Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
HTTP2 loopback server WaitForCancellationAsync should validate error code sent - #59313
Merged
Conversation
ghost
commented
Sep 19, 2021
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl Issue DetailsIssue #58235
|
| Assert.Equal(FrameType.RstStream, frame.Type); | ||
| } | ||
| } while (frame.Type != FrameType.RstStream); | ||
| } while (frame.Type != FrameType.RstStream || (frame is RstStreamFrame rstStreamFrame && rstStreamFrame.ErrorCode != 0x8)); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| }while(frame.Type!=FrameType.RstStream||(frameisRstStreamFramerstStreamFrame&&rstStreamFrame.ErrorCode!=0x8)); | |
| }while(frame.Type!=FrameType.RstStream||(frameisRstStreamFramerstStreamFrame&&rstStreamFrame.ErrorCode!=ProtocolErrors.CANCEL)); |
I think
ContributorAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ErrorCode property is an int, so I casted the enum
karelz
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2021
geoffkizer
suggested changes
Sep 30, 2021
| Assert.Equal(FrameType.RstStream, frame.Type); | ||
| } | ||
| } while (frame.Type != FrameType.RstStream); | ||
| } while (frame.Type != FrameType.RstStream || (frame is RstStreamFrame rstStreamFrame && rstStreamFrame.ErrorCode != (int)ProtocolErrors.CANCEL)); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should not receive any RstStream frame other than one containing the CANCEL.
As written, this will just ignore a RstStream that doesn't contain CANCEL.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So we should rather just assert that the error code is CANCEL, is that what you mean @geoffkizer?
karelz
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2021
geoffkizer
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2021
This was referenced Oct 25, 2021
karelz
commented
Nov 2, 2021
Member
Unrelated test failures:
|
karelz
commented
Nov 2, 2021
Member
Thanks for your PR @pedrobsaila! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes#58235