Validate ref/src parameter names - #43838

Merged
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Validate ref/src parameter names#43838
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional

Conversation

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstjericstj added the breaking-change Issue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release. label Oct 26, 2020
@ghostghost added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 26, 2020
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(System.Numerics.Vector<T> left, T right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(T left, System.Numerics.Vector<T> right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source1, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source2) { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> low, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> high) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this as long as we are fine with the breaking change.

That being said, lower and upper may be better names than low and high here and would match the names we are using in the newer hardware intrinsics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be revisiting names at this point. We should choose either src or ref as the winners. So far we've felt that choosing src as the winner is slightly less breaking since a compile time break is easier to deal with than runtime break.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Runtime/ref/System.Runtime.cs Outdated

@safernsafern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 -- as long we're fine with the breaking changes.

@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from bartonjsOctober 26, 2020 22:58
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@terrajobst do you support this change? Note a few places where I made parameter name changes in the implementation, or in both implementation/ref to match mono (which chose more consistent parameter names).

Comment on lines +500 to +501
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType) { throw null; }
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType, bool inherit) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changed both in ref and src to match Mono.

@terrajobstterrajobst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm onboard with these kind of changes as it's inline with the kind of breaks we want to be able to do in .NET Core. The proposed changes seems fine.

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

@ericstj

ericstj commented Nov 12, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

I preferred src over ref since they tended to have better names and it's less breaking (ref changes only break recompile). There were exceptions. Mentioned #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), and changes in crypto that made things consistent with other similar APIs in the same assembly.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like @stephentoub's changes in #43834 broke this. I'll fix those up as well.

@ericstj
ericstj merged commit 8ebd0d4 into dotnet:masterNov 12, 2020
@terrajobst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awesome. Thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2020
@ericstjericstj added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@ericstjericstj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2021
@ericstjericstj removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 14, 2021
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Doc : dotnet/docs#26519

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-librariesbreaking-changeIssue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ericstj@terrajobst@stephentoub@tannergooding@Anipik@bartonjs@safern@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Validate ref/src parameter names - #43838

Merged
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Validate ref/src parameter names#43838
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional

Conversation

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstjericstj added the breaking-change Issue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release. label Oct 26, 2020
@ghostghost added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 26, 2020
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(System.Numerics.Vector<T> left, T right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(T left, System.Numerics.Vector<T> right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source1, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source2) { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> low, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> high) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this as long as we are fine with the breaking change.

That being said, lower and upper may be better names than low and high here and would match the names we are using in the newer hardware intrinsics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be revisiting names at this point. We should choose either src or ref as the winners. So far we've felt that choosing src as the winner is slightly less breaking since a compile time break is easier to deal with than runtime break.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Runtime/ref/System.Runtime.cs Outdated

@safernsafern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 -- as long we're fine with the breaking changes.

@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from bartonjsOctober 26, 2020 22:58
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@terrajobst do you support this change? Note a few places where I made parameter name changes in the implementation, or in both implementation/ref to match mono (which chose more consistent parameter names).

Comment on lines +500 to +501
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType) { throw null; }
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType, bool inherit) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changed both in ref and src to match Mono.

@terrajobstterrajobst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm onboard with these kind of changes as it's inline with the kind of breaks we want to be able to do in .NET Core. The proposed changes seems fine.

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

@ericstj

ericstj commented Nov 12, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

I preferred src over ref since they tended to have better names and it's less breaking (ref changes only break recompile). There were exceptions. Mentioned #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), and changes in crypto that made things consistent with other similar APIs in the same assembly.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like @stephentoub's changes in #43834 broke this. I'll fix those up as well.

@ericstj
ericstj merged commit 8ebd0d4 into dotnet:masterNov 12, 2020
@terrajobst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awesome. Thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2020
@ericstjericstj added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@ericstjericstj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2021
@ericstjericstj removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 14, 2021
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Doc : dotnet/docs#26519

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-librariesbreaking-changeIssue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ericstj@terrajobst@stephentoub@tannergooding@Anipik@bartonjs@safern@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Validate ref/src parameter names - #43838

Merged
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Validate ref/src parameter names#43838
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional

Conversation

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstjericstj added the breaking-change Issue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release. label Oct 26, 2020
@ghostghost added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 26, 2020
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(System.Numerics.Vector<T> left, T right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(T left, System.Numerics.Vector<T> right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source1, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source2) { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> low, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> high) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this as long as we are fine with the breaking change.

That being said, lower and upper may be better names than low and high here and would match the names we are using in the newer hardware intrinsics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be revisiting names at this point. We should choose either src or ref as the winners. So far we've felt that choosing src as the winner is slightly less breaking since a compile time break is easier to deal with than runtime break.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Runtime/ref/System.Runtime.cs Outdated

@safernsafern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 -- as long we're fine with the breaking changes.

@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from bartonjsOctober 26, 2020 22:58
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@terrajobst do you support this change? Note a few places where I made parameter name changes in the implementation, or in both implementation/ref to match mono (which chose more consistent parameter names).

Comment on lines +500 to +501
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType) { throw null; }
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType, bool inherit) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changed both in ref and src to match Mono.

@terrajobstterrajobst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm onboard with these kind of changes as it's inline with the kind of breaks we want to be able to do in .NET Core. The proposed changes seems fine.

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

@ericstj

ericstj commented Nov 12, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

I preferred src over ref since they tended to have better names and it's less breaking (ref changes only break recompile). There were exceptions. Mentioned #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), and changes in crypto that made things consistent with other similar APIs in the same assembly.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like @stephentoub's changes in #43834 broke this. I'll fix those up as well.

@ericstj
ericstj merged commit 8ebd0d4 into dotnet:masterNov 12, 2020
@terrajobst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awesome. Thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2020
@ericstjericstj added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@ericstjericstj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2021
@ericstjericstj removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 14, 2021
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Doc : dotnet/docs#26519

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-librariesbreaking-changeIssue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ericstj@terrajobst@stephentoub@tannergooding@Anipik@bartonjs@safern@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Validate ref/src parameter names - #43838

Merged
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Validate ref/src parameter names#43838
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional

Conversation

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstjericstj added the breaking-change Issue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release. label Oct 26, 2020
@ghostghost added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 26, 2020
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(System.Numerics.Vector<T> left, T right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(T left, System.Numerics.Vector<T> right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source1, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source2) { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> low, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> high) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this as long as we are fine with the breaking change.

That being said, lower and upper may be better names than low and high here and would match the names we are using in the newer hardware intrinsics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be revisiting names at this point. We should choose either src or ref as the winners. So far we've felt that choosing src as the winner is slightly less breaking since a compile time break is easier to deal with than runtime break.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Runtime/ref/System.Runtime.cs Outdated

@safernsafern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 -- as long we're fine with the breaking changes.

@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from bartonjsOctober 26, 2020 22:58
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@terrajobst do you support this change? Note a few places where I made parameter name changes in the implementation, or in both implementation/ref to match mono (which chose more consistent parameter names).

Comment on lines +500 to +501
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType) { throw null; }
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType, bool inherit) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changed both in ref and src to match Mono.

@terrajobstterrajobst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm onboard with these kind of changes as it's inline with the kind of breaks we want to be able to do in .NET Core. The proposed changes seems fine.

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

@ericstj

ericstj commented Nov 12, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

I preferred src over ref since they tended to have better names and it's less breaking (ref changes only break recompile). There were exceptions. Mentioned #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), and changes in crypto that made things consistent with other similar APIs in the same assembly.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like @stephentoub's changes in #43834 broke this. I'll fix those up as well.

@ericstj
ericstj merged commit 8ebd0d4 into dotnet:masterNov 12, 2020
@terrajobst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awesome. Thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2020
@ericstjericstj added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@ericstjericstj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2021
@ericstjericstj removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 14, 2021
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Doc : dotnet/docs#26519

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-librariesbreaking-changeIssue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ericstj@terrajobst@stephentoub@tannergooding@Anipik@bartonjs@safern@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Validate ref/src parameter names - #43838

Merged
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Validate ref/src parameter names#43838
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional

Conversation

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstjericstj added the breaking-change Issue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release. label Oct 26, 2020
@ghostghost added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 26, 2020
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(System.Numerics.Vector<T> left, T right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(T left, System.Numerics.Vector<T> right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source1, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source2) { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> low, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> high) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this as long as we are fine with the breaking change.

That being said, lower and upper may be better names than low and high here and would match the names we are using in the newer hardware intrinsics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be revisiting names at this point. We should choose either src or ref as the winners. So far we've felt that choosing src as the winner is slightly less breaking since a compile time break is easier to deal with than runtime break.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Runtime/ref/System.Runtime.cs Outdated

@safernsafern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 -- as long we're fine with the breaking changes.

@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from bartonjsOctober 26, 2020 22:58
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@terrajobst do you support this change? Note a few places where I made parameter name changes in the implementation, or in both implementation/ref to match mono (which chose more consistent parameter names).

Comment on lines +500 to +501
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType) { throw null; }
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType, bool inherit) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changed both in ref and src to match Mono.

@terrajobstterrajobst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm onboard with these kind of changes as it's inline with the kind of breaks we want to be able to do in .NET Core. The proposed changes seems fine.

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

@ericstj

ericstj commented Nov 12, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

I preferred src over ref since they tended to have better names and it's less breaking (ref changes only break recompile). There were exceptions. Mentioned #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), and changes in crypto that made things consistent with other similar APIs in the same assembly.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like @stephentoub's changes in #43834 broke this. I'll fix those up as well.

@ericstj
ericstj merged commit 8ebd0d4 into dotnet:masterNov 12, 2020
@terrajobst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awesome. Thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2020
@ericstjericstj added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@ericstjericstj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2021
@ericstjericstj removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 14, 2021
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Doc : dotnet/docs#26519

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-librariesbreaking-changeIssue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ericstj@terrajobst@stephentoub@tannergooding@Anipik@bartonjs@safern@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Validate ref/src parameter names - #43838

Merged
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Validate ref/src parameter names#43838
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional

Conversation

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstjericstj added the breaking-change Issue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release. label Oct 26, 2020
@ghostghost added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 26, 2020
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(System.Numerics.Vector<T> left, T right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(T left, System.Numerics.Vector<T> right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source1, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source2) { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> low, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> high) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this as long as we are fine with the breaking change.

That being said, lower and upper may be better names than low and high here and would match the names we are using in the newer hardware intrinsics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be revisiting names at this point. We should choose either src or ref as the winners. So far we've felt that choosing src as the winner is slightly less breaking since a compile time break is easier to deal with than runtime break.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Runtime/ref/System.Runtime.cs Outdated

@safernsafern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 -- as long we're fine with the breaking changes.

@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from bartonjsOctober 26, 2020 22:58
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@terrajobst do you support this change? Note a few places where I made parameter name changes in the implementation, or in both implementation/ref to match mono (which chose more consistent parameter names).

Comment on lines +500 to +501
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType) { throw null; }
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType, bool inherit) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changed both in ref and src to match Mono.

@terrajobstterrajobst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm onboard with these kind of changes as it's inline with the kind of breaks we want to be able to do in .NET Core. The proposed changes seems fine.

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

@ericstj

ericstj commented Nov 12, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

I preferred src over ref since they tended to have better names and it's less breaking (ref changes only break recompile). There were exceptions. Mentioned #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), and changes in crypto that made things consistent with other similar APIs in the same assembly.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like @stephentoub's changes in #43834 broke this. I'll fix those up as well.

@ericstj
ericstj merged commit 8ebd0d4 into dotnet:masterNov 12, 2020
@terrajobst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awesome. Thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2020
@ericstjericstj added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@ericstjericstj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2021
@ericstjericstj removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 14, 2021
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Doc : dotnet/docs#26519

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-librariesbreaking-changeIssue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ericstj@terrajobst@stephentoub@tannergooding@Anipik@bartonjs@safern@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Validate ref/src parameter names - #43838

Merged
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Validate ref/src parameter names#43838
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional

Conversation

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstjericstj added the breaking-change Issue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release. label Oct 26, 2020
@ghostghost added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 26, 2020
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(System.Numerics.Vector<T> left, T right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(T left, System.Numerics.Vector<T> right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source1, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source2) { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> low, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> high) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this as long as we are fine with the breaking change.

That being said, lower and upper may be better names than low and high here and would match the names we are using in the newer hardware intrinsics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be revisiting names at this point. We should choose either src or ref as the winners. So far we've felt that choosing src as the winner is slightly less breaking since a compile time break is easier to deal with than runtime break.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Runtime/ref/System.Runtime.cs Outdated

@safernsafern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 -- as long we're fine with the breaking changes.

@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from bartonjsOctober 26, 2020 22:58
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@terrajobst do you support this change? Note a few places where I made parameter name changes in the implementation, or in both implementation/ref to match mono (which chose more consistent parameter names).

Comment on lines +500 to +501
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType) { throw null; }
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType, bool inherit) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changed both in ref and src to match Mono.

@terrajobstterrajobst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm onboard with these kind of changes as it's inline with the kind of breaks we want to be able to do in .NET Core. The proposed changes seems fine.

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

@ericstj

ericstj commented Nov 12, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

I preferred src over ref since they tended to have better names and it's less breaking (ref changes only break recompile). There were exceptions. Mentioned #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), and changes in crypto that made things consistent with other similar APIs in the same assembly.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like @stephentoub's changes in #43834 broke this. I'll fix those up as well.

@ericstj
ericstj merged commit 8ebd0d4 into dotnet:masterNov 12, 2020
@terrajobst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awesome. Thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2020
@ericstjericstj added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@ericstjericstj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2021
@ericstjericstj removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 14, 2021
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Doc : dotnet/docs#26519

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-librariesbreaking-changeIssue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ericstj@terrajobst@stephentoub@tannergooding@Anipik@bartonjs@safern@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Validate ref/src parameter names - #43838

Merged
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Validate ref/src parameter names#43838
ericstj merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
ericstj:apiCompatOptional

Conversation

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstjericstj added the breaking-change Issue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release. label Oct 26, 2020
@ghostghost added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 26, 2020
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(System.Numerics.Vector<T> left, T right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<T> Multiply<T>(T left, System.Numerics.Vector<T> right) where T : struct { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source1, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> source2) { throw null; }
public static System.Numerics.Vector<System.Single> Narrow(System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> low, System.Numerics.Vector<System.Double> high) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this as long as we are fine with the breaking change.

That being said, lower and upper may be better names than low and high here and would match the names we are using in the newer hardware intrinsics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should be revisiting names at this point. We should choose either src or ref as the winners. So far we've felt that choosing src as the winner is slightly less breaking since a compile time break is easier to deal with than runtime break.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Runtime/ref/System.Runtime.cs Outdated

@safernsafern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 -- as long we're fine with the breaking changes.

@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from bartonjsOctober 26, 2020 22:58
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@terrajobst do you support this change? Note a few places where I made parameter name changes in the implementation, or in both implementation/ref to match mono (which chose more consistent parameter names).

Comment on lines +500 to +501
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType) { throw null; }
public static System.Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(System.Reflection.MemberInfo element, System.Type attributeType, bool inherit) { throw null; }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changed both in ref and src to match Mono.

@terrajobstterrajobst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm onboard with these kind of changes as it's inline with the kind of breaks we want to be able to do in .NET Core. The proposed changes seems fine.

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

@ericstj

ericstj commented Nov 12, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I only have one question: it seems we're sometimes choosing ref and sometimes choosing src as the winner. Not that there is a problem but how did we choose? What makes more sense?

I preferred src over ref since they tended to have better names and it's less breaking (ref changes only break recompile). There were exceptions. Mentioned #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), #43838 (comment), and changes in crypto that made things consistent with other similar APIs in the same assembly.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like @stephentoub's changes in #43834 broke this. I'll fix those up as well.

@ericstj
ericstj merged commit 8ebd0d4 into dotnet:masterNov 12, 2020
@terrajobst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awesome. Thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2020
@ericstjericstj added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@ericstjericstj self-assigned this Sep 30, 2021
@ericstjericstj removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 14, 2021
@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Doc : dotnet/docs#26519

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-librariesbreaking-changeIssue or PR that represents a breaking API or functional change over a previous release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ericstj@terrajobst@stephentoub@tannergooding@Anipik@bartonjs@safern@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot