!
Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

Comment threadsrc/coreclr/src/vm/invokeutil.cpp
Outdated

@lambdageeklambdageek
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@lambdageek
lambdageek
commented
Jun 15, 2020

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
/cc @vargaz@lambdageek this will need similar fix on Mono side
I created an issue #37903 Looks like mono doesn't have a check in SetValue for static field reinit at all
@jkotas@janvorli
Apply suggestions from code review
2a580ac
Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
@jaredparjaredpar
mentioned this pull request
Jun 15, 2020

Closed

@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit d629976
into
dotnet:masterJun 15, 2020
@jkotas
jkotas
deleted the

initonly

branch
June 15, 2020 22:27
sandreenko pushed a commit
to sandreenko/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2020
Sergey Andreenko
Revert "Fix detection of static readonly field re-initialization via …
ef42c56
…reflection (dotnet#37849)"
This reverts commit d629976.
erozenfeld added a commit
to erozenfeld/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround.
04f7602
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255.
See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixesdotnet#271.
@erozenfelderozenfeld
mentioned this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
 Merged

erozenfeld added a commit
to dotnet/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
@erozenfeld
Undo a non-determinism workaround. (#272)
1561547
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255.
See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism.
It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed
init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has
been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849
so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi.
I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing
framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that
means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines
System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId.
Fixes#271.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@janvorlijanvorlijanvorli approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@am11am11am11 left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Reflection

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflection is able to set initonly static fields in some situation


6 participants

@jkotas@marek-safar@lambdageek@am11@janvorli@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot