Make ImmutableArray readonly - #44640

Merged
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Make ImmutableArray readonly#44640
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array

Conversation

@huoyaoyuan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis, @jeffhandley
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Details

Issue Details
Description:

Closes #334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

Author:huoyaoyuan
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Collections

Milestone:-


bool successful;
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref location.array);
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref Unsafe.As<ImmutableArray<T>, T[]?>(ref location));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this use just Unsafe.AsRef to just cast-away the readonly-ness? Unsafe.As is too big hammer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe

This may be a problem for Roslyn. @jaredpar ?

@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This may be a problem for Roslyn

It's a headache to update but not a blocker.

@eiriktsarpalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution.

@eiriktsarpalis
eiriktsarpalis merged commit 223fd3a into dotnet:masterNov 17, 2020
@huoyaoyuan
huoyaoyuan deleted the readonly-immutable-array branch November 17, 2020 13:20
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API proposal: Make ImmutableArray readonly struct

5 participants

@huoyaoyuan@jkotas@jaredpar@eiriktsarpalis@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Make ImmutableArray readonly - #44640

Merged
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Make ImmutableArray readonly#44640
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array

Conversation

@huoyaoyuan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis, @jeffhandley
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Details

Issue Details
Description:

Closes #334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

Author:huoyaoyuan
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Collections

Milestone:-


bool successful;
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref location.array);
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref Unsafe.As<ImmutableArray<T>, T[]?>(ref location));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this use just Unsafe.AsRef to just cast-away the readonly-ness? Unsafe.As is too big hammer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe

This may be a problem for Roslyn. @jaredpar ?

@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This may be a problem for Roslyn

It's a headache to update but not a blocker.

@eiriktsarpalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution.

@eiriktsarpalis
eiriktsarpalis merged commit 223fd3a into dotnet:masterNov 17, 2020
@huoyaoyuan
huoyaoyuan deleted the readonly-immutable-array branch November 17, 2020 13:20
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API proposal: Make ImmutableArray readonly struct

5 participants

@huoyaoyuan@jkotas@jaredpar@eiriktsarpalis@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Make ImmutableArray readonly - #44640

Merged
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Make ImmutableArray readonly#44640
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array

Conversation

@huoyaoyuan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis, @jeffhandley
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Details

Issue Details
Description:

Closes #334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

Author:huoyaoyuan
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Collections

Milestone:-


bool successful;
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref location.array);
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref Unsafe.As<ImmutableArray<T>, T[]?>(ref location));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this use just Unsafe.AsRef to just cast-away the readonly-ness? Unsafe.As is too big hammer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe

This may be a problem for Roslyn. @jaredpar ?

@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This may be a problem for Roslyn

It's a headache to update but not a blocker.

@eiriktsarpalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution.

@eiriktsarpalis
eiriktsarpalis merged commit 223fd3a into dotnet:masterNov 17, 2020
@huoyaoyuan
huoyaoyuan deleted the readonly-immutable-array branch November 17, 2020 13:20
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API proposal: Make ImmutableArray readonly struct

5 participants

@huoyaoyuan@jkotas@jaredpar@eiriktsarpalis@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Make ImmutableArray readonly - #44640

Merged
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Make ImmutableArray readonly#44640
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array

Conversation

@huoyaoyuan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis, @jeffhandley
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Details

Issue Details
Description:

Closes #334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

Author:huoyaoyuan
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Collections

Milestone:-


bool successful;
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref location.array);
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref Unsafe.As<ImmutableArray<T>, T[]?>(ref location));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this use just Unsafe.AsRef to just cast-away the readonly-ness? Unsafe.As is too big hammer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe

This may be a problem for Roslyn. @jaredpar ?

@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This may be a problem for Roslyn

It's a headache to update but not a blocker.

@eiriktsarpalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution.

@eiriktsarpalis
eiriktsarpalis merged commit 223fd3a into dotnet:masterNov 17, 2020
@huoyaoyuan
huoyaoyuan deleted the readonly-immutable-array branch November 17, 2020 13:20
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API proposal: Make ImmutableArray readonly struct

5 participants

@huoyaoyuan@jkotas@jaredpar@eiriktsarpalis@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Make ImmutableArray readonly - #44640

Merged
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Make ImmutableArray readonly#44640
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array

Conversation

@huoyaoyuan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis, @jeffhandley
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Details

Issue Details
Description:

Closes #334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

Author:huoyaoyuan
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Collections

Milestone:-


bool successful;
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref location.array);
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref Unsafe.As<ImmutableArray<T>, T[]?>(ref location));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this use just Unsafe.AsRef to just cast-away the readonly-ness? Unsafe.As is too big hammer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe

This may be a problem for Roslyn. @jaredpar ?

@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This may be a problem for Roslyn

It's a headache to update but not a blocker.

@eiriktsarpalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution.

@eiriktsarpalis
eiriktsarpalis merged commit 223fd3a into dotnet:masterNov 17, 2020
@huoyaoyuan
huoyaoyuan deleted the readonly-immutable-array branch November 17, 2020 13:20
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API proposal: Make ImmutableArray readonly struct

5 participants

@huoyaoyuan@jkotas@jaredpar@eiriktsarpalis@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Make ImmutableArray readonly - #44640

Merged
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Make ImmutableArray readonly#44640
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array

Conversation

@huoyaoyuan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis, @jeffhandley
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Details

Issue Details
Description:

Closes #334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

Author:huoyaoyuan
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Collections

Milestone:-


bool successful;
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref location.array);
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref Unsafe.As<ImmutableArray<T>, T[]?>(ref location));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this use just Unsafe.AsRef to just cast-away the readonly-ness? Unsafe.As is too big hammer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe

This may be a problem for Roslyn. @jaredpar ?

@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This may be a problem for Roslyn

It's a headache to update but not a blocker.

@eiriktsarpalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution.

@eiriktsarpalis
eiriktsarpalis merged commit 223fd3a into dotnet:masterNov 17, 2020
@huoyaoyuan
huoyaoyuan deleted the readonly-immutable-array branch November 17, 2020 13:20
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API proposal: Make ImmutableArray readonly struct

5 participants

@huoyaoyuan@jkotas@jaredpar@eiriktsarpalis@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Make ImmutableArray readonly - #44640

Merged
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Make ImmutableArray readonly#44640
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array

Conversation

@huoyaoyuan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis, @jeffhandley
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Details

Issue Details
Description:

Closes #334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

Author:huoyaoyuan
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Collections

Milestone:-


bool successful;
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref location.array);
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref Unsafe.As<ImmutableArray<T>, T[]?>(ref location));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this use just Unsafe.AsRef to just cast-away the readonly-ness? Unsafe.As is too big hammer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe

This may be a problem for Roslyn. @jaredpar ?

@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This may be a problem for Roslyn

It's a headache to update but not a blocker.

@eiriktsarpalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution.

@eiriktsarpalis
eiriktsarpalis merged commit 223fd3a into dotnet:masterNov 17, 2020
@huoyaoyuan
huoyaoyuan deleted the readonly-immutable-array branch November 17, 2020 13:20
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API proposal: Make ImmutableArray readonly struct

5 participants

@huoyaoyuan@jkotas@jaredpar@eiriktsarpalis@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Make ImmutableArray readonly - #44640

Merged
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Make ImmutableArray readonly#44640
eiriktsarpalis merged 6 commits into
dotnet:masterfrom
huoyaoyuan:readonly-immutable-array

Conversation

@huoyaoyuan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis, @jeffhandley
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Details

Issue Details
Description:

Closes #334 .

I noticed that #44629 does not come with api review. I think this can be done similarly.
As an implementation requirement, this PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe to netstandard1.0 target. It this acceptable?

Author:huoyaoyuan
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Collections

Milestone:-


bool successful;
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref location.array);
T[]? oldArray = Volatile.Read(ref Unsafe.As<ImmutableArray<T>, T[]?>(ref location));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this use just Unsafe.AsRef to just cast-away the readonly-ness? Unsafe.As is too big hammer.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR brings a new reference of S.R.CS.Unsafe

This may be a problem for Roslyn. @jaredpar ?

@jaredpar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This may be a problem for Roslyn

It's a headache to update but not a blocker.

@eiriktsarpalis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Thank you for your contribution.

@eiriktsarpalis
eiriktsarpalis merged commit 223fd3a into dotnet:masterNov 17, 2020
@huoyaoyuan
huoyaoyuan deleted the readonly-immutable-array branch November 17, 2020 13:20
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API proposal: Make ImmutableArray readonly struct

5 participants

@huoyaoyuan@jkotas@jaredpar@eiriktsarpalis@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot