Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Create runtime staging clone to manually kick off full test runs - #61443
Conversation
ghost
commented
Nov 11, 2021
Tagging subscribers to this area: @Anipik, @safern, @ViktorHofer Issue Detailsnull
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
safern
commented
Nov 11, 2021
/azp run manual-runtime-staging |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
steveisok
commented
Nov 11, 2021
/azp run manual-runtime-staging |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Santiago Fernandez Madero <safern@microsoft.com>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
steveisok
commented
Nov 11, 2021
/azp run manual-runtime-staging |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
…g' into stpfiste/manual-runtime-staging
c97977a to
3ebaa8cComparesteveisok
commented
Nov 11, 2021
/azp run manual-runtime-staging |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
steveisok
commented
Nov 11, 2021
/azp run manual-runtime-staging |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
steveisok
commented
Nov 11, 2021
/azp run runtime-staging-manual |
|
Azure Pipelines failed to run 1 pipeline(s). |
71b05ee to
5267f76Compare5267f76 to
44e7023Comparesteveisok
commented
Nov 12, 2021
@safern@akoeplinger conditioning the schedule based on pipeline name doesn't seem to work. Any suggestions? I think this might be where we actually need a separate yml. |
f13eacb to
10b3299Compare10b3299 to
b497b31Compareakoeplinger
commented
Nov 12, 2021
/azp run runtime-staging-manual |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
| trigger: none | ||
| extends: | ||
| template: runtime-staging-template.yml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
now that we have a template, maybe we can use parameters to turn on/off legs rather than checking based on pipeline name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
that works for runtime-staging but we still have runtime.yml, so I'd need to move that to template as well which I'm not sure is desired.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That one also has a schedule trigger, so it will limit us as well and we will need the template anyway?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is a good first step. I think we can get more custom in a follow up PR.
This change allows devs to manually kick off full test runs on the configurations that only execute smoke tests per PR.
/azp run runtime-staging-manualwill do the trick