Skip to content

System.Security readonly annotation - #51783

Closed
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Closed

System.Security readonly annotation#51783
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security

Conversation

@hrrrrustic

@hrrrrustichrrrrustic commented Apr 24, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR is a part of #46675

@ghost

ghost commented Apr 24, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghost

ghost commented Apr 24, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @bartonjs, @vcsjones, @krwq, @GrabYourPitchforks
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This PR is a part of #46675

Author:hrrrrustic
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Security, new-api-needs-documentation

Milestone:-

@hrrrrustichrrrrustic changed the title System.Net.Security readonly annotationSystem.Security readonly annotationApr 24, 2021
@GrabYourPitchforks

GrabYourPitchforks commented Apr 24, 2021•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for submitting this! At first glance my gut tells me that these changes may cast too wide a net. For example, one of the modified types is a ref struct "reader" type, and it's never expected for such types to be passed via "in" parameters.

As Steve said in the original issue, we also want to ensure that for our public APIs, the newly annotated methods will never at any point in the future need to modify state. So we'll need to confer on these to narrow down what public API contract changes would be appropriate to take as a long-term behavioral guarantee.

@jeffhandley

jeffhandley commented Apr 29, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley marked this pull request as draft April 29, 2021 20:42
@ghostghost closed this May 29, 2021
@ghost

ghost commented May 29, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Draft Pull Request was automatically closed for inactivity. Please let us know if you'd like to reopen it.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 28, 2021
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area-System.Securitynew-api-needs-documentation

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hrrrrustic@GrabYourPitchforks@jeffhandley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
System.Security readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51783 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Security readonly annotation - #51783
Closed
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Closed
System.Security readonly annotation#51783
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @bartonjs, @vcsjones, @krwq, @GrabYourPitchforks

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
This PR is a part of #46675
Author:hrrrrustic
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-System.Security, new-api-needs-documentation
Milestone:-
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
changed the title
System.Net.Security readonly annotationSystem.Security readonly annotationApr 24, 2021
@GrabYourPitchforks
GrabYourPitchforks
commented
Apr 24, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Thanks for submitting this! At first glance my gut tells me that these changes may cast too wide a net. For example, one of the modified types is a ref struct "reader" type, and it's never expected for such types to be passed via "in" parameters.
As Steve said in the original issue, we also want to ensure that for our public APIs, the newly annotated methods will never at any point in the future need to modify state. So we'll need to confer on these to narrow down what public API contract changes would be appropriate to take as a long-term behavioral guarantee.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@ghostghost
closed this
May 29, 2021
@ghost
ghost
commented
May 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Draft Pull Request was automatically closed for inactivity. Please let us know if you'd like to reopen it.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 28, 2021

This pull request was closed.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Securitynew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hrrrrustic@GrabYourPitchforks@jeffhandley

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
System.Security readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51783 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Security readonly annotation - #51783
Closed
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Closed
System.Security readonly annotation#51783
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @bartonjs, @vcsjones, @krwq, @GrabYourPitchforks

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
This PR is a part of #46675
Author:hrrrrustic
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-System.Security, new-api-needs-documentation
Milestone:-
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
changed the title
System.Net.Security readonly annotationSystem.Security readonly annotationApr 24, 2021
@GrabYourPitchforks
GrabYourPitchforks
commented
Apr 24, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Thanks for submitting this! At first glance my gut tells me that these changes may cast too wide a net. For example, one of the modified types is a ref struct "reader" type, and it's never expected for such types to be passed via "in" parameters.
As Steve said in the original issue, we also want to ensure that for our public APIs, the newly annotated methods will never at any point in the future need to modify state. So we'll need to confer on these to narrow down what public API contract changes would be appropriate to take as a long-term behavioral guarantee.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@ghostghost
closed this
May 29, 2021
@ghost
ghost
commented
May 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Draft Pull Request was automatically closed for inactivity. Please let us know if you'd like to reopen it.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 28, 2021

This pull request was closed.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Securitynew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hrrrrustic@GrabYourPitchforks@jeffhandley

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
System.Security readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51783 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Security readonly annotation - #51783
Closed
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Closed
System.Security readonly annotation#51783
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @bartonjs, @vcsjones, @krwq, @GrabYourPitchforks

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
This PR is a part of #46675
Author:hrrrrustic
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-System.Security, new-api-needs-documentation
Milestone:-
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
changed the title
System.Net.Security readonly annotationSystem.Security readonly annotationApr 24, 2021
@GrabYourPitchforks
GrabYourPitchforks
commented
Apr 24, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Thanks for submitting this! At first glance my gut tells me that these changes may cast too wide a net. For example, one of the modified types is a ref struct "reader" type, and it's never expected for such types to be passed via "in" parameters.
As Steve said in the original issue, we also want to ensure that for our public APIs, the newly annotated methods will never at any point in the future need to modify state. So we'll need to confer on these to narrow down what public API contract changes would be appropriate to take as a long-term behavioral guarantee.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@ghostghost
closed this
May 29, 2021
@ghost
ghost
commented
May 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Draft Pull Request was automatically closed for inactivity. Please let us know if you'd like to reopen it.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 28, 2021

This pull request was closed.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Securitynew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hrrrrustic@GrabYourPitchforks@jeffhandley

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
System.Security readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51783 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Security readonly annotation - #51783
Closed
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Closed
System.Security readonly annotation#51783
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @bartonjs, @vcsjones, @krwq, @GrabYourPitchforks

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
This PR is a part of #46675
Author:hrrrrustic
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-System.Security, new-api-needs-documentation
Milestone:-
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
changed the title
System.Net.Security readonly annotationSystem.Security readonly annotationApr 24, 2021
@GrabYourPitchforks
GrabYourPitchforks
commented
Apr 24, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Thanks for submitting this! At first glance my gut tells me that these changes may cast too wide a net. For example, one of the modified types is a ref struct "reader" type, and it's never expected for such types to be passed via "in" parameters.
As Steve said in the original issue, we also want to ensure that for our public APIs, the newly annotated methods will never at any point in the future need to modify state. So we'll need to confer on these to narrow down what public API contract changes would be appropriate to take as a long-term behavioral guarantee.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@ghostghost
closed this
May 29, 2021
@ghost
ghost
commented
May 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Draft Pull Request was automatically closed for inactivity. Please let us know if you'd like to reopen it.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 28, 2021

This pull request was closed.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Securitynew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hrrrrustic@GrabYourPitchforks@jeffhandley

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
System.Security readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51783 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Security readonly annotation - #51783
Closed
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Closed
System.Security readonly annotation#51783
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @bartonjs, @vcsjones, @krwq, @GrabYourPitchforks

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
This PR is a part of #46675
Author:hrrrrustic
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-System.Security, new-api-needs-documentation
Milestone:-
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
changed the title
System.Net.Security readonly annotationSystem.Security readonly annotationApr 24, 2021
@GrabYourPitchforks
GrabYourPitchforks
commented
Apr 24, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Thanks for submitting this! At first glance my gut tells me that these changes may cast too wide a net. For example, one of the modified types is a ref struct "reader" type, and it's never expected for such types to be passed via "in" parameters.
As Steve said in the original issue, we also want to ensure that for our public APIs, the newly annotated methods will never at any point in the future need to modify state. So we'll need to confer on these to narrow down what public API contract changes would be appropriate to take as a long-term behavioral guarantee.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@ghostghost
closed this
May 29, 2021
@ghost
ghost
commented
May 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Draft Pull Request was automatically closed for inactivity. Please let us know if you'd like to reopen it.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 28, 2021

This pull request was closed.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Securitynew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hrrrrustic@GrabYourPitchforks@jeffhandley

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
System.Security readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51783 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Security readonly annotation - #51783
Closed
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Closed
System.Security readonly annotation#51783
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @bartonjs, @vcsjones, @krwq, @GrabYourPitchforks

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
This PR is a part of #46675
Author:hrrrrustic
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-System.Security, new-api-needs-documentation
Milestone:-
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
changed the title
System.Net.Security readonly annotationSystem.Security readonly annotationApr 24, 2021
@GrabYourPitchforks
GrabYourPitchforks
commented
Apr 24, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Thanks for submitting this! At first glance my gut tells me that these changes may cast too wide a net. For example, one of the modified types is a ref struct "reader" type, and it's never expected for such types to be passed via "in" parameters.
As Steve said in the original issue, we also want to ensure that for our public APIs, the newly annotated methods will never at any point in the future need to modify state. So we'll need to confer on these to narrow down what public API contract changes would be appropriate to take as a long-term behavioral guarantee.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@ghostghost
closed this
May 29, 2021
@ghost
ghost
commented
May 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Draft Pull Request was automatically closed for inactivity. Please let us know if you'd like to reopen it.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 28, 2021

This pull request was closed.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Securitynew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hrrrrustic@GrabYourPitchforks@jeffhandley

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
System.Security readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51783 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Security readonly annotation - #51783
Closed
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Closed
System.Security readonly annotation#51783
hrrrrustic wants to merge 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-Security
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @bartonjs, @vcsjones, @krwq, @GrabYourPitchforks

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
This PR is a part of #46675
Author:hrrrrustic
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-System.Security, new-api-needs-documentation
Milestone:-
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
changed the title
System.Net.Security readonly annotationSystem.Security readonly annotationApr 24, 2021
@GrabYourPitchforks
GrabYourPitchforks
commented
Apr 24, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Thanks for submitting this! At first glance my gut tells me that these changes may cast too wide a net. For example, one of the modified types is a ref struct "reader" type, and it's never expected for such types to be passed via "in" parameters.
As Steve said in the original issue, we also want to ensure that for our public APIs, the newly annotated methods will never at any point in the future need to modify state. So we'll need to confer on these to narrow down what public API contract changes would be appropriate to take as a long-term behavioral guarantee.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@ghostghost
closed this
May 29, 2021
@ghost
ghost
commented
May 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Draft Pull Request was automatically closed for inactivity. Please let us know if you'd like to reopen it.
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 28, 2021

This pull request was closed.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Securitynew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hrrrrustic@GrabYourPitchforks@jeffhandley