Skip to content

System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation - #51784

Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Apr 30, 2021
Merged

System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation#51784
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices

Conversation

@hrrrrustic

@hrrrrustichrrrrustic commented Apr 24, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR is a part of #46675

@ghost

ghost commented Apr 24, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@jeffhandley

jeffhandley commented Apr 29, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley marked this pull request as draft April 29, 2021 20:42
@jkotas

jkotas commented Apr 29, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@hrrrrustic Could you please change this one to mark the whole type as readonly instead?

@hrrrrustic

hrrrrustic commented Apr 29, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jkotas Done

@jkotas
jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2021 21:56
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 29, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello @jkotas!

Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

@jkotas

jkotas commented Apr 30, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Failures are known issue #52031

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7f034d3 into dotnet:mainApr 30, 2021
@karelzkarelz mentioned this pull request May 12, 2021
Closed
@karelzkarelz added this to the 6.0.0 milestone May 20, 2021
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@jkotasjkotasjkotas approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area-System.Runtime.InteropServicesnew-api-needs-documentation

Projects

None yet

Milestone

6.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hrrrrustic@jeffhandley@jkotas@karelz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51784 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation - #51784
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Apr 30, 2021
Merged
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation#51784
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@hrrrrustic Could you please change this one to mark the whole type as readonly instead?
@hrrrrustic
hrrrrustic
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jkotas Done
@jkotas
jkotas
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 29, 2021 21:56
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Hello @jkotas!
Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.
p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 30, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Failures are known issue #52031
@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit 7f034d3
into
dotnet:mainApr 30, 2021
@karelzkarelz
mentioned this pull request
May 12, 2021

Closed

@karelzkarelz
added this to the 6.0.0 milestone
May 20, 2021
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 19, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jkotasjkotasjkotas approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Runtime.InteropServicesnew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone

6.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hrrrrustic@jeffhandley@jkotas@karelz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51784 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation - #51784
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Apr 30, 2021
Merged
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation#51784
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@hrrrrustic Could you please change this one to mark the whole type as readonly instead?
@hrrrrustic
hrrrrustic
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jkotas Done
@jkotas
jkotas
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 29, 2021 21:56
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Hello @jkotas!
Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.
p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 30, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Failures are known issue #52031
@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit 7f034d3
into
dotnet:mainApr 30, 2021
@karelzkarelz
mentioned this pull request
May 12, 2021

Closed

@karelzkarelz
added this to the 6.0.0 milestone
May 20, 2021
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 19, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jkotasjkotasjkotas approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Runtime.InteropServicesnew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone

6.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hrrrrustic@jeffhandley@jkotas@karelz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51784 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation - #51784
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Apr 30, 2021
Merged
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation#51784
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@hrrrrustic Could you please change this one to mark the whole type as readonly instead?
@hrrrrustic
hrrrrustic
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jkotas Done
@jkotas
jkotas
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 29, 2021 21:56
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Hello @jkotas!
Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.
p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 30, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Failures are known issue #52031
@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit 7f034d3
into
dotnet:mainApr 30, 2021
@karelzkarelz
mentioned this pull request
May 12, 2021

Closed

@karelzkarelz
added this to the 6.0.0 milestone
May 20, 2021
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 19, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jkotasjkotasjkotas approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Runtime.InteropServicesnew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone

6.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hrrrrustic@jeffhandley@jkotas@karelz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51784 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation - #51784
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Apr 30, 2021
Merged
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation#51784
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@hrrrrustic Could you please change this one to mark the whole type as readonly instead?
@hrrrrustic
hrrrrustic
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jkotas Done
@jkotas
jkotas
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 29, 2021 21:56
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Hello @jkotas!
Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.
p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 30, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Failures are known issue #52031
@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit 7f034d3
into
dotnet:mainApr 30, 2021
@karelzkarelz
mentioned this pull request
May 12, 2021

Closed

@karelzkarelz
added this to the 6.0.0 milestone
May 20, 2021
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 19, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jkotasjkotasjkotas approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Runtime.InteropServicesnew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone

6.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hrrrrustic@jeffhandley@jkotas@karelz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51784 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation - #51784
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Apr 30, 2021
Merged
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation#51784
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@hrrrrustic Could you please change this one to mark the whole type as readonly instead?
@hrrrrustic
hrrrrustic
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jkotas Done
@jkotas
jkotas
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 29, 2021 21:56
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Hello @jkotas!
Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.
p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 30, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Failures are known issue #52031
@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit 7f034d3
into
dotnet:mainApr 30, 2021
@karelzkarelz
mentioned this pull request
May 12, 2021

Closed

@karelzkarelz
added this to the 6.0.0 milestone
May 20, 2021
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 19, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jkotasjkotasjkotas approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Runtime.InteropServicesnew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone

6.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hrrrrustic@jeffhandley@jkotas@karelz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
})();
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation by hrrrrustic · Pull Request #51784 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation - #51784
Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Apr 30, 2021
Merged
System.Runtime.InteropServices readonly annotation#51784
jkotas merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom 
hrrrrustic:issue-1718-InteropServices
Conversation
@hrrrrustic
@hrrrrustichrrrrustic
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This PR is a part of #46675
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 24, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:
This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment).
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2021 20:42
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@hrrrrustic Could you please change this one to mark the whole type as readonly instead?
@hrrrrustic
hrrrrustic
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jkotas Done
@jkotas
jkotas
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 29, 2021 21:56
@ghost
ghost
commented
Apr 29, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Hello @jkotas!
Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.
p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.
@jkotas
jkotas
commented
Apr 30, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Failures are known issue #52031
@jkotas
jkotas
merged commit 7f034d3
into
dotnet:mainApr 30, 2021
@karelzkarelz
mentioned this pull request
May 12, 2021

Closed

@karelzkarelz
added this to the 6.0.0 milestone
May 20, 2021
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jun 19, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@jkotasjkotasjkotas approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-System.Runtime.InteropServicesnew-api-needs-documentation

Projects


None yet


Milestone

6.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hrrrrustic@jeffhandley@jkotas@karelz